Manchester United Banter Archive January 28 2019

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


28 Jan 2019 20:37:14
I get that it's harder in the EPL at the top of the league with 6 teams competing for 4 places. Yet this hasn't always been the case, both City and Spurs challenging is a recent phenomenon, only a few years old. Chelsea have only joined the party over the last 15 years and to some extent have done so as Arsenal have phased out to a certain extent. Liverpool have challenged for 2 maybe 3 league titles in nearly 30 years.

So it hasn't always been the case of 6 into 4.

For me the real issue though is that the 6 teams least likely to give youngsters a chance due to intense competition for UCL places are the same 6 clubs who hoover up the majority of the young talent, to such an extent that they even often compete for youngsters from abroad as well as domestic youngsters.

If all the most talented kids are stockpiled in academies where they realistically aren't going to get a chance then it stands to reason the kids who will get the chances are the less talented kids in academies outside of the top six.

Is shouldn't be lost on people that Jason Sancho and Callum Hudson-Odoi have both come from top six academies, both are hugely talented a d both look like they will have to go to German to make their breakthroughs. Yet they haven't gone to mid table teams in Germany, but instead to the top two teams in Germany, in Hudson-Odoi's case he would be moving to a side far more likely to finish higher in their league then the team he would be leaving will finish in theirs.

Should there be tighter and more stringent rules for British clubs with regards to youth academies?

Should their be a limit on the number of players you can recruit beyond a certain radius of your club? Obvious adjusted to take population into consideration.

Should their be stricter limits on the number of "home grown" players a side must register?

Should their be limits on the number of players a club can bring in during one season?

As we are seeing we do produce talented youngsters, it is the system in place which is stopping them getting through, it is the system we need to change.

Believable9 Unbelievable5

28 Jan 2019 22:06:22
Callum hasn't gone yet, Shappy :) we can enjoy him for 5 more months at least haha.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Jan 2019 14:52:52
Chelsea offered him a deal he said no. He wants game time and will get it at Bayern.

It wouldve been a different issue if chelsea never offered him a deal but they didn't and hr rejwected ao there isn't much Chelsea can dom. Its a results business and its personal choice for players.

He probably wants to play now rather then wait around so that is why he is moving.

Its not really a big deal as this is part of life and should be looked at as normal.

Agree2 Disagree0

29 Jan 2019 17:55:33
Jackson, If by enjoy him you mean watch him play 3 games most likely as a sub then leave in the summer then yeah, enjoy him all you want.

The lad has handed in a transfer request, he is refusing to sign a new deal. I'm sure being made to see out a contract at a club he no longer wants to be at will suddenly make him happy to sign a new deal and tie himself to the club for longer.

Its a silly stance from Chelsea, they have an offer of 35-40m on the table, for a player who wants to leave and can do in 5 months time regardless. At the present time he isn't even a regular starter.

If someone had offered us 40m for Pogba the January before he left nearly every United fan would have snapped their hand off for such a large fee for a player who just doesn't play for the club.

Instead Chelsea will receive practically nothing for him and he won't make a telling difference to the points they gain or the trophies they could win between now and the summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Jan 2019 19:35:44
3 games is underselling it, Shappy. He's started 3 in the last month alone, and I'm pretty sure more starts will follow.

His price also won't go down in the next months, especially if he plays semi regularly. And I'm thinkingbin the end he might stay after all, and that his mind is not yet made up completely. Otherwise the club would let him go, as they've shown in the past with Matic, Mata etc. If Sarri isn't full of rubbish in what he says then it would appear Callum will get minutes in the second half of the season.

I may be too optimistic, but we might be seeing more academy grads in the coming years. CHO, Mount, Ampadu, RLC, Christensen and Reece James all look to have a decent to good chance of making it. They've all been taught to play football the way Sarri and Roman like. Tammy should get the chance as well, but I'm not sure the club rate him as I do.

