Manchester United Banter Archive October 22 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


22 Oct 2014 22:04:44
I have to say that I think Isco is one of the most "wasted" talents in the world. Sublime and fantastic, would do excellently well in any other team with "limited" resources. I really rate the kid and IMO he is better than James Rodriguez. Madrid look like a juggernaut again

Deeps.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

23 Oct 2014 00:35:11
Completely agree, him, Kroos & Benzema were the best players on the pitch

Agree0 Disagree0

Only madrid would go and buy james for mega money when they had a player like isco .

Agree0 Disagree0

Isco is top class, when you think they had Bale missing as well - crazy.

Liverpool need to start worrying, one injury to Sterling and they could be in free fall. They look so slow this season.

Agree3 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 21:02:58
Is Nick Powell injured?

I see he hasn't featured for Leicester even as a substitute.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

22 Oct 2014 21:52:27
Pearson is playing him in the balotelli role (non existent) which mean he can still use another 11 players on the pitch as well.

Agree1 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 20:46:12
I'm thinking we all need to give Beast a break here. He's a regular poster although lately he's become a bit of a negative Nellie (no offence mate). However, everyone is entitled to their view and an opposite view is not necessarily a wrong view. He's not offensive like certain other now departed posters and I enjoy his different view. This is about debate, argument, and banter. Beast may be right, he's probably wrong, but how view is as valid as anyone else's. Keep posting mate, I for one will miss you if you take a break.

Believable3 Unbelievable7

Until the last couple of days the site has been very quite.
I can see the point beast is trying to make about lvg i just don't agree with sacking a manager after 8 games

Agree2 Disagree0

Me neither Jred, but many posters just call him names and don't even consider if he has a point, which he does.

Agree1 Disagree1

Thanks AJH. I appreciate the debate and realise my topic was extreme, but its important to be able to see things from different perspectives.

I hope my views are not automatically discounted moving forward just because this one is so controversial.

Agree4 Disagree1

Beast, I don't agree but I get your point. 8 games is too early to reach an opinion for me but I have an open mind. I love LVG, always have, but we need to see progress and improvement. Despite only drawing, I thought we looked much better against West Brom. If we can tighten up the defence we have every chance of delivering the top 4

Agree2 Disagree0

I have disagreed a lot with Beast about our Wayne and sometimes not used very polite language, but I completely agree with Tony - It's his view and he is not abusive, he is entitled to it. Calling names and ganging up defeats the purpose of banter. I was guilty of it in the past and it's plain wrong. I don't agree with his latest view of LVG being the biggest problem, but some of his points are debateable if not correct.

Deeps.

Agree1 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 22:05:51
I've refrained from posting the last two days. But for me the point is you've been negative on lvg from day one. Now I don't know if that's disappointment your own personal choice didn't get the job or whatever. But is seems you fail to appreciate the size of the task at hand or what has been accomplished so far.

Agree3 Disagree0

I tend to agree with the chap on most things and to an extent I agree that LVG's performance as Manchester United manager just simply hasn't been good enough. I'm still some way away from calling for his head - but can't stand the hypocrisy from others on here given how quick they were to jump down Moyes' throat. LVG's start has been equally calamitous as Moyes' despite having spent a considerable amount of money 'improving' the squad and yet most people seem to be defending him against even the slightest bit of criticism. Given the fixture list and the money invested in the squad we should be on 22 or 24 points (we've played 6 of the bottom 8, West Ham and Swansea). Looking further ahead at the fixture list and judging by the way we're playing I can see us being on 31 after 19 - and if that's the case I think the club will have to seriously start considering whether LVG is the right man for the job.

Agree1 Disagree1

22 Oct 2014 17:58:39
Question is can beast get to 50 before the night finishes 😜

Believable2 Unbelievable0

I knew I was on a hiding to nothing, but the simple truth is that the history of mankind has made a habit of ridiculing and mocking visionaries who are prepared to break with convention, only then for those visionaries to be seen as true greats ahead of their time at a future point. smiley face thing.

LVG is a disaster for our club.

Beast out.

Agree0 Disagree10

Beast

Moyes was a disaster from day one, LvG is not and not by a long way.

