Manchester United Banter Archive June 20 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


20 Jun 2015 20:08:24
Are we interested in W. Carvalho looks like he's progressing quite nicely and could do well sitting in front of our defence? Get Kondogbia as well, no goals and with Lacazette banging them in aswell, PL, UCL champs! Sorted!

Believable2 Unbelievable0

20 Jun 2015 20:12:32
We have probably been linked to Carvalho for at least the last 4 windows so its a possibility.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 20:36:35
Kondogbia is off to Inter Milan last I heard

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 20:37:23
Just what we need .An awesome cdm £28 million is a good deal in todays market i do hope LVG makes a move shortly

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 20:44:39
Carvalho to Arsenal is the latest rumor, and Kondogbia seems headed to Inter. WIth the media, it is hard to accept anything until it is official. All great prospects, though.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 21:30:45
Apparently we've interest but he's not top of the list.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 22:21:56
He's arsenal bound for sure unfortunately.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 23:14:21
Kondogbia to inter. Carvallho to arsenal and Schneiderlin to us looks the most likely outcome if you scan the Internet and forum pages.
Question is who gets the best deal as the prices are roughly the same. give or take. A few million!

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed004's Note - Or we may be holding off on Scheiderlin because we are waiting on Schweinsteiger}

20 Jun 2015 23:17:34
If he's Arsenal bound that could help us in signing Schneiderlin which would be brilliant. From what I've seen Carvalho is very good but I'd take Schneiderlin ahead of him. He'd fit right into our system and would be an ideal central midfielder.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 23:41:59
I know Schneiderlin is not seen as a typical no. 6 according to Ed001 but neither was Carrick until Saf moulded him into one. They seem to have similar qualities though and we haven't played with a full on defensive midfielder for a long time. Could he be moulded into that role? At Southampton he needed Wanyama next to him but at a top level club which retains lots of possession would he need the same cover?

I honestly don't know the answer so I'd be interested to hear people's views, Shappy Moon and anyone else who watches a lot of other teams.

Is he capable of dictating play from the back and putting in enough of a defensive shift to allow the likes of Herrera to break forward? Or is he only good when he himself has the license to attack at well as defend?

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jun 2015 01:48:45
I'll post something about MS tomorrow evening, if I forget he covered my in my review analysis

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jun 2015 11:53:01
I get the feeling that the order of priority is Schweinsteiger, Schneiderlin, William Carvalho, De Jong.

Gundogan I think is on a totally seperate list for a more advanced position.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jun 2015 12:08:19
badger
i don't think its his best position but i do think he can play there but doing it his own way.
he can sit and break it up like carrick but breaking forward and playing b2b is his best asset and it would be daft to take that away from his game .
so he will need some cover .
i don't think he can play the carrick role but i do think he can play a very important role for united doing it his own way

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jun 2015 14:51:09
Ok cheers, jred

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 18:32:20
Do we have any interest this summer with the up and coming talented midfielder that is Rubén Neves?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

20 Jun 2015 19:26:17
No he is not Belgian enough

Agree5 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 20:26:30
Match of the day fever? He was a 23 year old playing in an under 21 tournament against England. If he didn't stand out a little there would be a problem. I want to see more from him first. Very composed player but I'm not sure. I don't get the 23 year old playing in under 21 matches thing. It's not as if there isn't enough u21 players in a country that plays football. Absolutely daft ruling.

Agree2 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 22:02:09
Supasub,

It's under 21 at the beginning of qualifying, makes sense to me or a player could score 20 goals to qualify and then not be allowed to play in the final.

Agree2 Disagree5

20 Jun 2015 22:31:47
It would be better for me if they said 21 by the start of the actual tournament they are attempting to qualify for, therefore 19 and 20 year olds will be blooded in meaningful games and would be no older than 21 by the time the major competition starts. Having 23 year olds is kind of pointless because if they are any good they will already be full internationals and they are hindering the progress of potential.

I get what you are saying GDS2 and agree it would annoy me if I worked hard to get my team to the finals to then not play, but it should be reshuffled imo, the whole point of U21 competition is to ready players for full internationals not abuse the system or stifle development.

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 22:49:22
Having under 21 tournaments in itself seems a little strange to me (let alone having 23 year olds involved) as if they're good enough they would usually be ready for the first team. Having said that the other countries seem to manage it well, it's just British youngsters who often feel like they are 'too good' for such tournaments. The Germans and Spanish have shown what can happen if you take these things seriously.

Gds does make a fair point with regards the qualifying competition mind.

It's a similar thing when players who are up for the 'player of the year' award in the Prem are also still elligible for the young players award. It just feels like some of these systems are a little outdated given how young top players can make their mark these days.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 23:41:05
Also I thought there was a limit on how many over 21's you could have. About 2 or 3 if I'm not mistaken.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 23:39:44
I know gds, I just think surely there is a better method of doing it. You have under 20's. Maybe do away with under 21 and then have u23 or whatever. Sometimes that's just life if they happen to be too old for a tournament.

Agree1 Disagree1

21 Jun 2015 07:29:49
There might be 2 but I have to say the Ruben neves I thought of when ronnie asked was the 18 year old lad from Porto.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I am with you Jack, the only one I know of is 18, plays for Porto and has been given the stupid tag of being the new 'Busquets'. Looks a very good player from the little I have seen of him and United are one of a number of English clubs that regularly watch the Porto youth teams. I am told he is expected to stay this summer, having already rejected overtures from City and Liverpool. He knows he would not be being bought to go straight into the first team, so is happy to stay at Porto. If he impresses during the season, do not be surprised to see someone pick him up and loan him out for a season or two, as that was one of the possibilities put forward.}

20 Jun 2015 16:54:17
Might get slated for this, but seen today that both city and Chelsea are tracking Alex song and couldn't help but think why aren't we in for him? I'm not saying he'd be the answer to all our midfield problems but he'd add quality and depth to our squad. He's only 27 even though it seems like he's been around forever and barca supposedly only looking 5mil for him.

