Manchester United Banter Archive November 14 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


14 Nov 2012 22:59:45
Is it a case of Zaha or Ince, or are we looking at both regardless of how the other one goes? I for one would love to see both, but that's my greed shining through

Believable1 Unbelievable5

14 Nov 2012 22:52:17
discounting the obvious answer of recent seasons barcelona whats the best non united side people have seen? Personally i'd go with milan '94

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Madrid 2002 up there, hate to say it but the invincible arsenal up there but gotta agree milan 94

Agree3 Disagree1

As I'm 17 it's hard to look past Arsenal '04 or the Real Madrid Galacticos.

Hoppy

Agree0 Disagree3

For me its got to be bayern munich 71-72, dominant in europe and won the german division one title. that team consisted of 3 of the best players of all time in franz beckenbauer, sepp maier and sepp maier and gerd muller, one of the most prolific goalscorers of all time!

Agree4 Disagree0

This isn't exactly an answer to your question but I would've liked to have seen the Ajax team of 95' stick together for longer to see what they could've accomplished.

TK-Red

Agree0 Disagree0

Milan all day long, had a bit of everything
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't know if you're restricting it to club sides, but if not - Brazil circa 1970. The Harlem Globetrotters of football - 11 guys just kicking a football around for the sheer joy of it. The smiles on their faces as they played, you just knew these men were living the dream. The absolute apex of team play.

StevieK

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 22:50:08
We should be glad the debt has reduced but one thing people are missing is the cost of the listing. It cost the club £7.9m to sell shares that gave us £60m to reduce the debt. That is two years interest reduction , so it will take two years to benefit us. That £7.9m is a years salary for a top player. Also people needs to consider when the Glazers will have to pay dividends on those shares? Meanwhile the Glazers took the whole value of half of the share sale with the club picking up the costs. Yes the debt is down but to get where we are it has cost us hundreds of millions, cash which could have built the South stand and furnished us with a great player or two. We still have no plan published on how the remaining debt will be repaid and will what they pay in dividends offset the reduction in interest?

We are not as badly off as we were but nowhere near as good a position as we should have been. There is no way I will cheer for one second about what has been done to the club. We will never get the money back that has been thrown away and when the debt is finally repaid some who cheer a reduction will cheer again whilst forgetting the hundreds of millions lost forever that could have brought far greater success to the club.

Red Man

Believable3 Unbelievable3

We may not be in as good a position as we hoped but once the club was bought it was only ever a business sadly.

Pardoe

Agree0 Disagree0

Very true Red Man, the Glazers have probably wasted a net of about £300m and that could have built a new stadium. It is a lot of money that has been wasted.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Forget the financial side of the club, united are about much more than finance, weve coped with being in a less well off financial situation than other clubs or the past 30 years. we can do it for another 30!

Agree2 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 22:16:00
Henriquez scored tonight for chile on his debut. Get him in our team!

Caolán.

Believable7 Unbelievable1

Instead of who exactly?

Agree4 Disagree0

Dear of Dear!

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 22:08:15
Is there any possible loan moves in the pipeline for our young players. Players like henriquez,daehli,janujaz etc would benefit from playing first team football somwhere.

Cheers

Believable3 Unbelievable3

Henriquez should be loaned out to a championship side sooner rather than later, while Daehli and Januzaj should be given some u21 experience, and hopefully they will go on the next preseason tour and earning a loan move to a championship side.

Mick

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 21:55:53
Sydney is celebrating because the Glazers debt is down to 375 million and it has only cost us, that is me and you half a billion pounds that could of been spent on the ground or world class players to get here. That means we could have bought Ronaldo 6 times over and still had some change. I AM KLOOT

Believable7 Unbelievable2

We all hate the Glazers, but I'd rather have them over a sugar daddy who just throws billions at the club and ruins it(Chelsea,PSG etc.), once this debt is gone the money should start going on the club. But your right the Glazers should have never brought the club in the first place.

-JakeW

Agree4 Disagree4

But we didn't do that, so what is holding a grudge and harping on about the past gonna get you, apart from being miserable?

We all acknowledge what the glazers have done and that its not good for the fans but it makes perfect business sense for them and we are much better off than we were. You can't ignore the massive increase in revenues etc and only look at the negatives. Oh hang on its kloot, of course you can! :)

GDS

Agree4 Disagree2

Change the record Kloot!

Are you saying that you are not happy that the debt is coming down?

All you ever do is print the same boring statements.We all understand how unhappy you are regarding the way the club has been placed in debt but you don't need to keep repeating yourself we get it.

I think every United fan would be a lot happier if the glazers hadn't purchased the club with borrowed money(which the club is paying back) but it has to be a good thing for the club is the debt has been reduced again.

