Manchester United Banter Archive July 26 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


26 Jul 2012 22:22:50
the delay in the ipo flotation may not be a bad thing, if there is a clear lack of interest in buying so called shares { worthless } it may just hit home with the glazers that utd are not the cash cow that they have drained over the last 7 years, and that looking for a future buyer may be a viable option, heres hoping............... DJS.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

DJS

I think people misunderstand why the Glazers need £1.5bn plus for United if they sell.

First, any purchase is likely to be predicated on the Glazers clearing the £430m directly borrowed for the purchase of the club. I suspect that there are other loans / borrowings related to the purchase of the club they will also need to clear - the £230m that cleared the PIKs must have come from somewhere, for example. I also suspect the Glazers have other borrowing within their empire leveraged against some of their United holdings, however much they state this is not the case. This could be borrowing against the value of the debt they bought back, for example. I suspect the overall sale price would have to be at least £1bn on that basis just to start drawing a profit for them.

So I think the problem is they can't sell for much less than £1.5bn without putting the rest of their empire at further risk.

That's why I suspect they'll move to a full flotation. Ironically, they've put the club in a stronger overall financial / business position during their tenure (albeit not in a way that has benefitted fans) so we'd be more viable as a PLC if this did happen than we were last time.

DarkLard08

Agree2 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 22:14:23
Hi guys, a few players I am going to put forward, Nathan Redmond, Kerim Frei, and Erick Torres. I think they look good promising players, and they could be signed quite a small total, and they fit our trend of buying young players. Plus we have looked at Redmond and Torres before. What do you think, regulars and Eds. Gilly

Believable1 Unbelievable1

I personally rate will keane, Lingard and daehli ahead of them all.
Caolán.

Agree4 Disagree0

If we're going for a young mexican forward I'd rather we went for Marco Fabian.

T0MB0Z

Agree1 Disagree0

Couldn't agree more T0MB0Z, Fabian is the way to go. Work permit maybe an issue mind.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 21:52:23
Ive seen some terrible refereeing performances lately and this just adds to the long list of them... clear stone wall penalty and there should of been a red card for one of the Senegalese players.

Believable5 Unbelievable1

26 Jul 2012 21:21:43
So much for everyone saying moura would run riot at the Olympics he doesnt even make the team lol !!

Dio

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Yeah - Oscar looks good though eh...

Joe

Agree1 Disagree0

Moura will get a chance i am sure, but at the moment the likes of Oscar, Hulk and Neymar are all simply on a different level in terms of quality.

Agree0 Disagree1

Thats why chelsea got oscar and stopped bothering with moura because he is overated then again he would fit rite in at man u

Agree2 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 20:52:08
About time we realised that we have done our spending for the summer, can't see anyone else coming in, sure I think we have made bids but as usual we just won't pay that bit extra for what we want. WHY oh why are we not trying to buy a central midfielder, that is clearly what we need.
Oh well let's look forward to another season where our midfield gets overrun by the likes of West Brom and Norwich.

Red Daz

Believable5 Unbelievable6

More like blue rinse than red daz when did you ever manage a club?
ARB

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 20:51:22
Imagine you own your own house with no mortgage. Along comes someone you don't know and takes out a mortgage against your house then dumps the cash down the drain. Then you have to pay mortgage payments on that mortgage. Then that other person decides to change the type of mortgage on your house and you have to pay lots of fees for them. Meanwhile that other person doesn't have to pay anything because you are responsible for paying off the debt and they have no responsibility for it

Red Man

Best post I've seen in a while Red Man. And for the people who say they haven't taken any money out of the club for themselves - where does all the extortionate fees and charges go to, it would be very interesting to follow that trail.

J Bones.

Believable2 Unbelievable2

It is a very good analogy.

I can only see it as a failed attempt to gain the interest on the cheap (as usual).

If they had done the same AFTER signing the reported players we are interested in Moura, Van Persie, Baines etc using their own money then maybe they would have interest. Just now as it stands anyone with half a business brain can see they are only using this to clear debt as well as giving zero weight to the shares they are selling. So basically offering the investors the chance to clear the debt for them.

Jono

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't get it. The OWN the club. They purchased it legally. They can do what they like. Who's complaining with the previous owners who sold their shares.

Have they taken out money? YES
Have they increased revenue? YES
Is the club still competitive? YES

There are only a few clubs that we can't compete with financially and even if the Glazers didn't buy the club we would still struggle to compete financially with these clubs.

We operate at a profit and have one of the best teams in the world, 2 or 3 players from being the best team in the world. Chelsea and Man City operate at a loss and will continue to do so. They will never be able to dip into their PROFITS to sustain their clubs. We continually rebuild our squad and maintain our competitiveness.

I'm proud to be a Man Utd fan even under the Glazers. Had it not been for the SUGAR DADDY dollars Chelsea and City would have won nothing.

Agree2 Disagree1

Best post you've seen in a while? This is one of the most ridiculous and inaccurate analogies I've ever seen...

The shareholders of the club willingly sold the club to the Glazers. Therefore they own it. The loans which they effectively used to purchase the shares could indeed be likened to a mortgage (which 95% of homeowners in the UK have) - but as the money which is going towards the interest payments is coming from the club (which the Glazers own) - to say that 'you' (who I assume are the fans - 99% of whom were never shareholders in the club) are the ones responsible for paying the 'mortgage' is ridiculous.

The situation is far from ideal - but nobody is forcing fans to buy merchandise or season tickets. If you're not happy with the way the club is being run - don't spend your hard earned money to fund it (again - I'd imagine about 99% of United fans have never even been to OT let alone held a season ticket anyway). Like it or not the Glazers don't appear to be going anywhere anytime soon and no amount of bitching or complaining is going to change that.

The owners have backed SAF in the transfer market whenever he's asked them to and we've remained competitive during the time they've been at the club. Any queries with my definition of the word 'competitive' which would suggest failings must surely be attributed to SAF because, as he recently told the world, he has always had money to spend (either that or he is a lier). The club's turnover and valuation has increased dramatically since the Glazers came in and last time I checked there weren't any liquidators at the gates of Old Trafford just yet.

I don't want to re-open the whole 'Glazer' argument as like everybody else I'd rather the Glazers sold up and moved on - but things really aren't as bad as some people seem to be making out and ridiculous statements like this are just going to lead to more ill-informed Glazer-bashers who care more about bitching about the owners than they do about the success of the football team which the rest of us love.

T0MB0Z

Agree6 Disagree2

I agree with TOMBOZ - there are many holes in your analogy which render it useless.

Joe

Agree5 Disagree3

Tomboz

Pre Glazer the club had no debt , now we have £430m of debt. Did that £430m go on players or infrastructure of the club? No. That £430m and all the interest and debt already paid off will take the amount to over £1bn wasted at a time when the club should be dominating world football due it's position financially. We can't because of the debt. In fact we are unlikely to dominate in England for much longer if at all.
You cannot seriously believe the Glazers have always stumped up the money when the last few windows have been some of the most frustrating I can remember in 44 years. SAF says the glazers support him and you seem to believe that yet forget his whole philosophy is built on loyalty to his players, to him and to his boss. I suggest you read about SAF and his loyalty no matter what.

Red Man

Agree3 Disagree3

Red Man -

The value of the club when the Glazers began to investigate the possibility of a takeover was around £741m. At the time (Feb 04) that was around $1.397b. Since the takeover the club's value has risen to $2.235b (Forbes. 19/04/12) - which equates to an increase in value of approximately $838m. To put that into perspective - Arsenal's value as a PLC has risen by $92m over the last 4 years and Manchester City's as a privately owned club by $252m (despite their owners investing $599m on playing staff in that time). Our rise in value over the same period? $435m.

You ask where has the money gone which has been spent on the debt. I think the question answers itself. I ask whether the club's value would have increased by 60% were we to have stayed a plc or been taken over by some 'sugar-daddy'. Evidence would suggest not.

You're more than right about SAF's loyalty - although from what I've read it's to the players, the club and the fans. He's never been afraid to ruffle a few feathers and I would fully expect him (were the club in financial danger) to speak out whether it meant losing his job or not. The fact that he's effectively done the opposite suggests that things aren't as bad as people like RFT would have you believe just yet. I don't believe SAF would lie to the fans and believe that he's simply reluctant to take big risks in the transfer market anymore. He's the one who keeps saying 'no value in the market' - not the owners (Well. 'Transfer market' at least).

