Manchester United Banter Archive October 01 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


01 Oct 2013 22:12:28
I think jones should play just in front of evans and vidc and just behind carrick and fellani it's basically a 4-1-2-1-2 formation we can play kagawa rvp and rooney all in the one team valencia and buttner would be the full backs

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I wouldn't play Valencia as full back

Agree0 Disagree0

I like the idea but I can't see it happening unfortunately because we seem obsessed with using at least one traditional winger even if they're on poor form.

We seriously need to give Kagawa more than 45 minutes of game time to let him get back into it, it's becoming a joke. It's easy to see he's a gifted player but the way Moyes is handling him at the moment is not going to give him any confidence to get back to his best.

Agree0 Disagree0

Your ideal 1st eleven includes Buttner? Really?

Agree0 Disagree0

Very narrow formation given the width of OT but like the idea of both Jones and Kagawa getting game time playing a more central role.

Think the inclusion of Buttner was due the lack of options the formation does requires attacking full backs with pace.

Right now I would take anything than the slow old fashion 4-4-2 we are playing

Agree0 Disagree0

You would leave out the best rb in the league. really?

raf is a must and to be honest at times offers more than velencia going forward.

also Acker. all pitches are the same size. 105 x 68. so ot is not bigger in width than any other pitch we play on.

Agree0 Disagree0

It would kind of be like 4-3-3 really because Jones, Fellaini and Carrick would all drop deeper at times and change about while Rvp, Rooney and Kagawa all move along the front line to find space or make runs. Our 3 best attackers would be good on the pitch though.

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope we see a Smalling/Vidic partnership and go with our best fullbacks Rafael & Evra. If Rafael isn't quite 100% I would opt for Jones at RB.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney

You shall have your wish. Finally a proper back four HMM if you can forgive Evra for his occasional lapses.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks oxred aware all pitches are the same size just presumed the formation suggested was for our home games
And agree rafael would be first choice RB whichever formation

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 21:35:50
For those wondering what it was like to watch in the 80's, well it was like this but with atmosphere.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Late 70's early 80's (especially under Sexton) were very poor to watch, with the highlights being United able to roll over Liverpool on numerous occasions. As MrE said the atmosphere was brilliant at home games and is rarely reached these days apart from a good number of away games which still seem to attract a rogue element to them, which, for us oldies, is fun to watch!

Agree0 Disagree0

I remember all the kids in my school who supported london clubs or liverpool never missed a chance to left me know how sh. t we were :)

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 20:46:51
It'll be interesting to see who Moyes can bring in in January. Personally I think it's another smoke screen. Tell the world we're going to spend big. this will mean teams will over inflate their transfer valuations even further allowing the board to respond with the usual "no value in the market". That way Moyes attracts no elite players. We finish outside the top 4 giving them the opportunity to sack Moyes without compensation.TBH I wouldn't trust Moyes with my money either!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

01 Oct 2013 21:33:11
So they'd make sure we finish outside top four and lose champions league and all that millions of pounds in tv and advertising money just so they could sack the manager and save a tenth of the lost champions league money? Do you think that makes sense?

Agree0 Disagree0

Well you like to look at life from the sunny side don'cha ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

Congratulations on the most deranged, post of the week. Keep taking your pills

Agree0 Disagree0

It's only Tuesday so you've got plenty of time to come up with worse:-)

Agree0 Disagree0

Why is it the most deranged post of the week he has got a point if you are going to brag how mutch we are going to spend it stands to reason who ever we try to buy the selling club as got us where they want us it would be better the club shut there mouths about what we are spending and just got on with it we are the ones looking desperate because of the balls up in the transfer window and the start we have had

Agree0 Disagree0

We have said nothing about what or how much we are going to spend and just newspapers making it up.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 20:37:43
Personally I agree with Brendan down the page I think selling that role on the right to rooney and give kagawa the opportunity to play where a lot of people think he is a world class operator and give Januzai a ten game run. I think the whole team could benefit,,
if Januzai needs more time I would also look at rvp coming from inverted left of 3 and chich up top. if kagawa is as good as some believe rooney and rvp coming in from wider could have goals a plenty.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Ok, no name tag which is odd. So. why move the most prolific striker of recent times to the left? Why move Rooney to the right when he now looks hungry and up for it? Just to accommodate Kagawa? Really?

Agree0 Disagree0

I think start the game with Kagawa on the left, Rooney in the middle and Januzaj in his preferred position on the right. The three of them are good enough to play anywhere along that line which means they can change around constantly making it very hard to mark them. It annoys me we have either Januzaj or Kagawa on the pitch, I personally think they'd play really well together.

Agree0 Disagree0

AJH
At last someone with a bit of common sense.
Yes let's move our best player (rooney) out of his favorite position to accommodate a player (kagawa)who is low on confidence and has openly admitted himself that he is not playing well and has to improve.
Praise the lord that mr no name isn't in charge tonight.

Agree0 Disagree0

Simmo

Don't speak too soon, we've not seen what team we are fielding yet! Mum guessing Carrick and Fellaini in the middle, Rooney and RVP upfront, God knows who will be out wide. Hopefully, Rafael and Evra as full backs and Vidic and Evans/Jones at CB

Agree0 Disagree0

AJH

If you read further up it's all Rooney's fault that players like Kagawa etc are performing badly now.
I can't believe some posts on here.
We are actually blaming Rooney for playing well.

Agree0 Disagree0

Simmo

Some people just need something or the other to villify Rooney. There sure ain't a lot of fodder so far this season, so we see a different spin on it. E.g - "Players don't like him being the captain, Others underperform because of him, We are playing bad trying to accomodate him"

Well irony at full force, by some divine intervention he has been our best player this season, by a light year. I hope he is not "invisibily" pulling Kagawa's shorts impacting his performance. Imagine what people would have been saying if Kagawa or RVP would have had the kind of start that Wayne has had. Well worse, imagine Rooney playing like Kagawa has? They will rip him to shreds. This place smacks of double talk!