I honestly think you will be even more pissed off when the debt has been cleared as you will have to find something else to whine about

Marky Mark

Agree3 Disagree2

I'm the author of the statement calling kloot ridiculous. my name is pepe, forgot to add it into the body of my post, wouldn't want anyone thinking I was doing it anonymously. to further my point, at no point did anyone force kloot or anyone else to spend their money on united tickets, merchandise etc. so to claim that it's your money or that you have any right to direct the further use of it is ridiculous. would you dream of saying to Apple, I bought one of your iPads, I expect you to develop a new app that I want. you freely enter into a transaction, you get what you transacted for, nothing more nothing less. if you don't like the further behavior of your transaction partner, you are free never to transact with him or her again. to think that a massively valuable asset like Manchester United should be run for your personal enjoyment is the height of both naiveté and arrogance.

pepe

Agree6 Disagree3

15 Nov 2012 00:55:42
@kloot: what on earth makes you say "costing you and me half a billion pounds"? what claim do you or I have on the club's revenues? no one could or would ever buy Manchester United outright for cash so a debt financed purchase was inevitable. or were you so enamored of the various shareholder model that you think it would have resulted in hundreds of millions more going towards improving the club over the last 7 years? instead of being paid out in dividends of stock buybacks, ie profiting those who own the club. your position boils down to; you want hundreds of millions of pounds spent on your behalf (improving the squad or ground) that you have no claim over; it's ridiculous in the truest sense of the word.

Agree2 Disagree1

Well said gentleman. This notion that the money that was spent on interest and repurchase of some of the debt would have been spend on the club is quite naive as the previous shareholders would have banked a substantial dividend as a return on their investment.

I am just happy and over the moon that we are paying down the debt and moving in the right direction financially. I still believe 5 years from now, the club will make so much money that it will struggle to spend it and dividend payments and the stock value will increase tremendously.

I do hope we sign two world class midfielders in the next 9 months as a lot of this debate will go away when the team is back to competing for top honors in Europe.

Shahram

Agree1 Disagree0

So I have had it wrong all these years. The Glazers are not money making foreigners, mortgaging the clib in order to make a fast buck, they are the saviours of our club. To listen to you lot turns my stomach. KLOOT might be a miserable old hit but he understands this one only too clearly. Hundreds of millions of pounds have been blended out of the club to pay for loans and debt - that is money that the club earned. Do you really think the club wouldn't have increased its turnover without the Glazers?

I understand it is what it is but to come on here and be all cheerful is pathetic. As for the comment that it's better to have the Glazers than a billionaire sugar daddy, that person needs to go back to their padded cell.

Referring to United as an'asset displays a lack of appreciation of the history and devotion fans have. You can't simply stop supporting your club because you don't like the owners. We are stuck with the situation, there is little point moaning about it, but to read this thread makes me despair.

Eric

Agree3 Disagree1

Pepe - firstly let me make it clear that I am not supporting what Kloot says, as to me the whole Glazer debate is pointless, as we are stuck with them and they have true supporters just where they want them.
Your post shows you are either a glory supporter or have no idea how a true supporter feels. Basically you say if you don't like it then don't support Utd, don't buy tickets etc, what rubbish. Do you think we enjoyed relegation in the 70s and the 20+ years between league titles, off course not, but we supported Utd through it all because there is an inborn love that a true supporter has, it is not something you can turn on and off.
To compare the relationship between buying an iPad and following Utd is an embarrassment to you and shows you don't understand how a true supporter feels.
Like I said, the Glazers or any other owners have us where they want us as they know we will continue to buy our STs as we love Utd above everything else.

Keanooh

Agree1 Disagree1

So lets imagine the Glazers didn't buy Utd and someone else did, would they do it for nothing but because they support Utd ,lets say a little like Michael Knighton he said he supported Utd.

Therefore what is to stop any owner taking out as much money as they wish ..nothing!

Definition of business


DefinitionSave to FavoritesShow Examples

An organization or economic system where goods and services are exchanged for one another or for money. Every business requires some form of investment and enough customers to whom its output can be sold on a consistentbasis in order to make a profit. Businesses can be privately owned, not-for-profit or state-owned. An example of a corporate business is PepsiCo, while a mom-and-pop catering business is a private enterprise.

1. An organization or enterprising entity engaged in commercial, industrial or professional activities. A business can be a for-profit entity, such as a publicly-traded corporation, or a non-profit organization engaged in business activities, such as an agricultural cooperative.

1.
an occupation, profession, or trade
2.
the purchase and sale of goods in an attempt to make a profit.

3. a person, partnership, or corporation engaged in commerce, manufacturing, or a service; profit-seeking enterprise or concern.

Hence money making enterprise

Pardoe

Agree0 Disagree0

I actually agree with Kloot. I am not happy the Glazers have wasted so much of the club's money to pay interest, refinance and pay off a debt that they saddled us with.

But I think Kloot is wrong in thinking I am celebrating that we are £359m in debt, I am merely happy that the debt is going down and quite frankly so should he.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Keanooh hits the nail on the head for me.
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Nov 2012 15:39:46
@eric and @keanooh Manchester Unted is an asset, you can deny this reality if it makes you happier but it doesn't change objective fact. the true supporter stuff, again if it makes you feel better, go for it but that and a dollar will get you a cup of coffee here in New York. frankly it comes down to this, if you are silly enough to (in your mind) be constantlyscrewed by the Glazers but still mindlessly support them because "that's what true supporters do" fine, that's your call. but the moaning is really tiresome, either do something about it or get over it. organize a boycott globally, if enough fellow supporters feel as you do you can change the direction of the club. but if not, do give it a rest, please.