T0MB0Z

Agree2 Disagree0

Tomboz

1) who is to say that the value of the club would not similarly have risen after all we have David Gill still there. The Glazers are good at exploiting opportunities to market but we may well have done that anyway
2) value of the club etc. Well pre Glazer we had no debt so if you deduct the debt fron the value attributed to the club to give the real position then the net value of the club has not really changed, in fact if the value was the same it could be argued we have gone backwards as we may not have significantly increased in value
3) the debt has not improved the infrastructure of the club, except for more recent improvements in carrington which is a tiny proportion. Imagine if the plc had spent £500m on borrowed money and built the stadium up to its finished state and put the sort of infrastructure city are putting in around their stadium plus encouraged the youth of Manchester to go to games, what would the value of the club be now?

Red Man

Agree1 Disagree0

I was told by someone a few years ago (not particularly ITK) that David Gill and Sir Alex made a sort of pact (agreement) that they will stay at the club and see the club through the Glazer era. I genuinely believe our manager is very careful with the funds and does have our best interests at heart. Add that to his stubbornness and I think deals in the past have been ended prematurely by him and not necessarily the Glazers. I think there are a decent some of funds available, just not an unlimited amount like City, PSG and Chelsea have. This opinion doesn't mean I love the Glazers, they still put our club in major debt and they have been milking us dry to pay towards their debt. I still hate them as much as any other on this page, I just believe we have decent funds for players, whereas many disagree.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree1

Sorry but one final point
The only people who benefit from the value of the club are the Glazers when they sell

Red Man

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 20:42:44
Tom cleverly playing well

Caolán.

Believable3 Unbelievable3

His pass success rate had to be in the 90's, close to 100% if he hadn't hit those two long balls late on. Good to see his fitness coming back.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

Thought he was very bright. Reminds me in style of Scholes in his latter years - always looking to find space and get on the ball and picks out his teamates well. Unfortunately I'd say he's about as good at defending as Scholes! Much better going forwards

Gav

Agree2 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 20:33:51
Just saw our last pre-season match vs shanghai shenhua and I think Bebe has really improved the last time we have seen him... I know many hate him but you have to give credit for how he has become better...
AJ

Believable4 Unbelievable0

The thing is he has done nothing for people to hate. He was playing for a lower league Portuguese team and he got an offer to play for Man Utd. Like most people would he accepted. I think we should sell him but I hope he does well and proves all the doubters wrong. Gilly

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 20:23:52
If Manchester United were to benefit from the proceeds of the IPO where is the money coming from to pay for all the work on the share sale?

We spend every day on here talking about scraping around to find the money to buy players yet all the while the Glazers are spending money on failed attempts to sell shares. How much have these two attempts cost? Whatever it is it adds to the £500m already wasted. Imagine if it was £2m , not unreasonable but is that the difference between our and Sao Paulos valuation of Lucas?

Red Man

Believable1 Unbelievable0

I heard the Singapore attempt cost £4m in banking fees. Not 100% certain though.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney

£4m for the first one and how much are we arguing over on Lucas.

It seems that we can throw money at the share sale as it benefits the Glazerd by reducing the debt giving them more assets but penny pinch on transfers.

I understand for the latest IPO there were going to be road shows and fancy presentations costing plenty of money

I can't believe people cannot see what is going on

Red Man

Agree0 Disagree0

I heard we paid the bankers £4m to see the IPO through, not sure if that's in total or just for the Singapore IPO, but I did hear this before we filed for the NYSE so surely that would have been even more? Or perhaps the bankers didn't receive the full amount because the IPO never went through? I really don't know mate, all I heard was the bankers costs were £4m. Wouldn't mind as long as the IPO goes through, but it isn't.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney

Some of the bankers costs would be to underwrite the issue but there will be some no doubt even for cancelling
There will be hefty stockbroker and consultant fees as well

More money out of the club

Red Man

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 20:10:19
Good finish by Rafael in the Brazil game

Dylan

Believable4 Unbelievable0

26 Jul 2012 19:22:04
Team England and Wales soon to take to the hallowed turf - come on Senegal

Believable4 Unbelievable3

26 Jul 2012 18:47:17
Hope 1 of these rumours materialise and we don't get let down at the end of the window. Think we need couple of strong signings and show some intent. Gotze from Germany would be class

Believable1 Unbelievable2

He signed a new deal recently and has stated that he is very reluctant to move.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 17:40:29
Michael Keane is set to be loaned out to Aberdeen
Probably a chance for first team action as he appears to have a lot of potential but is not quite yet good enough to be in the first team at united

Believable0 Unbelievable2

26 Jul 2012 17:38:11
So, is the Moura deal dead? The Sao Paulo bloke that said it seems adamant that it is. I'm not convinced its dead though, its becoming like Sneijder gate all over again. It would be nice to hear SAF say that we are not going for him (if thats the case), then all the bulls*** will stop. If Moura doesn't come in, then do we expect van Persie? I still think he is going to get injured and see the treatment room more than the pitch, but he is a signing of intent. Personally I am pretty happy with what we have as long as we get a left back and a box2box player - i'd throw money at Bilbao for Martinez if I could but we won't. Maybe Witsel, maybe Dembele, who knows! Everythings a maybe at the moment - tough to call!

RedDevil19

Believable2 Unbelievable1

If we could get witsel and baines and add them to powell and kagawa i think the squad would be in great shape to compete on all fronts. Witsel would add some much needed power to the midfield, i really hope united act on their interest for him. Moura would be a good signing but would he add anything else to what nani can bring? tom17

Agree2 Disagree4

I think Moura would be great and although he does not give us another option, he would be another game changer we could use. Personally I think we should sign either Sahin or Martinezas they would both add another dimension to our play. Plus Sahin would link well with Kagawa, and next to Carrick we would keeep the ball and create loads of chances. Martinez would be solid next to Carrick, and he could cover centre back, plus he would keep the ball very well with him. Gilly

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 17:38:07
Don't fancy signin this gaston Ramirez he's got awful hair
Superdecs

Believable2 Unbelievable1

26 Jul 2012 17:33:45
Can some one tell me the fantasy football league and password for this year, i saw it posted the other day but cant find it now.

Cheers

RRED7

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Sun Mini League:

PIN: 102965
Password: Disney

G.A.G.U.S

Agree0 Disagree0

Also here's TK-Red's official fantasy premeir league:

fantasy.premierleague.com
22720-8435

G.A.G.U.S

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks

RRED7

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 17:20:33
Just reading tonights edition of the Manchester Evening News & cant believe Mancini saying he is dissapointed that ciddy havent bought anyone so far. For f%"^ks sake they have spent over £400million in the last 3 seasons & have a massive & very powerfull squad, just how many players does he want, i reckon hes seen us,chelsea,arsenal,spurs & even liverpool spending & is getting twitchy,because even though they won the league it was only on goal difference & touch wood we have a lot less key injuries in the coming season. MIDDLETON RED

Believable7 Unbelievable1

26 Jul 2012 17:06:17
wheres jenny these days she seems to have gone to ground after her modric posts

Believable6 Unbelievable1

26 Jul 2012 16:59:00
I'm trying to think of someone worse i could suggest we sign as a joke.............but i can't think of anyone!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Liverpools first team.

Agree9 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 16:55:41
I don't think this will get posted but here goes. I don't think utd will sign anyone who costs more than £20 mil. All these rumours flying round are either to boost season ticket sales or generate interest in the IPO.
The days are gone when we could have afforded anyone in the world. Most of our profits go on paying of the interest on the clubs debts. I'm not saying we won't win anything this year but were not like chelski or citeh who can spend what they like.
When fergie says there's no value in the market it's true but it wouldn't have stopped him splashing out £30 mil on a player in the past.

Believable5 Unbelievable1

No value in the market, i'm sick t death of hearing this bulls***..... Football has changed, times have changed and we have to change with it, its that simple..... Glazer's out.
HERBIE

Agree7 Disagree0

How much did a BMW cost 5years ago? Compared to now?

If you want a BMW, you pay the going rate.

RED_SKY

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 16:39:24
Does anyone know what's going on with Lucas or rvp ??

Seems to be nothing going on at all today ?

Salford red

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Lucas is over, he's not coming to utd

Langers

Agree2 Disagree3

26 Jul 2012 15:58:18
Why is Kagawa not at the olympics?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

I think utd and japan agreed for him to be left out so he could settle in with us and give him a rest after japans world cup qualifiers

phil

Agree2 Disagree0

Because they let him play for Utd as in the bigger picture it was more important

fearny

Agree1 Disagree0

He is at pre-season with us..