I'm not here to argue though, so don't take all of this the wrong way.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jan 2019 05:48:01
Bayern may have targeted Houdson Odoi as a long term replacement of Ribery and Robben.
Could be a solid investment if he fulfills his potential.
He could do better at Bayern because he is surrounded by quality players.
Moreover, the German league wouldn't be as challenging as EPL.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 20:36:31
There is loads of factors why England is a poor breeding ground for young talent. The competitive nature of the league leaves the top teams unwilling to spend time blooding youth in. It doesn't seem to be a mandate for clubs as a priority to bring through youth.

And can you blame a manager for not doing it? If you were guaranteed a few season you could plan the transition of youth players into the first team squad, but why would you when you could be sacked after 15 games?

Me personally, I would always have at least one academy player on the bench for every game. For the games you're winning comfortably and if you're trailing and just need a spark.

Another problem is that the reserve league is a load of pony. Nothing stagnates a players progress more than too many season's playing in the Premier League 2 or whatever name it has at the moment. Players need a chance. Look at Rashford. Not even first choice in the reserves and a few years later because of faith and him grabbing his opportunity, he's now one of the brightest prospects in football.

Back to your point about Germany being a beacon of hope for young English players. Money has kept the youth in England. I have no doubt that City offered Sancho more money than Dortmund did but he chose the regular football over more money. You have to remember too that he wasn't an instant success. His start in Germany wad a bit hit and miss, but minutes on the pitch for a young footballer is invaluable.

Footballers aren't the brightest bunch but maybe the penny has dropped that it's better for your career to go in search of regular football instead of whichever team is willing to pay you more.

Spanish and Italian teams let their youth prospect's go to their rivals all the time. English teams tend to hoard decent players until they've reached the age and their fans no longer care about them.

Sancho moves to Dortmund. Gets in the team ahead of Pulisic. Pulisic now wants to leave. Joins Chelsea for 50 million. Hudson-Odoi now has his path blocked and will move Bayern. It's a really weird one but until it becomes more financially viable for clubs to produce youth players, sadly it isn't going to happen that regularly.

Haven't said all that, we have a few awesome prospects and a manager that has the support of the fans and hopefully soon the full backing of the board. So maybe we'll see 2 or 3 of them get more game time over the next year.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

28 Jan 2019 21:57:40
Sorry, this was supposed to be a reply to Shappys post down the page.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 20:35:06
Why go for short term, let's think long term how many old players did fergie sign? Just watched this short clip of a history of Old Trafford. Hope you enjoy.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

28 Jan 2019 19:25:07
Well Well Well

Chelsea Away. Here we go again.

:)

BIg Games coming thick and fast.

Come on lads.

Believable6 Unbelievable0

28 Jan 2019 19:59:22
Just adds to the monster month ahead of us. Bring it on.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 17:55:01
Anyone else think Zaha could be a good option for the right? Didn't work out with us, bad management imo. But i think he could step up. Mind you would cost atleast twice as much this time around.

Believable1 Unbelievable4

28 Jan 2019 18:11:07
I think he’s found his level, I don’t see him at a top 6 team.

Agree6 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 18:25:38
Agree with AJH and why would he want to come back, Moyes’ daughter is no longer around.

Agree1 Disagree1

28 Jan 2019 18:36:52
Good player AJH, think he'd be a fit for Tottenham.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 18:39:47
I think he has the talent to be a player for a top 6 side, I don't think he has the mentality though. I think being the big fish in a small pond suits him better.

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 18:39:58
Hasn’t scored for about 5 months or something. Good player but a bit too in love with himself.

Agree1 Disagree1

28 Jan 2019 18:55:08
Will go to china at some point for the cash i'd say.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 19:13:44
What makes you say that ken? What impression from zaha have you got that he's that type of player who only plays for cash.

If anything it is the opposite, he could have left crystal palace for a few windows now but stayed with them and performed very well.

On zahas time at united its pretty clear it was too much too soon and it was overwhelming for him but we did sell him down the river, he signed in january 2013 on the assumption that sir alex would have a couple more seasons in him and he could develop under one of the best.