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 20:24:25
Hey ed Any hope of united making a bid for Ilkay Gundogan this january, He shows great talent as a holding midfielder {Ed002's Note - I think it unlikely he will be available.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

01 Oct 2013 20:16:56
I really enjoy the football of adnan januzaj. Its good to see united bring up prospect that shows potential

Believable0 Unbelievable0

His goal against Bolton was an absolute beauty. Hope we see more and more of him in the first team.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 20:14:55
Watching arsenal so far this season and again tonight it is amazing how one player (Ozil). One world class player has changed their team for the. Better and lifted the mood of their team.
It just shows how much we need that world class mid field player (or two preferably) to lift our team and improve our football.

Thoughts?!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Great first half from them ozil and Ramsey excellent but the whole team are very fluid, flamini makes a difference as well

Agree0 Disagree0

Completely agree

Agree0 Disagree0

Just a shame moyes and united money men couldn't see that.

Agree0 Disagree0

Flamini gave them a solid base from which they built a fluid attack. Ramsey finding his feet again is also a big reason why they are where they are now.

Now add to that Giroud, who, from his time in Montpellier, proved he could be a fantastic player once he adapts to a new team and an undoubted world class player to give the team a cantonesque push and Arsenal are right up there with the best of them in the league

Agree0 Disagree0

Add a good manager formation and tactics as well.
It's difficult to work out where the front 4 are playing

Agree0 Disagree0

Really wanted us to go after and buy Ozil. Instead we bought a dark haired version of Ashley Grimes.

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't you think that Ramsey has come on so much because of the Ozil signing? he's upped his game immensley, as have many of their players.

Bascically what I am saying is that we don't need a major overhaul. we have some top defenders already in the squad to replace ferdinand and vidic. and we have some great forward players. its just that central mid field player we lack. Simples! :)

Agree0 Disagree0

This is exactly what I said during the transfer window! I made a point of saying if you have to 'overpay' for a truly world class player isn't it worth it in the long run because what price do you put on taking a team to the next level!

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 20:05:08
It really does look like a good job the powers that be at united decided that ozil wouldn't fit in or improve our starting 11 (sarcasm)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Watching the arsenal vs Napoli game at the moment and arsenal, and in particular ozil, look superb. Did we really turn down the chance to sign him?! Something seriously wrong somewhere if we chose fellaini over ozil. I wonder if that has something to do with the our players looking quite un-interested and de-motivated so far this season? I mean if you were RVP and saw united buying felliani when arsenal get ozil, wouldn't you be a bit cheesed off and wonder about the direction of the team?

Agree0 Disagree0

Think it's more the fact of us keeping Rooney. But imagine a 3 of ozil-Rooney-kagawa behind van Persie. Ridiculous decision not to sign him if the chance to sign him was as high as we're told

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 19:55:36
Invented_by_Craig_Johnston. Wewere very poor, but to be honest, going down for a season did us the world of good. We slaughtered the old 1st division, and you had to be fit just to watch them!
I can't remember things too clearly, but as I remember it, we had a team that was aging and lacking investment. Very similar to what we have now. Not aging stars but lack of investment. If its any consolation, the year in the first division saw some of our best football ever.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

My Dad called it "lawn mower" football; Stevie Coppell on one wing, Gordon Hill on the other. We ripped the old second division apart that year. As you say, going down actually was a blessing in disguise, made people realise that big changes needed to be made.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 19:11:43
Reading the Kagawa thread further down and reflecting on Saturday's game. I really enjoyed the 1st half. Our defence looked a little shaky but there was some great movement and at half time I thought it was just a question of time before we scored. Nani looked better and I thought Kagawa had a good half and looked a threat (and that's from me who has not been that impressed with him yet). So I was a bit surprised when he was subbed at half time, it smacked of DM trying to force things when he should have just encouraged the team and told them to be patient. I assumed he had picked up a knock but apparently not. I really can't see why we took him off

Believable0 Unbelievable0

AJH I agree.

Enough of this stuff now. Celtic game starting.Love watching celtic pre-game for some reason I enjoy it unlike the scourers :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Pan scourers? :-)

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 17:20:43
Hi guys

As you know there has been a lot written over the last while about Man U's poor form. It got me thinking is there anyone on here who would remember the 73-74 relegation season? Just how bad were the team that season? How did they go from European Champs 5 years before to the position they found themselves in?

For what its worth I still think they will get top 4 this season and perhaps a cup.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Not quite, I started being aware the following season when we got promoted with Villa in 2nd and Norwich 3rd. Interesting as when we won the league in '93, Villa were 2nd, Norwich were 3rd.

I think the issue in the early 70's was an ageing squad and Managers struggling to follow Sir Matt. Tommy came in and brought in lot of young players - playing an exciting game with 2 wingers. Who knows what he might have achieved if he hadn't been sacked?

Agree0 Disagree0

Invented by Craig Johnston? Well didn't he invent the prototype for the Adidas Predator? Surely this is not a post from a football boot? LOL.

Agree0 Disagree0

We were poor in 73/74 but it was a culmination of poor managerial selection in not appreciating the size of replacing Sir Matt and not strengthening from a position of power. There was also the promise of youngsters that would be the new babes to come through which turned out to be false hope. We didn't plan well enough and didn't invest to improve. Also United were known as tight with money back then, Louis Edwards the focus of some stick.
Back then Manchester as a City was different and the ground bears no resemblance. The early to mid seventies were tough years living on the past but as Kloot will tell you the spirit would never be dimmed.
I was there at the game when the Lawman did the back heel for City and I will never forget it. It has made me angry to see recent events that could potentially mirror 69 to 71 unless we have more committed owners.
The Doc gave us some good football following on from that relegation season and we improved but the selection of Dave Sexton put us back years, in fact his was some of the dullest football ever seen.
Having been there to see that City game in 74 I appreciate the last 20 years and it is why I get angry at the club slackening even though we are nowhere near 74.

Agree0 Disagree0

Red Man

I started going regularly under Sexton and it was tripe. Big Ron gets some stick but he brought entertainment back and it's a fine line sometimes. Winning our 1st 10 games one season only for him to get sacked the next season.