-JakeW

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 15:44:23
"The fans deserve a big signing that's for sure.". Sydney.
Really!?! Deserve? Is it because you got relegated? No? You missed the top 4? Nope. You haven't won the EPL title in decades? No? You have never won the UCL? No. Ah wait, cuz you have crap manager? No?
Syd I think your a pretty intelligent person but that comment is a joke. Says a lot about MU supporters really. God forbid you go a season without silverware ,it's beneath you lot to have other teams enjoy a little bit of success.
Can't wait for SAF to retire and hopefully Kenny D takes over. It would look good on ya all. You guys deserve a couple of seasons out of the top 5 to truly appreciate what you have had all these years with the greatest manager ever.
Comments like "we deserve" equate to ungrateful greedy spoiled brats! Sorry, but just got to call it as I see it. Rant over. Good luck next season.
Ezdee
PS Kudos to you Syd, you had RVP pegged bang on all last season even when most thought it was unthinkable, you stuck to your guns and said he would not re-sign.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

Excelent post i agree wit you but its not the fact we have not won a bean that we are givin out about it the fact other teams we compete with are makin stronger the positions that caused them problems an we seem to struggle nailing down a big fan pleasing signing. the fans want us to spend big as a show of strenght its all bull but its all compitition

Agree1 Disagree1

Ezdee, because your club will never make a big signing and your fans are mugs and accept that, it doesn't mean we should accept it. Manchester United are a club that should be making big signings every couple of years at least. You may be happy with £13m (maximum) signings, but we are a club who expects to see £25m+ signings. Luckily for us we are trying to sign £25m+ players, whereas Arsenal are not. You may be happy with low budget signings, but we are not.

Sydney!

Agree3 Disagree3

Other teams can spend and strengthen all they want, but unless they are buying SAF, you should not worry so much. I mean, cmon, Mancini, DiMatteo, really. If SAF had Sh!tty's squad, or Chelski's, he would rack up a quadruple!
I just hope these billionaires get bored and piss off one day and leave their clubs neck deep in debt. It's what they deserve. Then it could go back to the respectable days of MU vs Arsenal. Maybe even Liverpool! Lol J/k, Liverpool sucks a$$!
Ezdee

Agree4 Disagree0

It's not about winning or not winning; it's about playing fast-flowing attractive football, which we haven't done for the last couple of seasons. This is what us MU fans expect, and it just hasn't been there for the last couple of years. So yes, we DO deserve better. End of.

DL10

Agree4 Disagree0

"but we are a club who expects to see £25m+ signings" Even when your club is in hundreds of millions in debt you still expect these huge signings? Lol, thanks Syd, like I said, spoiled!
Ezdee

Agree1 Disagree1

It's alright getting a £25m player like Kagawa for £12m or a £2m Powell who will likely end up a £25m player, but this is not going to happen every summer. Sometimes the club need to pay a top fee for a top player. Maybe not three every summer, but perhaps a biggy or two every couple of summers.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

Lol, mate so in other words you are jealous and you wish Arsenal and United could switch places for a few seasons?

I think te comment 'deserve' is more in relation to us not having made a 'big signing' since Berba 3/4 years ago, not because we didnt win anything last year

It sounds funny coming from an Arsenal fan too - most of which constantly moan about a lack of 'big signings' and about Wenger's stinginess in the transfer market

Gav

Agree0 Disagree3

"but we are a club who expects to see £25m+ signings" Even when your club is in hundreds of millions in debt you still expect these huge signings? Lol, thanks Syd, like I said, spoiled!
Ezdee"

Ezdee - what has our debt got to do with it when the money for any transfer we make will come from our profit? (that is, profit after making debt payments). It's not like we're going out to borrow another £30m to buy Moura, it would just come from the money we generate as a club! What is wrong with this?

You really are coming across as bitter. Can't think why...oh rite I forgot you support a team that sells it's best players each year

Gav

Agree0 Disagree2

First off, DL10, great response.
Syd, for me, Kagawa has been the steal of the summer. As far as being mugs and accepting the low budget signings, what would you like me to do, write a letter to the board?
Gav, I put my name and who I support so not to hide or be accused of being a scouser

Agree1 Disagree0

Ezdee, Arsenal's cheapest season ticket costs more than our most expensive season ticket even though you haven't won sh1t for seven years and we have won plenty. The club keep flogging your best players because they will not give them a salary that they believe they deserve. You are buying players for £13m tops and you are happy with that.

You may be happy with that but we wouldn't be.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree2

Damn iPhone , hit send too soon.
Anyway, Mr Gav, I claim my association with Arsenal as not to hide anything and you use it to claim jealousy and bitterness. Not the fact that in my op, the point was that saying your club "deserves" big signings sounds very self righteous and arrogant to other clubs' supporters. You deserve big signings why really, because you should be champions every year? Should the rest of the clubs just pack it up and hand you the trophies every year?
I'm just saying what a lot of other clubs fans have been saying all these years. Did you read the posts after you got knocked out of the UCL this year? I did. You would of thought it had been decades since you won it or anything. Some even slated the great SAF. Saying he was past it. Shocking! But a few months prior, you won the title and finished runner up in the UCL. Way to appreciate the man.
Anyways I'm bored of this, again, good luck, no hard feelings just a bit of banter to pass the time, and I hope you all get what you deserve. Emile Heskey! J/k, no one deserves that.
Ezdee

Agree2 Disagree0

Ezdee

Yes banter indeed, no hard feelings!

The thing is football is a business these days and as a business United generate huge revenues. This is all because of the success we've had and the following we currently have (who buy the tickets and merch). I think what Syd meant by 'deserve' is that we make plenty of cash (off the fans backs) to get a £25m+ signing every now and again, and we haven't now for a while. We are United and it's not for us to let other clubs be champions once in a while, as you seem to suggest. It is up to us to try and maintain our high standards and up to the other clubs to try and beat that, as City did this year

Ayway rant over, just wanted to explain my original point

Good luck to you too for next season!

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 15:37:01
Does anyone know why J. Martinez is always played at cb now. I know he can fill in there but he is class in midfield. It seems a bit strange

Believable1 Unbelievable0

I thought the same a while back. I know he was covering CB for a while but if he's as good as well all think he is you'd think Bilbao would play him in the position where he can influence the game most? Strange

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

I think it's more to do with the way Bilbao play. They press high, and want someone at CB who can carry the ball well into the opposition half and use it effectively to allow them to do this.

DarkLard08

Agree0 Disagree0

He started in midfield for Spain today but his namesake from Sociedad was sent off (wrongfully so) early on and he dropped back to provide cover for the rest of the game

=v1=

Agree0 Disagree0

He is a better ballplaying centre back for me. Very good in midfield, but a better centre back for me..

Whistler.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 14:54:54
the last thing United need is another injury prone midfielder.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Who?

GDS

Agree0 Disagree0

Nuri Sahin by any chance? If so one injury does not make him injury prone, just like Cleverley isn't injury prone...

fearny

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 14:51:07
I don't know very much about the Glazers, can someone tell me why they are taking out the money from the club? How did we accumulate this debt, was it the Glazers personal debts that they had before they bought Man Utd? Where did the debt come from?

Kai

Believable0 Unbelievable0

They borrowed the money to buy the club and use the profit to pay it back.

Agree0 Disagree0

They borrowed around £500m iirc to buy the club.

Agree0 Disagree0

Imagine you own your own house with no mortgage. Along comes someone you don't know and takes out a mortgage against your house then dumps the cash down the drain. Then you have to pay mortgage payments on that mortgage. Then that other person decides to change the type of mortgage on your house and you have to pay lots of fees for them. Meanwhile that other person doesn't have to pay anything because you are responsible for paying off the debt and they have no responsibility for it

Red Man

Agree3 Disagree0

Red Man

You missed the bit where they hide the deeds for the house somewhere but don't tell you where they've put them out.

DarkLard08

Agree0 Disagree0

Red Man

'Own our own house'?

Come on mate, unless you support a club that offers shares to ordinary fans, not many of us have 'owned our own house' for a long. long time.

I can't even blame the Glazers for that one!

StevieK

Agree0 Disagree0

StevieK

Pre Glazer we may have had shareholders but we were without debt.

The debt was taken out against our club and the £500m plus of loans now bonds or the further £500m plus gone out of the club in interest and fees has benefitted the club in what way?

The shareholders received dividends but that depended on profit , now we have to cover interest payments regardless of profits. We had a debt free club and that £1bn has effectively gone up in smoke for the good it has done the club.

If the FA want to do something about owners then they shoud stop leveraged buyouts as a start

Red Man

Agree0 Disagree0

Red Man

Mate, my point wasn't about debt, but about the slightly disingenuous comparison to owning 'our' own house.

We are all guilty sometimes of having a sepia-tinted view of it being 'our' club - unfortunately, 'we' haven't owned 'our own house' for a very long time.

The last owners didn't have to sell, but they did, and, imagine, they didn't even ask my opinion once! :)

Excuse my rambling, but it's officially the first day of my holidays, and I've had a few babychams :)

StevieK

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks guys, helped alot.

Kai

Agree0 Disagree0

StevieK

I understand about the ownership issue but the point I was trying to make with the analogy not a description was that we went from no debt to massive debt with no benefit to the club whatsoever

Red Man

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 13:44:23
The Liverpool fans must be bored today judging by some of the ridiculous nonsense i have seen on here today!

