16 May 2016 15:27:45
Quite a few City fans on Twitter saying that Iheanacho should be going to the Euro's instead of Rashford.

Now, apart from the fact that he is registered to play for Nigeria, do you think he is the better player?

I personally think that Rashford is better in terms of his composure and first touch. Iheanacho is a good player, but misses a lot of chances - he got a lucky one yesterday but missed so many because he couldn't sort his feat out. Martial and Rashford are the superior talents in my book.

1.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 15:40:37
Iheanacho is ahead of rash for me at the moment . martial is a step up from the pair of them.

2.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 16:53:42
Pace and power - rashford
Technique and finishing - iheanacho.

3.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 16:53:42
Pace and power - rashford
Technique and finishing - iheanacho.

4.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 17:30:39
Really? Iheanacho seems to take several chances to score.

5.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 17:39:00
Not sure but I don't think Rashford should go, don't think it's what he needs right now.

6.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 18:54:53
Damn. I was hoping he had a Northern Irish granny.

7.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 19:26:32
Stevie stop with the Rooney chat

8.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 20:53:17
Ians nachos us a tap in merchant.

9.) 16 May 2016
16 May 2016 18:47:03
Fresh, you said Iheanacho seems to take several chances to score. Yet he scored his first 6 goals for man city with only 8 shots on target. Can't really criticise his finishing and goal scoring attributes. He had a bit of a bad game yesterday but still snatched a lucky goal. If he can improve on his right side he could become a great striker. Would still have martial over him tho.