Agree0 Disagree0

I saw the team in 68 and then I watched us go to pieces in 72 onwards. Unfortunately I was at the game when Denis law did his trick. I also remember an excellent game v wba when we lost 5-3 but it was a superb game. The Doc made us play some great football.
It is worrying what is going on now. It is a shame we didn't learn from the first time.

Agree0 Disagree0

Blimey NM, you're even older than I am!

Agree0 Disagree0

I remember a George Best programme on TV that blamed it all on winning the 68 european cup the powers that be at United thought they had cracked it then didn't fund the team enough
I remember it, it was shyte and we deserved to go down

Agree0 Disagree0

Gordon Hill and Stevie Coppell :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Yep I was there in 74 against city cried my eyes out! Stepney was our top scorer at one point that season after scoring two pens I think that tells u how bad it was. The season in div 2 was fantastic really . Played great football fans a good time . Came back up confident and playing attacking football but sacked the doc and got sexton in. Apart from the odd game like the west brom 3-5 it was pretty boring and had awful games for example getting beat off Watford in league cup and only just beat Stockport in the round before in the last min and they were bottom of div 4 at the time.

Agree0 Disagree0

I was there the season we went down and remember being at stoke midweek when that game finally relegated us and banners and flags being burned on the terraces.i was also at the city game when dennis backheeled the winner it didn't relegate us we were already gone.ican also remember charging across to the scoreboad end feom the stretford end and seeing the bluenoses run for there lives not clever but it was funny at the time :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Im older but no wiser!
Steviek, coppell and hill were superb. Martin Buchan was also super player.

Agree0 Disagree0

No midfield, I'm a bit young to remember but just wondering if Gordon strachen was any good for us?

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 13:46:53
Saw a pic on twitter of Ashley young going on the plane for the champions league game. Very disheartening, thought Moyes would have dropped him again

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The whole squad will always travel.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree, every time I see him in a united jersey I die a little inside.

Agree0 Disagree0

It might be a very difficult game. Although they lost some players, I read today they have 4 new brazilians and an argentinian. The seem to be good at getting these guys cheap and then moving them on for big profit.

I don't know any of their new players.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ferdy ando and Zaha missing

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 12:41:02
Hi all,

I have recently come up with a theory that in my opinion could help understand the Kagawa problem.

What if Dortmund are the German version of Manchester United? Not in the sense that the club sizes match; but in their manager.

In this case I would like to compare Klopp to Fergie. I believe Klopp should have replaced Fergie based on him being the new Fergie in my eyes.

When we look at Kagawa at United and Kagawa at Dortmund we see two completely different players albeit playing different positions, he did however play out left occasionally and it didn't hinder his performance as much as now for BVB.

So my point is does Klopp manage to do what Fergie did and get the best out of average yet good players? Does he make them overachieve?

Look at how Kagawa is struggling at Utd, look at how terribly Sahin performed away from Klopp and now he is back is outstanding! Bayern left Hummels leave their academy with little fight but under Klopp is rated very highly. Lewandowski and Piszeck (spelling) do not perform for Poland but are brilliant for Dortmund. It'll be very interesting to see Lewandowski away from Klopp at Munich. Before Klopp only Blackburn were interested in a time of despair after all.

I am by no stretch saying these players are bad I am just questioning is Klopp just an outstanding man manager much like SAF? and is that where the mistake was made, by not bursting a gut to get Klopp in?

MUNCH

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I said from day one that Klopp would fit the bil perfectly. He buys players cheap, which suits the Glazers, then turns them into a UNIT. Something we do not have at United. We look disjointed and disinterested. No heart and no fight.
In addition, the criteria was to bring a winner with European experience, again, Klopp fits the bill perfectly.
Before Moyes starts spending the mega millions that we are promised, I would like to see him play our current players in a modern system, but he does not do that either.

Agree0 Disagree0

We really need to get over this talking about other managers lads we have 1 now.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 14:16:26
Klopp has developed a system that plays to all his players strengths and covers their weaknesses, he has also moved on the players who didn't fit into this system.

He is also very good at spoting the players who he can mould into his system amd he can improve them as players.

Kagawa has moved out of a system he fits well in into a system that is new to him and he has to play in a position that doesn't suit his skill set.

Lewandowski would work well in a system where he plays upfront by himself due to his selfish nature, he also requires many chances as atm he only converts about 25% of his chances. Bayern should be a good move for him.

Klopp is a fantastic manager and someone i'd like to see at our club, but as to getting the best out of your players? All you need to do is play them in their best position in a system that suits them.

I was over the moon when we signed Kagawa as I thought it might mean a change of system and approach. But sadly we are trying to fit square peg in a round hole, and unless we change our system then Kagawa will never repeat the form he had for Dortmund.

Agree0 Disagree0

He is also great for Japan so he will find a way to force his way into the team given time

Agree0 Disagree0

I honestly think he is more or less telling kagwa he dose not want him ican see him leaving then moyes will push hair do further up and then its one step away from stoke football under pulis god I hope not

Agree0 Disagree0

MUNCH how as Goetze (spelling) move to Munich worked out for him?

Agree0 Disagree0

He plays well for Japan and he doesn't play the 10 role for them

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 15:36:53
Kagawa has neither pace nor power so he isn't going to be any use when running at teams from deep.

What he has is quick feet and an even quicker mind, he sees openings and finds space like no one else in our squad.

But to be successful he needs to be playing in a team that not only has a lot of possession but a team that has that possession high in their opponants half. Dortmund do that and Japan do too. That style plays well with Kagawas skill set.

We seem to be adopting a more sit back and counter attack style, to do that we need three types of players, we need midfielders who can sit deep and are strong defensively, we need strikers who are strong and quick to enable a quick counter and be able to hold up play, and we need very quick link men who can either run out with the ball or quickly make it into the final third as reinforcements.

Kagawa doesn't fit into any of those roles, he isn't a quick strong striker who can lead the line, he isn't a strong defensive midfielder and he isn't a lightening quick wide man who can get up the field quickly or who can run the balk out from deep.

