Manchester United Banter Archive August 21 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


21 Aug 2014 23:31:35
Hey eds
Recently I've read that the glaziers won't be selling the club for at least another 5 years, given that I've read a few things on your site pointing to a 2017 selling has that estimation blown out to 2019+ or could it be another paper trying to sell nonsense?

Thanks for your time

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - The owners are not going to want too much distraction. The dependencies will surround the market.}

22 Aug 2014 09:07:21
They are probably too busy fixing them windows to do anything else anyway.

Agree1 Disagree1

21 Aug 2014 22:01:35
If arsenal get khedira, is there a chance they will cash in on Ramsey or Wilshere?

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - Try the Arsenal page.}

21 Aug 2014 22:29:37
Nope, Ramsey and wilshere are box 2 box, where as khedira would be a dm.

Agree1 Disagree0

Khedira is meant to be a box to box not a DM.

Agree0 Disagree7

21 Aug 2014 21:56:12
Whilst we are all arguing over signings we may be missing one of the real issues, strategy, forward planning and improvement of the infrastructure of our club. Take a look at what City are doing around their stadium including a new 7,000 capacity stadium and very impressive facilities including a college which connects them to the local people.

There is a plan, a direction of where they want to get to, I get a sense they are not just wanting to win now but are playing a long game, securing their key players on long term deals and planning a long term strategy. Our strategy seems to have become muddled, a poor transition, a buying strategy that ended with an unbalanced squad and a focus on the financial side, our sponsors. I just hope we haven't fallen behind too far but I suspect City have taken a leap ahead with what they are doing for now at least. We appointed Woodward based on his commercial strengths whilst City appointed the ex Barca strategists into the club. We now expect it all of LvG, revolutionise the team and the club, City started planning this several years ago whilst we stuck with the old tried and trusted methods.
I hope there is someone with a good strategy that involves more than player purchases and sponsors and if you don't believe me take a look at City's development.

Believable5 Unbelievable2

I agree, it all boils down to us standing still and allowing our big rivals to overtake us, and our lesser rivals get on par or (by last seasons standards) overtake us also.

This is what Scholes is alluding to, IMO. We're stagnating and other teams are passing us by.

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 23:02:14
Course Scholes coming out of retirement and Giggs playing til he was 40 didn't contribute to our stagnation at all

Agree3 Disagree0

Redman the main problem is that there is no strategy for anything other than making as much money out the club as possible. There is no real plan for the future or for transfers etc but there is for revenue which woodenhead has been very good at .

Agree2 Disagree0

There is a very clear plan pancho: secure as much income as possible and reduce the expenditure to the lowest level necessary to remain competitive, use the growing profitability to inflate the value of the club and eliminate the debt, then sell for a world record fee and walk away.

The Glazers have always known that their lack of investment was going to catch up with them, they just hoped the SAF would stay on for a bit longer to paper over the cracks. The last year has shown them that we are in danger of slipping from the top echelon and that means risks to sponsorship, competition and tv income. So they will spend a bit more money over the next few windows to try to get us back into the top 4. However, they won't bankroll the rebuild that we actually need because they only need short term competitiveness, not long term stability. We need experienced top quality players, and have balked at the fees these players command.

Agree2 Disagree0

Danny, you are largely right but anyone looking at spending close to £2b is going to do their due diligence and examine the club's projections and infrastructure to determine the additional investment needed before they purchase - unless money is no object.

The worst case scenario for us fans would be if the next owner decides to re-leverage and put us back to square one.

The thing about sports franchises is you just never know what's going to happen.

Agree2 Disagree0

A great debate with some really good points raised.

In the 70's and 80's we were nothing more than an FA Cup side but we were developing old Trafford while the competition wasn't then we got SAF and everything changed. Our number of scouts doubled and we got success and built a state of the art training facility ahead of anyone in Britain and the success continued.
Now the competition has caught us up and in the case of City and Chelsea have overtaken us. They have a clear path and vision of the future whereas we don't as we are in the post SAF era and have owners who are only interested in the bottom line over the short term.
We need someone at Man Utd who looks after the long term interests of the club in terms of the football side.
As has been said by others Ed Woodward has done a great job commercially but he has no knowledge or interest in football. Although I have not been a fan of this thing in the past I think we are in need of a Director of Football. Someone who can plan the clubs strategy and long term vision, assist the manager with transfer targets and ensure that the football side of the business is moving in the right direction long term. LVG is very knowledgable and experienced, he will have views about the clubs strategy etc once he has settled in but he can't do it all.
In the short term we just need a few new players in so that we compete ar the top of the PL. Then the club need to look at the long term strategy but with the Glazers owning the club this is unlikely to happen.
Just hope one day that the club is owned by someone who genuinley loves football and can relate to the fans as well as look at commercial success.

I live in hope!

Agree2 Disagree0

There are many problems with the way we are going. I don't know of too many billionaire individuals that love football who have not already acquired a football club, so the chances are when the Glaziers sell it will be very messy and will involve a lot of debt.

The thing that sets City apart and any other club owned by a Sheikh/Oligarch is that there is a long term plan for places like the UAE - they know their oil/gas etc will run out so there is plans in place for using that money for long term investments and the mind-set of the wealthy is to play the long game in all their businesses with a global portfolio. The problem with the majority of listed companies or Western owners is that like society everything is needed instantly, so we slip into this problem of constantly changing the plan dependent on who leads. Likewise if you don't adapt we don't have the resources to sustain a poor run - we held onto SAF and in turn old guard for a couple of seasons too long, this made us stale and harder to change course.

We had our chance for 20 years to build a long lasting legacy because the Prem started and we were just taking over as money flowed in, we had our luck. However we became greedy and complacent due to the owners and stubbornness of key individuals. We are no longer ruthless enough, players like Rooney would have been moved on a few years ago (Stam, Beckham etc), Mata & Fellaini wouldn't have been signed in desperation, systems would be built for the long term, but we are chasing the quick win now.

We are focussing energy on sponsorship deals but they are short term, when the deal runs out the sponsor goes to the next big thing and that in all likelihood won't be us in 5-10 years time.

The game has moved on to the next stage and probably the penultimate stage before break down. Next will come a Euro Super League and then a return to domestic focus again I hope, where football matters not the bank balance.