Believable0 Unbelievable1

26 Jul 2012 13:34:34
The IPO is delayed again but I wonder if this time it really is market conditions or the alleged disagreement between the Glazer family on how to go forward. They cannot have missed the market conditions unless been living in outer space for some time. If it is a family disagreement then maybe just maybe it will push us a step towards being sold in full. That would give the biggest cheer ever known at Old Trafford

There again according to SAF my 42 years of support doesn't make me a real supporter because I want the Glazers out

Red Man

Believable11 Unbelievable0

Red Man

Do you think the people who clicked "Agree" agreed with your assessment of the reason or with you not being a proper supporter? Bit harsh if it was the latter.

Although there are some specific market concerns right now, I suspect your opinion on this might be close to the mark - I don't think the conditions have been great for an IPO for United for the last 9 - 12 months (since the Eurozone really started to destabilise).

My view is they only really have 2 options if they want big investment / return - full flotation (a risk in the current market) or a sale (with no-one willing to meet their asking price).

So we're back to square 1 on that basis...

DarkLard08

Agree0 Disagree0

Darklard

It was 44 years and I would guess most hope the Glazers will go.

I understand they have enough problems with their other businesses and are split on why they have such debt with us. I can't see a full listing as when we went to the plc as the message it would give after postponing two IPO issues would not be good at least for some considerable time. Also having used market conditions as a reason what bank especially in today's banking market would underwrite a £1.5bn share deal.

They cannot appear to be desperate to sell which I feel a full listing would now show. There are not many with £1.5bn available. The interesting one is Red and White holdings heavily embedded into Arsenal usmanovs partner in red and white is a man utd fan so if he becomes frustrated at Arsenal finally he may turn to us.

We can but hope

Red Man

Agree0 Disagree0

Red Man

You do like a conspiracy don't you? Not saying you're wrong on this one but perhaps sometimes you are looking for something that is not there...

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

Red Man

I can't disagree with what you've said. I think, ultimately, they were hoping we'd be the cash cow that would bankroll their other failures, and it might have worked if the markets hadn't gone belly-up, but that just shows they were irresponsible and took too great a risk in what they did and what they leveraged. Unfortunately it's United that has paid for that.

They have done some positive things - revenue growth has been amazing. But it would have been nice to have the revenue growth support cheaper ticket prices and big signings instead of debt.

I actually think they might go for a full flotation sometime late 2013 or into 2014, as it's the only way they will recoup what they want from the club now. And that won't necessarily be good news.

DarkLard08

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 13:30:38
Any danger of uploading any of my posts {Ed004's Note - What posts?}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

26 Jul 2012 13:11:44
Am i the only one who would rather have muniain than lucas moura?
1- muniain is, by far, the better passer and has better vision.
2- He has just as much pace.
3- is just as young
4- not quite the same dribbler but dont forget that he plays in la liga.
5- Has more goals/ assists
6- Is a better team player with a better workrate.
7- plays good on the left ( which is whre we need him most as we have nani and engine on the right ).
8- is proven in europe and has around the same price.

So if muniain is willing to come to us, i would prefer him over moura. I know im overthinking it but might fergy be using lucas as a smokescreen to get muniain ? the only downside is that he might want to go back to spain later on in his career, but imo the same might go for lucas.
Mick

Believable9 Unbelievable9

I like the name engine for tony.

1redarmy

Agree2 Disagree0

Muniain and martinez double bid.......

would be all we need.......

would cost 50-60 but well worth it....

Agree4 Disagree2

50 - 60 million lol, Would be closer to 80 me thinks! Bilboa Value both at around 40 million, Munian was offered to us last summer for something like 40 million (correct me if im wrong eds) But surely that has only increased because he has began to control his behavior off the pitch and perform on it aswell, As for Martinez Bilboa already stated they believed his value to be close to 40 million.
In regards to op i believe He would be a better signing then Lucas, less of a risk and has so much potential.
James!

Agree0 Disagree0

James, they are valued at 40m euros each by Bilbao, which equates to £62m.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

Also James/Syd - they're not going to get the full 40m euro's for Muniain so it would be less IMO

On Muniain - I doubt he is as fast as Moura but he may well be better technically at passing etc. Some people question his attitude but I don't know much about that. I'd be happy with either TBF!

Gav

Agree2 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 12:49:35
After reading this morning that the flotation is not going to happen i am getting worried.
Will this now affect us getting another couple of quality names into our squad for this season?
How anybody including Fergie can sit there and say good things about the Glazers is beyond me.
They have raped our club and took over half a billion pounds from it stoppin us competing for top players.
It's an absolute disgrace how this family even got into a position to buy our fantastic club.
I am really p*ssed off about the whole thing now!

Sorry for being negative!

Simmo

Believable11 Unbelievable1

Would you tell your boss he was rubbish and say horrible things about him in public? Thought not. Fergie said the glazers have backed him with every transfer, we don't know if this is true or not so no point speculating.

When the ipo was announced loads of people on here said it was terrible and a bad thing, are they the same people saying if it gets postponed it is also a bad thing?

Not saying that is you Simmo as I can't remember what your opinions were at the time, but don't think I have ever read a positive post from you on here and when I question you you always get very defensive and kick off at me. So I expect that again this time.

GDS

Agree0 Disagree0

Why? KLOOT/RFT has been telling you this for 2-3years mate, and a few believers like myself have been repeating his claims.

Why has it taken you til now to realise? SAF ahs been covering for the Glazers for a very long time, as has Gill, and both SAF and Gill have been lying to you and me for several years now.

RED_SKY

Agree5 Disagree0

RED_SKY

Why are you berating someone for agreeing with your views?

Surely you should be happy more supporters are coming around to your way of thinking.

GLAZERS OUT!

Red Joe

Agree3 Disagree0

GDS

I don't claim to have any kind of financial kowledge but i know the basics of what the Glazers have done to our club.
I have never once said on any of my posts that i support them i can't even bear to look at them and how they are allowed to watch a match at Old Trafford is unbelievable!
I am not asking Fergie to come out and call them all kinds of things but just be straight with us fans. Surely Fergie knows that we don't believe this constant crap about how we can compete with the top clubs when we can't, just look at the last three years since we sold Ronaldo and Tevez and look at all the names we have missed out on. Something is wrong don't you think??
Im not always negative, Kagawa is a great signing and we don't know alot about Powell as he is still very young and learning and could turn out to be a cracking player for us.
The fact is this squad we have now is nowhere near good enough to challange on all fronts it was only Fergie's fantastic management and winning mentality that got us near to City last season. Would you honestly say the football was great last season because i certainly didn't think so. We were horrible in Europe because we just wern't good enough playing Giggs, Park and Scholes in midfield.
I have no doubt that we will be there or there about's next year in the premiership race but only because of Fergie because he is so special at what he does whilst they sit back and put money in there pockets from our hard earned cash.
REDSKY - i am agreeing with you about the Glazers.

Simmo

Agree3 Disagree0

I also remember gds saying it was a goodd
thing and i said there was a c hance it wouldnt even get off the ground,so not such a good thing ehhh.
mick the red fireman.

Agree0 Disagree0

To all above posters (Simmo and co)

Apologies, that wasn't meant to come across as harsh - I just find it baffling that only now some are realising this. It's been the same for a few seasons now.

I predict the following:

- no more major signings; maybe 1 youngster.
- SAF/Gill to give their usual spin, no value in the market etc (when we know full well this doesn't stop any of our rivals improving their teams)
- another trophyless season and finally
- (this is more a hope) - the Glazers realise that 2 x trophyless seasons does not bode well and decide to get out of town.

RED_SKY

Agree4 Disagree0

RED_SKY

Lets hope the last point about them leaving town is true!

Simmo

Agree0 Disagree0

RED_SKY

Much as I would love to see them go after a couple of trophy-less seasons, why would they?

They know when they're on to a good thing. We're the gift that keeps on giving. I bet they could hardly believe their luck when they got us - invest none of their own money in a worldwide 'brand' ( God, how I hate that term when talking about a football team of our stature), and take the certain profits that ensue from ownership.

I mean, if you're a businessman, it's quite brilliant....unfortunately, it's also happens to be an almighty kick in the nuts to real football fans....

StevieK

Agree2 Disagree0

StevieK

Agreed. A lack of trophies for a couple of seasons would seriously dent our incomings though, that's for sure, they'd feel that surely! Hope so.

RED_SKY

Agree2 Disagree0

RED_SKY

don't know mate - with supporters in Asia especially, willing to spend their money on a cigarette butt with the UTD badge on it, I have a horrible feeling they could fleece us for another few years more, trophies or not :(

StevieK

Agree1 Disagree0

When I was last in South-East Asia travelling, 2009, it was incredible how many Thais/Indonesians considered themselves Chelsea fans now......