Kagawa has no place in a counter attacking style. Now hopefully Moyes fell back on a counter attacking style as he didn't know the players very well and he wanted to keep things tight in our very tough start to the season. If he keeps to this same style between now and christmas then don't expect to see Shinji he come September the 1st next year. As he simply has no place in that style.

I'm hoping Moyes will now look to try a new style of play, but i'm not holding my breath.

Agree0 Disagree0

Shappy
At last we agree on something I've been saying the same thing for a while now

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 16:56:08
I know you have jred, I was hoping that the signing of Kagawa might be a prelude to a switching of style. But alas it looks more like another Anderson where we try and stick a squad peg in a round hole.

If we were to move to a more modern more european style then Kagawa could be a key player in making that happen.

My concern atm seems to be with Moyes seemingly trying to set up a team to suit a couple of players. He seems to want to play both Rooney and RvP centrally but is trying to keep the width, thus leaving and already weak midfield over exposed. I though he realised this when he was getting Valencia to tuck in when we were under the cosh to give us more numbers in the middle.

Unfortunately that just isn't enough. Personally with the players he has available and the poor form of our wingers over the past couple of seasons I would drop our wingers altogether.

A 4312 seems the best option imo. The three in midfield would consisit of Fellaini Carrick and Cleverley so as we can control the game. I'd then play Kagawa in something more similar to his natural position in behind Rooney and RvP.

Long term i'd look to replace Evra with someone like Coentrao and Cleverley with possibly Ander Herrera or Koke. For Carricks long term replacement i'd loom at Verratti but with him unlikely available i'd go for Jordy Clasie.

But I don't see anything like that forth comming. I expect to see more 4411 in a defensive set up that unfortunately has no place for Kagawa.

Agree0 Disagree0

Shappy
I've been really disappointed by the tactics and formation to be honest I would like to see 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-2-1 but there's no sign of that yet although that might change if the results don't improve

Agree0 Disagree0

Like the man says "All you need to do is play them in their best position in a system that suits them" and that's basically the nub of the matter.

One would hope the Manchester United manager has a footballing brain good enough to recognise this rather than unsuccessfully pursuing a dogmatic approach, trying to shoehorn players into a way of playing which doesn't suit them. Otherwise, what the hell is he doing as our manager?

Its seems there is a concensus on this site towards employing a 4 3 1 2 and fergie had some joy with this system last season with the same players we have now.

If Moyes can't adapt to make the most of the squads strengths then I think we have the answer as to whether he's good enough to be our manager.

An interesting hypothetical is whether Klopp would be flexible with his system to suit the players we have or would he have tried to impose the same system he uses at Dortmund, even if that wasn't suitable? {Ed004's Note - I still feel as long as we get a very good left back then Kagawa could play out left. He would need a full back who works very hard offensively and defensively as well as having the speed to get back into position. I can't think of many players like that available apart from Coentrao who seems to be a very hard worker}

Agree0 Disagree0

At dortmund and Japan, Kagawa has a lot of technical high tempo athletic players alongside him. Need we say more?

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 11:12:41
Something I have been thinking about over the last couple of weeks is the size of the job that the manager has at our club.


Sir Alex was an exceptional manager and was able to keep many plates spinning at the same time. That was one of his main assests. How many managers can inspire and maintain a challenge on four fronts, control the scouting and recruitment at the club, take part in all the commercial aspects of the club while also keeping and eye on all the young players and taking an interest in all of the playing staffs social lives.

That is a lot to manage, Sir Alex in later years was known for taking abit of a back seat in some aspects while still keeping a close eye on things so as he could do everything that was required of him.

David Moyes is a very hands on manager and as such I think is spreading himself too thin, he didn't congratulate Lingard on his debut performance for Birmingham, his press conferences aren't as polished as Sir Alexs, this maybe down to not having enough time to prepare for them. And I think all the stuff he had to do on the pre season tour distracted him from spending enough time with his new players.

And if i'm honest I don't know if anyone else could have handled everything any better.

So what I think we need is to imbrace a new style of running a club as quite simply there isn't anyone else who can run the club in the manner in which Sir Alex ran it.

I think we need to restructure and have a director of football and possibly have a club ambassador.

That way all matter to do with player recruitment and planning pre season tours can be delt with by the director of football, he can have meetings with the manager and the chief scout and then work with them and the chief excutive to bring in the player the club wants.

The club ambassador can take over a lot of the public relations work and can go on to promote the club taking away that distraction from the manager.

That way the manager can concentrate more on managing the playing staff and preparing for games.

This way the manager will be less strained and able to focus more on getting the results the club needs.

As for who should fullfill the new roles, the club ambassador should be a club man, someone who has the club at heart and can do the club proud, personally i'd go for either Bryan Robson as he is a club man through and through and he has managerial experiance so he will know what he can and can't say to the press, or the other option would be David Beckham purely for his global appeal.

As for the director of football, well for that we would need someone who has very good connections within football so as he could use them for the clubs advantage. Maybe an ex manager but I think the best option could be a Jorge Mendes. I know what a lot of you might think but Chelsea employed Pini Z

Believable0 Unbelievable0

01 Oct 2013 11:38:18
Obvioiusly I accidently sent this before I finished. Lol. So heres the rest.

Pini Zahavi, and that went really well and he helped them bring in some really top players.

I know people have a distrust of agents, and i'll be honest i'm not kean on them myself. But that is the way modern football is run, we are better off moving with the times than trying to fight it. And bringing soneone in like Mendes will give us the inside track on some of best players around, and his connections are second to none.

I appreciate if people would rather not have Mendes, but it remains that we probably need someone to fullfill this role.

All opinions are welcome.

{Ed002's Note - You have clearly misunderstood something Shappy. PZ was never Chelsea's "Director of Football" and never employed by Chelsea. Mendes cannot take any job at Manchester United as a working agent.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't we have a club ambassador? Seriously that is a made up job if ever I heard of one
DoF christ we'd end up with joe kinnear or his ilk

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 13:21:27
I thought PZ was a paid consultant by Chelsea, so not strictly an employee but working for the club to help conclude transfers. I did consider that having an agent would possibly be considered as a conflict of interest, but wasn't sure of the implactions of such an appointment.