Until then I think we will see our desperate attempts to correct matters, but the runaway train has built up too much tempo now and we don't have the people or plan in place to change it.

Agree1 Disagree2

{Ed002's Note - The sale of the club won't be messy with debt.}

21 Aug 2014 21:43:34
Evening Eds!
I was wondering if there has been any change with regards to both depay and blind? Do you expect them to move this window?
Also, terence Kongolo the centre back from feyenoord would he be of any interest to utd? He looks an outstanding prospect.
Always a pleasure to read the site!

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - Nothing has changed.}

21 Aug 2014 23:34:54
Thanks ed!

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 21:38:17
All the talk is about Di Maria, but I'm getting a little excited by the Lucas Silva rumours who is being regarded as one of the best passing central midfielders Brazil has had for a long time. He would be a great addition to ease into the side ahead of Cleverley.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I would not get too excited just yet.}

21 Aug 2014 20:50:00
Hi Eds

Was just wondering if you could explain why we are paying nanis wages on the loan? Was this just a sweetener? Thanks guys

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - That was what was agreed. It is not uncommon.}

I'm sure city paid several players wages for about 3 seasons to get them out of the squad. I bet they think Its easier to pay somebody to take them and give you room for a much better player in the squad sometimes.

Agree0 Disagree0

If nani stayed we would have still payed his wages and he would have either sat on the bench or not played or come on and do nothing. Atleast on loan if he shows any kind of form we may be able to sell him at a higher price.

Agree0 Disagree1

21 Aug 2014 20:10:57
Is the vidal deal completely dead and buried? Does anyone know if the clubs are in discussions? Too many conflicting reports?!

Believable5 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 20:23:33
I would like an answer for this also. media these days saying one thing one day then another thing the next day guess will have to jus wait untill deadline day.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 19:06:14
Interesting article on the Daily Fail site about where big teams have their players loaned out.

For as long as I can remember we have always been the 'go to' team when it comes to commending squad depth. A lot of our success in the past has come not from having the strongest 11 - but the best squad in the league. It's been clear the past few years that that is no longer the case; but this article really shows just how far we've fallen both I terms of squad depth and young talent.

At the moment we have two players loaned out (one of whom is Nani - a player who is only out on loan because we can't sell him). Chelski have 17 (most of whom are at top flight clubs) and Manchester City have 14. I know we have a few promising players coming through and that there are still young players one expects will go out on loan and develop this season (Zaha, Powell, Keane and Keane being the prime candidates) - but until we build up our numbers with some promising young talent as well as a few world class players - I worry that we're going to continue to fall further and further being City and Chelski.

Bringing in big money through sponsorships is all well and good - but what use is having all that money if we're reluctant to spend it? If we're unable to break back into the top four over the next few years the appeal of the club will diminish to the point where sponsors aren't willing to pay silly money - and then we won't have money to spend.

Believable10 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 19:26:36
Having loads of players out on loan means nothing. Out of the 31 players you mentions at City and Chelski how may do you reckon will make the first team? Zero would be a good guess.

If player is good enough i.e. Januzaj or the class of 92 they will go straight in the first team. Its players such Welbeck and Cleverly who are squad players at best that are more likely to be loan out.

Agree1 Disagree5

I'm assuming you don't watch much football outside of the Premier League? Thorgan Hazard had a fantastic season on loan last year and Lucas Piazon will be world class. Kalas isn't too far off the standard of Smalling and Jones despite being two or three years younger and I expect Atsu to have a big impact at Everton this year.

Other than Karim Rekik (a decent prospect) I'm not overly familiar with City's loanee's if I'm being honest - but given the strength of their squad I don't think they have too much to worry about.

Agree4 Disagree0

Redseven we will most likely have Keane Powell and Zaha on loan none of these are far of the chelsea players you mentioned

Agree1 Disagree2

More than anything, developing young players can be a profit center. The investment is relatively small and if they make it you've acquired a gem for nothing, and if they don't you can often sell them on for a bit of a profit anyway. While they're out on loan hopefully the team they're playing for is paying their wages.

I take your point though. As I suggested in an earlier post, I think the club has been run with a lack of vision and hubris over the last 5+ years. Let's add complacency.

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 18:54:59
Are united interested in Daley blind? If they are will they submit a bid or have they?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - UTSF.}

I don't understand what you mean are they interested or not?

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 16:50:49
Gents I have been an avid user of the site for a couple of years. Here's to all of the times you have helped me through a long day at work during the transfer window - Thanks. I couldn't help but think, specifically Ed002, does not in fact stand for Editor but Ed Woodward. I only pondered it for a moment because I actually think Ed002 is more clued up! So here is a thanks to all the contributors keep up the good work

Believable1 Unbelievable1

21 Aug 2014 17:43:42
The biggest thing holding Di Maria from joining Untied is no Champions League this yr and possible next yr. Although if he came to United that would really help qualifying next yr.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

21 Aug 2014 16:23:42
A newspaper is conspicuously quiet regarding the di Maria situation. They have an article about the "Khedira standoff" but absolutely nothing on di-Maria. Very strange since Ancelotti mentioned the fact that di-Maria wanted to leave the club in the same interview as he stated Kedhira had rejected a contract.

I think he's become persona no grata because they know he's off. The question is where is he going?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 15:07:38
The money is there. I haven't "changed my mind" either. MU have plenty of money, but the club do penny pinch. I have always said this.

Sydney!
we disagreed about this a lot a few years ago, I argued long and hard that the glazers were not willing to splash the cash .
i didn't think we really went after the top players like we had in the past and used ferdinand as a prime example.
you argued we couldn't kidnap players etc etc. Or your famous " we tried "
i always though the glazers main priority was getting the debt down and it affected our transfer dealings.
i actually think the has been a change in attitude and united are now ready to buy big but time will tell.

now we have disagreed over a few things in the past but imo no more than this .
so I am genuinely interested when and what was it that changed your mind

Believable3 Unbelievable2

Nani £20, Anderson £25m, Berbatov £31m, Herrera £30m, Shaw £33m, Fellaini £27.5m, Van Persie £27m, Rojo £20m, Mata £40m. Money is there, the problem with MU IMO and has always been my opinion is that the club penny pinch too much when other clubs like Chelsea, PSG, Monaco, City, RM, Barcelona etc can trump us. We take too long negotiating to get pennies knocked off, then in comes a club above and pays the premium and they get the player. It's hard enough attracting top stars to go to Manchester anyway, so you have to pay what it takes. Over the past 2-3 years we have need 3-4 world-class signings. Mata is one, we need 2-3 more IMO.

