Manchester United Banter Archive October 21 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


21 Oct 2012 22:32:50
Syd

Here's a question, if the editor is correct and it was in fact pretty guaranteed Pogba was going then why did it take as long as it did for him to eventually sign for Juve? If it was basically set in stone he was off then I would have expected an announcement and signing as soon as was possible after our contract was finished.

Outwith the agent though the way SAF treated him by punishing him was shocking and for someone who prides himself on getting the best out of individuals SAF acted like a child when he didn't get his way. If he thought it was goodenough to offer him such a great deal then why react like he did and no doubt damage the relationship further and take the sittu to a point of no return?

IMO there were more factors than just his agent angling for image rights. He would have no doubt considered what we had to offer and where he was going and what SAF did only weakened our hand dramatically.

I find it's very easy to point the finger at the agent or advisors but looking at how he was treated, him seeing non CM's playing ahead of him, us pulling Schole sour of retirement instead of trusting in him must have all played their part in his final desicion.

So while I don't disagree that his agent was touting him about Europe last summer but that is his job. If we had played ball with his agent, sweetened pogba with game time, shown a bit of faith in him then maybe we could have had him in our team still and not licking our wounds and blaming. Agents for us not keeping the players we want to.

Jono

Believable13 Unbelievable2

Sydney doesnt apear to acknowledge the fact that the club, and fergy at its head, are not always right. We can blame the kid and the agent, we can even do a liverpool and start talking about conspiracy theories, but Pogba leaving was partly our fault. Fergy was playing the likes of rafael in the midifield while Pogba wasnt even though he is much better ( in that position ). I agree that he might not have been ready, that's where the loan system comes to the rescue.

Add to that an agent that wanted him out and Viera who didnt want him at United, you can understand the kid. So as i see it he was advised to leave, but it was ultimatly saf's deciions that made him want to leave.

Mick

Agree14 Disagree0

I think it best to just accept what happened happened and that we will never truely know what was said and by whom, and what everyone involved was thinking. We don't even know all the relevent facts about what went on.

For whatever reason Pogba made the decision to move to Juve. He is now doing well there so it would appear to be the right decision for him.

Could things have been done differently? Of course they could, would that have made him stay? Maybe but we'll never know.

All thats left to do is wish him well and get on with supporting our players.

Shappy

Agree10 Disagree1

Shappy
well said
jred

Agree4 Disagree0

22 Oct 2012 07:32:16
Yes i guess its best to move on and wish Paul the best. But the problem is, the trend continues. We still have a 39 yr old RG either on the pitch or the bench. Even Cleverly, who Syd thinks is the answer to our midfield woes couldn't find a spot amidst the "brilliant" performances by Giggs and Scholes against 'Pool and Co.

Blame the agent, blame the discipline, blame the lifestyle, blame it to may be he aint ready. Really? Not ready enough to see Scholes coming out of retirement? Ready enough to see a RB/LB playing in the midfield ahead of you.(Read Pogba).. Petrucci is head and shoulders above any youth team player. He turned Inter down. Can't be about the money, but Ohh some people see a conspiracy theory as to him holding out or whatever. Its funny to the extent that we can go to talk about what these youth players lack, and just not look at whats right in front of you. Sir Alex Ferguson prefers starting with a midfield of Giggs/Scholes and Carrick!

To be honest Pogba/Petrucci/Ravel are better than Cleverly. It's just Petrucci that we are left with. I seriously hope the lad gets a chance.

Deeps...

Agree7 Disagree0

22 Oct 2012 08:08:20
Cleverley is better than both Ravel and Petrucci.

Agree4 Disagree3

I think Cleverley could be part of the answer to our midfield issues, but more importantly I believe he should be given a fair crack of the whip before discarded as a failure. I also believe Cleverley is better than Morrison and Petrucci. Pogba IMO is a notch above them all. Cleverley and Pogba would have completed our midfield with Pogba at the base of the diamond, Clevs and Kags either side and Rooney at the top.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree2

22 Oct 2012 09:48:02
Syd

We can have our subjective/objective opinions on who is better and not. You think Cleverly is better than Petrucci, i think otherwise, but will become a tidy little honest hard working player. I wont mind playing such a lad in the team.(Cleverly)

What i dont understand is why would you support SAF and the management when it comes to not giving youth a fair crack. Like you said before you discard someone as a failure, you ought to give him a fair few chances. But even Cleverly is not exactly getting that. Would u really want to believe that he was rested for the Braga game? My problem is be it Petrucci or Tom or Pogba, none of these lads have got their chances which were due. Petrucci not even for League cup games? Even if Pogba was destined to go, why not give him play time just for the benefit of the team?

Deeps...

Agree3 Disagree0

Shapps

I totally agree with the wishing him well and moving on but only if this was an isolated case and not a running trend. We seen others who didnt quite make the grade get shown the door but Pogba and Ravel were specifically picked out by SAF for praise and he said himself they were the future.

Fast forward 1-2 years and we have now sold one (which I agree with as he had as much help as we could offer) but not managed to convince the other to stay which is not only damaging to the 1st team as he was ready but also to the whole club as the clubs famous for trusting youth.

The way he was in and out of the team showed me that for all SAF's commments of we knew he was off and the likes he clearly didnt know where we stood. His agent will get the best deal, that is his job, but our job is to produce the best team on the park and letting jewels from our youth team leave shows that we are not doing our job.