LvG is undertaking a transition of playing staff and style. Frankly calling for his head at this stage when he can demonstrate a CV that confirms his ability to do the job is beyond belief.
Your call for SAF to come back is reminiscent of Busbys return and that prompted a long term disaster, however the difference is that now we have a manager whose experience confirms we must trust him to undertake a difficult transition.
I can only guess you are very young

Agree3 Disagree0

If you where to give an un biased opinion i think it would be fair to say that so far lvg hasn't been any better than moyes.

Woody has improved tho

Agree1 Disagree1

At the risk of being contentious, LVG has 1 more point than Moyes at this stage having played Burnley, Leicester, QPR, West Brom and so on. Let's also bear in mind that DM did not have Herrera! Falcao! Blind, Di Mari! Rojo.

I'm not by any means saying Beast is right but to dismiss him the way you all have is unfair. Let's see how the season pans out before dissing him.

Agree1 Disagree0

Red Man - the truth is SAF's time was up 2009. I just think if we sacked LVG (which won't happen yet I agree), he would be a logical interim manager to get us back on the right track whilst a more suitable long term replacement is found. A lot of people were asking what I would do, so that would be my call.

I am just not believing in LVG. Its fair enough for me to have that view considering how we have played and what he has done so far. Granted continually changing management is a recipe for disaster however that doesn't mean you should not make a change if it isn't working. It is possible to pick two wrong managers in a row.

I just don't see the progress many people feel is shaping up, I don't believe in his long term plan as it keeps changing short term. I see the same sort of performances we have been seeing for the past 12 months, with the exception of ADM making a bit of a difference, any manager could have ADM making a difference.

Being called a child by every man and his dog for wanting to be ruthless is frustrating me, it would take a real man to sack LVG now, but I truly believe it will be for our long term benefit. Where can I voice that if not on this website?

I accept other peoples opinions differ from my own, but that doesn't mean I think they are insane or childish or anything else - just they see things differently and voice their views on a forum for supporters of the team as a whole.

For the record I am in my mid 30's and have been relatively successful in business. Not a flippant short termest juvenile who has no clue how the real world works.

Football is different I understand that, but I know what I like and I don't like LVG, he is old school and we need a different approach in my view.

Lets see what happens, but its horrible for me now because I want us to win every game but I really don't like our leader or agree with his methods.

Agree0 Disagree2

Jred

I can give an unbiased opinion on LvG because he wasn't my first choice so I am supporting him because I can see what he is doing not through blind loyalty. I am surprised there are a few who on here who cannot see what LvG is trying to accomplish and somehow try to compare him to last seasons useless incumbent who didn't have the vision and someone who many revere on here, SAF, has said the club was too big for.

Agree1 Disagree0

Redman
What has lvg done .
Where would we be with out di maria .

We have bought well and with falcao, di maria rooney rvp our attacking has looked better, not great tho.

I think lvg has a better squad than moyes but so far i don't think we are playing well.

If you where to judge moyes and lvg after 8 games i would say they have both been as bad as each other.
Lvg has a bigger name tho so seems to get more slack .

Agree0 Disagree4

Beast

LvG wasn't my first choice but given his CV he deserves time. I respect you don't like him but I feel I can see he is trying to change the club following 26 years of old school control and one year of mess. For me the transition wasn't started last season but in fact this one and it will take time.
I think LvG's Achillies heel maybe RVP but I will go along with what he is trying to do having seen chaos in the early seventies with inexperienced managers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred

Nothing to do with LvG having a bigger name and all to do with the fact he has a Cv that confirms he knows his stuff unlike Moyes after 1, 3, 8 or any number of games.

Agree0 Disagree0

Redman
Lvg has an ok cv 4 titles in the last 20 year my worry would be that he got the sack at munich in under 2 year and his last spell at barce he was gone by the january 3 points of relegation.
I think he will do ok at united as we will throw a lot of money at the team but lime i said when he first came i don't think he is a great manager.

Agree0 Disagree1

Jred

LvG is like a short term turn round director, he has come in to do the tough decision making, to transition the team and put new foundations in. The next manager is who we should think about in approximately 2 years when we are better set.

I posted the other day about an article in Manchesters local paper about how we should be working on the next manager now and not in 2 years. LvG is unlikely to be the long term option and I am interested in the next incumbent in due course and that is one reason why I am not getting too uptight on LvG

Agree0 Disagree0

Possible reasons for sticking to LvG:
Maybe we believe i LvG's philosophy?
Maybe we know "Rome wasn't built in a day" after all LvG didn't 'inherit' the defending champs.
Maybe we can see a bright future after a humble beginning.
Maybe this is the phoenix story.
Maybe we know that LvG has poor starts at new clubs.