Agree5 Disagree2

It may well be true that we are penny pinching but a penny pinching club does not pay 27 million pounds for a Fellaini.

Granted it was a panic buy but you'd think we would learn our lesson but we clearly haven't, have we?

Agree2 Disagree0

Hummels, Vidal & Di Maria would put us right back to where we need to be.

Agree5 Disagree2

Syd
5 of them players you named we have bought over the last 12 month which is why I think there has been a change in attitude . i'm much more confident we will now buy big .

But like I said I think this particular topic is what we have disagreed over most .

There was a time you argued we couldn't kidnap players or that there was nothing wrong as we " tried " to sign players.
The main issue was prob the glazers willingness to really go the extra mile for the top players .

Now this was a hot topic on the site for a while as i'm sure a few can remember but imo you seem to of changed now mind .
I have no interest of getting in to an argument but did wonder what had changed your mind.

Ps if u have not changed your mind no probs I must of imagined it so let's leave it at that

Agree2 Disagree2

Mumbai
40 mill for mata

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred, we have tried to sign many players. I would love to have a list of the one's we have came close to, but just missed out on. I think it would bring us fans to tears personally. I wrote this a long time ago:

"15 Nov 2011 12:56:52
United's gross debt down to £433.2m, down from £516.7m this time last year. That is a debt reduction of £83.5m in just one year. Our yearly bond interest payment will dip below £40m this year compared to the £50.7m paid out last year.

Even though are debt is being reduced rapidly, I still cannot help but think who we could have signed without this unwanted debt that the Glazers saddled us with.

Sydney!"

We have plenty of money, more so than we did a few years ago, but we will always penny pinch because it's in the owner's nature. Problem is this summer we needed to make an exception.

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 16:23:59
"I have no interest in getting into an argument"

Pull the other one, jred :)

Agree1 Disagree1

I don't believe there's any doubt whatsoever that the debt burden pursuant to the LBO adversely affected our ability to step into the market for the very best players. And I also believe that Rooney's issues revolved around his recognition that the club was no longer able to compete with the European elite. Let's face it £60m+ a year has been going out of the club to finance debt. Just imagine if that had been invested in the squad.

That being said I think it's evident that the club is now in a more stable financial position and is prepared to spend. In fact, the Glazers must recognize that if the club wants to remain among the elite of European football, and maintain its investment value, they have little to no choice.

Unfortunately the last few years have been dogged by a lack of vision and hubris. I honestly believe that SAF, while still driven, did not have the vision to respond to developments either on the pitch or in the transfer market. The gulf between us and the elite European teams was clearly widening. The hubris has been evident in the the delay in responding to the need for change, and the dismissive attitude to other clubs, in particular the noisy neighbours.

The appointment of David Moyes was a manifestation of both lack of vision and hubris. To think that this man who demonstrated no ability to take a team beyond its modest expectations, could suddenly step into a hot seat of expectation and replicate the success of his far more capable predecessor, was madness.

It is not uncommon for businesses at the top not to recognize threats early enough to respond effectively or at all. I'm sure many of us will have met those smug superiors who sit in their corner offices and say things like "we've always done it that way", as a justification for refusing to change with the times.

Agree4 Disagree0

Steviek
i honestly haven't , have a look at my op from the other day that started the discussion .
this was a hot topic on the site a few year back and was debated at length by several of the regulars.
It went on for a couple of year.
syd
You think we need to make an exception this summer I think to stay at the top we need to pay top dollar every summer

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 22:40:38
Mate, I'm only joking. I swear you two get some sort of kick out of baiting each other :)

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 14:24:39
Di Maria has asked to leave RM yet sources suggest UTD have made no bid? Surely an upgrade on Nani?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

No bid means nothing, we can still be in talks. Talks will take place, fees will be discussed and then we will make a bid.

Ancelotti though said that a bid for him has been rejected from an side.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 13:56:31
How many people would be happy if we followed up the Shaw, Rojo & Hererra signings by signing Carvalho, Clasie and Depay?

Those 6 along with De Gea, Raf, Jones, Januzaj and Wilson would be the foundations for hopefully a wc team, with an average age of 21.7 years.

I appreciate that they may not be ready now, but with VG leading this group of players who thinks that could lead to a World class team in a couple of years?

Believable6 Unbelievable2

Carvalho would be a good signing as would Depay but not sure on Clasie - similar but not as good as Herrera.

Agree1 Disagree0

Claise is not very good at tackling, or taking on players and is not renowned for his scoring ability but one thing he has is his passing ability is amazing! Always seems to ind his targets and he plays his passes at pace which would not slow down our game. Long passing or short passes always seem crisp and snappy. He can control games with his passing. Not very similar to Herrera IMO likes to dictate the tempo while Herrera likes to play higher up the pitch and works better in tight spaces.

Agree3 Disagree0

Clasie would definitely be a better option than Cleverley

Agree5 Disagree0

Sounds like Scholesy, especially the tackling.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 13:46:13
Would anybody be happy with a package deal from madrid of di maria and khedira?

Believable6 Unbelievable2

Don't rate Khedira - would as soon a have Carvalho, Vidal or Guarin but I pray we sign Di Maria as our new number 7. I'm craving a world class winger.

Agree4 Disagree1

Red79 there are a lot of possible signings that would make us fans happy, unfortunately we don't seem to be close to achieving any one of those.

Agree2 Disagree2

I am with Fresh.would prefer Carvallho. Maybe I am missing something with Khedira as so many managers rate him but I just don't see it. That said him or nothing. I would probably take him!
Us fickle fans hey

Agree1 Disagree1

Fresh! You don't rate Khedira? You must be joking?

Agree1 Disagree2

He seems to run around like a headless chicken whenever I have watched him. Lack of positional discipline.

