Manchester United Banter Archive October 30 2018

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


30 Oct 2018 22:49:18
Question for the Ed's.

Why are most contracts set at a max of 5 years?

Surely if you sign a player at 20, you would tie him to 10 year or more?
If they fail it will probably happen in the first 5 years anyways and you could cut your losses at any time?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - The rules limit contracts to 5 years plus the season you are in.}

30 Oct 2018 23:05:13
Thanks eds.
What is the rational to that rule then? If both parties want the deal?

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - I don't know why that period was chosen but it does not concern anybody at all.}

31 Oct 2018 08:40:43
On the topic of contracts ed002, has there been any progress in the clubs efforts to renew the contracts of david de gea and anthony martial?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of anything having changed at this time.}

31 Oct 2018 11:25:09
Are both de Gea and Martial looking to depart or renew?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Martial would like to leave but because Manchester United over priced him in the summer and would not consider any sort of part exchange dals they will likely look to extend his contract. Some sort of convoluted loan to buy deal was proposed but that will likely not be in favour of the player. De Gea will be regretting not pushing harder for the Real Madrid move but you can expect that there will be an offer coming for him - the player will need to make a decision.}

31 Oct 2018 12:40:35
Ok thanks Ed. Would be good if they stayed but can understand the reasons for going.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - The club will look to the one year extension but that could also leave them with miffed players who don't want to be there.}

31 Oct 2018 14:51:22
Could i be greedy and ask which club will be putting in an offer for De Gea Ed002? Thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - PSG remain keen.}

31 Oct 2018 15:21:44
Thanks Ed002.

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 23:35:58
Are united watching any potential replacments for De Gea? Or are they confident on persuading him to stay.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Right now the options might prove to be:
Joel Pereira (GK) - MU may opt to utilise Pereira as first choice
Jan Oblak (GK) - interest from the club will be there but the desire of the player to move may not be still
Aleksandr Maksimenko (GK) - Spartak would not be keen to sell but he has been watched on a number of occasions.
Danijel Subasic (GK) Monaco are going through changes and would like to hold on to Subasic but they know a couple of high profile sides, including MU have been looking at him.}

01 Nov 2018 23:26:25
Thanks for the reply ed, hopefully De Gea does get persuaded to stay with us.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Oct 2018 20:24:57
No messing with real Madrid if the manager isn't getting the results they show him the door. But if it's Madrid theirs an excuse he wasn't the right man not the right fit at the present moment but if it happens at united we are toxic, if Manchester United was in Spain the fans would be waving the white hankies at Jose months ago.
Cantona said it Sunday Jose is a good manager but not a fit for united.
He said we need creative football, attacking football committed players.
I'm with you Eric.

Believable9 Unbelievable3

30 Oct 2018 20:37:39
He's not half the coach Jose is for a start. Their squad is far superior at this moment in time too.

I'd much rather behave the way united do than madrid. Those white hankies are embarrassing and their fans are toxic.

Agree10 Disagree4

31 Oct 2018 06:27:28
I get your point Leahy but if we want to use Madrid as role models then we are in serious trouble.

Agree4 Disagree1

31 Oct 2018 08:19:08
Yeah 3 consecutive Champions Leagues as opposed to the dross we see week in week out, definitely need to steer clear of Madrid's model!

Madrid/ Bayern/ PSG/ Chelsea/ City even Everton! All show a ruthlessness we lack. We need to be more decisive when things aren't working and don't look like working.

When SAF moved on we needed to evolve, the fairytale idea of backing managers for years even if not performing has gone - it went 15+ years ago, the idea of having a team full of youth products has gone. Patience has unfortunately gone.

Too much money, too many rich rivals competing for the best talent, too many short-term flippant fans, who will change clubs when things go bad (more so the new breed of fan from overseas, which is more important to the club now due to the numbers) .

We either evolve or die. The game has changed, certain clubs are aware and put little stock in history. The prestige and glory is what attracted the owners to the clubs because it is a leg up and something that guarantees instant financial support, they have no regard for it once they take over though because money talks. Our owners and management are trapped, we are not one thing or another now. Until we become ruthless with players and managers we will continue to drift and throw good money after bad.

