09 Jul 2015 16:05:36
BBC reporting that we're interested in sakho of West Ham


1.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 16:22:39
I was really impressed by him home and away last year, didn't give the defence a minutes rest, fast and strong. He's shown he can deliver in the Premier League


2.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 16:31:13
Well we do need a new striker but him? Is he the guy we really need?

I'd rather take a chance and splash £40million on Kane.


3.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 16:32:17
Hope not, not near good enough in my opinion


4.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 16:51:44
Not a glam name, but not an overpriced has been who will command all the money in the world. He had a fantastic season and for £15 million, great deal. A long way to go before anything concrete can be proven though!


5.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 17:22:24
You have to think what do we need and what are our plans. We play 433 then we need 1 more than rooney/Wilson. If rooney is 1st choice in lvgs mind you need an up and coming who is willing to bide his time and take over fully later. Sako possibly does Thst along with benteke but at a much cheaper price.
Who knows they may even take Rafael as part of the deal!!!


6.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 20:03:33
Could be like Saha. He turned good for us (when fit!)


7.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 22:01:07
Like 60% of you, I would actually prefer the £15m Sakho. For now.
Jeeeees u guys make me feel old!

👴👴👴


8.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 22:38:31
Yep Rooney up front should be good for 15 goals if he plays upfront every game and include penalties. Rooney is going to have to have complete change of trajectory to be the striker many are expecting him to be. That rarely happens at his age and is a huge gamble.i have no doubt that rvp had he played all season would score twice as many as roonaldo. Our current strike options aren't even in the top half of the prem in terms of results.Rooney ain't good enough to have team play for him and can't play as part of a team. He can't beat at egg. Apologies for the Rooney thing.