Manchester United Banter Archive February 24 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


24 Feb 2014 21:28:53
Just a thought, but would any of you agree that United's whole set up during the late SAF years was geared to a disappearing world? Not only have we not not been developing young players with the technical skills to thrive at top European clubs, we have rarely been able to acquire anyone with them, and if we have they tend not to have prospered because they did not fit in to Fergie's wing based approach. A great coach the man undoubtedly was, but it is hard to teach an old dog new tricks.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Januzaj, Pogba, Rossi, Morrison, Daehli are some of the world class talents we've produced/ acquired from a young age.

Other talented individuals doing well for themselves either in our team or in other/ lower levels : James, Drinkwater, Brady, Eikrem, Pique, Evans, Norwood, Cleverley, Welbeck, Shawcross.

Powell, Rafael, Fabio, Jones, De Gea, Zaha ad others are players we managed to get at a young age.

I'm not sure what the academy is supposed to do in your opinion. Produce a couple of Scholes' per year?

We always have produced fine, fine talents quite consistently. Pogba is one of the top young players in the world, but he chose to leave. Morrison is the most talented individual to come out of this country since Scholes, but he had a hard life and could not adapt. Daehli is a magnificent young player, and so is Januzaj. Rossi nearly reached world class status at Villareal, his price tag the only thing stopping Barcelona from getting him. Petrucci was one of the most talented players in his age group, and Roma fans were gutted to lose their " next Totti ". We beat lots of competition to get Henriquez, Powell and Zaha, and they have yet to be given time.

Sean Goss and James Wilson are 2 of the finest talents in the country in their age group.

Point is, we keep producing young talented players. Some will leave ( Pogba, Pique, Daehli, Rossi ) despite our efforts to keep them. Some will get injured and never reach their otential ( Eikrem, Petrucci ) some will struggle in their life ( Morrison ) and some are just not good enough, despite being very talented ( Shawcoss, James, Brady. ).

Having 5 academy lads in the team is pretty darn good, especially with our recent luck ( it could have easily been 10 with Daehli, Morrison, Pogba and co staying ). They are all internationals ( apart form Januzaj, and that's too complicated ). I see we're doing a good job for ourselves.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think yes and no! No because he kept a winning team throughout his reign which had lots of change in cycles in European futy by adapting styles of play and changing personnel! But yes because I think he didn't have it in him to take on board another shift in European change in style he seemed to concentrate on grinding the prem rivals down and winning leagues so a few of our young talents got cast aside? I just think if he was 10 years younger he would of gone again and built another dominant side? Whatever the man did or does he will never be bettered!

Agree0 Disagree0

The problem was that for one reason or another he didn't replace the players from the 2008 team that left. Ronaldo & Tevez were huge losses, we never replaced Hargreaves who was a vital player for us and Anderson had a brilliant season. Of course then we had Scholes too. Nani also played well and Giggs was younger. He didn't replace the players with sufficient quality, Valencia to take Ronaldo's position was a huge down grade for example.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mick, it's all a question of personal opinion, but I think the list you produced makes my point entirely. The best ones are gone, and the rest are not top quality players.

Scholes, Giggs, Nevilles, Butt, Beckham etc they are not - any of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 21:22:56
Hi Guys

Having watched the Arsenal - Bayern Munich game last week I can't help thinking that Toni Kroos is a must buy.It wasn't just his excellent passing and his ability to score a great goal but his ability to control the tempo with vision and technique.I can't help thinking he could be our modern day Paul Scholes.
Toni Kroos and 3 other similarly talented players added to the quality we already have and we will be a force again next season

Believable0 Unbelievable0

It is worth noting, that the German tv commentators
and the tv pundits on German Sky TV Ribbery, Beckenbauer et al. All of them said Kroos played his best match in ages, much better than his recent form. All my colleagues were of the same opinion that Kroos played an absolute blinder against Arsenal, and they've watched him for a number of years. So it could be that Kroos runs a bit hot and cold, hence his irregular starts for Bayern

Agree0 Disagree0

I just see him signing a new deal just before or just after the WC. Players like him are hard to get to leave the club, look at Schweinsteiger - been linked with us, Chelsea and Madrid plenty but he is still there.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Feb 2014 10:25:52
You guys are unbelievable with who you'll drool over next, pitiful to be honest.

Where was this Tony Kroos guy when Arsenal were giving them a roasting to start with or did he wait until it turned into a practice match before he showed up with all this ability.