Then it turns out fergie retired, moyes and his cabal come in and we all know that season was a shambles, it would have been hard for any young attacking player to develop in that season.

Hope he gets his move and proves people wrong, quality player.

Agree2 Disagree2

28 Jan 2019 20:03:21
Its just where i think he will end up Dsg. If he can't get a move to a top 6 club in the next year or 2 i think he and palace might get an offer they can't refuse.
I really like him as a player he get your attention every time i see him. But i'd say he wiuld be twice as frustrating as nani ever was and the flashes will not happen and they don't happen often enough.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Jan 2019 00:57:09
His decision making is horrible, he loses the ball too much and is very inconsistent. Nani was twice the player that he is.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Jan 2019 09:39:40
Not for me. Should stay at Palace and be the main man. Well he can go anywhere, as long as it’s not back to Old Trafford.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 12:15:29
So a slight change of topic, Bayern Munich are pushing very hard for Callum Hudson-Odoi, and it looks like they might get their man.

It wouldn't be the first time recently that a young talented English player moved to the Bundesliga, in fact its becoming somewhat of a well walked path. Reece Oxford, Jadon Sancho, Ademola Lookman, Mandela Egbo, Kaylen Hinds, Osayamen Osawe and Reiss Nelson have all moved either permanently or on loan over the last few years.

We complain that Germany always do better than we do at international tournaments, we bemoan the riches of the conveyor belt of German talent, and lament the bare cupboard we have back at home.

Yet it is in Germany where many of our potentially next great generation of footballers are making their debuts and forging their careers.

Why is it possible and easier for our young players to get the regular minutes they need across the channel than it is here at the clubs many of them have been at since they were 7 years old.

If Hudson-Odoi does complete his move to German then the future first choice wingers of our country could both be playing in the Bundesliga and not our own EPL.

Is it a case of top clubs hoarding talent then not being able to give them a chance? Or is it more complicated?

Either way something needs to be done, or will we lose players like Gomes and Greenwood to Germany in a year or twos time.

Believable13 Unbelievable0

28 Jan 2019 12:35:19
We won't lose players like Greenwood and Chong because we are not Chelsea and we give youth a chance.

I think it would be better for kids to go and play in a tough league like Bundelsiga then just stay here and play for the reserve team and learn nothing.

Kida at 18 years of age need proper coaching and if they are playing with players below their level the they wouldn't learn anything.

Agree6 Disagree1

28 Jan 2019 12:50:22
Its a combination. Here most of the big clubs are ran by egomaniacs' for whom its all. about the latest expensive signing rather than play young academy talents. Its noticeable that the two main such clubs haven't produced much from their academies in years.

Also the standard of competition in Germany is lesser. Bayern are guaranteed to win the league in 8 out of 10 seasons. Dortmund are pretty much expected to be 2nd or win in those other 2 seasons. Beyond that everyone's only playing for European places and its a more level playing field. Here there's six teams vying for top 4.and even below that there's intense competition. The money on offer means most clubs won't risk 3-4 young players at once. Even United have dropped off on this. Jose only played McTominay to prove a point and Rashford only got his break because of injuries.

Agree2 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 14:01:41
There is maybe ten teams in the Bundesliga who simultaneously know that getting in to Europe is their ceiling and would need an absolute horror show to even think about getting relegated. In these circumstances bringing through youth and hoping you unearth a gem is one of the most viable ways of competing with Bayern and Dortmund.

The problem in England is pretty much down to the top six clubs and the threat of no champions league. If this were taken away and the top six qualified at least for the CL playoffs maybe things would be different. Perhaps Chelsea would have gone all in with youth this year after their title challenge was over. Maybe we would have recalled Tuanzebe and played Chong after Mourinho was sacked.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 15:08:07
Look at 90’s Italian football, a similar thing happened there whereby they had all the foreign imports which meant Italian player started moving to other leagues to get their chance. Football is just cyclic I guess.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 15:13:52
Tricky keeping talent content and patient over time. I hope we have the right staff to do that.
For all we know Shappy, Odoi may choose to follow the likes of Albert adomah and kwesi Appiah and choose to play for Ghana instead of towing Welbeck's line. Likewise Ogbo, Osawe and Lookman may opt for Nigeria's National team.