Pardoe, we do have several ambassaors but imo they are under used with too much reliance on the manager to talk to the press. At Bayern they have several high up ex players working within the club and they frequently speak to the press rather than the manager. Obviously the manager has to do the contracted press conferences and such, but a lot of the other press arrangements are delt with by other people. I think this could help all future managers by taking some responsibility off their shoulders. {Ed002's Note - There are very strict rules governing the activities of registered agents. PZ has never been an employee of the club in the same way as JM will never be an employee of MU.}

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 16:33:02
Ah right, thanks Ed02. I thought there might be something like that. I wonder if there could be some kind of loop hole if say an agent was to un registar themselves as an agent but remain as a director of their own agency. It would all be abit murky but could there be a way around the rules like that? Or are they sewn up air tight?

{Ed002's Note - There are rules, if they are abused they would without doubt lose whatever licence they have. You seem to be helplessly clutching at straws Shappy.}

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 18:45:41
Thanks Ed02, I don't see anything like this happening. I was more interested in whether it could. Thanks again anyway, and glad to have you back on the site.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 09:51:40
Kags on the brom game "I have to take this like some kind of message (from the manager).

"I need to improve more and more, or I cannot survive at this club."I thought that I would have been able to find some space to create the chances in the second half, " he added.

"In that sense I was disappointed. Sure, I wasn't involved that much. I didn't touch the ball enough but I was trying to be patient so I didn't feel that bad."

Believable0 Unbelievable0

You have to love his attitude, for a player of his quality, to be having a tough time and to still have such a good attitude towards his situation is sometimes rare to find.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 09:01:59
You got to credit Kagawa for how he is acting. Just read that he stated that he has to continue to improve to get the trust of DM and to succeed at Manchester United. Very refreshing to see a player not sulk when things are not his way. I really hope DM looks at this and starts to put more faith in him cause he is an exceptional talent just waiting to dominate English football

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The lad is class both on and off the field. I just hope we can get the best out of him. To lose a player of his ability when we are so obviously lacking in creativity would be a crying shame. I just hope he can find some form and show us what he is capable of.

Agree0 Disagree0

The guy is a class act, he has all the ability in the world and many players would have been throwing their toys out of the pram, take note Mr Rooney.

In my eyes to get the best out of Kagawa and our attacking play, we need Kagawa in the number 10 role in a 4231 formation. Yes I know Rooney has been our best performer so far, out of a pretty bad bunch, but his first touch and short, sharp passing are nowhere near the quality of Kagawa. Personally i'd like a front four of Januzaj on the left, Kagawa in the middle and Rooney on the right of a front 3 behind RVP/Hernandez. I think with Fellaini sitting deep and Carrick linking with the front four we could have a lot of joy.

Now I said this a few times over the summer and got shot down as people wanted Kagawa on the left and Rooney in the middle but it doesn't get the best out of him or the attack. We have a less effective Kagawa on the left and a player in the 10 role who's game isn't suited to the role in my eyes. Rooney would be as effective on the right of tge 3 as in the middle.

I hope Moyes works out a formation that gets the best out of Kagawa as that would be hugely beneficial to us.

Agree0 Disagree0

The problem with Kagawa is simply his position - he is a number 10 not a winger unfortunlately for him Rooney is on fire in that position with RVP up top.

Moyes has stated he has played left for Japan so its not foreign to him but he just not natural out wide - to be fair the couple of times he has played this season he has struggled physically which is frustrating.

I do hope that he gets a bit of form as he is a class act.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan

Based on how they perform and their form, why should Kags, Wayne and Persie not rotate. What makes Van Persie undroppable? I would rather want to see Kagawa behind Rooney for a few games. Last season they were a treat to watch whenever they linked up. A lot of games, and I think all 3 of them will get enough game time. RVP can even cut in from the wings(he started of as one).

I agree Kagawa needs game time at No 10, but there is not a lot he has done to "deserve" the spot IMO. But yes he needs to play, that's for sure. And yes, Rooney is as good as Kags in terms of passing if not better. You need to look at his passing stats this season, phenomenal. I don't remember one brilliant pass played by Kagawa. Nothing against Kags, infact I feel he is being wasted here.

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Goal threat is what makes RVP undroppable if you intend winning football matches.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sadly DM will never rate him and he will leave and we will have lost a great talent that will come back to bite our arses

Agree0 Disagree0

Get a life Brendan
Without Rooney this season we would be a laughing stock.
Are you no able to put the past behing you. obsessed isn't the word.

Agree0 Disagree0

Pardo, not unless we get rid of Moyes first, bring someone who can play football and not keep telling us in press conferences that we will be getting more thrashings this year!

Agree0 Disagree0

Deeps, Kagawa has never had a decent chance at number 10. It is a position where he will need a run of games to get the link between midfield and forward right. He is a perfect number 10 but he is being wasted and it's a great shame.

I agree IanO.

I hope you are wrong Pardoe, I really do.

Simmo it is nothing to do with 'obsession", it is about understanding football. Rooney isn't a great number 10, Kagawa is a much better option there in my eyes. To be a great number 10 you have to have great vision, composure, awareness, a range of passing from short/sharp to longer range and the best show great skill and flair. Look at some of the great number 10's, Maradonna, Zidane, Cruyff, Messi and compare their attributes to Rooney. His first touch is poor as is his short passing and he has no real skill or flair.