Jesus we could do that you to and Arsenal if you only had ten men. What would he have done if it had stayed 11 v 11.

But don't let reality get in the way of any thing on here as usual.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wallace,

A Chelsea fan on a united site talking about a bayern Munich player. Haven't you got a premier league title race that your manager thinks you aren't good enough to win to be worrying about?

Are you actually saying that kroos isn't a good player? I agree that basing an opinion of a player on one game is ridiculous and happens way too often on this site, but kroos has been on the radar of a lot of fans on here a long time before the arsenal match. He probably isn't going to sign for us, but he's of the quality that we are looking to sign to rebuild our squad.

Agree0 Disagree0

So your saying kroos would have been walked over for the whole 90mins if it was 11v11? the reality of that comment is that its a complete guess because no-one will ever know so your comment isn't really very useful, thanks for trying though.

Agree0 Disagree0

So who do you prefer Kroos or Carrick I know who i'd choose

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 19:22:16
What do people think about Jan Vertonghan? Would they be happy with him coming in?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Didn't his agent say he wanted champons league?

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd love him to join as he is a great player but in his recent interview he's only considering leaving Tottenham if they don't get champions league football which is looking like something we may not be able to offer for the next 1-2 seasons, then again the lure of playing for our club may tempt him but I highly doubt it.

Agree0 Disagree0

He reminds me of Jagielka slightly. Can also fill in at LB so wouldn't be surprised if Moyes was interested.

Agree0 Disagree0

As a utility man, yes, but not as a first team starter. If we had already got a new first team left back and centre back in the team already and were looking for squad additions then he would be the one I'd like us to go for - but I don't think he is what is needed.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes he would be a great signing but would cost a bomb and Tottenham will sell abroad rather than to us, and there will be no end of clubs in for him if he came on the market but would be very good for us indeed

Agree0 Disagree0

Not for me.I would prefer someone like Mangala or Varane

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Feb 2014 00:10:52
Jan Vertonghen if made available would be my first choice CB, was very impressed when he played against us for Ajax and his ability to play the ball from the back was great and something we could seriously do
He's one of the best CBs in the PL IMO because o can't think of an area that he lacks in as far as defenders are concerned apart from maybe pace. Of course he'd be difficult with Spurs reluctant to sell but I've heard on the grapevine that he's a united fan and that alone is a reason to sign him IMO. I think he's a top player and would be a fantastic addition to our squad

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 19:06:49
Hi guys, have been reading all the posts and I think a few of you have been very unfair towards Fellaini, yes I admit he has started slowly at United but he did come with no preseason and got injured and played through injury when required, in my own opinion he has'ent done as badly as others make out and gives orthers the licence to get forward, and by not surpporting him and calling him WIG give me the impression that some on here are not true United supporters . I for one have seen the bad times at United far worse then they are today, I think Moyes was given an impossible job and Fergie knew it and passed on the batton, leaving behind him an injury ravished aging squad behind him for Moyse to rebuild. John the big fisherman

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Depends what you think is a " true supporter" . Everyone is entitled to their opinion on a player who cost 27 mil and had been playing in the prem for the past couple of years. Mata has not had much of problem and he has only been here a month. So who do you consider true supporters? People who were also there when things were bad - when we got relegated- and have spent thousands going home and away and Europe over the years or people who never go and watch it on tv then go on forums telling people how it is. In my book if your a united then your a united fan if you go or not and entitled to an opinion but if your going to talking about who you think are true supporters because they a different opinion to you then I will split hairs too.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 20:27:50
Good post and I agree. Give the bloke a chance

Agree0 Disagree0

Pancho, Filliani did'ent set the transfer fee and Woodward/Moyes tried getting him on the cheap and it back fired. What does it matter if you go to home and away games or just watch on TV that dos'ent make you any more of a true supporter. True supporters backs there team in good times and bad that's what's wrong with some on here they no nothing but good .

Agree0 Disagree0

Pancho, much as I think Mata will prove to be a great signing, if we're being honest, he's hardly set the world alight just yet. And he was injury free.

Some people have just taken the view of him, that he's not a ' United player', and it won't matter what the fella does.

Agree0 Disagree0

Both Fellaini and Mata will offer us a great deal in the future. My concerns with Fellaini was I thought we needed a busier midfielder, but if Fellaini is going to replace Carrick and someone like Gundogan is going to replace Cleverley, then it will work pretty well. Mata will be better when we have better players behind him in defence and midfield. The same applies to Adnan, Rooney & Van Persie. We must build from the back.