Agree4 Disagree2

31 Oct 2018 08:49:56
Exactly AJH. Who’d want to win that many champions league titles playing such attractive football. Simply nauseous.

Agree2 Disagree1

31 Oct 2018 11:37:25
Beast - I take your point pal and part of me feels the same but I'm not sure we can afford to operate in this way and I don't think we should lose sight of what made our Club successful over the years.

Madrid are struggling because they lost Ronaldo. They have lost 50 goals per season and not replaced them. He's been the foundation of their success since they snatched him from us almost a decade ago.

Madrid are a Club that traditionally have always spent big and signed the best players. This is their MO but it's expensive and doesn't always necessarily yield immediate results. They have won La Liga 3 times in the last 10 years and before their current run of success they hadn't won the Champions League since 2002. Madrid and Barcelona don't operate on a level playing field in Spain. They don't share their TV revenue and as we all know money talks. Eventually if you sack enough managers and buy enough good players you'll inevitably stumble across the right combination. This style can only be successful if money is no barrier and it can be spent indiscriminately.

Being successful is hard. Barcelona await a similar fate when they lose Messi and despite the riches on offer at PSG and City neither Club are yet to win the Champions League.

The harsh reality has been over the past decade Madrid and Barcelona have had two of the best players in the history of the game. (Had they not had Messi Utd might have won two more European Cups) . They have been able to support and enhance their talent by signing other great players and it's been hard for the rest of Europe to compete. The landscape is changing, Messi and Ronaldo are not immortal, they cannot play forever and other Clubs will soon get their chance.

Madrid will have to re-build like they have done in the past. They will undoubtedly continue to be successful but how many managers will they sack and how much money will they have to spend in the process is anyone's guess.

I think Utd need to adopt a more sensible approach and take heed of what made us so successful in the past. Whilst we are a rich Club we can't afford to spend money indiscriminately. History has taught us we need to invest heavily in our academy and scouting departments. We need to find the right balance between signing and developing young players and investment in the squad. We need to appoint managers that share this approach and philosophy.

Our history is based on two great men. Their success built from blooding youngsters that shared an identity with the Club and supplementing this by signing new players. I don't believe this approach is outdated.

As transfer fees continue to spiral out of control maybe the most successful Clubs of the future will be the ones that can find the right balance between identifying, developing and trusting young talent whilst continuing to sign more established players. I don't think even Madrid can afford to sign the likes of Neymar or Mbappe anymore and even if they could they wouldn't have much left over to address other parts of the squad.

Perhaps Jose biggest barrier to success at Utd has been he doesn't like the City. If he doesn't view us as a long term project then his tenure is destined for failure as he won't be afforded enough money to yield short term success.

Jose has the ambition, pedigree and to some extent the ammunition to build a dynasty at Utd. If he can somehow bend to the Clubs traditions, show more faith and patience in youth, develop a more expansive style of football, learn to love the City, really commit to the Club and develop a longer term strategy we'll be ok. Ok your right this is never going to happen what was I thinking 😂?!

Joking aside I think we already have the blueprint for success. We just need to find the right man with the pedigree, courage and patience to implement it again.

Agree5 Disagree2

31 Oct 2018 12:51:26
Good post DLIB. We're overhauling both scouting and academy so we look to be going that way. We have a lot of players either soon to out of contract or coming to the end of their career so we need a lot of fresh blood. We can't buy to replace so the academy will have to supply part if not most.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 15:46:51
Thanks Mort - For anybody that reads my posts (I accept most are like essays and not worth the effort) I've been highly critical of the Glazers. I have concerns about their ambition and worry they won't invest enough to make the difference between us having a good side and a great one. Putting those concerns aside I can't really complain that money hasn't been invested in the squad. What we haven't done yet is found the right man to spend that money wisely whilst continuing to develop and nurture some of our very talented youngsters.

