29 Jul 2020 17:07:26
Torres, a player Edd02 has spoken about looks close to a City transfer for £25 million, would he not have been an ideal candidate for RW?

1.) 29 Jul 2020
29 Jul 2020 17:20:57
Funny how city always seem to grab a decent player at a decent price. it’s almost as if the people doing their scouting/ negotiating are competent at their jobs.

2.) 29 Jul 2020
29 Jul 2020 17:53:03
Same with Chelsea Tim. The cost of not having competent people is ridiculous. Everyone knows we are rubbish at negotiating and can afford to pay top dollar so pull our pants down.

3.) 29 Jul 2020
29 Jul 2020 17:36:11
Or maybe that's what thwy want for him?

I'm sure if city was in for sancho he would cost them exact the same as what United need to pay.

4.) 29 Jul 2020
29 Jul 2020 19:09:06
Im with Bolger on this one.

5.) 30 Jul 2020
30 Jul 2020 06:28:02
Torres is young and quite raw, sancho is leaps ahead at the moment.

6.) 30 Jul 2020
30 Jul 2020 04:16:03
Than my simple question is, Is sancho worth 120m Euros? I mean why United always quoted with this insane figures? Why English youth players are treated as pinnacle of quality in the Market? 23m Euros for Torres is superb, when we were linked, media quoted as 75m. and now that's nit even Half. It shows how foolish our scouting and recruitment dept it.
Or is it like. Cheap player? Not marketable enough. We don't want it.

7.) 30 Jul 2020
30 Jul 2020 10:55:11
Maybe don't believe everything you read in the papers, Rodio. Most of it is bs.