Agree0 Disagree0

As I said if you read it - all united fans are ok in my book - but if you start saying people are not true supportes because they have a different opinion than you then that is wrong. I could turn round and say I was there when we got relegated and ever since. Spent loads following them and local as well . So I could argue as some do that I am more of a true supporter but I am not . I am not saying I am any better "true supporter " than anyone but you are . If people don't think he is any good that's their opinion. He had one ok game. He cost a lot of money and was an established prem player so should not be taking this length of time to settle in injuries or not. He may turn out to be great he may not. People attack wellbeck and cleverly who have not done any worse and came through the youth team and cost jack. Is that right? This is a banter page it's about opinions . It's united banter page so if we can't have a go here to get rid of frustration where can we? If I was talking to a scouser or a city fan I would be defending him but I thought I wasn't!

Agree0 Disagree0

Pancho, I don't agree with some of the abuse against Cleverley or Wellbeck either.

My own opinion, is that if they wear a Utd shirt, then I'll support them. If they're out of form, which happens to everyone at some point, they'll get dropped. They don't need the fans calling them all the names under the sun too. A bit of humourous or tongue-in-cheek mickey-taking is fine - they're big boys getting well paid. But some of the abuse is over the top.

The only time I think it's ok to have a serious go at one of our own players, is if it's blatantly obvious that the guy is not making the effort. That's inexcusable. I can always forgive poor form or silly mistakes, as long as I know the player is trying his best for the team. But I wouldn't stand for one of them insulting me as a fan, by just going through the motions.

Agree0 Disagree0

Stevie's
That's fair enough I don't agree with getting at players or booing them at fed etc. But if I don't rate someone or don't think they are good enough . Or if any other united fan feels that about a player . I think it's ok to speak amongst your mates about it or on a forum like this . If people don't agree - so what - that's opinion amongst reds! It doesn't mean your not a " true supporter " as it was put because you don't rate someone. As I said I could start throwing that about for other reasons as stated but I don't because a united fan is a united to me even if they don't go. People need to careful who they accuse of not being true fans because they don't agree with them. The banter is about debate if we all agreed it would be boring

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm in agreement with you pancho. We're all united fans and we ALL have our own opinions. So just because we are critical it doesn't mean we're bad supporters!
Roy Keane used to be critical so was Schmeichel, didn't harm the teams they played in.
Thank god we're not all of the same opinion, otherwise life will be boring.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 19:04:29
Hi guys, have been reading all the posts and I think a few of you have been very unfair towards Fellaini, yes I admit he has started slowly at United but he did come with no preseason and got injured and played through injury when required, in my own opinion he has'ent done has badly as others make out and gives orthers the licence to get forward, and by not surpporting him and calling him WIG give me the impression that some on here are not true United supporters . I for one have seen the bad times at United far worse then they are today, I for one think Moyes was given an impossible job and Fergie knew it and passed on the batton, leaving behind him an injury ravished aging squad behind him for Moyse to rebuild.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Feb 2014 14:03:19
As I posted last week its easy for clubs and players to back themselves into corners on contract negotiations. Beckenbauer on Kroos ( I know its a regurgitated old quote )"You have to make a decision as a club when someone's demands are going through the roof. There is not a single player who's worth changing your entire wage structure for, " as I understand it Kroos is not pushing, for a changing wage structure rise, just parity with Goetze/Thiago.

I wonder how many definite ( paper talk done deals) we will be linked with before June. Today alone we have Gundogan, Kroos, Song and Garay
done deals. with us going head to head with City for Mangala and interest in the younger Alcantara.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Feb 2014 12:31:56
with gundogan being out all season how will mu go about the medical if he was to sign especialy with it being his back as much as I think he is a great player we realy do not want another Hargreaves and do you guys think we should look elsewere; especialy as he is young to be starting with a problem like that and being out nearly all season thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Does anyone know what is the exact nature of his injury. Is it a disk problem or something muscular?

Agree0 Disagree0

Do not no what the problem is GCU but certain reports say they do not expect him back any time soon but

Agree0 Disagree0

Not the exact nature but has been widely reported as nerve damage.

His father has also been reported that he (son) does not have arthritis.

Buyer beware me thinks!

