18 Jul 2019 18:31:35
Hi fellow posters rarely post but read every day. What do people think of Danny rose as competition for shaw. 29 years old. Maybe available for around 20mil.

1.) 18 Jul 2019
18 Jul 2019 19:29:52
He's a better attacking outlet, but much poorer defensively in my opinion.

2.) 18 Jul 2019
18 Jul 2019 20:09:48
Not now. 3 years ago yes but at 29 his best is behind him. i'd be delighted if shaw reaches roses level. Like shaw has had a ciuple of injury issues but had a great session season last year.

3.) 18 Jul 2019
18 Jul 2019 21:31:53
Basically NO - for the reported cost we could put a bid in for Tierney who would be a much better purchase NOW and for the future.

4.) 18 Jul 2019
18 Jul 2019 21:57:56
Tierney is better than Shaw who gets caught out of position far too often for my liking.

5.) 18 Jul 2019
18 Jul 2019 22:30:35
Tierney looks a great player playing for a side that never has to defend in a league so poor my Grandma would be a half decent player.

He needs to move to the big leagues to see if he is as good as he is hyped up to be.

6.) 19 Jul 2019
19 Jul 2019 05:07:00
Like Robertson Shappy?

Trust me, Tierney is every bit as good.

7.) 19 Jul 2019
19 Jul 2019 05:36:29
Absolutely no.
Rose is yet another injury prone player.
We have Dalot who can cover both LB and RB spots if Shaw/ AWB is unavailable.

8.) 19 Jul 2019
19 Jul 2019 07:08:52
Like others I would say no to Rose and I would say yes to Kieran Tierney. But it would only be a short time before Shaw is the one trying to put pressure on to regain a 1st team berth.