I'm going back in 2013, I bet the City shirts will be absolutely everywhere. I'm confident that a few seasons without trophies would see our fanbase decrease at least a little - they have no ties to any English team really, and quite often, side with whoever's winning.

RED_SKY

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 12:16:33
I just researched lucas mouras agent Wagner Ribeiro and found that he was the agent of robinho when he came to Man City. If you can remember he held out until he got the maximum amount of money.Therefore unfortunately SAF wont buy him.There are other players like witsel ,strootman and sahin.

Believable4 Unbelievable3

Witsel, Strootman and Sahin are nothing like Lucas? Lucas is an attacking midfielder.

-JakeW

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 12:02:55
Just wanted to pick up on something that Sydney said about this summer being pivotal to the future of the club. I completly agree. Next year we will see the retirements of Giggs and Scholes, Ferdinand may move on if one of Evans, Smalling or Jones can hold down a place. Evra surely will be gone. Fletcher may retire also. Thats 4 of our over 30 experienced players and also a great engine in Fletcher who has worked hard to get where he has. This season we have also lost experience, Park has gone and Berbatov will go. Macheda will follow (not that i'm bothered). So for me, its vital that we get most of their replacements in now so they have a year at the club to bed themselves in. Some replacements I feel we could have within the club, Cleverly could replace Scholes, Lingard could replace Giggs and Tunnicliffe could replace Fletcher - even Wooton is in with a shout.

But we can't just hope that these lads make the grade. Even if they do, we would still be short in numbers. We have Kagawa and Powell already, two great buys. But we need 3 more for me. A box2box player, a versatile attacker and a left back. Ideally it would have been Alba, Martinez and Hazard. But we must look elsewhere so thats why I feel Baines, Cirigliano and Moura are the targets. If that fails, Izaguirre is 3rd choice, but i'm not sure about who we'd turn to instead of Moura and I'm not sure we are even in for Cirigliano. I have mentioned Cirigliano because he has youth on his side and bags of talent and versatility - he is fairly low risk.

If we had a summer where we managed to get Powell, Kagawa, Cirigliano, Moura and Baines we would be nicely set up. Baines would give a bit of experience to the back line as we would have a couple of younger players in there like Rafael/Jones/Smalling alongside the experience of Baines and Vidic - a good blend. We would have a youthful central midfield with the experience of Carrick alongside Anderson, Cleverly, Tunnicliffe, Petrucci, Powell, Lingard etc. The wings would also have that blend, the experienced heads of Valencia, Nani and Young with the youth of Moura. And also up top with Rooney's experience alongside Welbeck, Chicharito and probably Will Keane.

If we do secure these players then next summer will be relatively quiet. More will leave/retire than will come in. If SAF is still in charge we could move for Rodwell, Barkley, Lundstram, Papadopoulos, Henriquez etc. Getting the job done now is crucial I feel to the long term success of this club, hopefully in a couple years time when Scholes et al have moved on this could be a successful line up for us:

_____________DDG
Rafa___Small___Vidic/Jones__Baines
____Clevs___Tunners___Kagawa
____Moura___Rooney___Welbeck

That is also heavily Enlgish which is a nice touch. There would also be plenty of options with Petrucci, perhaps Barkley, Hernandez, Keane, Lingard etc. The future will be looking good if we do the right things NOW.

RedDevil19

Believable3 Unbelievable5

Not a bad shout. Following Shappy's post on Dembele the other day perhaps it could be Baines, Dembele and Moura coming in?

Let's hope we bring in at least 2 more of our targets

Gav

Agree1 Disagree0

Dembele or Cirigliano would both be effective, energetic players. Cirigliano has been brought up to play there though, its more of a recent transition for Dembele so Cirigliano is still my preference.

RedDevil19

Agree1 Disagree1

I think we may go for Rodriguez if moura fails, or even next year.

him on the left instead of wellbeck would be a more balanced team

Agree2 Disagree0

RD19

How can this Cirigliano? guy be your preference, the chances are you know nothing of this kid. He plays in south America if I am correct. A few YouTube videos doesn't make you a top scout. It is very likely that you didn't even know this kid before he was linked with us. You change your mind on the "best fit" for us more often than you change your underpants.

Today Cirigliano? tomorrow it will be some other random name we get linked to. Stop watching YouTube and get off of FIFA.

REDLAD

Agree3 Disagree1

I think the last 2/3 years have all been pretty pivotal what with Neville, Van De Sar and Hargreaves (pretty much) all retiring as well as Ronaldo and Tevez moving on.
De Gea for VDS - long term maybe good replacement
Valencia for Ronaldo - Well, he is irreplacable and Valencia is a totally different player but a good signing none the less
Chicharito for Tevez - Great first season, not so much second, the jury is out.
Rafael for G Neville - More talented, certainyl not as reliable but he is young, time will tell.
You could argue that bar Evra there are perhaps replacements already beign bought through for the defence in Smalling/JOnes/Rio Cleverly for Fletcher, Pertrucci/Powell for Scholes.
Its too early to judge most of these players of course, however it is mildly concerning that in most cases so far at least you would certainly rather have the former player than the new one.
I dont think we are just looking at replacements, the signings of Kagawa and Powell show signs of this. I think we are looking at slight changes to our style. I am not surprised we are being linked with a big signing this summer as for all the techical and intelligence potentially of the signings we have made, bar potentially Nani we dont have anybody with the magic to make something happen like Ronaldo did and that we need so the likes of Hazard and Moura dont really surprise me. The BIG thing for me in the next 12 months though is our midfield, we have Cleverly/Powell/Anderson/Pertrucci/Tunnicliffe but bar Carrick that is probably it next season. I think bar Martinez there arent any obvious signings to make in the middle, most of the names mentioend for me are average. I think either Fergie is giving it another year in the middle to give ANderson a chance and test some of the youngsters or maybe there is some genuien interest in a new steely midfielder like this Argentinian mentioned. Either way personally I think we still have a side without any more signings as it is to challenge for the premiership, challenge for the champions league though and I think we are definately short in terms of quality in a couple of areas, all the more reason to hope for a Hazard Moura type signing and hopeful surprise talented one
Invisible STuey

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 11:57:28
Interesting insight on Lucas Moura from a Brazil football expert. Sounds good, but risky.....not exactly getting me too excited. -KG

http://www.sambafoot.com/en/news/33808_brazil_expert_on_lucas_moura_to_manchester_united.html?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

26 Jul 2012 11:43:58
I am just going to take a moment of my time to shoot down Bebe.

I really did get giggles when some of you were saying that Bebe has played well and maybe he has a future with United. He doesn't.

How can some of you call for Chicharito's head then say Bebe is good based on pre season? Hernandez has had 1.5 solid seasons where he has scored important goals (without having a magic touch or any build up ability) yet Bebe, who has been slammed for even being a footballer and has become a joke amongst our own fans has been given a second chance....

They are both simular ages yet some of you think Bebe will come good and Hernandez wont? get real.

The moment Bebe has a bad game or falls over trying to kick the ball you will all be slamming him again. Anyone who reads my posts will know how much I stick up for our own but I just can't stick up for Bebe, the decision to sign him is beyond dumb.

1redarmy

Believable5 Unbelievable5

1redarmy

You are spot on mate...i was thinking the same yesterday but just didn't have time to post anything.
Simoe people are fickle...Bebe is absolute dog sh*te end of.

Simmo

Agree1 Disagree2

Hey guys just want to throw my 5 cents in on this discussion after giving it some thought. If you guys could find it in you to empathise with Bebe instead of knocking him every chance you get you might be able to have a better outlook. Lets not forget he was recently homeless and now plays for the biggest team in the world surely he should get a grace period for transition. Other players get the excuse oh he just needs time to adjust why not Bebe his life has done a 360 so why slate him at every turn. He may well surprise some of you but to blast someone because UNITED paid an insane amount for him is not his fault. You guys expecting him to be a world beater are naive give him time and confidence and he could be a quality player. Those of you that keep hating on him even when he tries his ass off and seems to be improving are only a hinderance to his development. I am by no means a Bebe fan but I feel that everyone deserves a fair go at it before being dismissed. As long as he wears the red shirt of United I will back him and hope for him to do good things for us. I'm sorry if I'm not as negative as some of you but give the kid some credit. Just my honest opinion.

Darren-Bermuda

Agree0 Disagree0

Simmo - do you ever say anything positive about our club or our players?

I'm undecided on Bebe but doubt he will ever make it at our club

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 11:33:36
Copy and paste

The Manchester United Supporters Trust have called on the Glazer family to launch a full flotation of the Old Trafford outfit, amid reports that their planned initial public offering (IPO) launch in New York has been shelved.