Agree0 Disagree0

Apparently its spinal compression, if it was just a disc or discs he'd be back by now. He was originally out for 2 weeks last April then played on and had 1 game this season only. If it was me I'd want him to have several games before even considering a move.

Agree0 Disagree0

So if he was to transfer to us do the dvb medical staff have to disclose the problem or is it our medical sstaff that have to find this out especialy with the money involved I ask this because of what happened with Hargreaves thanks

Agree0 Disagree0

Grund

A ruptured disk would fit. They are nasty and can take a long time between rehab and surgery. I had one and it knocked me out for about a year just to get back to some level of normalcy.

Agree0 Disagree0

Take as you will but I had read that he was expected to be back by the end of the season so hopefully we will get a few games out of him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lots of rumours that he has spondylolisthesis, which is quite serious I believe.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 12:16:37
There' really not too much to say when we actually win against a team in the lower half of the table, is there? It's an improvement on a loss or a draw, and against CP United did exhibit a more controlled and confident solidity in their approach to the match, but until we start to beat the teams above us again, one cannot feel too confident that a corner has been turned.

I had suggested a couple of weeks ago that the club needs to accept this season is a goner as far as CL qualification, and concentrate on losing the anxiety that's been permeating our performances, in particular at home, and starting to work on establishing the tactical strategies Moyes believes can get us back into contention in future seasons. Saturday's performance looked like that's exactly what they were working on.

The EPL landscape has changed with SAF's retirement. Under Brendan Rodgers, Liverpool may well continue to be a substantial force, and the changing financial picture at Arsenal should ensure that they too will continue to be perennial contenders, and be in the market for big signings. Getting into the top four is no longer going to be a given. With the extent of the rebuilding job we all know needs to take place, I would consider champions league qualification in 2014/15 an achievement.

On a slightly different topic, Everton look like they're going to finish up pretty much where they have every season for the last few years - 6th or 7th, but maybe with a couple of extra points. Given their financial position, can anyone really see Martinez accomplishing much more than Moyes did? Let's face it, there's a direct correlation between money spent on players and success. It's always been this way, but the extent of it now may be unprecedented.

Finally, I'm sure Pep Guardiola is a good manager, but I bet David Moyes could have won the Bundesliga inheriting that team. I'd like to see Pep go to a mediocre club and turn it around - that would show him to be a great manager.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Peashooter

Good post and agree with most of what you have said.

It is vey difficult to overcome financial restrictions over a 38 game league and eventually things catch up to you.

Managers like martinez can only be judged in 3 years time when he has build his own team at Everton and has had to manage the transition of personnel and then see where they are.

My gut says worse than today and he might be fighting for his managerial life.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 11:58:34
Have to say I was delighted when seen the team sheet on Sat it was the first time in years where I was genuinely excited about the team we were putting out.

The good news is it didn't disappoint although we weren't outstanding I thought we looked solid and completely in control. Fellaini was a breath of fresh air for me and looked a different player to the one before his lay off. I think someone energetic beside him would be a very good partnership.

The front 4 will only get better and better and I see us going on a run now and not slipping up against teams below us anymore. Teams are not going to enjoy having to face us from now on and we can get that fear factor back then roll on the summer.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

If we're not careful here, Devil, we run the very real risk of a serious outbreak of optimism on this site!

We need Boarshawred on pronto, to quell this thing before it gets out of hand.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 11:15:41
Liverpool are not slipping up, even yesterday they got over the line which is so important. We are 11 points off of them and I don't see that gap closing to less than 5 by the seasons end. I think Spurs are the ones we shall over take and get 5th. Europa League football next season is inevitable, but I can't wait for summer. The game against Palace might of shown us a new system with two number 10's and a winger than swaps sides. It worked beautifully and we kept the ball much better, yes I know it was Palace but we managed to break them down. Fellaini and Gundogan will give us a good platform to allow Rooney, RVP, Mata and Januzaj or new signing to strut their stuff.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Liverpool will leak points and have a horrendous April schedule. It is important we shave the gap and apply some pressure on them. If we can get it down to 6 points by end of march then we might be in for an interesting run in.

A win at home against them is a good place to start with.

Agree0 Disagree0

The Stoke and Fulham slip ups were catastrophic for us. They had to be MU wins. With a gap of six points and Liverpool coming to OT they would have gotten nervous. 11 points is a large enough gap to coast home. Like I said after the Fulham game, we need to look at next season now.