Agree2 Disagree0

Fresh! Did you watch Germany at all during the WC? If not I highly recommend it. I watch a lot of European football including RM I can assure you there are few better players than Khedira in that position. You have obviously only seen him on his very very rare off days mate.
KingGiggsy

Agree0 Disagree2

21 Aug 2014 13:39:14
: Carlo Ancelotti confirms Angel di Maria wants to leave Rm. don't mess up this time Woodward!

Best regards
Wilf

Believable3 Unbelievable2

21 Aug 2014 13:28:26
Reports from Spain suggests Di Maria will sign within 48 hrs.

Makes sense though, Ancelotti has confirmed that Di maria wants to leave. No need for this "saga" to drag on.

Fingers crossed.

Believable1 Unbelievable2

Loads of reports suggesting this, some even suggesting Di Maria will fly over today. He has asked for a transfer, PSG can't manage it, we will offer him big money and he grew up being an MU fan - all good signs.

Agree2 Disagree2

With LVG naming Di Maria as the type of winger we need at the club I will be shocked if we don't go all out for him.

Agree2 Disagree0

Grew up being a man u fan? wher u learn tht?

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 16:28:03
Should have got him when he was at Benfica, but I'd be happy with better late than never. Next level down from Ronny and Messi, imo.

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 13:22:49
Reports coming out that Carlo Ancelotti has confimed Di Maria has refused a new contract and asked for a transfer, any truth in this?

Believable4 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 13:16:50
So Di Maria has asked to leave Madrid and we look to be the side that are in the negotiations with RM. I think this one could really snow ball quite quickly now.

Believable2 Unbelievable2

21 Aug 2014 13:14:16
So it is confirmed that di Maria is to leave Madrid. Does this mean we all sit glued to Manchester Airport webcam for his plane to arrive?

Believable3 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 13:11:47
So Di Maria has asked to leave Real? Surely we've got to go for him now?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 13:02:27
Carlo ancelloti has confirmed that de maria has asked to leave Madrid. please hope we get him what do you think edd002?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I expect him to move to PSG or MU.}

This was one that I really didn't expect to happen but it seems we are in with a chance.

He isn't my favorite player in the world but he has what we have missed since Ronaldo he is exciting, versatile and in the top echelon of world footballers.

I think the club are doing everything right at the moment and a next week or so could be amazing for us all.

With the Rojo, Shaw and Ander signings we are nearly there a bit of goldust sprinkled over them 3 and we are away!:)

Agree2 Disagree2

21 Aug 2014 13:08:27
Here is some .
Angel di Maria has asked to leave Real Madrid.
Now this could be interesting!

Believable4 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 13:02:09
So it appears that a number of sources are claiming Di Maria has put in a transfer request, things are finally looking good for united 'if' we pay Madrid's £50-60 valuation, but I feel we must act fast before PSG Finally decide if they are going in for him!

Believable3 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 12:59:56
Paul Sholes is a United legend. The guy was immense for us and we sorely miss his sublime talent in the middle of the park; but I must admit to being a little bemused by some of the comments he has been making lately. His latest statement about us needing 5 more players or risk going into football wilderness, IMO, is a bit of an over the top comment, considering the team that played on Saturday was very under-strength.
I am not sure if his comments are being slightly embellished by the fact that he is getting paid to make them, but I for one do not agree with him in the slightest. I for one think all we need is a few more top quality players and a bit of time for the manager to get it all to work, and we will see a completely different United team.

Believable3 Unbelievable9

I see Scholesy now and then in the chippy near his mams, I will ask him where his new found voice has come from.

Agree3 Disagree2

He has played with most of these players, and coached them last season. He has also played in numerous league winning sides, so he knows the standard required. He has no axe to grind with the club and has always given honest opinions about the club.

Why do people find it so hard to believe that we need a massive overhaul to get back to the top level? We have failed to bring in top quality players for years, we failed to rebuild with the Ronaldo money, bought poorly and invested heavily in the wrong positions. We didn't finish seventh last season by accident. Moyes was a factor, but the sad truth is that other teams have moved forward over the last few years while we have gone backwards.

Scholes knows the quality that we used to have at the club and how far this squad is away from that standard. As the man said, this summer we needed top class players ready to step into the first team and, so far, we have come up well short.

Agree4 Disagree3

I think he's got it spot on. This squad is poor. We've wasted money on the likes of mata who was not needed in my opinion. And fellani? Doesn't even need explained. If we can get di Maria and Vidal in by the end of this window it will be a major step in the right direction.
Everyone else is improving and were not so I don't see how schooled comments can be seen as OTT.

Agree5 Disagree2

Carloto, be careful when mouthing off in a chippy. You might get battered.

Agree6 Disagree1

Funny how Scholes was saying that we needed 5 players at the start of the season, and now we need another 5 on top of the 3 we already signed.

So what has changed his opinion, considering - as someone just pointed out - he coached these players last season?

If he is basing his assessment on the Swansea game, then I would argue that such assessments should be aired when the team has been able to put out a stronger team.

Just my opinion of course.

Agree2 Disagree1

Could he be basing his opinion on the fact that madrid barce munich chelsea and city among others have better players than us .
And that the gap between our selves and the top teams is getting bigger

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 12:56:53
SSN reporting , Ancelotti confirming Di Maria and Khedira both asked to leave and club hav recd and rejected a bid for Di Maria but won't name the club!

PSG or Utd?. now this will be entertaining!

This will run and run now!

Believable1 Unbelievable1

21 Aug 2014 12:56:40
Wish everyone on here would stop using the term 'world class' and suggesting that we should only be after these players. Although I would love nothing more than to sign players like Vidal, di Maria and benatia or hummels these aren't the only players who could make an impact on us. Did anyone deem vidic to be world class before we signed him? Or kompany before he went to City? What about Vidal before he signed for juve? Players aren't known as world class before they are given the chance to show their abilities at the top level. If we fail to sign the above mentioned targets why not go for players like veltmen, kaya, inigo Martinez, depay, deulofeu, carvalho. Players who could become greats for us and play where we need players. Ed do you know of any interest in any of the players I've just mentioned? And if so is there recent interest?

Believable2 Unbelievable2

I think it's probably because world class players are the ones we should be signing we are Manchester United!
If the players don't want to come then there's nothing we can do but I don't feel we're trying hard enough.
I see your point that others could add to the squad who are not so called world class, but you are taking a chance on potential when you could pay the bit extra and get the finished article.