First in Hong Kong and Singapore, then New York, it has seemed the Glazer family have been looking to raise additional capital through a partial sale of the club.

It is estimated the debt incurred during their leveraged takeover in 2005 has so far seen in excess of £500million taken out of United to pay assorted fees and charges. And within their prospectus, it was admitted the club's present debt of £423million could hamper them in the transfer market.

Dylan

Believable3 Unbelievable0

26 Jul 2012 11:30:20
With the IPO pretty much cancelled, I honestly cant see us signing RVP or Lucas. Maybe SAF got some info regarding the IPO not going ahead and thats why he has been so vocal with the bids for RVP and Lucas ? He knew we would'nt have money so if he says were in for both of them then he comes off good with the fans ?? Maybe im just thinking too much about it. He could of just been putting pressure on the Glazers to back him with new signings. I honestly dont know, Any thoughts on the matter?

Dylan

Believable1 Unbelievable1

I don't think it will affect our transfers as I dont think they have cancelled it all together, they are just waiting for the right time.

1redarmy

Agree0 Disagree0

Moura or another big signing is still possible as a Nani sale will likely fund the deal. I do think it will only be one top signing now, still think they will all be good signings though, just not all expensive.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

Im very love/hate when it comes to Nani. Has great moments of skill but the he fails to make the easy passes or holds onto the ball too long. I dont know if id be happy or sad if he left. If he did leave, Id much rather the money spent on Lucas rather than Van Persie. Mad money to pay for a nearly 29 year old player who has only had 1 season injury free. Great player last season but just not worth it over all when you include 10m + wages for 3-4 years. Lucas or Eriksen for me. Possibly Willems at PSV if nothing happens with Baines.

Dylan

Agree0 Disagree0

I am at a loss to what difference the postponing of the IPO will make to transfers and why Nani's transfer would have to fund the Moura bid. Some of the so called posters with authority on here have always said that it is Fergie's reluctance to pay over the odds for a player that has restricted us in the transfer market and that money has always been available, so what difference does it make postponing the IPO. Surely if we don't sign Moura it is because we are not prepared to pay the price and nothing to do with the IPO being postponed.
On top of that where has the 'Hazard money' gone, we bid for him before the details of the IPO were made known, so why do we have to sell Nani to fund the Moura transfer. Also if we are relying on selling Nani to raise funds look back to last summer when it seems Nani was touted around and there were no takers at the price we wanted, so that doesn't bode well.
Or maybe, just maybe there is a realism that we do not have the funds to compete at the top end of the transfer market, hence suggestions that we need to sell Nani to fund Moura.

Keanooh

Agree0 Disagree0

Sell before you buy syd . wow . thats where your club is at under the glazers .

Agree2 Disagree0

Keanooh, I have always said that I believe Nani will be sold if another winger is signed floatation or no floatation. If we signed Hazard I believe Nani would have been sold. My views haven't changed.

No name, all clubs balance the books. Even City will have to sell be fore they can buy. RM must do the same.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree0

Keanooh

We certainly don't have the funds to compete with Chelsea/City/PSG (if that is the 'top'). But then we never competed with Chelsea back when they started spending hundreds of millions. We are self sufficient and they are not

I do however believe our club SHOULD be in a position to add what we need and we should be able to afford a £25m+ player from time to time. So I will feel let down if we get to Sep with Kagawa/Powell as our main signings

This summer feels like a bit of a watershed moment for our club in that sense

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd , you just keep saying that it will all work out when clearly it is beginning to manifest in your transfer or lack of spending power , other clubs might balance the books as you put it but they dont HAVE TO like utd have to . kawaga and powell are hardly going to sort out utds lack of quality . {Ed004's Note - But them, along with the return of our captain and all our youngsters becoming a lot more experienced will}

Agree0 Disagree0

No name, we are a self sufficient football club, we are not owned by a sugar daddy, we use our profits to buy players, not money generated by outside sources. Liverpool, City, Chelsea are all funded by their owners. Arsenal, United, Spurs are self sufficient. We need to balance the books like any other PROPER football club would have to. At the very worst I think our team will line-up like this next season, not too bad is it?

___________DDG
Rafael__Small___Vidic__Baines
______Carrick___Scholes
TonyV_____Kagawa____L.Nani
__________Rooney

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

Is that team good enough to win the league or CL?
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

The league yes, the UCL no.

Then again a very ordinary Chelsea team were the poorest team in every tie yet still won the UCL.

I wouldn't be happy with this Jred, but I think this is the worst we could expect.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

Syd
The UCL you always have a chance as chelsea proved last year, but i dont think that team is good enough to win it if im honest.
and the league, well we have a chance but if im honest i think the city team on paper is better I also think city will be a better team for winning it last year, just look at us once we won the first one.

the truth is with the above team i wouldn't put money on us winning the league or the UCL next year
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 10:56:17
Opinions lads and ladies. Will the Lucas deal go ahead. Not looking for facts just general thoughts. Seems a lot of so called fans think this is just the club trying to send out the message that they're willing to spend money but it won't happen. I for one think a big signing is going to happen be it Lucas or otherwise.
DarrenUtd.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

If it does happen i think it will be before august 1st.

JK92

Agree1 Disagree0

The fans deserve a big signing that's for sure. I would be more than happy with Moura, Baines & Dembele. I suspect Nani will compensate for the Moura costs. Would love to see Lewandowski arrive, but we will need to see Kiko and Berbatov leave first.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree4

Syd, you seem overly sure Nani will be going. Every time Moura's name is mentioned you say Nani will go but is Nani not the type of player Fergie will want if we are to become more fluent?

1redarmy

Agree3 Disagree0

Nani will be going nowhere. I can honestly see Young leaving next year, but having the four is not problematic. Nani, Moura, Valencia and Young gives us good options on the wings, Young and Valencia are both pretty direct options on both flanks and Moura/Nani would give us more flair and fluidity. Both types of players suit some matches more than others. Then of course there is Bebe as well who could see some game time (I hope he gets a chance).

I'm still by no means convinced that we will sign van Persie. Its Moura or Van Persie otherwise we just have far too many options. Having 3 strikers and Kagawa to play in the hole is plenty, Kagawa is essentially a second striker. Berbatov obviously is going to leave, and Macheda has been pretty rubbish despite his goal, this was probably his last chance so I don't think that he will be around much longer.

I'm hoping for Baines, Moura and Cirigliano, that would cost us around the £50 million mark but I think that it is necessary.

RedDevil19

Agree4 Disagree0

We'll see soon enough.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree2

26 Jul 2012 10:40:53
So the IPO has been put on hold with andy green saying its dead in the water
the reason being given for it not launching is due to volatile markets the same as the last 2 times but its been reported that the real reason is "Fund managers who have looked at its preliminary prospectus have been either negative or lukewarm on the prospect of buying shares in the club"
a major issue being the glazers over valuation of the club.

I think the major question is how much do the glazers need this money from the IPO and what affect will not getting the money have on the club and our transfer spending
jred

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I wasn't too fussed about next summer's funds or the summer after, but really wanted us to bring in what we needed this summer. With just 1-2 top signings added to Kagawa and Powell we would have the youth to keep us strong for many years to come. This summer was very important and I hope the IPO cancellation hasn't restricted our funds. However I suspect it has :(

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree0

Syd
I think you may be right ,
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred, the very least I'd expect is Nani/Moura, Dembele and Baines. This is the least I would expect to happen this summer.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

So Syd - would you now agree that we are in financial difficulty? Last summer you were insistent the Glazers ownership wasn't affecting our transfer market delvings......same this summer....

Are you finally ready to agree that the club is in financial jeopardy and, contrary to what SAF and Gill have been spinning us for years, we cannot compete financially and cannot get the right players?

RED_SKY

Agree1 Disagree0

Sorry, that's not what I expect will happen, it's what I personally would be happy with, the very least. I should have been clearer.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

RED_SKY, not at all, I just expected us to be more flexible with the IPO going ahead. Obviously funds will be more prioritised than they could have been if we had been floated.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

SYD
I know what your saying i think if you look at the top teams in europe it quite plain to see that we need to continue to strengthen.
i would like a lb a worldclass CM and a top striker but im not sure we are going to get them , but fingers crossed
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred, several journalists on Twitter believe Baines is going to happen eventually. For me that would be one big problem sorted straight away. Hope it happens. I think we have some good young midfielders in Powell, Clevers, Tunners & Petrucci, but three of them are probably not quite ready. We do have Scholes & Carrick, but I think we still need one more midfielder to come in. I wouldn't mind us keeping Nani and buying Lewandowski, but I feel Nani will be sold and I imagine the club would need to swap him with an exciting talent or face angry opposition from the fans.