Agree0 Disagree0

CGU, I think that you don't rate Liverpool's chances very highly and you have said they will slip up a lot of times now, and they're not.
Rodgers has put together a very very good team, and more importantly, they are playing a high tempo, high pressing games, and they have the best strike force in the league and their midfield is playing very well. So let's give credit where credit is due, they are an excellent team and they're not going to slip.
There is more chance of Arsenal and Spurs slipping than Liverpool. I don't think our chances of beating Liverpool in the forthcoming fixture are very high to be honest. I think they will exploit our defensive frailties and unless we come up with the right tactics and flood the midfield, then I think we will lose that game.

Agree0 Disagree0

NM, Liverpool have slipped up a few times, sadly we have slipped up more and haven't taken advantage of their slip ups.

Agree0 Disagree0

NegativeMidfield you are the most optimistic person I've ever read on this site.

Agree0 Disagree0

Nomid

You are confused as I have said the same thing constantly. With our strikers back and looking like getting fit we are a different team. Liverpool have dropped points the problem is we have dropped more.

Liverpool will drop 15 points from here, the question is how many will we drop. You my friend are a classic for the grass is always greener on the other side.

Finally, we are actually a difficult team for Liverpool since we sit deeper and defend deeper. They kill teams, who are stupid enough to play high up the pitch and give suarez and sturridge all that real estate to run behind defenders.

I expect us to beat them my concern is how we perform against city as we might be on a good run and have closed the gap by the time we play them.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney

The draw against Fulham was the killer. 9 points back with potential to shave that to 6 at OT would have been just fine.

They have to play, chelsea, arsenal, city and spurs at home and given the league table they might lose three of those fixtures.

The road games will all be very tricky and anyone can beat any of the top teams. We can hope that at least we will be in with a shout come end of april and see how it goes.

Agree0 Disagree0

We played Arsenal already. We beat Arsenal 5-1

Agree0 Disagree0

GCU, I don't know if you've been in a coma lately but we've played Arsenal at home and beat them 5-1.

Agree0 Disagree0

As difficult as 11 points is there are lots of games to go and its getting towards crunch time for the teams trying to avoid relegation as much as those being in the title race. As stated by posters above we need to go on a run and apply pressure and see where we end up

Agree0 Disagree0

Plymouth Red

Yes you have and that was my mistake and your task should be even easier. I would not worry about is since you guys will just waltz into top 4 according to some here :)

Agree0 Disagree0

See how quickly the Scousers lit on you there, Shahram!

Anyone would think they spent more time looking at this site, than their own.

Surely not :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Plymouth Red

What a nice comment to make about Shahram. I applaud you sir! Such intellectual honesty to make an observation as intelligent as that.

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cgu, not confused at all, you said Liverpool will leak points and have a horrendous April schedule. You also say that Liverpool will drop 15 points from here on. I don't think either of that will happen.
Its not s matter of being half full or half empty, it is a matter of seeing what's in front of you and not being blinkered. You can believe what you want, but the truth is Liverpool are really working for their points and grinding out results. If you think they will suddenly collapse and start dropping points, then you are sadly mistaken.

Agree0 Disagree0

Nomid

Remember 33 points to play for an they will take 18 and drop 15. It actually is a nice score card to keep. I still say 73/74 points gets champion league spot.

Our Issue is very simple we win 9 and draw 2 we get in. We win 10 we get in.

We do that it does not matter what the scouters do. It is a big ask as we need to go to Everton and Newcastle and win away and they are not easy places to go to.

Barring any injuries we should give the scousers a good hiding in a few weeks.

Agree0 Disagree0

Deeps

Nice to see you too:)

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 10:35:20
There is a report we are offering Kroos 250k a week, which 3 times his current salary. First off all his current salary is about 60k a week which is peanuts but we would never go up 250k, that is for sure. Scary when guys like nani are on 90k and cleverly is on 50k.

I just shows how useless the journos are as they are taking the speculated rooney wage and whatever it might be a and soon every tom, dick and harry who is a potential target will be supposedly offered 25ok a pop. On this basis we would be broke in 2 years time.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

We would offer him no where near that, it's laughable. 150k would be the most, same level as Mata.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well, people said that Rooney wouldn't get the 300k package as well, guess what?

Although 300k for Kroos, regarding our financial structure is too much. But I rather wait and see.

Agree0 Disagree0

Nick86

I still say Rooney is not getting 300k as I would find that excessive but I am not in footballer valuation business.