Agree0 Disagree1

14 Nov 2012 21:53:51
do the eds feel united will target ince in jan and another winger in the summer. zaha and rodriquez are the names mentioned.

another point which il get slated for do you think it would make good sense to sell vidic for 20m and nani for 15m and replace them with zaha 12m ince 6m
hangeland 6m okore 7m and put in a bid for wanyama or sandro 15m or there abouts {Ed004's Note - No... Why sell a world class centre back and replace him with a player like Hangeland? Also I rate Nani ahead of Zaha and Ince and I can't dee either of the replacements making a big difference to the United team}

Believable0 Unbelievable4

Thought id ask the questions thanks for answering i also think theres better out there like rodriquez tello reus gotze for example

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 21:28:26
Tonight, for me, has proven that Shawcross isn't mobile enough for us. He needs to be able to deal with world class movement and he just can't.

Fresh!

Believable8 Unbelievable2

I agree, Smalling looks a lot better. As does Evans possibly.

I think for Utd you have to be a ball playing centre back, far happier having had Ferdinand all these years instead if Terry.

I know you need a blend, someone who attacks the ball, but you have to be mobile enough to get back a cover.

DodgyBanter

Agree3 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 21:26:21
OMG FERGIE SIGN UP THAT IBRAHIMOVIC GUY! haha jus kiddin

Believable5 Unbelievable3

14 Nov 2012 21:22:50
WOW!

That is one of the greatest ever goals from Ibrahimovic. Fair play.

DodgyBanter

Believable7 Unbelievable0

He is a nightmare for defenders. For such a big guy he has the technical ability of a world class midfielder.

Shahram

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 21:11:26
hmmm... i wonder if Joe hart will get slated in the press tomorrow, because Im sure if DDG was in goal for England tonite he would be killed!
Chris the REDman

Believable13 Unbelievable3

Unfortunately, Hart plays much better for club than country.

Agree5 Disagree1

He has been overhyped cos he's english
he not and never will be in the same league as casilias buffon neuer cech

Agree5 Disagree3

Neuer? Don't put him up there with Buffon just yet. He is on pretty much the same level as Hart at the minute and is prone to the odd clanger himself. You talk about overhyping English players and yet you seem to be rating Neuer more because he ISN'T English.

TK-Red

Agree0 Disagree0

Hart was poor tonight but has been v good overall this season
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 21:06:28
just wondering if anybody knows what brand of gum sir alex likes to chew. rekon he has stayed faithful to the same one all these years?

Believable7 Unbelievable0

This is probably the best question I've ever read on this site haha

Jono

Agree0 Disagree0

Judging by the amount of chewing that takes place when the gum is in his mouth Id have to go with Juiceyfruit....he is clearly a 'stick of gum' guy - you just dont get that volume of gnawing with the Extra stuff!

IrishRed

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 20:08:50
Dear Ashley Young,

See what can happen when you use your left foot! If you could stop diving and do that more often I might start believing that you could play left wing for Man Utd.

Cheers

DodgyBanter

Believable8 Unbelievable2

Someone needs to tell Welbeck to stop doing fancy flicks EVERYTIME the ball goes near him.

Agree4 Disagree4

14 Nov 2012 20:33:54
Watching Denmark v Turkey . Kevin Conboy is awesome at left back.Surely United should be scouting him.Apparently his fathers from Manchester and they're all United fans.What do you think ?

Believable0 Unbelievable4

14 Nov 2012 18:36:52
for me, the worst thing about the glazers (apart from the debt) is the lack of communication towards the fans. And i don't mean a few token words from mouthpiece gill. I mean one of the brood coming out and saying "hi yes we appreciate your worried about the debt but we are working hard to reduce it and are committed to keeping the club competitive." i mean it wouldn't kill them would it.

Believable11 Unbelievable1

Thats not gonna stop the doom and gloom brigade from saying the same things as before.

The debt is far from ideal but in the long term it looks like 2 steps backwards while moving 5 steps forward.

Mumbles

Agree3 Disagree3

Mumbles your an person. i know the editors will be mad at me for being offensive. It isn't fair on persons to get compared to you. I AM KLOOT

Agree1 Disagree2

Damm it Editors you could have been a little bit more inventive. I AM KLOOT {Ed007's Note - It is the filter that changes some words IAK. It could be a better change though, it's not as if you are calling anyone a 'kloont' is it?}

Agree0 Disagree0

Klootyboy - For gawds sake if someone has a different opinion to you it doesn't make them a "person".
You must be really pissed off that the world hasn't collapsed due to those terrible Glazers. I bet the financial results were a massive disappointment for you.
Mumbles is no more a "person" than you are.
Keep taking the tablets (or get back on them)
Have a nice day.