Agree0 Disagree2

mbd              

22 Oct 2014 17:58:08
It seems like blaming Fergie is not over yet. Greatest manager of all times, rebuilt our club and restored it's pride, got us unrivaled success and had a major hand in carrying us to the top of world football, both as a club, team and franchise and yet we still find a way to blame him for our current predicament, like he has not done enough.

Appointing Moyes was a massive bargain. But it could have gone both ways. he could have carried on Fergie's era, or he could have destroyed it. And SAF put him on the right way to do just so.

He got the fans and the older players to back him before he even started despite the doubts. He lined up transfer targets that would have solved most of our deficiencies, he left us with a good blend of youth, experience, and quality. We had a solid coaching staff who the players were comfortable with and who knew what it takes to guide the team.

1-RVP, Carrick and Vidic are 3 leaders in their respective positions. Rio and Evra also had unrivaled experience and pull in the dressing room, and yet Moyes managed to alienate the lot of them, and turn them against him.

2-Mike Phelan was a tactical disaster as it seemed, but he had a part to play in Ferguson's plan. He took care of the day to day work, the planing, the schedule and the inner player resources and he knew what he was doing.
Rene Meulesnteen is widely known to be our tactical planner. he knew the modern games, understood the tactics, took care of the formations, explained to the players exactly what needed to be done, and where it will lead.
In his later years, Fergie began counting more and more on his staff, and they got the job done. Moyes did not want any of it, and his micro management style just showed that it is impossible to take care of so many aspects, and he ended up not having anyone to count on.

3- targets, we had Strootman, Herrera and Garay planned up. Rodriguez, Benatia and Thiago were realistic targets. Yet Moyes did not attempt to get any of them. Imagine Strootman instead of Fellaini, Tiago instead of Blind, Garay and Benatia leading the defense, Rodriguez instead of Mata and our season would have looked a whole lot better. Instead Moyes was hell bent on getting Fabregas and Bale, and we ended up with swat.

4- youth: Jones, Powell, Zaha, Januzaj, Wilson, Smalling, Welbeck, Kagawa, Rafael, what more could a manager ask for? An aging squad my arse.

Fact is so many changes last year affected the player. If it would have been done gradually, it might have been easier. Moyes was always a pragmatic manager, and the pragmatic thinking to do would have been to approach the style in a way the player were used to and yet he didnt. He tried too much too soon and it backfired.

Had he stuck with Fergie's formula, and did what was planned, we would have been better off, and he might still have a job. But he didnt, he went against everything Ferguson had asked of him, and he paid the price. Unfortunately, so did we.

Fergie planned for Moyes' tenure, prepared for it, and Dave was in all likelihood appointed because he would follow the plan in a way the likes of Guardiola and Mourinho would not. But dear Davey tried to be one of the likes of Guardiola and Mourinho. How can Fergie be blamed?

Everything we have been going through this season is because of that. The team's confidence was shot down, the player are frustrated and learning a whole new different set of tactics and philosophy under different managers and trainers with different team mates might be harder than some of you expect.

We are still paying the price of last years disaster

Believable6 Unbelievable1

22 Oct 2014 18:04:34
Great post Mick, u have been missed while not posting as much mate.

Agree 100% with most.

Agree2 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 18:06:57
Always enjoy your very level headed, down to earth posts Mick and this one was no different. Well put mate.

Agree1 Disagree0

I was thinking that way myself Mick foundations were put in by the specialist but a cheap builder was bought to do the house and shabby workmanship was done now an expert is in and an awful lot of has been and will have to be spent

Agree0 Disagree0

Mick, you're a top poster and I usually agree with and respect your views, but SAF has to take some responsibility here. Yes, he's the greatest manager ver but in his later years he wring the best out of a squad that was. Ageing and had some holes. At CB Rio and Vidic were ageing and Jones and Smalling are still yet to convince. More worryingly, we are lacking in CM yet we continued to sign players in other positions. Pogba could have filled that gap but for whatever reason we lost him for nothing. His treatment of Rooney was odd, I would have been happy for him to go but we ended up caught between 2 stools.