Believable0 Unbelievable6

20 Jun 2015 17:27:28
Chelsea are signing him to replace mikel which tells you all you need to know about the quality of him.

Agree2 Disagree1

20 Jun 2015 17:26:30
Who says they are? The internet fabricazzi (new word coined right here and now) could interpret my grandmother's eructations as a corroborative sign we're in for someone.

In any event, if he ain't good enough for Barcelona he certainly ain't good enough for us!

Agree3 Disagree2

20 Jun 2015 18:14:12
We should have signed him 2 seasons ago, he has a great connection/understanding with RVP and he would have been like two signings. Now it wouldn't be half as valuable as RVP is finished for me.

Agree0 Disagree2

20 Jun 2015 18:17:43
Wayne rooney wouldn't be good enough for Barcelona and he's arguably our best player, also seem to remember a young man named yaya toure who was deemed not good enough for them, don't know what ever happened to him :-/

Agree5 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 18:39:55
I think its because he's home grown that's probably the only reason why.

Agree2 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 20:12:59
Didn't any of you think Song performed well at West Ham? Being a Chelsea fan I'd be pleased with him as midfield depth. I however doubt the validity of the report.

Agree3 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 20:49:53
Yes, Yaya Toure has been great at City within the EPL, but what have they won in Europe? And in comparison, since he left, what have Barcelona won?

I was being a little facetious in my response. Song is a good player but to my mind his opportunity to really excel has been and gone. His first half if the season at West Ham was excellent but it tailed off somewhat, and as Beast notes he did have a good understanding with RVP but that isn't going to happen again. At this point in time his future at any big club is as a squad player.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 22:30:06
Meh

He's ok as a Dm but a bit too lazy at the top level. He's ok at b2b but not that creative and doesn't stand out, which is why Arsenal were happy to see him go. A decent squad player perhaps but we should be looking to improve our starting 11 rather than finding decent squad players.

Apparently he counts as homegrown which is why Chelsea/city will see him as a useful signing.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 22:36:19
Jackson - Yes he did well for West Ham and dominated some games, but he would only really be a squad player for any team looking to do well in Europe or win the league. He is too much of a liability now for an LVG possession based game

I think people underestimate how many chances he created for RVP when at Arsenal, we would have seen a much better RVP and a more creative midfield had we signed him 2 years ago. Now RVP is virtually finished he would be another squad player and Utd need world class starters desperately, we are full of 6/7 out of 10's - we need our Matic or Fabregas (first half of the season).

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 22:54:33
Beast, yes they did do well together for a while but I'm not sure I agree that 2 players can be made for each other in some magical sense. It's probably a case of things clicking at a particular moment or just good coaching, surely a player better than Song would be more effective given the right coaching and system. Just because they had a good season or two together doesn't make it some kind of magical relationship that cannot be replicated with other player(s).

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jun 2015 08:26:10
I agree that a top club shouldn't bring him in to be an instant starter. But as midfield depth I felt he is an interesting player. He has experience at the top level, he probably won't be expensive and is still only 27 I think. So as back up, that's pretty good IMO.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he wants something like 100k a week, he doesn't track back and thinks he is some kind of superplayer. I would suggest steering well clear.}

21 Jun 2015 15:29:41
Really, Ed?? 100k is a little over the top. Guys like Matic and Oscar don't even get that. I still think playing wise he'd be a good addition but those wages are indeed high.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 10:33:11
It looks like ottamendi is really pushing for a deal. I would of personally preferred hummels but this guy wants to play for united so I've changed my mind.

Also anyone catch any of the u20s did periera and milinkovic have good tournaments.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

20 Jun 2015 14:15:15
I don't know what happened there but here's the video again, sorry to whoever's post has went MIA.

Agree3 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 14:01:14
Cheers ed

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - (yes)

20 Jun 2015 10:21:35
Seen Pereira's goal in the u20 final?!

Believable1 Unbelievable0

20 Jun 2015 07:46:32
If you get a chance check out Pereira's goal in the u20 world cup final. Brilliant stuff, very pleased we got his contract sorted.

Believable5 Unbelievable0

20 Jun 2015 08:03:36
On in the 65th, scored in the 73rd , and playing great. A very good player.

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 08:31:34
Very good goal

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 09:37:56
Best part, this is biggest stage he's played in and he did that

Agree2 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 13:18:16
Amazing player in the making. We need to nurture him properly so he can break in the team within the next few years.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 14:09:10
Singh I agree.

Serious question to all, with that being the case and having just signed Depay and needing to find playing time for Adnan too - should we even be considering Firminio?

Agree2 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 14:19:47
Nothing wrong with adding a bit more quality in depth, think adnan might be out on loan anyway

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 15:43:59
Maybe you're right. But we also have Mata, Young and Fellaini who like to occupy similar positions too. I just hope Pereira and Adnan don't get blocked and get opportunities at the right time. They both have big potential.

Agree4 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 18:14:38
It wouldn't be so much of o a problem in signing Firmino. Pereira is still very young and is around 3 years away from breaking into the first team.

We should only really be buying firmino if we are getting rid of few attackers.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 20:48:46
Fair question Honey Badger. I think our center mid priorities would be more of the #6 and #8 role than a player like Firmino.

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Jun 2015 22:57:17
That's what I'm thinking zidaniel, perhaps a Vidal or Sneiderlin (no. 8) or a quality no. 6 to compete with Carrick is more what we need. These youngsters need chances otherwise we'll be moaning about how we wasted their development again in a fe seasons time.

Agree1 Disagree0