Mike

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 18:21:19
Hoping that Welbeck, Young and Cleverley do good tonight. Especially Welbeck, we need to see his confidence back, it would be healthy for the squad because it will give even more competition for the attacking positions.

-JakeW

Believable6 Unbelievable0

With Welbeck he needs to be used properly, through the middle. He's not a wide player. I think he's being played out of position to try and improve his all round game. Also as out an out striker he's behind RvP and Chico.

Cleverley just needs the right people in midfield with him. He plays best in a 3, and links up well with Rooney and Welbeck.

Young, well i like his workrate and thta he covers for Evra, but i question his mental strength. I don't think he has the bottle to truly be a United player, but good for squad depth.

Mort

Agree4 Disagree2

Of course if Young can use his left peg more and Welbeck can keep tucking them away...

Mort

Agree0 Disagree0

Mort, I think you hit the nail on the head. Ashley Young just seems to not have the United mentality, it's not something you can teach. For me, that's why RVP was such a big signing, he just oozes class whilst also being not to bad at putting the ball in the back of the net.

Tetrahydro

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 18:09:38
The financial statement released by man united was for previous times! if we can pay off debt and buy players and still make a profit , surely it looks bright for us considering we didnt get anywhere in cl last year! we will get better sponsors that start in 2013 and also more revenue !

I for one never like the glazers but when i take a look at success etc and how the club makes so much compared to others maybe its time we beleived in them!

Come on people the debt has dropped alot since years ago when it was arounf 800mil

Big V
syd your veiw on this ?

Believable2 Unbelievable4

Big V if it's not too difficult for you who do you think has paid that 500 million. I AM KLOOT

Agree1 Disagree0

Of course with their money... I believe they are the owner and the money earned belong to them

Agree0 Disagree0

Of course with their money... I believe they are the owner and the money earned belong to them

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 17:58:57
Who's a better prospect in everyone's eyes, daehli, Wilson or januzaj?

Caolán.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

14 Nov 2012 18:33:25
Januzaj and Daehli mate.

Whistler.

Agree1 Disagree0

Oddly, I rate Daehli and Wilson higher that Januzaj, but still rate Januzaj massively. Maybe it's because I've seen more of the other two. Daehli, for me, is the one though.

Percy

Agree2 Disagree2

Januzaj is the best prospect we have. He is the same age as Daehli, but has been promoted to the reserves. He has had a few problems with injuries so he hasn't returned to previous form yet, but he is a certainty to make it far in the game as he has everything, Daehli and Wilson (just 16) are quality players, but Januzaj will be a star.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 17:06:31
Manchester United are interested in signing Holgar Badstuber from Fc Bayern

Believable0 Unbelievable6

Would be a class signing, will be one the best centre halves in the world in a coule of years

Agree1 Disagree0

Anyone looks world class compared to Rio.

Agree1 Disagree4

14 Nov 2012 15:31:31
I saw jordan Henderson turned out for england u21 against northern Ireland last nite... I guess he has found his level
Chris the REDman

Believable8 Unbelievable0

Definately not a premier league player! he cant even get in the liverpool team and that tells you something

Agree8 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 14:58:21
For the regular observers of the Youth, who do you think is a better prospect between 17 yo Ravel Morrison and Mats Daehli?

Imo daehli is a much better prospect because of the attitude, but i think that ravel has more talent in him. I also think that daehli will go on to be the better player. What are your opinions?

Mick

Believable3 Unbelievable1

I saw genius from Ravel, he was a truly world class talent, Daehli has a similar level of talent, but doesn't look quite so awesome, Ravel looked almost like Zidane when executing his tricks. From what I've seen, Daehli is more consistent and has a better head on his shoulders.

Percy

Agree3 Disagree1

Without doubt daehli is the better prospect and im not just saying that because ravel left us,hes much better on the ball,better vision and has a much better range of passing,admittedly ravel had a better shot on him but overall im more excited about daehli,the way he carries the ball reminds me of messi a lot(dont jump on me im not comparing them)and he hardly ever loses the ball,his technical ability is fantastic,hopefully he can carry his potential into the reserves where hopefully we'll see him a fair bit this season then really kick on next season where hopefully he'll be ready for a loan if hes progressed as quickly as he has been lately,very exciting player.

phil

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 14:21:51
Wow, gross debt down to £359.7m.

According to Andy Green the club will look to refinance the debt in 2-3 years and interest will be less than £20m a year.

Sydney!

Believable5 Unbelievable3

I just got the sms on the financial and have not looked at the detail but very encouraging on headline numbers.


BTW i bought shares a few weeks ago,


Shahram

Agree3 Disagree2

Sydeny in ur opinion hw long do u reckon it will take to clear rest of the debt? Thanks. T45

Agree0 Disagree0

Wow, only 359.7m pocket change.

Agree3 Disagree0

If this is true, does this make the Glazers not as bad as everyone thought?

Paddy

Agree1 Disagree4

Paddy

Given forward looking earnings, it will all depend on how much we spend on players going forward. The debt is not going to be that relevant given the current global economic conditions and cost of borrowing/refinancing.