Agree1 Disagree2

21 Aug 2014 12:54:43
I wonder why we haven't shown interest in Khedira this summer? A double deal for him and Di Maria would solve 2/3 issues for us anyway.

Believable3 Unbelievable2

There will be a mass flurry of activity this month, let's hope we are involved :)

Agree0 Disagree2

Think your right Syd it will go mental over the next week. I have even booked the the day after deadline day off so I can enjoy it properly ( a few scoops) :)

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 12:51:12
I am hopeful of 3 signings in this window. I think we will go for Di Maria regardless of whether he is overpriced etc. I think adnan will learn even more from him. I think Guarin is very realistic signing and a CB, not sure, maybe Benatia. I also think Strootman is a defo in January if he proves his fitness, a very good friend of Van Gaal and RVP. The boss will then assess until next season when I think many more may leave if they don't step it up and we will get a couple more very good signings. I think that should set us up nicely with youngsters Wilson, Blackett, Keane, Powell etc trying to break into the squad

Believable1 Unbelievable3

21 Aug 2014 12:48:31
Hi all,
Di Maria and Khedira have asked to leave RM.
KingGiggsy

Believable1 Unbelievable2

21 Aug 2014 12:47:32
SSN : Ancellotti confirms Di Maria has asked to leave the club along with Khadeira

Believable2 Unbelievable2

21 Aug 2014 12:45:53
Real Madrid manager Carlo ancelotti says angel di Maria and Sami khedira have both asked to leave the club

An unnamed club have had a bid rejected by Madrid for di Maria

Believable1 Unbelievable1

21 Aug 2014 12:41:35
Di Maria has apparently put in transfer request.
Eds! can we expect a bid from united or u feel he is PSG bound

Believable0 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 12:40:16
S"Di Maria has asked to leave and rejected [a contract] offer from club, "
"[But] if he does not find a future solution he stays, no problem.

"Khedira has one more year and has rejected new deal. It is different than Di Maria as he has not asked to leave." Ancelloti

Believable0 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 12:17:22
Ed, Any truth to the "utd is preparing a bid for Xavi Alonso" rumor?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - "Preparing a bid"? Does that mean counting out the money?}

mbd              

21 Aug 2014 12:46:41
Be some signing , two players in one :)

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 12:56:16
Looks like di Maria could be on.Him & khedive a have asked to leave.Think the fee is steep but it ain't my money & we are lacking anyone who has pace.Still need a top class centre half & two midfielders & also the deadwood shifting asap

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 12:17:46
If rumours are true and if Liverpool sign Balotelli and Arsenal a DM and a CB.
I don't think we'd finish in the top 4 unless quality comes.
Chelsea City Liverpool and Arsenal would all have had a great transfer window and would have filled all their weaker positions.
We needed

3 Defenders - Have already signed 2 in rojo & shaw. Another CB like Benatia and our defence looka promising and strong. Although Mexes would be an average signing if we are unable to land any top targets.

2 CM - With Herrera having signed, another box-2-box or DM would be great. Carvalho seems unlikely. Vidal impossible. And strootman not close. De jong could be okay.
But I won't be a fan of us signing 2 players from a very awful milan side. Blind would be quite achievable and nice signing.

Don't think a World class would come over to unites for obvious reasons.

So Blind, Mexes and Depay would be decent business IMO

Believable2 Unbelievable1

Let's put it this way, Arsenal will have got Sanchez, Liverpool Balotelli - but if we sign Di Maria I think that we have got the best of the bunch.

Agree3 Disagree0

Personally I wouldn't want Mexes anywhere near our squad

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 12:14:07
Not really a rumour, but just a thought. Benatia wears number 17 for Roma, presumably because his birthday is the 17th April, and yet Utd have just loaned out their current number 17 so it's vacant!

Not really sure what my point is.

Believable6 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 11:32:30
"All the requirements are there for Vidal not to leave before the end of the transfer market, " Juve general director Giuseppe Marotta told Gazzetta dello Sport.

"The contract extension he signed has made more solid the marriage between Juve and Vidal.

"Vidal has always said he wanted to stay here and we are more than happy to keep him."

Believable3 Unbelievable0

What's your point?

Agree0 Disagree2

Sorry that sounds a bit harsh, what I meant was what's your thoughts on this? You usually have an opinion after a copy and paste.

Agree0 Disagree2

Syd
To be honest it just adds to my feeling that this deal is dead, no inside info or anything I just haven't been confidant of this for a while now.
cant wait to be proved wrong.
still have a good feeling about di maria so fingers crossed

Agree0 Disagree0

Fingers and toes crossed :)

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 11:21:58
I personally think we should not sign Di Maria. £56mil is too much. Don't get me wrong I do want utd to Spend spend. But to be realistic we should sell Hernandez, Cleverly, Anderson And few other deadwoods to raise some extra funds. So we can go Cm: Vidal WB: Cuadrado CB: one of Benatia, Hummels, Miranda etc. We sign players for those position We will and I mean we will for sure be contender for the title.

Believable1 Unbelievable6

Cuadrado and Blind are more likely IMO. The club will balk at the Di Maria and Vidal asking prices. They may even balk at the Cuadrado asking price. But I think Cuadrado and Blind are more probable.

Agree0 Disagree3

21 Aug 2014 11:55:18
Ash,

But how can we spend when there is no money?

Agree1 Disagree1

The fact of the matter is those players aren't available and di Maria is. We've spend 2 years chasing players who were never going to leave aka fabregas last summer, pretty much every player at bayern and players like Reus and Hummels, we're wasting our time.

Agree2 Disagree0

I have good feelings that we will get Di Maria and Guarin.

Agree0 Disagree3

Dont forget Syd we can afford to and would break transfer records for the right players LOL not quite sure who the club deems as these players though because its obviously not somebody we need like vidal or hummels

Agree0 Disagree0

Red79, we have plenty of dough mate, but our constant need to penny pinch will hurt us when we are competing against other top clubs for players.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 11:17:09
If Vidal isn't going to happen then carvalho is the perfect choice. In fact, considering vidal is more of a box to box player similar to herrera although with more bite, carvalho might be the better fit in our system as he seems to like sitting deep and just destroying everything in front of the defenders. He'd even be able to slide into the backline if you have either wingback caught forward. We need one of the two, but I wouldn't be upset about missing on vidal if we signed carvalho. I rate him highly and I hope lvg does too.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

It's far more probable that when Chelsea fail in their efforts to get Pogba, they will sign Carvalho.