Moyes made huge mistakes, back room staff, transfer targets, tactics, but let's not ignore the deficiencies we had.

Agree0 Disagree2

I would agree with ajh on this imo the team that won the title had peaked .
We have spent 250 mill since then and still need a cb or 2, a cm and a rb

Agree0 Disagree0

Mick

I have to say your post is completely unbalanced and quite Naive. Fergie bought rubbish for 5 years and got every inch of value from the likes of vidic, evra, ferdinand, giggs, scholes, rooney to win.

He left a very poor and ageing team team behind and you concept of this and that player was in and Moyes did not follow true is quiet naive mate.

Our players not performing has nothing to do with last year but more about some are not good enough and also struggling to adapt to the new system.

Strootman is rubbish and i don't know where you suddenly think he would have been the saviour. He is good enough for italian football and watching the football in Europe it is quite clear it is a league for players to see out their careers or so so players from the PL, Germany or Spain league.

Thiago was always Bayern Munich bound and I would argue that yes we missed out on Garay but LVG this time also passed on him, he also passed on Benatia and a few other defenders, so where is your indept analysis of those decisions.

Finally some of youth players will never be good enough and gone in 2 or 3 years or even sooner.

Agree1 Disagree1

Shahram - Hope you are doing fine mate! As usual, I completely agree with your post and very well written.

I agree with Tony and Jred as well.

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi Deeps

I am up to me neck with work at the moment and travel and try and get a few minutes in to read the board but lately been difficult.

I still maintain the start of the season given what we have spent and who we have played has been calamitous.

I don't understand people defending it as the previous manager was crucified for a fraction of what we are seeing.

The only reason we don't have a full scale riot on our hands is other teams like Arsenal and Liverpool have also dropped points. Imagine if they had there start like last year where we would be. The difference is I can see us potentially being 6 or 7 points behind them after the next 2 games from 4th place and even the likes of Everton also going by us and I wonder how understanding the fan base would be then.

Agree1 Disagree2

22 Oct 2014 10:13:22
Hi guys, I hope you don't mind me visiting the page with a question.
Regarding Di Maria, is he injured or what's his situation? Unlike some other people, I'm actually worried about your team. And that's due in large part to ADM.
Our own situation doesn't look so rosy at the moment. Costa injured and Remy as well. Most likely you're going to go up against Drogba leading the line at the weekend. Probably a most welcome sight for you guys ;-)
With Azpi suspended and Mikel, Ramires and perhaps even Schurrle all in some sort of doubt, this is a great time to play us.

So was just wondering whether one of you had any knowledge regarding the Di Maria situation.

Cheers lads

Believable0 Unbelievable0

22 Oct 2014 13:22:57
I expect costa to make a miraculous recovery in time for the game.

Agree6 Disagree0

SomehowI doubt that. It's just too good an opportunity to let him rest for a couple of weeks now and allow him to finally fully recover. After playing you guys there's Swindon, QPR and then Maribor before we play Liverpool. Apart from the game on Sunday, we should be fine without him up until Liverpool.
So for the greater good, I think he'll sit out.

Agree0 Disagree2

22 Oct 2014 15:33:57
Hello mate, I think for that reason he will play, be can be rested for those games after. Trust me Costa will play.
I expect ADM will play too.

Agree2 Disagree0

I agree with Chris completely! ADM and DC19 will both feature.

Agree1 Disagree0

mbd              

It'd be awesome if both of them could play. Sure it would be harder for both teams to win, but it's always more fun to play a team when they're at least close to full strength.
Well of course I hope Chelsea gets the win, I also hope it's a good game to watch. I'm sure your boys are going to hold up their end of the deal when it comes to attacking football.
With the talent both teams have, it should make for a good one.
Cheers guys

Agree2 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 17:50:43
Lets hope so Jackson mate.

Agree1 Disagree0

Costa will play because he has the strenght to beat our centre backs pace wont

Agree0 Disagree0

MrE

Totally agree, costa will play and not a sign of an injury and don't really believe that he is injured.

Agree1 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 08:21:43
Interesting to read SAF's comments this morning, oh how defensive he seems. I'm sorry but he has to be held somewhat accountable for last seasons misery, he can say all he wants about the squad being fine but to liken it to Chelsea of this season? Come on Alex. I have all the respect for the man in the world but at this rate he'll end up just as bad as Keane.