If i were to guess 5 years and it will be a lesser of factor for the club going forward when it comes down to competing in the transfer market. I believe we will have 70 million to spend next summer.

Shahram

Agree1 Disagree1

T45, we may have debt for ten years or more, but the point is it's manageable. We were paying £68m interest just a couple of year's ago and in a couple of year's time it could be as low as £18m.

No name, £359.7m is a lot of money, but it is considerably less than what we owed a few year's ago and more importantly interest has halved in that time. £359.7m debt would ruin a club like Liverpool, but United are a money making machine and I am glad to say we are over the worst of our monetary issues by some distance and more importantly we are still competitive.

Sydney!

Agree4 Disagree3

Oh yeah let's celebrate being over 300M in debt when we never needed to be.
Syd showing his love of that the glazers again?
Can see why Kloot calls you an apologist for them.

Red Daz.

Agree2 Disagree8

The point missed here is that revenue increases in excess of £100m annually will be generated over the next 3 - 5 years from uplifted tv rights and increased sponsorship revenues. £500m income by mid decade is not inconceivable, which would generate well over £100m of regular transfer budgets assuming that wages are kept at reasonably similar levels.

The nature of the income, earned from sponsorship and commercial deals means that if this all pans out, the club will be very healthily placed under FFP, and might emerge as the highest spenders for several years to come.

Aesop

Agree1 Disagree1

Red Daz

Well done for jumping on the band wagon - do you actually understand the finances or are you just jumping on Syd's back?

Read Aesop's post and it may make more sense....yes, debt is BAD but huge revenues are GOOD

You can't just look at one variable (i.e. debt) and draw valid conclusions from that

Also, nice try at getting brownie points from Kloot. You're a Kloot agologist ; )

Gav

Agree1 Disagree1

We will never be debt free (esp with low interest rates) - very few businesses run totally debt free.

Many would rather look for new opportunities than pay off all their debt.

Mike

Agree0 Disagree0

Forgot to add, obviously being in debt is a poor situation for our great club to be in and I'm certainly not an advocate of that. I'm just glad that it's coming down. Today's news is good news in that sesnse surely? We've all known we are in debt for years so no use crying over it still, the sooner we get rid of it altogether the better. But I reiterate, today's news is positive

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 19:28:49
I just can't get the PIK's of my mind though...

Whistler.

Agree0 Disagree0

Red Daz, when you have found your way out of Kloot's ass and scroll down you may realise that I have said we never needed to be in debt in a previous post. No one likes the debt we are in, BUT we are in debt so deal with it.

Sydney!

Agree4 Disagree0

Reddaz

So you think the Irish boys and the rest of the previous ownership would have said let's spend every penny on new players.

Shahram

Agree1 Disagree0

Mike very good point as all businesses are always looking to optimize their debt to equity ratio as equity is more expensive.

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 14:14:23
according to press fergie is wanting sandro of tottenham.

Believable5 Unbelievable6

Great player, strong athletic, just what we need in the middle of the park

Agree6 Disagree1

He won't move though!

Agree1 Disagree1

14 Nov 2012 13:43:48
I hear city are considering expand their stadium, which is funny seeing as they cant fill it as it is.

Ste-Utd

Believable20 Unbelievable2

Got to admit tho its a nicer stadium.

Agree7 Disagree15

Very true and they still think there bigger than united..dream on

Agree12 Disagree0

Got money to do it.

Agree1 Disagree0

No name,the city of manchester stadium is not a nicer stadium,in fact its quite dull.

phil

Agree8 Disagree0

What!! So they want to put MORE empty seats in?
MACRED 99

Agree5 Disagree0

They can sell all the empty seats at top prices to mysterious middle eastern fans who are invisible to tv cameras. Great little revenue earner for FFP.

DodgyBanter

Agree3 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 13:43:06
Hate Liverpool Football Club as much as you want. But please SIGN THIS PETITION!

Anne Williams has been fighting for 23 years to get justice for her son and 95 other football fans.

She now has terminal cancer, so the inquest in to Kevin Williams' death must be brought forward!

Please do not let her pass away before she gets the answers she needs!!

Thank you.

Stone LFC

Believable16 Unbelievable4

In such situations, football rivalries take a back seat. You ve got our full support.

Mick

Agree12 Disagree2

Without question I will sign the petition, and would of thought the majority who come on here will follow suit. Perhaps a link to the petition would help!

Agree5 Disagree0

No problem, a more than worthy cause

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

Stone lfc
Just signed it hope its successfull
Good luck
Onecut

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 12:33:49
I read on here the other day some comments about Fellaini and one or two of you know-nowts said he
wasn't good enough !! He is precisely what your
club needs and if you cannot see that then you are obviously supporting the right team

Puzzled

Believable0 Unbelievable12

Where would he play? He is best as an attacking midfielder just behind the striker. We have Kagawa and Rooney already for that role. Unless we sold Rooney we do not need a Fellaini type player, we need a defensive midfielder and a box to box midfielder, of which Fellaini is neither.