This season he has played 6 games, he has 5 goals (3 free kicks and 2 from open play against Leverkusen) and 2 assists (1 corner and one from open play against Leverkusen again). Could he not have scored the 3 free kicks and took his corner from a position slightly to the right of the number 10? In my eyes he HAS been our best player but we have been very poor. He has tried and given lots of effort and my view is not an attack on Rooney, it is just that he is taking a position that Kagawa is more naturally gifted in. Rooney would give just as much on the right of a 3 as he does now and we would also be getting so much more from Kagawa, it can only be a positive in my opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan
Yet fergy and now moyes have never really played him there even when Rooney was injured, why do you think that is

Agree0 Disagree0

JRED, last season was his first in the PL and it was also greatly hampered by injury. This season is the first chance for us to really see what he is about. I don't think we will get the chance though. Watch him during his time at Dortmund and tell me Rooney is better suited to the number 10. I think with Januzaj and Rooney beside him behind RVP/Hernandez, we could be very good.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan
I did watch him at Dortmund in the 2011/12 he done ok after Xmas before that he was poor. He didn't always play the number 10 role either.
By the way that same year Rooney scored 34
You don't pick players on what they did 2 years ago fir a different team in a different league.
Moyes sees him every day in training as did fergy and it would seem neither thought he deserved and run of games at number 10

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan

You are absolutely deluded if you think that Kagawa is a better than Rooney. I am in total shock with that statement.
Wayne Rooney has absolutely everything, a great footballing brain, superb passer of the ball, he can tackle, he guarantees you 20+ goals a season when played correctly and if he avoids injury.
He has all of those attributes that you mentioned in your rather silly post.
He is the complete package.
You are quite simply becoming obeseed with Kagawa.
If he was that good then he would be able to adapt to playing on and on the right or the left because have a guess what. Wayne Rooney can do that roll as well, he can also play central midfield when asked.
Sorry mate you have made yourself look very silly with that statement.
How can you say Rooney lacks vision, skill, awareness and flair.
Even in his worst season last year when he was injured and played out of position he still created more assists than any united player and finished second top goal scorer.
Im still trying to pick myself up off my chair after reading that.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan
I would be quite happy if we used kags to get gundogan and then bought a top class left side player

Agree0 Disagree0

From your post Simmo, it would appear Brendan isn't the only one with a player obsession.

Agree0 Disagree0

Simmo what flair/skills does Rooney possess exactly? Can he beat a man? Rarely. Do any flicks etc come off? Rarely. His long passing is very good at times, his short quick passing and control are poor in comparison. A number 10 needs that rather than long range passing.
If you have a player who is good in a position why play them out of it? People have been whining about square pegs/round holes at United. Would you play any of the players I mentioned above out of their number 10 position? Of course not. Rooney does not possess what is needed for the number 10 role, SAF realised that which is why he has been played all over, and he is poor in CM so that was a pointless statement. Also I didn't say he didn't have vision/awareness, I said those are what you need. I do think he has those attributes but he lacks the control and short passing to use them properly in and around the 18 yard box.

We'll have to agree to disagree on it I guess, I'm certainly not Kagawa obsessed but I do want what is best for United and I feel him in the number 10 is that. Maybe it's that our forwards aren't able to play the right way for Kagawa to fulfil his potential with us. I think he needs a good opportunity though. Maybe having such poor wide players means Rooney has to play there to help cover when they lose the ball and Kagawa couldn't do that and it's not really a number 10's job anyway. That's why a front 4 of Januzaj, Kagawa, Rooney with RVP/Hernandez up top would benefit everyone I think. Kagawa could play his best position with some very good players around him. We wouldn't have Young, Nani or Valencia losing the ball permanently. Rooney could concentrate on going forward and would still score 20 goals and assist plenty too. They could also interchange throughout the game at times to confuse the opposition.

I just think we will lose a very good player because we are sticking with very poor wide players and 442, meaning we can't use the formation that could make us successful this year, it's just frustrating.

Agree0 Disagree0

Stevie K

Do you not agree with what I put about Rooney then?
I am only saying what probably 95% of man united fans would probably say.
How can you say he doesn't have any of them qualities?
I must of been watching a completely different player over the last 9 years.
Bendan, let's just say we are not reading off the same page.
Lets ask all the other United fans on here if Wayne Rooney has NO SKILL, NO FLAIR, NO AWARENESS, NO RANGE OF PASSING AND TO TOP IT OFF NO FIRST TOUCH.
If that's the case I wonder how he won all of the following awards by not posessing any of the above:-
PFA Players' Player of the Year (1): 2009–10
PFA Young Player of the Year (2): 2004–05, 2005–06
PFA Fans' Player of the Year (2): 2005–06, 2009–10
PFA Premier League Team of the Year (3): 2005–06, 2009–10, 2011–12
FWA Footballer of the Year (1): 2009–10
Goal of the Season (3): 2004–05, 2006–07, 2010–11
Goal of the Month (6): October 2003, January 2005, April 2005, January 2007, March 2007, February 2011
Sir Matt Busby Player of the Year (2): 2005–06, 2009–10
tv Young Sports Personality of the Year (1): 2002
Bravo Award (1): 2003
UEFA Euro 2004 Team of the Tournament
FIFPro World Young Player of the Year (1): 2004–05
Premier League Player of the Month (5): February 2005, December 2005, March 2006, October 2007, January 2010
Barclays Player of the Year (1): 2009–10
Premier League 20 Seasons Awards (1992–93 to 2011–12): Best Goal (vs. Manchester City, 12 February 2011)

FIFA Club World Cup Golden Ball (1): 2008
England Player of the Year (2): 2008, 2009
Golden Boot Landmark Award 20 (1): 2009–10
FIFA/FIFPro World XI (1): 2011

It's just quite simply ridiculious this conversation. I shall say no more.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with you brendan and convinced if the guy is given a run of 5 to 7 games, he is a better number 10.

There is no point arguing with Rooney club as it is sacrosanct to mention anything remotely different that would not suit Wayne.

I guess people forget what the number 10 is supposed to do and going back and picking up the ball from defenders is not their role. People confuse grind, hustle and work rate, which is what your midfielders do in balanced teams for a classic number 10 role who has to have great first touch and be able to make a telling pass. Wayne usually needs 2 or 3 touches and then decides what to do.

BTW I have no obsession with either but know DM current formation are not working and we are creating nothing. I think moyes spent most of his time this summer trying to retain rooney and now doing whatever makes Rooney happy.

It will interesting to see what happens when we win a penalty next and who takes it as SAF clearly took that way from him and RVP was given the task. That should tell you a lot about what is going on behind the scenes.