Believable7 Unbelievable2

22 Oct 2014 10:57:56
How you can even contemplate fergie has done any harm to united is beyond me we won the league by eleven points with a side that was suppose to be old . Chelsea had an old squad the season moyes took over. In my opinion. The other thing that fergie probably did not expect was for moyes to get rid of the coaches so quick he should of at least of given it a season . I think he wanted to do it his way to quick. But what do I know.

Agree4 Disagree4

22 Oct 2014 13:13:06
You joking right? Like he hadn't done enough for the club already? You take what he did for granted it was going to be difficult for any manager taking over from him because the club would have been set in it's ways about how it operates. Moyes' made a meal of it, by the sound of it not many of the players took a liking to him and there's also the fact he didn't strengthen the squad which is arguably Woodwards fault. So there are a lot of people to blame before a manager who kept us at the top throughout two decades.

Agree2 Disagree1

So no one can ever criticise SAF? He blatantly neglected the midfield for years, his refusal to look for a replacement for Keane and Scholes was stupid, we had a perfect replacement in our own ranks and we chose to bring Scholes out of retirement and play a right back center mid.

I absolutely adore the man and I was there for his last game, but I won't let myself be blinded by him. Everyone has their flaws and SAF's were his stubbornness and ill temperament, which probably actually contributed to his greatness, but still guys you have to admit you're being a tad bias?

Agree1 Disagree2

22 Oct 2014 15:37:06
Thing is anon he won the league with the team he left so u would he feel he left a inadequate squad?

Agree2 Disagree0

Pogba was always going to leave United whether we played him in that game against Blackburn or not. He wasn't played because he wouldn't sign a contract so others where picked ahead of him.

Agree1 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 15:46:41
You can criticise him for the Pogba situation. He did try bring in midfielders such as Thiago but that can't exactly be his fault considering he has nothing to do with transfer dealings and how do you know he was given as much support (financially) from the Glazers as LVG has received recently considering we were in a decent position before whereas now the Glazers realise they'll have to invest to keep us at the top otherwise basically the value of our club will drop.

Don't understand why you said at this rate he'll be just as bad as Keane, not really the same is it if he's defending himself as opposed to bitterly attacking someone for something that happened years ago.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 15:54:02
You say neglected the midfield but it's not about signing big names or spending lots of money, it's about winning championships which is what he continued to do. That's what separates the good managers from the great. Like Chris said he won the league with basically the same squad as what Moyes had, expect Moyes had the addition of Fellaini. Do you really think if he was still in charge then we would have finished 7th?

Agree1 Disagree0

Moyes didn't have a fit committed rvp, fergy did that was a massive difference .
But winning the league with that team was one of fergys biggest achievements

Agree0 Disagree0

No Ozwald, but that's not what I'm saying, I said "somewhat accountable", he probably would have finished 2nd/3rd, as he's a world class manager, moyes simply wasn't.

Agree0 Disagree0

He didn't neglect the midfield, he tried for year to find suitable replacements, Djemba, Liam Miller, Veron, Ando, Fletch, Hargreaves, Carrick, Alam Smith even. Promoted Gibson and Cleverly and brough in Powell. He did try to get Essien and even got Mikel in a way.

Agree0 Disagree0

mbd              

22 Oct 2014 18:09:56
I'm sorry Anon but I just see no logic in laying blame on SAF after all he's done.

Agree1 Disagree0

Ozwald

No one is blaming fergie but he left poor ageing team behind and compounded that by buying poorly window after window in his final years and that is a fact mate and I would love to hear how how anyone can dispute the purchases of Young, Zaha, Nani, Anderson, Smalling, Jones, Bebe, given what we paid as good transfer business.

Agree0 Disagree0

RvP and DdG weren't poor signings. Nor were Chicharito or Even Kagawa.

Agree0 Disagree0

mbd              

23 Oct 2014 17:52:57
Yes he made some bad ones, but like MBD said RvP? DvG, Chicharito and arguably Kagawa. You say he left an ageing squad, he also left a lot of very promising young players, you could even say it was a very well balanced squad with the need for a couple of world class additions which obviously he wouldn't bring in whilst retiring.

He had some bad luck with transfers in his latter years but name me one manager where all 100% of his transfers have been successful?

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Oct 2014 03:39:20
Been a while since i posted, been busy but seen some really shocking posts in the last couple of days.