I look at how we operate as a Club, our tradition, our style and there is only one candidate for the job and that's Potch in my opinion. He plays an aggressive, entertaining style of football and is prepared to develop and nurture younger players. He has also demonstrated a commitment and loyalty to the Clubs he's managed. What he has achieved at Spurs whilst working on a shoestring budget has been fantastic. Like City courted and serenaded Pep I believe we should do the same with Potch.

I've heard people call for Eddie Howe but think it's too soon for a Club of our size. He ticks most of the boxes but we just don't know how he would handle the egos or the immense pressure and expectation that comes with being Utd manager. Maybe he could go to
Spurs and replace Potch once he's appointed the next Utd manager. I hope in time he may grow disillusioned at Spurs and look for a new challenge. As they look to finance their new stadium I don't see them investing in their squad and just keeping their most talented players will be considered a success.

I think all this talk of new managers is a touch premature anyway. I've seen the green shoots of recovery (Juventus aside) in our last few games and I still believe that with some clever investment in January and the summer (if he lasts that long) we're still not that far away.

Conversely I think we've reached a point when we can only judge Jose on a game by game basis. He's certainly had enough time and money to transform us into a top 4 side and we should be able to navigate our way through to the last 8 of the Champions League as a minimum. We should also have a recognised style and settled team by this point into his tenure. At the moment it's not been good enough and we can ill afford any more set backs.

Saturday will provide a useful barometer to judge if the mini recovery is based on solid foundations. It's a game we should ordinarily be expected to win but Bournemouth are in good form and we'll face a tough examination. Nothing less than a win will do however and if we come back with anything less than 3 points the pressure will intensify and the vultures will be circling again.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Manchester United has not suffered from the lack of investment in players.}

31 Oct 2018 18:22:06
DLIB - I think we agree in principle. My point was more to do with the ruthless nature of clubs. We tend to be quite passive, it took an age to act with LVG, we extended Jose's contract at the wrong time and look no better off for it.

Madrid whilst struggling at the moment and domestically against a powerhouse in Barcelona do act with ruthless precision more often than not. Jose would not still be in a job if we were Madrid and we the club would be much better off if we bring in a hungry manager with desire and can mix up big signings and youth.

Who knows what the future holds, I notice a lot more loans of good players because wages are a problem. Recession round the corner and various other issues. Bayern also need to rebuild.

Utd have wasted vast resources under LVG and Jose, we need somebody to come in with a plan, back them fully and if they start to deviate from that plan hold them to account - the fundamental skillset a new manager needs is attacking intent.

I just can't see Jose turning this around, everything is against him. He doesn't have the fear factor, the tactical courage or the charisma he once had, that X factor has gone. We need new ideas, somebody to respect the clubs history and traditions (because other clubs replicate the way we played and do well), we need that swashbucking 'score more than you' approach to games again. I'm just saying that we can't be loyal for loyalties sake anymore because other clubs will take advantage of that weakness.

Any new manager coming in now would have a massive job on their hands, same as at Madrid. BUT Jose is 3 years in now and as a project we have lost 3 years because the job is just as difficult as the one Jose inherited from LVG, probably worse because we have even more players that don't fit on bigger salaries!

Madrid acted after 3 months of messiness, we have had 3 years of the same thing, plus Jose's attitude. A lot of the Madrid players seemed to like Lopetegui, but I think there will be a fair few Utd players popping open the Champers when he is finally relieved of his duties. And a great deal more Utd fans.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 19:02:18
Perhaps the club are confident in waiting for the very talented youth as we did in 95, Chong, Greenwood and Gibson plus Gomez? They may or may not make it but alongside Jose is I recall someone in McKenna who knows them.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 16:37:55
Ed002 - I never said they had. My suspicion is the Glazers lack the ambition to make the difference between a top 4 side and Champions.

We saw in the summer that the Club rested on its laurels and didn't invest enough to improve on a good second place finish last season. After all we finished a long way behind City, the squad still needed significant improvement and we didn't do anywhere near enough to bridge that gap.