Moura, Lewandowski, Dembele & Baines would be very nice IMO. But for this to happen Nani, Berbs, Kiko & Anderson would probably need to be sold.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 09:11:47
Daily Star Arsenal to make RVP stay until January . If they do and then want to sell him he should see out his deal and then move on a free with a nice wage from his new employers who would save a large transfer fee . How stupid could Arsenal be over this . RVP wants to go let him take what cash you can get and use it to strengthen the team . As a Utd fan I thought the same when Ronaldo wanted to go you can't keep players who have decided that time is up .

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Not the first time this has back fired on arsene

Agree0 Disagree0

Arsenal will sell RVP this summer, Arsenal will not turn their back on £15m.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

You think theres a good chance he'll come utd syd?

TRUMORS

Agree0 Disagree0

No, I believe City will pay him higher wages and will pay Arsenal a bigger fee. They have unlimited funds.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Havent they given Podolski RVP's shirt number? That was said on TalkSport earlier. If true, that's a big indication that he's on his way...

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 08:59:32
Why jump in at £35m? Why not wait and see what Bilbao accept then enter the race.

Sydney!""
dear mr Sydney
ngiak has seen a lot from you opinions on every post
even penguins have better things to do every hour of every day
ha ha ngiak misses ribbing you
btw if we don't go in at 35 million... the bids will increase
and our usual token 25 million bids will surely be rejected, no?
ha ha ha Manchester united will surely not even come lose to 35 million bidding war
but at least we competed
guess what? the player is greedy for going to the higher salary
and the selling club are at fault for trying to get the highest price
and he did not leave for footballing reasons
ngiak got our list of excuses right?
gan

Believable3 Unbelievable0

As a great man from South Park would say............... Umkay.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree4

26 Jul 2012 08:24:29
Morning Everyone, just doing a bot of thinking outloud. After watching the first 3 pre-season games, been very impressed with Powell & Kagawa (shrewd business by SAF as per usual). Kagawa could prove to be buy of the summer already, his touch, vision & composure is emense. Jessie Lingard, Tyler Blackett & Ryan Tunicliffe are coming along nicely. Im still disappointed that Pogba went but this may actually be to our benefit, no more pre-madona antics to distract the youngsters coming through.

Now on to Moura, I personally think he is what we need, he Kagawa, Nani, Valencia could be devistating. I know people think we still need an enforcer and we still might, but as mentioned above of Tunicliffe can break through, Anderson stays fit &/or Fletcher comes back hopefully, I think this area has been resolved. However I obviously wouldnt complain if someone else cones in as the more options available to us the better.

Now on to RVP, I think even at 28 & 20-25 million he would be a phenominal signing, additional creative flare and the ability to link up & provide for Rooney, I fail to see what the problem is. He is proven in the league & CL and that alone is worth 10million in my opinion.

Just my thoughts, what do you all think?

Ole99

Believable3 Unbelievable2

RVP at 29 and with a poor injury history is not good value at £20m-£25m. It's daylight robbery. Add that to a £10m a year salary and you have to say he is very expensive. That is all good and well if he is fit, but what if he is injured for half the season like he usually is? The money could be far better spent elsewhere. Lewandowski's fee would be cheaper, his salary would be a quarter of RVP's and he is 6 years younger.

RVP - £20m-£25m + £40m (4 years) = £60m-£65m.

Lewan - £15m-£18m + £12.5m (5 years) = £27.5m-£30.5m.

Sure RVP would be the instant world-class addition and would be a major coup, but in terms of value he would be very expensive and not the logical way to go.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree0

I understand that financially wise RVP wouldn't be the best signing. However I believe for footballing reasons and more he would be a brilliant signing.
1) We won't have to over rely on Rooney and he can be rested properly.
2) Having two players in your team who will score 30 plus goals a season can only be good.
3) We will be loosing a lot of our experienced (Scholes, Giggs, Rio) players in the next few seasons so we need to ensure that with our excellent youth coming through we have players there to help mentor.
4) It weakens our direct opposition and and ensures are other rivals do not get stronger.
5) It is a huge signal of intent on the league. It is the marquee signing we all crave for, so I can not see why people would be disappointed if we sign him.
6) He will be useful for set pieces. I remember him curling in a few free kicks from the right side and we will have Rooney on the left and even Baines at left back potentially.
7) It gives us a better chance in Europe as if Rooney is not up to his best or if RVP isn't both can play lone striker to devastating effect. Something that I don't think can be said about Welbeck and Hernandez yet
8) I could easily see RVP and Rooney forming a deadly partnership. From what I have seen RVP plays on the last man or near about whereas Rooney plays in the hole. However both are comfortable playing each others roles, ie, RVP dropping back and Rooney going further forward making them extremely hard to mark
9) RVP is more dangerous in the air compared to Hernandez etc and he has more presence on the pitch. Look at some of the times to he has rallied that Arsenal team this season
10) I personally think an attack of
______Carrick____Cleverley/Anderson
Moura______Rooney______Kagawa
___________RVP
would be the best in the league and our defence is the best or second best in the league and would only be better if we added Baines and keep Vidic and Smalling fit.
The Red Manc

Agree0 Disagree0

I completly expect RVP to be injured for at least 3 or 4 months this season. Last season was his first without injury, a fluke season if you will.

RedDevil19

Agree0 Disagree0

I wouldn't complain if we signed RVP, just believe Lewandowski is far more likely to happen. I also think Lewandowski could be a very good player and he already has a great relationship with Kagawa.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 08:14:29
Rumours have Adebayor agreeing to terms with Spurs, which means City will be clear to pursue Van Persie. Probably inevitable anyways, but if SAF wants him, he'd better move fast and decisively before City get involved.-KG

Believable1 Unbelievable0

But city still have, Aguero, Tevez, Dzeko?, Balotelli. They clearly don't need RVP and he would rot on the bench!

Agree0 Disagree0

Tevez and Dzeko both likely to leave also

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 07:57:58
RVP loses no.10 shirt to Lucas Podolski... Does this this confirm he is in the move during this window? I'd say yes ;)

Sydneys mother!

Believable4 Unbelievable0

Mum, he is definitely leaving this summer. Kroenke will want his dividends. Arsenal pretend they will be strict in selling him, but all the clubs know he will be sold hence the £8m-£12m bids.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

There's a story in a few of papers this morning, that Aresnal are going to hang on to RVP till January...

RedDub

Agree0 Disagree0

Welcome to the site syd mum

Ross

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 07:53:28
Do any of the eds know if Barca & Munich have made bids for Martinez and of how much??

seen a report that both clubs have only bid 26m euro....

if true then why O why are we not going in there and bidding 35+

Martinez would be a fantastic signing..

Oxred

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Why jump in at £35m? Why not wait and see what Bilbao accept then enter the race.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

United wont go head to head with barce and munich
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred, why?

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd
there are a number of reasons why united wont go head to head with barce or munich there are also a number of reasons why we wont try to sign martinez all of which have been covered numerous times and I cant really be bothered "bantering" about them now.
lets just say i will be amazed if we sign martinez, very surprised if we even try, and will fall off my seat if we wait untill either barce or munich agree a price and then come in with an offer over that
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

So it's just your opinion then?

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd
of course its just my opinion.
do you really think we will try to sign martinez and out bid barce and munich with transfer and wages?
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

If the manager wanted him then yes we would at the very least bid and offer him terms. I do not think Bayern are stronger than us in the market, financially Barcelona are not either, but they do have the luxury players to play alongside and the great location. This wouldn't stop us trying to sign a player though.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Martinez will also be playing with several international team mates and will not have to relocate too far. I doubt we would sign Martinez, but if the manager wanted him he would enter the race whether or not Bayern or Barcelona are in it.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

Syd
Do you that as a fact or is that just your opinion
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Okay then Jred how about you bring some evidence to the table that proves "United wont go head to head with barce and munich" and I will bring some evidence that proves the manager does bid for players who he wants to bid for.

You can go first.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd
Like I said it is only my opinion , you can't know for a fact that fergy will bid for Martinez
He may want the player but he may not have the cash or he may feel the player is over valued or he may know the player wants to stay in Spain.

You say yes fergy would bid for him if he wanted him but that's just your opinion , you don't know that any more than I or anyone else on this site does.

Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd
there are a number of reasons why united wont go head to head with barce or munich there are also a number of reasons why we wont try to sign martinez all of which have been covered numerous times and I cant really be bothered "bantering" about them now.
lets just say i will be amazed if we sign martinez, very surprised if we even try, and will fall off my seat if we wait untill either barce or munich agree a price and then come in with an offer over that
jred
That's a copy off my second post have a read of it I'm not going to argue about it because neither of us really knows the truth.
I really don't understand your need to prove people wrong and yourself right
I have said for the last 12 months Martinez would be my first choice signing and I would be chuffed if we got him but I don't think we will ( that's just my opinion)
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

If the manager wanted to make a bid for Martinez, then he would make a bid for Martinez. Why wouldn't he? Whether he gets him or not is another story, but if he really wanted to bid, then he would bid.