1. Thoughts on the game - We controlled the game well, had lots of possession, didn't take our chances and were not up to scratch in the final third. To me, the biggest problem wasn't the defending but the front two. Van Persie simply didn't hold the ball enough, didn't bring others into the game, and Mata was second to every other ball and slowed us down. No wonder that it improved after Fellaini came on.

2. Mata - Did virtually nothing all game, and is very slow, doesn't release the ball quick enough, hasn't got the punch to chase down some balls that will start off counter attacks or the knockdowns from the striker, hence we never win the second ball after a header since it almost always falls to him due to the position in which he plays.

Very easily knocked off the ball. We missed Rooney badly. My guess would be that Mata will be sold, perhaps in part exchange for someone like Vidal.

3. Van Persie - Was average in his overall game last year and has gone shockingly backwards this year. Looks uninterested, is very lethargic and seems to be feeling the effect of age. Didn't do anything that is expected of a lone striker, neither did he make clever runs, nor did he hold up the ball well or finish. The two chances he had in the first half would have been in the back of the net in his first season. Seems to have lost that swagger and nastiness that he had which made him get stuck in.

Falcao needs to start the next game. He is as good a finisher as RVP and offers much more up front and chases down defenders.

4. Defense

Jones - It was his first game back after injury, give him a break! Yes he made an error, but the defense should function as a unit and due to injuries that is simply not happening. We need an injury free run and the defense will sort itself out.

Shaw - Positioning is a concern, but he will learn. He was excellent last year and needs time to settle.

Rafael - Was very good, a few little unlucky headers went to WBA players but has been very consistent overall. A big improvement from last year.

Rojo - Was excellent at left back, but his positioning and heading ability at center back is a serious concern. Does have the pace to cover for it though and is good in the tackle.

Overall the whole defense needs a consistent run of games together.

5. Di Maria - Has been our best player going forward, but fitness is a concern and looks completely drained out after 70 mins every game. Needs to manage his energy levels better.

6. Blind - Can't believe he is being criticized for his defensive ability. He has done a great job shielding the defense imo. The problem wasn't him but that Herrera was poor and he had to cover for him as well constantly. Also given that we were chasing the game, it was clear he was instructed to quicken the tempo and press forward.

He has been our best player so far, should have been our first signing to be honest! Great composure on the ball, and has brought that much needed calmness to our game and is always an option and an outlet for the defenders. We control games, largely because of him.

What he needs is a partner in crime. Vidal would have been perfect, but even the return of Carrick could see us play a good counter attacking game with two sitting midfielders controlling the game. We have the quality up front now in Falcao, Rooney will get a lot more space to play in with two sitting midfielders and can cover a lot of ground with his energy and in Di Maria and Januzaj we have genuine pace out wide.

7. Fellaini - Where did that come from! Couldn't do any wrong since coming on! It was almost as if a tree of Narnia had woken up! Made a great impact, suddenly the ball stuck up front and our midfielders, full backs and wingers got into the game more.

8. On Van Gaal - He has improved our style of play, but to me that had to happen with the players we have bought. If Moyes had Di Maria, Falcao, Blind, Herrera, Shaw, Rojo we would have played a similar style imo. But still credit where its due, the style has improved and we control possession better. Some are clearly biased against him, some in favor of him, but if he was to be judged by the same scrutiny Moyes was judged by, then he has not done a much better job imo, but any new manager creating a new team needs time, more than a year in fact.

He started off with the vision of a 3 at the back, wanting to get the best out of the front 3 but its clear that RVP and Mata are off the pace and we don't have the center backs to play that style. He has changed it and its worked. I think the tactics against WBA were a pre cursor to what he will be trying to implement against Chelsea and beyond.

I think the diamond works for us going forward, but does leave a huge gap in the middle of the pitch, leaving Blind isolated and exposed when defending and Di Maria and Herrera have to cover far too much ground, especially since Mata doesn't chase back and that in turn exposes the defense, especially in the last half an hour when the legs are tired. I think now we can all see why Sir Alex persisted with a 4-4-2 or a 4-4-1-1, its a simple and fluid system and manages the energy of players better and it always allowed us to get better towards the end of the game.

In the long term can see Van Gaal playing a 4-3-3 after buying another midfielder and center back.

Believable7 Unbelievable0

Interesting analysis, good read!

Agree0 Disagree0

mbd