Agree0 Disagree3

21 Aug 2014 11:12:27
Well if newspaper reports are to be believed then Di Maria will be an MU player within 24 hours and Guarin will soon follow. I'd love both and Guarin would be a good alternative to Vidal if that deal proves to be implausible which seems to be the case. If those two deals were done by the weekend / early next week then I think we could reasonably expect another defender in before the window shuts.

Still all ifs and buts though.

Believable1 Unbelievable4

Don't forget the maybes Fresh

Agree1 Disagree0

Di Maria will not be a MU player in 24 hours. I doubt he will be a MU player at all.

Agree3 Disagree0

Similar player to sandro who is younger and has premier league experience, only problem is he's injury prone, after Capoue's performances I think he'll be surplus at spurs.

Agree0 Disagree1

21 Aug 2014 10:47:20
Hi Edds, has ther ever been any interest for ron vlaar. could u suspect a plan c option for man utd? I wudn't mind seeing him at utd. His WC performances didn't surprise me!

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - Not that I am aware.}

Plan C? More like plan H.

Desperation.

Agree3 Disagree0

More like plan z Sydney he is a disaster worse than what we have and is as injury prone

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 10:34:31
Ed, I heard Di Maria flies to manchester for medical and agreement. It is true?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Twitter I guess.}

21 Aug 2014 05:46:01
Ed002, I know you don't usually have an opinion on players, but you did mention the likes of Rojo and Moreno (the CB) before the World cup to the Liverpool fans. What do you make of Rojo? Thanks.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - He has very greasy hair.}

Greasier than most I have to admit. It's to help him run faster and jump higher.

Agree0 Disagree0

I went into the local subway the other day and said to the waiter give me the biggest greasiest sub you have the gave me Andy Carroll

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 13:57:53
That is why City never had any interest in Rojo, Joe Hart said he wouldn't be able concentrate looking at that greasy mop in front of him.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 05:45:47
Ed002 do you no anything on today's di maria story?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I have no idea what that story is. Sorry.}

Is this the "made up" story reported from Spanish outlet Mundo Deportivo, which they got from Caught Offside? Some people are so gullible.

Agree0 Disagree0

No you though, factual itk sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

In English please.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 09:40:51
So this is the way I see things atm.

LvG wanted to bring a balance to the side, he wants to have two box to box midfielders who can both defend and attack, he also wants wide players who can play as full backs, wing backs and wingers. He wants this as it allows him to constantly change the shape of the team during a match almost making it impossible to play against. But it appears that his main targets are differcult to sign to say the least.

Hummels looks like he will stay at Dortmund, Benatia wants to go to Bayern, Vidal wants to stay at Juve and Di Maria wants to either stay at Real or join PSG. Personally I don't think we will be able to pull off any of those signings. So we are left with three options.

First sign players who can play the same roles but aren't as good. This means LvG will still be able to play the way he wants but more emphasis will be placed on team play as there will be less individual brilliance in the team.

Second option sign no one and wait until the players he wants become available. This is a terrible option, mostly because the players he wants will have likely moved to other clubs so won't ever be available.

The final option is the one I would go for. That is to slightly tweak his system, it won't be quite as fluid or interchangable as he would like but it could work well as a half way house while they learn his methods and allow them to evolve into his system in a more natural way. For this what I think is needed to to look at the situation, we are unlikely to be able to get a world class CB which means we will be a bit open through the middle. As we can't get a world class box to box player either then the compromise has to be to sign a great or potentially great defensive midfielder. This will provide two benefits, first off it will provide more cover for the defence and hopefully stop us conceding goals like we did against Swansea, and secondly it would release the wide players to attack more and potentially the other midfielder as well. So we could switch and go for Carvalho/De Jong/Mascherano ect and push through a deal for Cuadrado. That would then be enough make do and allow LvG the time to implement his systems while still having more security to the defence. It will also allow Woodward to have the time to focus on the big signings for next summer as he has shown it takes him around a year to get a target once it is picked.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Lvg will have a plan to build united over a season or 2 not one summer.
Every manager is flexible how many post did we have about lvg system and that he would only play 4-3-3.
People need to calm down .
Lvg and united will sign players with a long term view not with a short term view just for the sake of it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Good post Shappy!

One thing is for sure, we won't make top 4 with our current squad. Chelsea, Liverpool, City and Arsenal clearly have better chances than us.

We need reinforcements and stay away from injures(difficult this one).
Rojo is a good defender and will help a lot, but we still need another CB, CM and a winger preferable 2 to be able to compete for top 4.

I just hope we don't become complacent and end up in a Liverpool away.

We always spend a lot of money on signings but most of the time, we invest in the wrong ones.

Even thou, I'm still positive about this season because it can't be worse than the last one.

Agree1 Disagree1

Great post Shappy.

I agree that signing no more players would be suicide, without at least two more world class players I can't see us securing a spot in the top four. We do seem to be having trouble securing the services of most of the top targets you mention, although I think you're a little wide of the mark when it comes to Vidal; if he's so happy at Juve, why hasn't he publicly stated his desire and intent to stay in Italy? I think Vidal is attainable, it's just a case of paying what is being asked for and I can't see that happening, even though he would be the difference between Champions League and Europa League qualification.

Agree1 Disagree0

Jred, It's all well and good preaching about a long-term perspective but Champions League qualification is essential this season and could well be the difference between a sustained period of decline and a minor blip on the radar.

Agree2 Disagree0

Rumple
Imo we have been in decline for the last 5 year, I've made no secret of this .
we are now seeing the result of not properly investing in the squad in the years after ronaldo.
United and lvg will have a plan imo and I don't think it will a case of just buying anyone.

1 week ago everyone thought lvg was a god the team where on an up young and fletcher where great lvg had installed confidence in the team etc etc.
Then after 1 defeat everything changes.
Lvg should change the system he has worked on all summer, the same system people where raving about 5 days ago, if we don't suddenly sign x y z we won't make top 4.