Agree0 Disagree0

Simmo

Wow you are not obsessed with him all at are you :). His first touch and one touch passing is not great mate.

The problem is he hates playing the advanced striker role and playing on the shoulder of the CB and gets very frustrated. He tried that in the city game and got no change out of company and then we switched and had Welbeck playing as the advanced striker and he got no change out of company either :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Sharham
Would anybody of got change out of company that day.
Rooney has said a few times he wants to play striker and plays there for England .
When rvp and Rooney have played there have been times when rvp has dropped in behind Rooney it really has been a front at times opposed to one playing of the other .
The question is why didn't moyes play kags of Rooney when rvp was injured or kags of rvp when Rooney was injured?

Agree0 Disagree0

Simmo, Brendan never said he had no flair, skill etc. He just said he didn't possess these qualities to a level high enough, to be classed a top number 10.

Misquoting people is a sure sign you know his argument has merit.

Agree0 Disagree0

Add that to the fact any meaningful personal award Rooney won was in 2010, but as u say u dnt pick players for wot they done 2 years ago, what a silly tit for tat this has become!

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred

Not any of our strikers against Kompany as we don't have anyone in the mould of a Lukaku or Drogba.

I don't want to turn this into a Rooney debate and more about Kagawa as a number 10. Fergie did play him there in a few games mate.

My point is give the guy 5 games in that role and see what he does. Yanking him at halftime is not going to build confidence for any player especially when you play him out on the wing with a headless chicken like Buttner as his linkup partner. Moyes other statements are also not helping.

Rooney has had many howlers of games in the past and until last year Fergie would keep picking him and let him find some form. I feel sorry for Kagawa as it seems like if he does not have Blinder he is out. If Fergie had not retired I am pretty sure he Kagawa would be our no 10.

Maybe, I am not explaining it properly, Sometimes you look at a player and you know it's there and it is a matter of time before he delivers the goods, but you have to give him time and games and live with his so so performances in the process.

A good example is RVP, which by by all accounts is struggling(maybe niggling injuries, fitness not ideal, other issues) but you know it's there and rightfully you have to keep playing him and he will come good.

I do agree with your assessment that he is not DM type player and neither was Thiago. It seems like Moyes likes the hustle and tussle type players rather than what I call guys who were not born to be bruisers and do things based on their technical ability.

It is odd but kagawa is ideal for a Barca style type of team, highly technical payers who are effective not because of their physicality.

For what it's worth, klop who many rate as a top manager, moved Goetze out to left wing to keep kagawa playing the no 10 spot after Goetze came back from his injury.

The guy has bags of talent and a very different player to Rooney and gives you something very different but not sure we have the team or the players to appreciate what he can do, wrong time wrong place I guess as they say.

Agree0 Disagree0

God created
Kags has played number 10 under fergy and he was poor to be fair he never managed to hold the place down
Honda is picked in that role for Japan .
I'm not doubting he's a good player but I don't think he is the right number 10 for United.
I'm not sure he is the right number 10 for moyes.
Ferguson could of gave kags a run of games last season due to Rooneys form and injuries but he choose not to.
Moyes could of played him 10 when rvp was injured.
We are struggling with our wingers form we are struggling in cm and the back 4 I also think the formation is an issue I don't playing kags 10 will change any of this .
He needs to earn a run of games I've yet to see him have 1 great game for United .
Now the lads a good player but some off the things moyes has said and taking him off after 45 minutes tells a story . I'm guessing but it seems moyes has little faith in him so he can hardly be lighting training up either.
With the players we have at the moment I don't think kags would do any better than Rooney in the 10 role I also think rvp Rooney is a better partnership especially in the EPL
One last thing the role he had in the European game the other week should of really suited him, he started out left but was obviously given licence to come inside and find space but he never had a great game. I think this particular role is well suited for him and should help him find space and get on the ball, I would play him here rather than 10 as I think in the EPL he will be marked out the game playing 10

Agree0 Disagree0

Guys if SAF had stayed on I think we might have had a front four of Januzaj, Kagawa and Thiago behind RVP this year. Compare that to Moyes' choice so far of Young, Rooney, Valencia, RVP. Which would you guys be happier with? I know which i'd want.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan
Thats a bit unfair on moyes, fergy bought and played Valencia and young plenty.
Also people on the site moaned year after year about fergy not playing the kids or playing giggs

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred

That is not true as Kags was not available for selection as you make it out to be. He was injured last year and was struggling for fitness and had a stop start season.

This year he was knackered and pretty much played the entire summer between WC qualifiers and confederation cup.

Anyway, difference of an opinion mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

God created.
Opinions make the site interesting.
I don't know if you are watching the arsenal match but ozel is playing from the right and drifting infield, this is the role I would give kags but from the left

Agree0 Disagree0

Yep, what a goal. The difference is the supporting crew around Ozil. Arsenal look the real deal and can"t deny they play football like we used to many years ago. I think their midfield is class.

Keep switching and been watching the porto game.

We seem to have not mentioned fisher for a while, going to be some player and seems to have filled in and looks much bigger.

Agree0 Disagree0

Watching the CL is like a kid being in a candy store. Draxler just a wonderful goal.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm completely against it but it's a good advertisement for a European league.

Draxler looks a fantastic player

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred

Putting him on the left might work if he had a fullback that was any good.

I understand where you are going with this but when he drifts in, you need the number 10 to go out wide, which generally makes it difficult for the CB to decide as they don't know if they should pick up the no 10 or stay put. Arsenal do this very well.

With us what generally happens is they tend to get into each other way when Kagawa comes in and seen that a number of times. Rooney is a north south runner and not someone who makes a lot of diagonal runs and tries to get behind the defense. RVP is much better at those runs.

Agree0 Disagree0

God created
That's a fair point but we need to improve as a team we need to be more fluid and quicker all other the park imo.
I don't think we will see the best of kags untill we do

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes IanO, we never scored goals before we bought Van Persie did we? Its current form that should count!

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Stevie K

Quote from Brendan
"His first touch is poor as is his short passing and he has no real skill or flair"
I rest my case!