Agree0 Disagree0

mbd              

28 Jan 2019 18:59:11
I can't think of too many that have left and become top players in germany or anywhere else shappy.
Its a short list.
How many of chelseas loanees have gone on to be top players elsewhere.

Agree0 Disagree1

28 Jan 2019 20:00:15
Ken it's only a recent phenomenon, a couple of years old. It's also not about whether they become world class players or not, just that they needed to leave the country to get a chance.

Agree3 Disagree1

28 Jan 2019 20:33:00
Only 11 can play. kids coming through are normally 3rd choice for their position at best. Its tough getting games it very competitive. i'm not even sure its a phenomenon at all. I don't even think their is a handful of players gone anywhere in europe. Just hyperbole or fake news.

Agree2 Disagree3

28 Jan 2019 10:14:15
So what is happening with Spurs and Pochettino? I ask as he is still the favourite for the United job.

It has been a tough couple of weeks, losing in the league and getting knocked out of both the domestic cups. So what's going on?

Is it that Spurs are massively over reliant on Kane and with him injured they struggle?

Or has Pochettino's head been turned and he is making mistakes he wouldn't if he was fully focused?

Or are Spurs suffering from the boards decision not to invest in the squad last summer?

Or are we just getting excited by a storm in a tea cup?

To be honest I think it is likely a combination of all of them, a lack of investment in the summer means Spurs still look light up front, especially when Kane is unavailable. I also feel that since Mourinho's departure Pochettino has seemed a little distracted, he has spoken on several occasions about United and had it been a different manager the press might have construed that as flirting with the United job. This has coincided with a drop in form for Spurs. Do the players feel the manager might be leaving in the summer?

Of course it could just be typical Spurs, do well then self implode when they can see the finish line.

Either way I feel what is happening at Spurs at them moment is certainly making many United fans question whether Pochettino has what it takes the get his teams over the line, is their a mental fragility there? His latest comments that cups are just ego boosters and are entirely reliant on luck is not the kind of comments I would want to hear from our manager if we had just been knocked out of two cup competitions in a week. I would hope that there would be serious reflection on why that happened and what can be done to improve it moving forward. Of course, that might well be what is happening, and Pochettino is just deflecting and avoiding washing Spurs dirty laundry in public.

However, it will in many fans eyes count as a potential mark against the Spurs manager.

Personally, I feel Pochettino is probably the best manager available, however, as I have said before the best man available isn't necessarily the best man for the job.

Believable8 Unbelievable1

28 Jan 2019 11:06:00
Injuries and lack of investment are catching up with them. Alli, son, kane all not playing and levy and his penny pinching means no real replacements either.

Imagine if utd were without pogba, martial and rashford all at the same time but rather than lukaku and Sanchez and fred our replacement options were llorente, moura and an academy kid.

Agree2 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 11:33:19
Good post Shappy.

Kane, Alli and Son are players that Spurs just can’t be without. The backup options are just not good enough.

Pochettino also seemed to rest a couple yesterday which I have always disliked and based on how many were missing due to injury etc that was something Spurs could not afford.

Utd rested Rashford and Martial for Lukaku and Sánchez which as a Utd fan I’m ok with as they are quality players to come in. Bailly also played instead of Jones but with his performance we could say that was an upgrade.
Spurs didn’t have all those options.

Before anyone jumps down my throat about Lukaku. I do not like his first touch and he has been slow and overweight at the start of this season and so I am glad to see Rashford replace him, particularly as he is one of our own. However Lukaku is a proven goal scorer at PL level.

This downturn in Spurs form does raise the question about Pochettino which I believe is a good thing. Utd need the right person to fit them, Ole has shown that understanding the club history and the fans is important in order to set out the way the team should play.
I don’t want to get sentimental but I hope Ole keeps us winning and gets us top 4 plus into the FA cup final to give the board a real problem.

