14 Jul 2016 17:38:45
You have to laugh. Manchester United have asked Bayern Munich about Renato Sanches' buy out clause! This is the laziest peace of Journalism I have seen.

1.) 14 Jul 2016
14 Jul 2016 19:00:33
I can see us keeping tabs on him while he's there. Bayerns midfield is strong enough without Sanches so we may be trying our luck. He could be back up to Pogba. I would pay 60M on Sanches and still think that's cheap in today's market.

2.) 14 Jul 2016
14 Jul 2016 19:45:08
Aparently JM has asked what the cost is now because he's thinking of him for in a couple of yrs time?

Gotta b the stupidest story theybhave tried this yr. #desperate.

3.) 14 Jul 2016
14 Jul 2016 22:46:56
Not wanting to be rude but cr92 and even you too must be on the sauce and i am amused by the thought process.

4.) 14 Jul 2016
14 Jul 2016 23:05:56
Lazy? .

At least u had the energy to write this drivel 😣.

5.) 14 Jul 2016
14 Jul 2016 23:38:12
what makes you think i'm on "the sauce", because i estimate sanches at 60M wich is twice what Bayern paid for him?

He has just had an amazing Euro, where unlkie many players out there, Sanches exceeded peoples expectations of him. One of the standouts of the tournament and if anything, out played Pogba trhrough out it. only 18, but what did we pay for Martial? And who had a better tournament? Similar price to Martial and still a lot cheaper then Pogba. My estimation of Sanches, probably isn't any where close to what bayern value him at.

Also youd be stupid to think that the club will just forget about sanches now he's at bayern. i'm pretty sure they'll be following his progression while others will also be doing the same.

i also never stated that the club have bid or even asked, just that i could see us following his progression and that if Pogba failed, i would spend double on Sanches because i rate him more then you're Gomes or Schneiderlins.

no offence but x-files died in the 90s, with dechovnys career.

6.) 15 Jul 2016
15 Jul 2016 05:47:29
Cr92 bayern haven't got sanches on cheap as you are suggesting, the deal for sanches is much like martial, if reports are to be believed its 35mn upfront with fee going upto 75-80mn with various clauses, they would never sell him for 60mn. Martial started 1 game and was withdrawn 45 mins into it, deschamps was criticized for giving martial only 10 mins in the final, so the comparison is rubbish. Also sanches was given a more free attacking role, pogba in the final was playing a deeper role, again thank descamps for that. Sanches is a good player potentially even worldclass, but he is not near pogba's level right now.

7.) 15 Jul 2016
15 Jul 2016 15:24:40
I only compared them for fee related reasons. There 2 different players no doubt, BUT out of all 3 of them only Sanches had a successful Euros and in not one of his performances was he criticised but praised in all of them.

And yes its 35M euros which is 27.5M pounds, Also IF reports are to be believed the deal could reach upto 45M EUROS (How am i suggesting its cheap? ) . I can't seem to find any reports claiming the deal to be any where near the 70-80M with clauses. i'm not sure why you think i was suggesting Bayern bought him on a cheap, when all reports suggest that he cost around 30M :s.

Not once did i say Sanches is a better player then Pogba or Martial. I mentioned Sanches just incase we fail to get Pogba, not instead of him. With Martial, all i was stating is he didn't justify his price tag at the Euros but we all know he is worth every penny we paid for him an more.

Sanches would be worth every penny spent on him, if we was to go for him again. yes its very unlikely United will be enquiring so soon, but no doubt will the club be tracking his progress and may act on that in the future.

8.) 15 Jul 2016
15 Jul 2016 16:30:21
Cr92 it is not upto 45mn it is 35 mn upfront with 45mn in various related add ons, not upto 45 but 35 + upto 45mn addons that makes it a deal potentially of 80mn.

9.) 15 Jul 2016
15 Jul 2016 17:35:39
You may be right on that. But for them to pay that he would need to keep exceeding expectations and have to see out his contract whilst also probably winning the Ballon Dor.

In many cases if Bayern where to sell him sooner rather then later, they wouldn't be paying the add ons. If we was too bid or make an offer, we would certainly be adding a few add ons here and there also.

10.) 15 Jul 2016
15 Jul 2016 19:32:11

Because no one keeps tabs on a player who is 18 and just moved on a 5 year to a a new club and definitely does not go enquiring about his release clause. its is not the cattle market mate.

11.) 15 Jul 2016
15 Jul 2016 20:03:48
Are you broken? Why do you think teams will just stop tracking him now? I don't get your logic . He's a football player that's coming up with world class status. Plenty of clubs will be watching over how he progresses at Bayern. Do you think when Bale went to Spurs we simply forgot about him? SAF has said before he still kept tabs on Bale after we lost out to Spurs. And a specially being of such a young age, his progression will be watched very closely.

12.) 16 Jul 2016
16 Jul 2016 18:00:43

Teams move on and you sound like a broken record. No team goes asking about a player they were in that went to another club about his release clause with the new club, which is what the article supposedly said. only the ultra naive and fief brigade believe this stuff.