Worry about your own team maybe?

GDS

Agree2 Disagree0

Even though he is not what we need....

G.A.G.U.S

Agree0 Disagree1

If we wanted to play long-ball football we would employ Kenny Dalglish.

Sydney!

Agree6 Disagree1

And if we wanted to play boring football resembling Italian football of the 70-80s we would hire BR
Chris the REDman

Agree5 Disagree0

Living up to your name again, I can only echo what the other posters have said - Fellaini is not what we need right now. Thanks for the visit though

Gav

Agree1 Disagree1

14 Nov 2012 11:02:59
United's accounts will be released this afternoon and they should show a gross debt lower than £400m. I predicted a couple of months ago that it will be around £369m, but it's unknown how the purchases of RvP, Buttner & Henriquez will effect this outcome. Edward Woodward did mention something about £29m (I think) being paid out for players after the 30th June, so I think the £369m figure maybe distorted somewhat. We all agree that debt is something that we do not deserve and something that was dumped on us by our owners who quite frankly couldn't afford to buy us outright, but I am much happier now than I was in 2010 when we had a rumoured debt of around £800m. Where have all the rival fans with their 'one billion in debt' jibes now? We know the PIKs were never our debt, but they still never sat easy with us being there. They were paid off somehow by the owners and are now not tied to the club's name in any way.

Debt has been coming debt regularly since 2009 and interest rates too. Just a couple of years ago we were paying £68.8m a season on interest and now it will be around £35m. It isn't perfect, but we are in a much stronger position than we have ever been under the Glazers. We have spend £130m (net) in the past three seasons and we are still linked to and buying top quality players. So although we could be in a better position debt-wise, we are still in a very strong position and we will only get stronger. No club in the EPL can live with us in a financial sense and Glazers or no Glazers we will continue to dominate this league for the foreseeable future. We have a couple of challenges ahead like the change of manager and more recent the completion of the transition, but if they are dealt with well we have a very bright future ahead. Here's to another 20 years of domination.

Sydney!

Believable17 Unbelievable5

Hi Sydney - can you tell me where you bought your rose-tinted glasses?
Was it Glazer & Glazer?

Puzzled

Agree6 Disagree7

Puzzled, come back when you are able to post a profit and are challenging for a title.

Sydney!

Agree10 Disagree1

If Kloot doesn't reply to this post I will eat my hat!

I agree with you Syd and like to be positive about the future of the club, none of us like the situation the club is in but none of us can do anything about it especially as we love the club and want to continue supporting. So any good news is always going to be a positive. You will clearly get the doom mongers using what you said and twisting it into a negative but that is just their opinion.

Oh and Puzzled, we aren't even a rival anymore and you aren't even a big club, ask the Swedes.

GDS
GDS

Agree5 Disagree0

Rose tinted glasses or pure facts, Puzzled? No need to be bitter just because you face another 20 years of playing 2nd fiddle. Although 2nd is a drastic improvement for your bunch.

TK-Red

Agree2 Disagree0

Well Sydney has a point

Pardoe

Agree2 Disagree0

GDS, exactly. We are stuck with the Glazers for a long long time so we can either cry and moan about us not being able to spend £100m in one window or having debt, or we can just be thankful that we are still competing and have competed through these hard times. No one wants the Glazers or their debt, but I am also glad we have paid for our players ourselves unlike City, Chelsea & Liverpool.

Sydney!

Agree4 Disagree0

Sydney!

First off, well said.

Now, clearly I an American (you can tell by my name) and I am from Tampa where the Glazers other franchise is located. I will say this, not to support the way they run the club, because I too do disagree with some portions, but I am not sure that they should be battered around as bad as they are because we still do remain very competitive.

Sure there are debts, but as an American I will tell you that this is a basic business model in my country. Owners take out loans and debts against assets and if money savvy they usually conitnuously run well. I have no reason to believe that SAF would lie and say that he is given all the money he needs in the transfer market and that surely not be the case.

I do support the Tampa team as well and I want to point out an interesting fact for everyone here. Last year the Glazers received loads of "hate mail" from both sides of the pond in the way that moeny was being made available for players. In the NFL offseason the Glazers made a MAJOR effort by signing very very key free agents (which were expensive) just to make the team competitive again and get the fans off of their backs. I will say that I believe between Jan and the Summer transfer windows, we will begin to see this same approach here (I think it has started with signing RVP).

In the end, NOONE can agree with EVERYTHING the Glazers do in the running of the club, however I do believe that the amount of bashing they receive is a little much.

My £.02
ussoldier77

Agree2 Disagree1

GDS...that may have been the funniest thing I heard all day "ask the Swedes"...GREAT REPLY
ussoldier77

Agree1 Disagree0

62.6m off the debt this first quarter, down to 359.7m

Pardoe

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney! made more points in that post than Liverpool will in the entire season!