An ambitious board, one that truly valued trophies above profit would have made the investment necessary to give the manager what he needed to challenge. If they'd have got the players Jose wanted and needed my suspicion's would have been unfounded but unfortunately they didn't and my paranoia was compounded.

I have only seen real investment in the squad on the back of failure. My suspicion is once stability is returned the purse strings are tightened.

I accept money has been spent but sometimes timing is an important factor as well!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - My comments were based on you saying of the Glazers: "I have concerns about their ambition and worry they won't invest enough to make the difference between us having a good side and a great one". They are nrespondingf to requests for the money and you like so many otehrs are advocating them as soft targets. They are not - they have authorised vast amounts of spending much of which has been wasted because the fundamentals are wrong. Don't blame them based on your lack of understanding of the business.}

31 Oct 2018 19:45:50
I can't argue with any of that Beast like I said part of my wholeheartedly agrees with what you say!

Whilst I failed to say in my original post was I respect Madrid's pursuit of excellence and there is no doubt in my mind that every part of the Club is committed and determined to be the very best. I'm just not sure we should follow their methods but I do agree we have a propensity for procrastination which sometimes provides a safe-heaven for mediocrity.

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 21:43:51
Ed002 - If the fundamentals are wrong who's fault is that? If they are responding to requests for money it fell on deaf ears over the summer and if money has been wasted then as the owners of the Club they have to take their fair share of the responsibility for that as well.

I am not arguing that money hasn't been invested in the squad or that much of that money has been wasted; Nevertheless you don't have to be a genius to
understand that further investment was needed if we were serious about competing for the top trophies and wanted to be the best.

The last time I checked we had the biggest turnover in World football yet despite finishing 19 points behind City last season Liverpool, Chelsea, Fulham, Wolves, West Ham, Everton and Leicester all invested more in their squad than we did over the Summer window. That simply cannot happen for team with ambitions to win the league. Yes they have spent money but so has everybody else and I can't understand why we didn't push harder in the summer. I heard the immortal words return "no value in the market" yet no such words were spoken as the Club were panicked into spending vast amounts when we finished outside the top 4. Surely this was the summer to back the manager having won two major trophies the previous season and securing a second place finish and an FA Cup final the season after. Call me a cynic, throw insults in my direction that I don't understand the business if that helps but I've haven't had a reasonable explanation as to why we didn't invest more in a squad that so badly needed strengthening if they had serious aspirations of bringing the title back to Old Trafford?

We generate the most money in world football, the Glazers bought the Club on the back of a leveraged buy out burdening any risk on the Club not themselves, they have saddled us with back breaking debt. Our turnover is significantly higher than the likes of Fulham, Wolves, Leicester, Everton and West Ham and substantially higher than Liverpool and Chelsea, I think we can expect our Club to be more ambitious than most of those teams and to fully back the manager.

My post was more a question of ambition and how determined and serious our Club are about being the very best. Real Madrid don't mess about, they don't accept mediocrity, they act decisively and whilst I don't advocate going to those lengths I think myself and others are entitled to question the ambition of our board. If the fundamentals are wrong it's incumbent on them to put them right. We've been waiting over 6 years for them to do this yet whilst turnover increases results on the pitch don't mirror our success off it.

I'll wager you a side bet that if the Club finishes outside the top 4 we'll see significant spending in the summer which beggars the question why they didn't back our manager in the last window. I suppose there was no value in the market but that doesn't seem to matter when your chasing the top 4 just the title it would seem. Your right about one thing there is something fundamentally wrong with our Club but who's fault is that?!