But nothing has changed since lvg took over . I am sure when lvg took over he will of sat down with the relevant people and set out a long term plan and I don't believe that will change on a week to week bases

Agree0 Disagree0

LvG will continue to play a 3412 and we will be much better this season under LvG. But we still need 2-3 top notch signings. That has been the case for 2-3 seasons now.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 08:45:23
Not a frequent poster but like many on here I can't resist a quick look around the site every couple of hours just in case we have signed someone who can improve the team - ideally Vidal. No joy so far but on the plus side I now have revised my pension portfolio 10 or 12 times and have abs like Gerard Butler.

The thing I wanted to flag is that this morning Juventus CEO Marotta has made some comments that I think are interesting. He gives the reporter the usual guff about no offers for Vidal, nothing to talk about etc but then he goes on to discuss Buffon and Pogba and their contracts, and says that they are in the process of renegotiating Pogba's contract. I wasn't aware of this and it seems to me that this is the key to the Vidal question. I am sure that Juventus would not want Vidal to leave before getting Pogba signed up because otherwise they can be held to ransom. To me this explains the silence from Vidal (why not state your wish to stay with Juve?) and the delay in announcing any transfer - the club don't want to show their hand before Pogba has agreed terms. Marotta says he hopes to conclude the Pogba negotiation shortly so fingers crossed that I am right and we get our man.

Believable5 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 08:35:47
I am pleased to read this morning that Man Utd have denied making any bids for Muller and Reus.
It has also been stated by Juventus that no negotiations and have taken place for Vidal from United. Earlier in the transfer window we had all the crap about Uniteds interest in Cavani. And there are many more that I cannot be bothered to list including almost the entire Dutch World Cup Squad.

So as we approach the last week of the transfer window it is now becoming clear that the press really do not have any idea at all of the United transfer targets. Even yesterday Sky Sports were reporting that United had no outstanding bids for any player. They just do not know so they fill their pages with rubbish about players turning us down that United never ever wanted. Because, let's be honest, they are enjoying this period when Uniteds dominance is being threatened & questioned. Every report is a put down.

So let's enjoy the final 10 days of the transfer window and see what exciting presents (players) sign for us in this remaining period.

Its a bit like an early Christmas when you think about it. Haha.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

21 Aug 2014 08:13:18
When you say 'another' who else do you think was a panic buy? Getting a bit sick of people with little digs at the club all the time.

I keep reading on twitter that loads of people won't be happy and we have no chance of top 4 unless we sign do maria and vidal, but what if these players just don't want to come to us, Woodward can't kidnap them and bring them here, so we need to be smarter about our business and use players who have been spotted by our top scouts.

Believable1 Unbelievable6

21 Aug 2014 09:10:16
Sorry this was meant to be a reply to MU_Devil below.

Agree0 Disagree0

GDS

I don't disagree, I love a good Vidic or Evra type signing.
But I was thinking about our scouting system yesterday, actually. I sometimes wonder who they're scouting.

The only players we sniff around are established players – journalists were linking us players like Hummels, Vermaelen, Di Maria at the start of the window. Shaw didn't need scouting due to being a PL player, we saw enough of him to know he's the real deal. Herrera was seemingly scouted years ago, bidded for last season and signed this season.

Why don't we seem to have a scouting presence in the German and Eastern European countries? Whenever we're linked with a German it's a world-class CL player. When Dortmund signed that Ginter lad, I wondered why we don't target that sort of the player, a cheap/reasonably priced up-and-comer who looks nailed on to be a starter in a season or so.

Ginter would probably start for us, actually. We don't seem to be as good as we used to be at scouting diamonds in the rough.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Manchester United do have a scouting presence that covers Germany, the Czech Republic and Austria.}

21 Aug 2014 11:59:41
RED_SKY,

I agree and I was having the same thought process yesterday about this, we rarely seem to sign 'unknowns' at the moment and when we do (Bebe, Obertan) they seem to flop.

I think the whole 'only being linked to top players' thing answers itself though, would people pick up a paper to read 'United to sign Robben and Schweinsteiger' or to read 'United to sign 1860 Munich midfielder Hans Speckler'. I assume behind the scenes we look at these players but the press will only link us to the top ones because they are the stories that sell.

Agree1 Disagree0

Cheers for that Ed.

GDS, true. Also, if we are scouting those players its less likely to be common knowledge – few journalists will be checking the stands for our scouts in Austrian or Czech league games, for example.

If this window closes as I expect, with no more signings, then it's clear we need to give up on targeting world-class players and begin preparing for next summer already. Get the scouts on overtime, target 4-5 quality looking players in the European leagues and get deals in place so we can kick on next summer with no delays.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 07:28:56
When a player like scholes comes out and says what he's saying, you know something is very wrong.

Believable6 Unbelievable2

21 Aug 2014 09:10:43
Or you know the paper he is writing for are paying him a lot of money.

Agree2 Disagree4

21 Aug 2014 09:30:29
When he's prepared to come out and give Fergie his fair share of criticism I'll listen to him .

Agree2 Disagree0

The guy is a legend in football terms, and is passionate about UTD.

He makes good points which probably a lot of us agree with but these days his job is column inches and let's face it he's been v outspoken about utd and its making it easier to do his job. We are making headlines for him and he's being a bit too anxious to quote them in order to do his new job.

Purely personal opinion but I don't like Utd greats having a pop at us when all social media and gutter press are doing the same. Not helpful!

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 09:57:24
Champions,

I agree, because it gives these people an extra angle. 'Paul Scholes said it so it must be true' etc.

Agree1 Disagree0

I think scholes just tells it like it is .
For most fans its no big secret they can see it for themselves .

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 11:04:26
In the middle of Scholes article he says that it's 'not all Van Gaal's fault' , thereby implying between the lines that a lot of it is

Agree1 Disagree0

MUFC is like a religious cult. Even when a worshipped legend of the club speaks out, the fans turn on them and claim they're talking crap. Like last season, because SAF told us to give Moyes time, any fans who started dissenting and seeing Moyes for what he was (seriously out of his depth) were lambasted by other fans.

Scholes is speaking the truth. It's just an uncomfortable truth for a lot of fans.

Agree2 Disagree0

It's obvious we need 2-3 top notch signings, but MU will not pay what is needed. The penny pinching continues.