REDFAITH

Agree7 Disagree0

77, it does hurt knowing that £555m has left the club in costs due to the Glazer takeover, £555m that could have been spent elsewhere. Okay if you take away what we would have spent on dividends and what the Glazers have saved on tax and I guess you could add the £62m that they used from the IPO back it leaves around £290m wasted, it's still £290m wasted. Arsenal bought a stadium with that amount of cash. I fully understand why fans are angry with them.

Sydney!

Agree3 Disagree0

Sydney

A very balanced view and very much what I think. I got crucified a few weeks ago for posting something of a view on the clubs financials and was looking forward as our financial position will continue to improve and we will always be one of the biggest clubs in the world that will compete for top honors.

Maybe the club will surprise us and spend 70 million net this summer and get us all the missing pieces.

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree1

Shahram, what it tells us is we can spend £50m (net) in the transfer window and still post a sizable profit. With sponsorships increasing, TV money increasing and the new record breaking Nike deal soon to be negotiated it means the club are in a very strong financial position. I think the debt will continue to reduce by £20m-£40m annually until gone. Could go even quicker if the Glazers choose to float more shares and pay down some more debt with some of the proceeds. What's important is the interest, less interest equals more cash flow for team investment.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi Syd

Sometimes I agree with your posts and sometimes I don't...I agree 100% with this one. Regardless of our debt or who owns us we are in a strong financial position. It will only naturally get better and better too as revenues grow and debt falls. And 'IF' FFP has any effect at all (I think it will but not to a great extent) we will be in an even better position. People can moan about the way we were took over all those years ago or they can move on and look toward a positive future

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

Lovely comment REDFAITH - made me smile - thanks
Mike

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney

I was just thinking if they can refinance the majority of the debt at around half the current coupon cost on the bonds.

A friend of mine just refinanced quite a large deal in the states at 3% borrowing cost believe it or not. I know borrowing cost is slightly higher in the Uk so I believe we should have 50 at the lower range and up to 70 million to invest and as as you rightfully guessed 30 to 40 million repayment.

The real positive numbers will start flowing through in 2014/2105 where I believe we will be able to pay down quite large chunks of the debt and do not believe we will need to invest as much in players as there are a number of youth and current first teamers that will form a very solid squad if we buy properly this coming summers.


I am now getting prepared for Kloot to blast me for being positive on the clubs future:)

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

Very true lads, in 2014 we will be receiving £45m a year from GM Motors, £25m more than we are getting now, an extra £34m from TV revenue and we would have negotiated the new Nike deal by then which will be at least £20m more a season than what we are currently getting. That's already £80m more there. This isn't even factoring-in the streaming rights which could be a license to print money. Then you have all the little sponsors and United's mobile and communication deals. By 2015 I imagine revenues will be around £450m. Debt will be in the 200m's and interest at around £15m.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 10:45:38
reporting that man united are considering to buy zaha.I have never seen him play ,is he good ?

Believable0 Unbelievable7

14 Nov 2012 10:13:22
Munkydunk, All i can say is youv'e been spoilt ,that lot you picked were world beaters compared with some of the dross we had to put up with in the seventies and eighties. Here's just a sample:
John Connaughton
Tommy Oneil Ian Ure Arnie Sidebottom Frank Kopel
Tony Young Tom Sloan George Graham Willie Morgan
Alan Foggon Wynn Davies

Can anyone pick a worse team than that lot ?

Raffa

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Morgan was pretty good imo

Pardoe

Agree3 Disagree0

You're still looking at 'recent times Raffa' I
remember the Albert Quixall days

Puzzled

Agree0 Disagree2

14 Nov 2012 14:28:13
You're still looking at 'recent times Raffa' I
remember the Albert Quixall days

Puzzled

------------------------

In a few years people will be saying:

'Do you remember the Henderson / Shelvey / Downing / Borini / Allen days?'

And then 'Yes the days before we got relegated and went into administration because a Queen used all our funds on amazing players like Charlie Adam and Andy Carroll'

'Ah well at least Stevie Gerrard can still hold his 5 fingers up to us when we are getting beat down at Gillingham'

Sorry, couldn't resist...

GDS

Agree5 Disagree0

Wots funny GDS is in a few years liverpool fans will prob be saying ''remember when we had great players like henderson, carrol and adam? now we have parkin, reid and zamora''
Chris the REDman

Agree1 Disagree0

Raffia if that is the case I can't imagine how bad those lot were as I've only seen they guys I posted and god they were bad.


Munkydunc

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Nov 2012 09:40:22
I know a lot of people are saying they would sell Rooney to get 2-3 new players, bt who's to say the same wouldn't happen as with Rnaldo and all the money goes in the leeches back pockets?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

Because we haven't bought anybody since Ronaldo left?

GDS

Agree4 Disagree2

Gds
So do you think the ronaldo money was used for new signings
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Ronaldo money? You think they just gave us cash and then with that same cash we go down the shops and buy another player. It doesn't work like that. The ronaldo money will have gone back into the club (and on to debt) just like the sponsorship money and all other revenues.

I was just getting at the fact we have spent money since ronaldo left on many players, some good some bad, we didn't sell ronaldo, never buy a replacement and get relegated like some would think reading posts on here like that.