Saying we wouldn't enter a bid for Martinez just because Barcelona or Bayern are interested in Martinez is utter nonsense. Opinion or no opinion is is nonsense and completely unfounded.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree1

Syd
Of course you think it's nonsense because it differs from your opinion ,
But you can't know for a fact your right it's just your opinion.
Everyone is entitled to the opinion
Mine is I don't think fergy would get into an auction with bayern and barce for Martinez I think if barce really want Martinez there would be little point trying to sign him as he would end up at barce
But for the 5 th time that's just an opinion I may be wrong
You think different and that's fine that your option your entitled to your opinion and your entitled to think your opinion is fact and anyone else is wrong
Like I said I really didn't want to get in to this because I new were it would go
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

LOL ;)

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 05:04:54
talk of Rio's testimonial remineds me of another legends testimonial Bryan Robsons, when it was still the game of the working class, does anyone remember him throwing cash into the crowd, can you imagine any modern day players doing that.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

26 Jul 2012 06:33:46
Sao Paulo chief Lopes says Man Utd can sign Lucas

Sao Paulo vice-president Joao Paulo de Jesus Lopes says they could still agree a fee with Manchester United over the sale of Lucas Moura.

Lopes insists the door is not closed to Barclays Premier League outfit.

He told Radio Estadao ESPN: "I don't rule out the possibility that in the future there are some sort of negotiations, because we received Manchester [United] with great courtesy and left open the possibility of more talks.

"Manchester [United] came to us and their approach was serious. Other teams expressed an interest for Lucas, but only through the media in their countries."

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Well perhaps it will be slightly more difficult now the IPO has pretty much canceled. I hope I am wrong, but I think funds may be slightly more tighter than they would have been had this IPO gone through.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

I think the Glazer's might have pulled one over on SAF, tell him there's money go after your targets, get him to publicly back them then pull the rug, so to speak!

Tommy

Agree0 Disagree0

Tommy, it costs money to file for IPO's, it costs money to hire private bankers to set up the floatation. This wasn't a facade by the owners. We will still have money to spend, but I think it will be less than it could have been had this IPO gone through like planned. We'll see I guess.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 05:00:50
Gav eriksen is nothing and i really mean nothing like modric.

marlow"""
dear mr marlow
finally a voice of reason
eriksen is so overrated it's ludicrous
ngiak has watched Ajax in more than half their games last season
ngiak would rather have welbeck
or even in the Ajax team.. young de Jong is much more influential
most of the time eriksen is just roaming the field hiding
and ngiak shall not even start about the quality of opponents
to compare him with modric?
ngiak can't stop laughing!!
ngiak would not even bid 5 mil for him
gan

Believable3 Unbelievable2

Marlow/gan (RTFP)

I didnt comment on how good Eriksen is. I replied to a post that listed 5 players that we have supposedly 'turned to' since missing out on Modric. My point was that only Eriksen comes even close to playing the same role in the team

I do agree they are not the same player and Modric is class whilst Eriksen is just potential

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 01:22:00
As much as I expect to get criticised for this.
Is it me or bebe doesn't look that bad in the recent friendlies.
Opinions eds ?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

Bebe was never as bad as one or two made out he was on here, but still not United quality.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

"The lad Bebe has come on leaps and bounds....he's like a new signing...."

Sir Alex Ferguson, August 2nd, 2012.

Mark my words.

RED_SKY

Agree1 Disagree1

RED_SKY, Bebe will be sold this summer. I think you may be being a little over dramatic :)

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 02:38:52
Wondering if United should put n a bid for Nigel De Jong. He's 27 and would be a cheap option as a holding midfielder.

Forget about RVP and get a strong tackling midfielder to break up plays and start the counter attacks.

KB

Believable1 Unbelievable4

Good shout but i doubt City would sell him to us.

Mad Hatter

Agree1 Disagree0

United do not want a De Jong type player. The manager has been very clear about that. The manager likes his midfielders to be more versatile. Box2box midfielders that like to defend and attack is where it's at ;)

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree0

If De Jong is not good enough to get in the City team ahead of Barry what makes you think he's good enough for United?

He isn't the greatest with the ball and tackles in a cowardly manner leaving his studs up or following through with the other leg.
Rather stick with what we have
ajk

Agree1 Disagree0

Ajk, to be fair to De Jong he was a regular before he started being difficult during contract negotiations.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 20:21:46
Hey guys was just wondering about fantasy league codes my team "BermyUnited" is ready to play do I need to make a uniform. Thanks for the help. To avoid any confusion Bermy is what we locals call Bermuda.

Darren-Bermuda

Believable0 Unbelievable0

There are a few mate. The one I set up is code:

22720-8435

on fantasy.premierleague.com

TK-Red

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2012 01:16:24
Rumours about Baines seem to have gone quiet, but with fryers & fabio not there surely he has to buy an understudy/replacement for evra.

Fergie has been experimenting with Brady at LB on the tour so far, and despite his effort and his ability going forward, he looks very vulnerable defensively and don't think he could be relied upon in the prem if evra got injured.

Gpot7

Believable3 Unbelievable0

I agree that we need a new LB but your having ago at Brady who has played two games in a new position... It took Evra a full season to make that position his own and really start putting in good performances, give the kid chance to find his feet there before slating him

fearny

Agree1 Disagree1

Gpot7, Baines has hit a deadlock from what I hear. Everton and United cannot agree a fee. This will likely drag on for a while longer. Apparently we will not go above £12m, Everton want more. We'll see what happens I guess.

fearny, to be fair Brady will not likely play LB again after the tour. He is a stop-gap til Evra joins up with the squad. The lad is a left-winger, a talented one at that too. I think he will go on loan to Hull, but I hope he goes to somewhere like Wigan.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd
i read that on caugh1offside and go1l as well
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

I suspect they (Caught offside & Goal) read that from the same place that I read it? A top journalist's Twitter page. They often get their info from such places.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

OMG, I didn't think you meant this story was released on Caughtoffside & Goal,Com TODAY. I thought you meant a while ago. Steve Bateman said this a couple weeks ago and they are getting this info now? Just goes to show how poor these sites are.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

I repeated this story on here on the below time/date.

"17 Jul 2012 08:55:08"

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd
My bad I must of missed it when you posted a couple of weeks ago that we wouldn't go past 12 mill.

So in future we u put I heard should I take that to mean you read on twitter
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes Jred, you know I have no sources within OT. I have made that very clear for some years now. I get a little bit of hearsay around Carrington which can be pretty accurate regarding the youngsters, but not the seniors, but I do listen to certain little snippets from Twitter. Not any Tom, Dick & Harry, but journalists with close ties to certain people. I do not take the info as gospel truth either, however the Baines/United deal deadlocked at £12m is something I heard (via Twitter) 9/10 days ago. That is just filtering through to other media sources now. To be fair a lot of the stuff they say is near enough what Ed002 would say. They are much vaguer though.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 22:00:19
I.P.O postponed due to volotile markets. Will this affect our transfer activity?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

25 Jul 2012 22:48:46
Well my amigo's I am away for the next two weeks in sunny Marbella. And what a two weeks they could prove to be. Hopefully I am completely wrong and we splash the cash and bring in some exciting world class players. If I am right when I return we will still be being linked with everybody and signing nobody whilst Fergie tells us all there is no value and what great owners the Glazers are. At least my old mate GDS gets a rest for the next two weeks but I am sure he looks forward to my return. If I hadn't seen such riches I could live with being poor. I AM KLOOT {Ed007's Note - Have a good holiday mate, I hope the Wi-Fi in the hotel is broken.....;-)

Believable5 Unbelievable1

Have a good one,

Cban

Agree1 Disagree0

Have a good one mate, and remember, smile.

GDS

Agree1 Disagree0

I was in Marbella a couple weeks back, make sure you go to Puerto-Banus!

Ps. Don't even contemplate going to News Cafe if you see it....10 a drink sets you back a fair bit you could say ;)

Have a good time, bud.

MPez

Agree0 Disagree0

I am away also for the next 2 weeks in the sunny algarve and will be computerless by choice,i also hope we do some business but wont be surprised if were scrambling around after someone on the 31st august.i will miss my daily fix of opinions but the sun ,super bock and sea bass beckon
johndenton

Agree0 Disagree0

I was also there.. got back on the 14th, really nice place, like mpez said go to puerto banus, has Ferrari', Lamborghini' and those big yachts, also go to linekers if you can, it's a bar in marbella.

JK92

Agree0 Disagree0