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 12:01:42
It is not that I disagree with some of what Scholes is saying, I just think it does not help when you already have a greedy fickle fanbase who are already threatening protests because the club haven't signed anyone in a summer where we have spent over 70 million on 3 players in positions we needed.

Agree1 Disagree0

Syd
You argued for a long time that the money was there, " we tried to sign " or you can't kidnap player.
Honest question not on the wind up but when did you change your mind

Agree0 Disagree0

The money is there. I haven't "changed my mind" either. MU have plenty of money, but the club do penny pinch. I have always said this.

Agree0 Disagree0

Whilst Scholes didn't blame fergie he did actually say that looking back it was bad that a 38yr old was often picked because he had noo genuine challengers to his place (or words to that effect) the thing he said that we can all agree with the most is that this summer was not the time to be buying potential we need the real deals this summer who will instantly improve us

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 06:11:40
Hi All,

Does anyone know if we do have any interest in Lucas Silva from Cruzerio? heard rumours about him on few sites. Another panic buy?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

Maybe he is just an honest bloke with no hidden agendas, and is giving an honest account of how he feels about the current squad. I don't claim to know Scholes, but he did say he hates criticising the club he loves.
Some ex players see thing through those good old rose tinteds. Other are honest and straight talking, and just tell it like it is. I think Scholes fall into that category, the same as Gary Neville and even Roy Keane ( though the later does have an anti Fergie agenda).
Personally, I think when people like Paul Scholes, as loyal a player as we have EVER has, speak out against the club, we should all game notice.

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 05:46:18
Hi all,
Purely my own 'rumour' but I hope an educated one.
Just been looking into the Rojo signing, one I think will prove an astute one. More specifically the money side of things (sorry Ed002). Interestingly it would appear that only €10million is being paid up front with two later instalments of €5million. Now, didn't our board state that 'enough money was available to sign the most expensive player in the world'? I might be acting slightly naive here, and I am aware that more often than not transfer fees are paid in instalments, but could the €10million be an indication that money is being set aside for something 'bigger' in terms of transfer fee? Maybe it is just a case that 50% was required up front and I am reading into nothing but I am curious (and hopeful) that a bigger deal might be about to happen.

KingGiggsy

Believable3 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 08:15:10
I think we know for a fact we have made bids for top players and are looking to do business for these players in the coming days, so you are right but that has nothing to do with the Rojo fee I imagine.

Agree3 Disagree2

21 Aug 2014 03:53:47
Is it confirmed that Rojo will take No.5 shirt?

Believable3 Unbelievable0

He's on Uniteds website holding a shirt with the number 5 and his name on it so I'd say yes.

Agree1 Disagree2

21 Aug 2014 01:27:56
Just pulled this off the ESPN website tonight:
Javier Mascherano has revealed he asked Barcelona if they wanted him to leave this summer, then he would. He said: "At the end of last season, I offered the club to leave if they wanted me to. But they told me to stay. I try to give my best."

Imagine getting Mascherano in. It is criminal that a player that good is not starting. I am not saying I think we can get him, but I would love it if it happened. He is a true leader and a fierce competitor.

Believable2 Unbelievable3

21 Aug 2014 00:57:50
Anyone claiming Ed Woodward needs to be sacked is completely wrong. But hear me out. He needs to be relieved of football related issues (transfers, contracts, etc) but he has been amazing for the commercial side of the club and without these deals we wouldn't be in such good FFP shape despite the glazer debt. My suggestion? Hire a director of football, not SAF or someone like that who would have opinions that could clash with the manager, but someone who performs similarly to Zidane at Madrid or txiki at city. Sitting across from the board of juve or Madrid and sitting across from the board of Some Japanese air conditioning company are very different situations. The amazing thing to me is how Woodward can be a 10 on the commercial side and a 0 on the football side. I'm in awe of the deals he's arranged for the club with Adidas, Chevy, etc etc etc but I'm equally in disgust when viewing our recent transfer windows under his leadership. Agree/disagree? Suggestions for candidates?

Believable7 Unbelievable0

21 Aug 2014 08:07:28
I couldn't agree more, have the same thoughts. I think Van Gaal may move into that kind of role if/when Giggs takes over. He was offer DOF role at Liverpool. I honestly have no idea in how the role works or what kind of knowledge/experience you would need to be good at it, one thing I can be sure of is that Ed is not the man for it at the moment. He may well be good enough with a few windows 'Practice' but in a few windows time we could be as far down as 7/8 - Permanently. Here's hoping the last 10 days are good to us.

Agree0 Disagree0

Exactly what I think and the mani would use is beckham. Loves the club was a great player and still the most famous man in the world. U see how Hollywood a listers and modern players get star struck around him.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 08:33:47
In theory it seems like a good idea but in practice I doubt it would work. This is simply because LvG wouldn't want someone working above him on the football side of things.

I think a better idea and one the club seem to be using is getting a third party involved to act as a go between as Ed clearly lacks something in that area. Maybe we could do something similar to what Real have done in the past and use a former great player to make approaches to butter up the players and help speed up the transfer. I would imagine players would be more impressed speaking to Cantona, Scholes or Beckham than talking to Ed.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lvg was director of football at ajax he lasted 6 month.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Aug 2014 10:57:26
I can see becks being perfect for the role for the reasons above and the fact that his family moved back to London. And he wouldn't have to be in Manchester to do the job. Could also be the first step towards eventually being the face of a group of investors who buy the club once the glazers clear the debt and can sell the club debt free.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You are living in some sort of fantasy world.}

20 Aug 2014 23:23:12
Hi all, long time reader first time posting.
Edds
I got to say this is truly the best rumour site around. Always looking forward to your replies. Keep up the great work.
Fellow reds
Just wondering where most of the regular posters are from and your veiws on which direction the club is heading.
Im from Bermuda so never been to Old Trafford but its on my bucket list. I think where gona be fine this season with what we have but wouldn't mind a few more. A few of the youngsters need to step up and and show their worth but I have faith. Anyway looking forward to this season it should be interesting.

iAreDe1

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I would keep it quiet you are in Bermuda, if Ed007 finds out he will be tapping you up for a place to stay on his holidays!}

Im from a little place called newport in south wales

Agree0 Disagree0