I accept you think I talk nonsense, have little understanding of football and probably think I'm a cynical, paranoid, idiot but I love my Club and want to see them be successful again. Posting on this site provides me with a cathartic release. Not many people share my enthusiasm for Utd and people can choose to read or ignore my posts as they deem fit. Anyway thank you for taking the time to reply, goodnight.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I don't think you understand how the club or business are run at all. You certainly don't understand the role of the owners and I have no interest in gambling with you.}

01 Nov 2018 19:35:12
..................abuse removed................and both users - great job....................

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Oct 2018 13:53:29
Question for Ed001 if you are around, what do you think of Victor Lindelof? Or your opinion of him?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - decent defender, good on the ball but a little on the weak side. He is adjusting though and becoming more robust as he gets more games. His main issue is his defensive partner - Smalling is all over the place and it is messing with any chance of him showing decent positional sense. If he gets a partner alongside him he can work with, I think he will be a very good long term choice at centre back.}

30 Oct 2018 14:08:26
Definitely agree with you on him being on the weak side, though it's improving. Said it last week after the Juve game that he needs to play with a better CB, no-one can excel playing alonside Smalling, if anything they get worse. Maybe Jose can see how good Lindelof can be so he hasn't really took him out of the team this season, nor criticised him. Haven't really seen Koulibaly but meant to be very good, him or Alderweireld alongside Lindelof would be excellent.

Agree2 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 14:37:12
Hopefully jose, woodward or whoever deals with transfers can make room for a new centre back in january.

We have the likes of jones, rojo, smalling and bailly who have been in and out of favour with Mourinho and at least 3 if not all 4 should be allowed to find new clubs.

I think jones and smallings contracts are up in the summer, do posters think they should be renewed?

Also on a side note what were the club thinking giving rojo a 5 year contract in 2016?

Agree0 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 15:25:03
Would definitely keep Bailly, the rest can go.

Agree5 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 15:49:08
I think Bailly ha been treated unfairly.
Smalling has made plenty of mistakes.
At the time Bailky became the fll guy for the poor team performances.

Agree4 Disagree3

30 Oct 2018 16:00:08
The thing with Bailly, Smalling, Rojo and Jones - they are all scrappy defenders, the type suited to teams that are under the kosh and throw their head where most wouldn't put their feet!

Whilst we have been pretty awful for a while now compared to our previous standards, these type of 'last ditch defenders' rarely get to play to their strengths, on the ball they are poor, positionally they are poor (which is why they fly around) and they don't have footballing brains.

We need to sign defensive players who ooze authority, calmness and a clever nastiness. Most of our current batch are guys that would be first over the trench as cannon fodder, we need a general or even a Rambo (stealthy but effective) - not fodder.

Doing this will also mean we can sack off Matic and the role he plays, that extra man in midfield we can push forward so we can actually focus on attack, which will help strengthen the defence. So many things to change (proper RB as well, maybe Sidibe will be gettable in Jan), but fundamentally I get why Jose wanted CB's but he would probably just buy the wrong type again.

3 years in and I still see glaring holes, players not suited to one another's game, a lack of cohesion everywhere. Some nice inter-play on Sunday though, so hopefully he will stop tinkering and let a settled team form bonds.

Agree2 Disagree3

30 Oct 2018 16:03:48
The reason Lindelof has improved in the last few games is due to a massive increase in his strength and aggression, it has been very noticeable, he is still prone to the odd terrible ball out but he is generally good with the ball at his feet, better than any of our other central defenders anyway. I think until Jan I would play him with Rojo and see what happens.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 16:39:40
agree there beast.

maybe that's one of the reason we were linked with the likes of godin and bonunchi. we are in need of an experienced defender.

the likes of Jones and smalling should have learnt from rio and vidic but they have only gone backwards since.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 17:19:37
Smalling jones and rojo should all be binned. Bailly could go either way it depends on what the issue is there. We do need an old head to guide them. Lindelof, Shaw and dalot have a lot of potential. Add in Tuanzebe etc. Just needs an old head.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 18:13:34
I don’t think it has helped that he has had to cover the left centre back position but I have really liked what I have seen over the last few games. If we could buy an experienced ‘left’ centre back who is postionally sound and move Lindelof to the right I think he could be outstanding for us.