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah Simmo, no real skill/flair, obviously he has more than the average player but not to an extent that he could be called a very skillful flair player or a great number 10.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan

I understand your point of Kags not getting a proper shot at his favouite position. But there is hardly any doubt about the fact that Rooney is a much better player than Kagawa, present form or playing careers, whichever you look at it.

Kagawa plays on the left of the Japanese front 3. Honda plays the number 10. With proper personnel Kagawa should do well in that position. But presently won't make sense shifting Rooney from his favoured position. Considering he has started like a house on fire.

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Deeps he has started well but he isn't really doing the job of a number 10. That is linking midfield with attacking, creating goals, getting in the box and scoring, short sharp interchanging play. He has 5 goals and 2 assists from 6 games. 3 of his goals were free kicks and one of his assists a corner. The only two open play goals and open play assist came in the same game against Leverkusen. For me that isn't good enough to guarantee him the number 10 role. I'm certain he could do just as much on the right of a 3 whilst getting more out of Kagawa at the same time, and getting Januzaj game time. For me it is win win win for all 3 players.

This hasn't been an attack on Rooney, just that I believe Kagawa is better suited to the number 10 role and Rooney would be just as effective just to the right of this and interchanging with Kagawa/Januzaj throughout the game at times anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

Exactly, how is it he can perform for Japan drifting in from the left but can't do it for us, he is obviously struggling with the whole process of the premiership and playing at United.
Im will put my house on it that Kagawa will be sold come the end of the season.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan
Pele in his prime would struggle to link our midfield and wingers and score goals and create goals.
Kags has done nothing yet to show he has adapted to the EPL or United,
It's been said before but kags has played well out wide for both Japan and Dortmund so it's not the role
If you watch arsenal last night ozil played on the left and the right ans played very well I've watched kags do that for Dortmund a number of times

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan

I thought I would ignore it the first time you mentioned it, but just because you mentioned it, have to say this. Wayne has 4 assists. 2 from the Swansea game you forget. Specially one of them for Welbeck was a typical Number 10's pass. 3 assists from open play mate and one from corner.

It is a pity, but he is leading both the scoring and assists charts. 6 games - 5 goals, 4 assists! If we have to integrate Kagawa, I don't understand why do we need to do it at the expense of Rooney? When RVP was injured, Moyes still ignored Kagawa for the number 10 role.

It just doesen't make any sense to me as far as shifting our best player is concerned. That too for the sake of experimenting and trying things out. I would want Kagawa to do very well, but then he hasn't delievered yet. That remains a FACT.

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry Rafa, I mean Deeps my error. But remind me, was that the game where he failed to celebrate because he was sulking and still wanted a move away? Anyway, that's another story that the Rooney lovers choose to ignore.

Kagawa hasn't been given chance to show what he can do for us there. Last season was injury interrupted and this season he's only just getting back due to international commitments. As I said, I don't think Rooney has done enough as a number 10 to warrant the role when he could easily do what he has been doing just to the right. As I have said he has been the best of a bad bunch but that doesn't mean he is right for the 10 role does it as he isn't doing the number 10's job.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lol Brendan, you talk like the Brendan from Merseyside ;) . So just because he did not celebrate the goals, we should chalk off his assists? that's more like "The best team lost - Jose or We had more possession - Brendan"

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brendan
Change the record you went on about rooney all last year and you ended up looking a bit daft.
Sharham made some good points about kags and might be right you just come over as "anything but rooney "
He played bad you wanted him dropped and kags to play 10
He played well you want him dropped and kags to play 10
We get it

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 08:45:45
Guys, the u21 game against Bolton was fantastic to watch. Januzaj and zaha were excellent and need not be starting behind young, nani, Valencia and co. If this is going to be a transition season, then let's give them a chance. Let's give kagawa a chance in his correct position.
One player that must get a special mention is ekangamene, this lad can play, breaks down attacks, good simple passer of the ball, and he has bags of energy.
I think Moyes is still trying to get the players on his side. But when you watched him at Everton, he was a lot more assertive. So time to start getting tough with the players and while at it, play some of the youngsters to show the senior players that their places are not guaranteed.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Simmo I like rooney as a player but last season and especially on saturday his 1st touch was shocking

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Oct 2013 07:48:18
This is taking me back to the days when Sir Matt retired. We adopted the revolving door policy as no one could do what Sir Matt could do easily. McGuinness, O'Farrel, Sexton, The Doc, Atkinson. we then found the master, though he took a few years to show us. The difference between him and Moyes being that SAF HAD won things with another club, breaking the domination of Celtic and Rangers!
To be fair, I don't believe any of the rubbish that the Glazers gave him the money but he didn't spend it. Its hard to make someone believe you need to spend when you have just galloped to another Premiership. IMO the Glazers are NOT investing in the team, probably feeling there is no need. let's not forget, these are not football people.
We now have to see what the Glazers do next as much as what Moyes does next but after 3 years of not buying in the position we needed most, CMF, why should we expect any change? I expect nothing much to happen again in January, though if we re still midtable, the summer might be interesting.
Moyes has a 6 year contract, so I can't see anyone trying to get rid of him. The Glazers won't spend on players, so they won't be doing an 'Abromovich'. Moyes is here to stay so we had better get used to it.
Sorry David, but the alarm started sounding when you said that if no new players were signed, you'd be happy with the squad. Well 6 weeks later you need 5 or 6 world class players? No more excuses please David, results and flair are all that matters at Old Trafford.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

01 Oct 2013 05:47:08
Another post sent yesterday another post not published.When I enquired a few days ago why you were not publishing my posts you said look in match/others.I looked and no they were not there.Obviously someone has taken exception to my opinion and has decided not to print what I write.I have now taken the hint and will not waste any more of my time sending posts to your site
Regards
Bob {Ed002's Note - The last post we got from you was on the 28th - also moaning about posts. Prior to that there is another post moaning about something else - that was posted. You have taken your decision, which I respect, and I will remove your account for you.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Ouch lol

Agree0 Disagree0

The irony of posting about not posting.

Agree0 Disagree0