I think most of the stuff being reported is far off and nowhere near the truth.

Agree0 Disagree0

Anyone who thinks Kroos would get this is mad. Mata, a world class player like Kroos is only on 150k - that is roughly the figure Kroos or Gundogan will be offered.

Agree0 Disagree0

Although Nani is on around £80k a week and Cleverley is on around £35k a week, I couldn't agree more regarding Kroos. We have offered £150k a week to Kroos according to reports at the time the rumours first broke. That is roughly what he wants from BM. BM will give it to him in the end.

Agree0 Disagree0

If Rooney is worth £300k a week, then Kroos is worth £250k a week. But I'm not agreeing that it is a good idea, it is just supply and demand.
If we want the best, then we're going to have to pay for them.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am sure that the £250k a week being talked about Kroos is pure paper talk. We all know that Manchester United are primarily being used to apply pressure to BM to offer Kroos a package which matches the other top players that they have. Maybe he is after £150k a week or something and perhaps Utd would be willing to pay that.
We need to remember that Rooney's conract is not a staight £300k as if it was then why is it that it was agreed in principle a month ago and then just he fine details needed to be ironed out. He will get a guaranteed basic with add-ons based on goals scored, assists, PL position, CL qualification and trophies won etc. Then there could be some form of payment based on merchandise sales which might also be variable.
I know this might also sound a bit odd to some of us but Rooney is also on such a large wage due to the fact that he has been at Utd for 10 years and is proven at this level. He has a status in the game which has a commercial worth to him and Man Utd.
The signing of Mata and the new contract for Rooney is a statement of intent from the board. Which is the most positive thing I have seen for a few years. Although we are very unlikley to qualify for the CL I still believe that top class younger players will want t come to Utd. It is also pleasing the fact that DM is going to have a clearout and get rid of the "Dead Wood" in order to bring in some new players and hopefully also elevate some of the young players that we already have.
I feel more optimistic now than I have for quite a while and am looking forward to the summer and next season.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gcu, some papers/sites are reporting that Kros is on 80k so that's why are reporting triple wages.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't think we should be concerned what players are earning. I'm not. The glazers will take more money out of the club than any player will in the end. And one thing is for sure they won't pay anybody more than we can afford.
We aren't going to be in the cl next year, so paying top wages is what we will have to do to land top players. Pay it and get them here.

Agree0 Disagree0

There is a Bayern players wage bill that was printed in one of the papers and he is on 4 mill euros, which is about 80k in euros and not pounds.

I think Bayern being Bayern might actually help our cause by playing hard ball him. Even at 120k basic wage it would be huge jump for him.

What is quite amusing about all their winging and various statements is that they constantly screw Bundesliga teams of their talent by out paying everyone and now don't like it when someone their own size is looking at one of their players.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 19:36:34
When Nani ...

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - We are not going to go there Syd.}

Fair play Ed002, it's all guesswork anyway.

Any news on Nani Ed, who do you think will actually get him? Inter? AC? Gala? Fiorentina? Juve?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - If he doesn't sign the six year deal being offere by MUFC Syd, I reckon he will move on.}

Ed002, is that a teeny weeny little dig at MU for trying to flog him for 3-4 years and then offering him a new deal? I guess it was pretty shocking, even to us MU fans.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 08:52:27
Who would you guys rather us sign, Marco Reus who is as I believe the 'finished article' for around £35-40m or the developing german talent who many predict will reach the heights of Reus, Patrick Herrmann for around £15-20m? I myself would love either but Reus is what we need in my opinion

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Splash the cash and bring in Reus. May be difficult since we want Gundogan as well who is the priority. I'd take Reus over everyone other than Ronaldo. Griezmann, Lucas or Pedro are the others I would look to go for.

Agree0 Disagree0

Herrmann? I don't rate him. Draxler vs Reus would be interesting, I'd choose Draxler

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 07:09:22
Interesting reading the observation about pitch size and Fellaini made me wonder what size Selhurst Park was and then about other pitches. This was quite interesting
1. Manchester City, The Etihad Stadium - 116.5 x 78 yards - 8932 sq.yards

2. Hull City Football Club, KC Stadium - 114 x 78 yards - 8892 sq. yards

3. Manchester United, Old Trafford 116 x 76 - 8816 sq.yards

Selhurst Park was indded a lot smaller being 110 x 74, so shorter and narrower

Believable0 Unbelievable0