Agree0 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 19:59:59
Lindelof is a good covering defender, watches runs well and usually gets there, makes it difficult to get a shot in, almost a bit of a sweeper. He isn’t an organiser, commander or leader, he doesn’t take the first header. He doesn’t easily move out to cover his full back, almost like he needs telling when to go out to cover. He needs a commander next to him, but unfortunately he has Smalling. Smallings tackle for their penalty on Sunday was utterly ridiculous and where was Smalling when David Luiz crashed the header against the post. Smalling is too inconsistent and doesn’t command a defence. Lindelof with a good strong commanding defensive leader alongside may not be a bad player.

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Oct 2018 22:49:42
I posted during LVG’s first season that Chris Smalling should donate his salary and match fee to the other 10 players on the pitch with him and got slated for it. Chris Smalling is one of the single worst players I’ve seen at united in the last 25 years. Jones is ten times the defender, the lad unfortunately is injury prone.

Agree1 Disagree6

30 Oct 2018 22:52:20
I like lindelof but as all said above, his defensive partner has always been lacking imo. Bailly would in my eyes and should have been the perfect partner but he has had a few dodgy moments and again does not look like he is massively built. We need a commander. Koulibaly would be my pick. But what i'd give for vidic in his prime right now.

Agree1 Disagree1

31 Oct 2018 00:52:17
Would prefer Ferdinand or Stam Redwhiskey.

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 03:20:43
Pallister would do nicely.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 11:28:06
I think Chris Smalling is a visitor here going on the number of dislikes.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Oct 2018 22:30:53
Good post beast. I agree with a lot of that.

Agree0 Disagree0

Review Of The Day 30th October 2018

30 Oct 2018 07:29:01
{Ed's Note - Ed001 has posted a new article entitled, Review Of The Day 30th October 2018

Believable0 Unbelievable1

30 Oct 2018 00:57:35
I must confess I love watching Gary Neville on Monday Night Football. I prefer his analysis more than the games sometimes!

Interesting debate around Martial and I agree with every word. I think Shappy picked up on this a while back and identified that Martial's stats per minutes played are actually pretty good and I seem to remember he was questioning why he wasn't playing more often?! I think what Neville identified however was absolutely correct and his movement off the ball can let him down. He's always struck me as a player that wants the ball to feet and there have been times when I've been sat watching him literally screaming at him to accelerate into space or make a run ahead of the ball. He's often too static and prefers the ball to feet which allows the opposition time to re group and get players back behind the ball and the move often breaks down.

What I found fascinating was that Martial's running stats are poor. He runs at least 1.5 - 2km less than all the other top players such as Hazard, Mane, Salah, Sane, Sterling, William etc.

I posted the other day that we are essentially a counter attacking team. We defend deep and mark zones rather than putting pressure on the ball. I don't like this tactic and would prefer to see us be more proactive and try to win the ball back higher up the pitch; Nevertheless we draw teams onto us and then try and break quickly especially away from home. I think we've struggled recently for a variety of reasons principally players like Smalling and Matic not moving the ball forward quickly enough or with sufficient quality, slowing the transitions, giving the ball away or getting caught in possession. When the ball is played forward into Lukaku his hold up play isn't consistent enough to allow players to get forward and support him and players like Martial, Mata and Sanchez all prefer the ball to feet and rarely make runs ahead of the ball. I've questioned our running stats for some time and we often lack the desire, intensity or application to transition quickly from defence into attack. Somebody like Bale would have been perfect and I can understand why Jose was so keen to land Perisic. It makes the Sanchez signing a curious one as he is another player that prefers the ball to feet and likes to try quick, short passes and play through balls to willing runners rather than making penetrating runs himself. I think this explains why he has struggled at Utd. He is simply not suited to our style of play certainly not out wide anyway and the only way I can see him making any kind of impact at our Club is to try him upfront.

I've mused for some time why Martial often looks a far more dangerous player at OT rather than away from home where he can has often been poor or appeared disinterested. I think that although we still drop deep at home we generally enjoy more possession meaning Martial gets the ball into feet in more dangerous positions. Away from home he maybe lacks the desire and intensity to make those lung busting runs forward and he receives the ball far too deep to be effective.