Agree4 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 11:46:44
CSM, That is true. However Kane and Alli were available against us. Losing to Chelsea with injuries is fair enough. However, even with key injuries they should have a good enough squad to beat Palace. They had Rose, Winks, Lamela, Wanyama, Aurier and Lloris on the bench against Palace, several of them aren't first choice or play every week so he could have put out a stronger 11 if he wanted.

They could have lined up Llrois, Trippier, Sanchez, Dier, Vertonghen, Rose, Winks, Wanyama, Moura, Llorente, Lamela.

Or even 433 and push Dier back into midfield. So he had options, and he didn't have to play three youngsters. Two of which (Foyth and Walker-Peters) have played several first team games so are hardly untested youngsters. it would be like us playing McTominay and Tuanzebe. Talented young players who have several first team appearances under their belts.

Spurs should still be in the FA cup, and they are not. Was that down to luck like Pochettino says, or down to poor team selection/ tactics?

Agree4 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 12:26:04
Shappy they lost to us because we had ddg and they didn't nothing to do with managers really. Also they should have beat palace yes but can you really blame pochettino for resting his starting team, there is a pl game in 2 days time and unlike us they really don't have the option of rotating his main players especially with injuries.

Agree2 Disagree2

28 Jan 2019 13:20:22
His after game comments suggest he is prioritising top 4 which is sad. He's pretty much accepted he is playing for third and the mood music is thanks the best that is possible at spurs.

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 14:22:26
I think it was ed001 who made some very valid points about his choice of transfers. How many players has he bought that have really improved the team.

He has bought an awful amount of sub standard players.

Agree2 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 14:58:43
It's an interesting situation as it asks the question why can't Spurs win? Has their manager reached his limits, or are there limits beyond the managers control which restrict them?

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 15:05:31
Exactly what I was going to say angelred, Ed was spot on with his analysis. For all we know he may end up at real madrid.

Agree0 Disagree0

mbd              

28 Jan 2019 19:06:45
There are areas in our team that if you take out our 3 1st 11 players from 1 area like midfield in herrera pogba and matic we would have to play a midfield of fellaini fred and mctominay. If we have to play that midfield we will lose as many as win.
I agree with shappy that he could have played a stronger team but it would have risked epl and cl games in nwxt 10 days if he got more injuries.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jan 2019 10:12:44
I'm amazed our old friend ronnie hasn't come out of hiding on hearing the news Tielmans is available for only £20m!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

28 Jan 2019 11:48:26
Tielemans is too old now, just like Ronnie stopped going on about Reben Neves once he turned 21.

Ronnie's moved on to the next 18 year old playing his first few games at senior level.

Agree2 Disagree0

Review Of The Day 28th January 2019

28 Jan 2019 07:29:01
{Ed's Note - Ed001 has posted a new article entitled, Review Of The Day 28th January 2019

Believable2 Unbelievable0

28 Jan 2019 09:13:39
Cheers Ed001 for the article. Was wondering what kind of sanctions Milwall could be facing. Surely nothing as severe as CAF took against Ismaily?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I have no idea mate, the FA seem to be pretty much toothless when it comes to Millwall, despite their fans continuing to cause the same problems as they ever have, they have even given them awards. For some reason they are afraid to admit that Millwall fans are a problem. So long as they do it away from stadiums the FC doesn't give a toss. As for this chant, I very much doubt they will take as much action against them as they should.}

mbd              

28 Jan 2019 10:11:31
Great read Ed001, its really shameful for a club when a particular fan base behaves in such a way.

Also would like to know your stance on Perisic, would he be a fit in Ole's system or we should just let him go to another club as we are stacked up on the left side.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - on his day he is an excellent player Perisic, but he can be inconsistent, which is not good when you are coming up to 30. He would at least give you more options in wide areas, where you have few and quality if the team gets the best from him. Not like United can't afford to spend a little on a shortish term rebuild to get back to the front of the table, so why not buy him? So long as the policy isn't to buy only that age, one or two to bulk up the team seems a good idea.}