GDS

Agree0 Disagree0

Gds
No probs, I was just having a go at leaving one of them short sarcastic comments your so fond of
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred, no worries, I do like a sarcastic comment, I like to think sometimes they make people smile as well as angry at me? I will always explain the comment if needed!

GDS

Agree0 Disagree0

Gds
Like I said no probs pal
Jred

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Nov 2012 23:28:49
Right lads I saw earlier the post of best united 11 so the flip side what would be your worst united 11....

Tiabi

Not sure of back 4

Kleberson djemba veron bebe

Tosic

Diouf


Munkydunc

Believable0 Unbelievable5

Well some of my picks arent from the fergy era, and since im not old enough to have seen any other manager, my father gave me some names, and after doing my research, these are the worst united 11 :

GK : Paddy roche : Paddy could always be relied upon to drop a howler or 3 every game. He couldnt even catch a cold.

LB : Colin Gibson ( are all gibson players bad for us ? ) : joined us as a european winner from aston villa, reknown for his attacking intent. horrible doesnt sum it up, he makes patrice evra ( on current form ) look like a football god.

Centre Back : william purnier : the new Jaap Stam, recommended by King Cantona. Made 2 starts for us, one of them against tottenham, where the floodgates opened. In a recent poll he was voted 6th worst ever machester united player. The cmparisons with stam end with the shining head.

centre back : Graeme Hogg : I remember him beeing probably the slowest athlete in the history of sports. watching him turn is like watching a tree grow.

Right back : John guidman : first signing made by Ron atkinson, he was moked by the media throughout his career for beeing too slow. I bet he could be beaten for pace by heskey. As one TV pundit said, "Watch his pace, he's slower than he looks."

Left midfield :" the new Georges Best " Ralph Milne.: hes probably the worst crosser ever bar Bebe. He couldnt even cross his arms.

Central midfield : here comes the wonders :

-Kleberson : never have a seen a brasilian that can play this badly, no wonder he was called ' clubfoot" kleberson

-Eric Djemba Djemba : words cant describe how Sh** he was.

-Right midfield : here is the funniest position. When competing with the likes of Gabriel Obertan, David Bellion and Bebe, it takes a special kind of bad to be the worst right midfielder in the club's history. Ashley Grimes takes the mantle. He was skinnier than De Gea, And he never had a good game for the club. Not one.

Striker: Terry Gibson ( another gibson ): 1 goal in 23 appearances, the record spaks for itself. It was more likely that the other team scores an own goal than gibson scoring.

Striker : Peter Davenport. His record isnt too bad, he was just a bad player. You recognise a really bad player when you see one, and he is as bad as they come. He had no ability whatsoever. he made chicharito look like a magician on the bal and had the finishing of welbeck, without ever beeing able to score a spectacular goal.

Subs :Jim Leighton, Bebe, Obertan, Taibi, Diouf, Jordi Cruyff, David May

Special mentions : Darron Gibson and diego Forlan

Mick

Agree4 Disagree8

Diouf and toisc have been very succesful since they left united!!

Agree4 Disagree0

Mick good post there all before my time but undoubtably united flops, and no name I know they have been successful after united but it's a united worst 11 not what their like now.


Munkydunc

Agree0 Disagree1

14 Nov 2012 02:45:06
Come now Diego forlan was mighty unlucky in his time at the club, and while he may not have been the most clinical of finishers we have ever seen his goals to game ratio of one in six games isn't deserving of being in a worst united squad.
United we stand

Agree5 Disagree0

Any player who scores against the Scousers does not deserve to be in a worst ever XI.

StevieK

Agree5 Disagree0

Mick - having witnessed all of those players you have mentioned I don't believe that Terry Gibson and Davenport were worse than Birtles and MacDougall. We signed Birtles from Forest and at the time he was recognised as a top striker yet it took him about a year to score for us.Macdougall scored about 50 million goals (well he was prolific) before we signed him and what happened then, well he made Birtles look like RVP.
It is harsh to mention Diego as he is way better than many of the strikers we have had, Gibson, Birtles, MacDougall, Crooks, to name a few. Seeing dear old Paddy Roche mentioned makes me wonder what the reaction would be on here to his performances when you look at some of the comments aimed at De Gea etc.
For those of you that remember, would it be harsh to criticise Alex Stepney as a striker, never got in the box enough lol, after all he was our top scorer at one point.

Keanooh

Agree3 Disagree1

Keanooh, im still a university student and i hadnt even heard about most of these guys, but i come from a long line of manchester united supporters, and according to what i was told, these are the worst For United. I mean take Forlan and veron, absolutely worldclass, they just looked like bunkers for us. The reviews Fergy had of Forlan ar frightening.

Mick

Agree1 Disagree2

I'm nt sure Jim Leighton and David May deserve to be on there. Granted they never set the world alight but they did a solid enough job for us when called upon.

TK-Red

Agree2 Disagree0

Mick

That is great post and you have a great sense of humor. hats off to you.

Shahram

Agree1 Disagree1