I think there is absolutely no doubt that Martial is a special talent and at the moment our most exciting player. If he could adapt and learn to make better runs off the ball we'd have some player on our hands. He has all the other necessary attributes to be a top player and I love watching him when he picks the ball up in the final third and runs at defenders. I worry however about his casual languid style and hope he can learn to make those penetrating runs that will really transform him into a special player.

I saw against Everton promising signs of good link up play between Shaw, Pogba and Martial. Whilst I'm yet to be convinced by Fred I like his energy and he is a willing runner from midfield. I think if Mourinho is to make a real success of his time at OT he must find a RW that can carry the ball and make runs ahead of the CF. I think we need a more mobile CF capable of both linking the play and making penetrating runs and we must find another dominant, commanding CB that is also good on the ball and of course we need Martial to continue to develop and sign a new contract.

Believable5 Unbelievable4

30 Oct 2018 09:02:55
Agree with your post.

We still need 3/ 4 players plus adjustments to our playing style in order to compete at the top.

Watching the Spurs v City game last night we are a long way off the fast, free flowing football that City play. Their defence is good but they score goals freely against the lower sides. Watching the passing of City last night just makes me realise how far from competing with teams of that quality Utd are!

Agree2 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 09:50:48
wont ever get controlling fast football with Jose. He won't change.

Agree5 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 11:55:36
Still not in favour of pogba tbh- he just doesn't do it often enough for me and would welcome some sort of deal with Dybala at juve. That obviously would help with a number of attacking options right, centre attacking and in the 10 role. Rashford is a kid who has lost his way a little -he doesn't know where to go and ends up drifting to the wings when he was best placed to play down the middle on Sunday. Martial played well as did lindlehof but yet again smalling, penalty waiting to happen and matic, ran ragged these are the areas we need to address and have for some time. We have had decent results from the last few games but there's still a good way to go.

Agree0 Disagree2

30 Oct 2018 13:01:45
And yet we were the better team against Chelsea and should have won but for some awful defending.

The squad is not that far away.

Agree2 Disagree4

30 Oct 2018 13:58:59
Red tinted glasses by any chance Dodgy?

Shots 21 vs 7
Shots on target 6 vs 4
Possession 63% vs 37%
Passes 611 vs 371
Pass accuracy 89% vs 76%

Not sure where and how you think we were the better side. All stats point towards Chelsea being on top win, lose or draw.

Agree5 Disagree4

30 Oct 2018 14:05:50
Apart from money why would Dybala leave Juve for Utd? He must be crazy.

Agree2 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 14:58:05
FZZ- maybe because of a certain superstar coming to town- and money?
why did pogba come back to utd when he left feeling he wasnt treated right? footballers can be as fickle as streetwalkers mate.

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - Pogba orginally left on the advice of two individuals - it was not related to "feeling he wasn't treated right". He returned because the other interested sides (at that point down to two) would not agree the overall asking price (not just the transfer fee, as that was not an issue). It was a mistake and his career has not progressed since.}

30 Oct 2018 15:12:48
FZZ

I watched the game rather than looking at stats.

Both conceded CFC goals were woeful defending that should not have happened. DDG made a few very easy saves, perhaps one very good one.

MUFC scored a couple of legitimate goals. Missed a one on one.

Football is about opinions, so not arguing with yours, just what I saw.

Agree3 Disagree3

30 Oct 2018 16:35:01
Fair enough, but I do think overall a draw was a fair result.
They way I saw it reflected on the stats as well.

Agree3 Disagree2

30 Oct 2018 16:41:03
stats mean absolutely naff all. the only stat that matters is goals scored.

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Oct 2018 17:40:05
So based on your conclusion bolger2 a draw was a fair result? Something I said before.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Oct 2018 17:43:34
cheers for the clarity re pogba ed002 - my intention was to put forward that players move for all manner of reasons, some logical and others maybe not so and that the movements will continue to throw up surprises:)

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - You need to see players as tiny transient snapshots in time. A few will stay for the duration but most will not.}