If Syd and the eds are correct and agent + third parties are big reasons to why he went then we have to ask why was he even offered anything if SAF was so certain he was going? Why was he being punished for not doing as SAF wanted? That is no way to be treating any player of any age.

He did nothing wrong. He evaluated his options and for whatever reason he chose to go. I can accept that. But what gets me is this iron fist policy that SAF continually goes with that clearly is something of the past. Its the same in all walks of life now not just football. The players need a bit of incentive to stay and what did we do when it looked like he could be off? punish him!

Did SAF really think that was going to get him to change his mind? Did he think by making an example of him it would help keep other young players who would like to weigh up their options first before deciding. What do you think Petrucci now thinks with no sign of him getting a game and yet we want him to commit to a 3-4 year contract and expect him to be ok with maybe not playing for another year or so? The guy is 21 now and is ready as was Pogba to play now. I know his injury was a bad one but his body has coped fine and he is still a fully grown adult. At 21 I would say he is fully grown and has shown in his games since he is more than capable with the playing side of things.

So we are back to square 1, a year on. Read Petrucci for the new Pogba. IF the rumours are true tha he has still not signed then will his exlusion from the CL squad be the first in a line of punishments handed out until he signs on the line or will we learn that playing is whats most important to most youngsters as without playing and making yourself important from a players point of view they will not be content to just sit around and wait till they are 22-23 to get a game.

Look at Kags for example. We signed him at 23. He has played in Japan, Germany and now here and he is only 2 years older. Petrucci is Reserve captain and a stand out candidate to made the step up, the same as Pogba was yet we are showong no faith in him while giving Powell cameos, Giggs/Scholes starts and not putting him in the CL squad list.

And please nobody come away with Petrucci is miles behind in developement as thats horsesh*t! He still grew at the exact same rate when he was injured, it was only his knee that needed attention and that seems fixed now so his ability should be judged on what he is capable of doing not how much football he has played previously as he IMO is another one thats clearly ready.

Time will tell if we keep a hold of him.

Jono

Agree1 Disagree0

Why do people keep going on about Petrucci, he,s a very good player and will make a good living in the game ,but with the best will in the world he will never make the grade at OT and from what i hear will be allowed to leave if not in January then certainly in the summer.
Petrucci's problem is that the younger lads ( Linguard, Januzai,Tunnycliffe, Pearson and Rothwell ) are all catching him up. As for Cleverley along with Wellbeck,Raffael,Smalling,Jones , Kagawa and De Gea he's the future of our club.
Raffa

Agree2 Disagree1

If we are conparing ravel pogba petrucci and cleverley talent wise i think ravel stands out. He has so much potential but that doesnt mean he will reach it. When we bought Petrucci he was one if the most talented youngsters in the world ( a bit like fischer atm ) but his injuryslowed down his progression. Pogba is unbeleivable and cleverley is very talented.

Now i dont think cleverley is in the same league as the afromentioned 3 but that doesnt mean he will not make it big time. He has a cool head and brings something different to the tea. He might not have the raw abiliy of ravel pogba and petrucci but that doesnt mean he will not be just as good in a few years.

I remember once there was this young player who was supposed to replace a legend but he wasnt doing a great job and people didnt trust him. that player is xavi who was supposed to replace guardiola and wasnt having the best of times. But than the team started playing to xavi s strength and he reached the worldclass status. Now im not conparing cleverley toxavi or saying he will be just as good but you never know how good a player will turn out to be.

But in terms of ability atm cleverley is better than ravl, pogba and petrucci because of his exoeriance.

Mick

Agree1 Disagree0

Deeps, I haven't defended SAF once. I just believe Ed002 when he said repeatedly that Pogba was never going to sign a United contract. I like Petrucci and he will get his chances, but he will have to be patient like everyone else has been.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 22:05:49
Cant believe doubters of welbeck, he always looks dangerous, yes not the best finisher but at least it looks as if something will happen when he's on the pitch and not stale like it has been at times this session. He has class touch when ball played into his feet with short passes, which is type of football it looks like we are aiming for.

Was watchin qpr game today n granero looked class even got stuck in at times. Looks a bargain at 9mill n could easily fit into our midfield. Is good age at 25 and wunt cost the earth

Believable1 Unbelievable4

I really rate welbeck and think as a front 3 with Rooney and rvp he will flourish, he took his header brilliantly, he was so unlucky when he hit the bar, Danny will not be a 30 a season type player but I think he will get about 15 this year and he's still young and learning, remember when Rooney first game it took him 3 years to get above 20 goals, stay patient with Danny he will be a great player for us, I have no doubt about that.

Caolán.

Agree5 Disagree1

For every goal he scores he wastes 3 chances. He will score the spectacular goal and then be wasteful. I don't think he will ever be a natural goal scorer.

Agree3 Disagree3

21 Oct 2012 20:59:11
Jred, so how do you suggest DW to become good enough without playing games? Answers on the back of stamp please mate.

And to answer the question Villa, Falcao, Llorente, Drogba & Cavani at 20/21 were NOT good enough to lead the United attack. That of course comes with experience and plenty of game time. A 20/21 year old DW couldn't replace RvP now, but a 24/25 year old DW just might.

Sydney!

answers on a stamp pal its quite simple , no matter how many games welbeck plays I dont think he will get to the level of rooney or rvp.

also again how many times did you watch a 21 year old falcao, llorente drogba and cavani to make the assessment that they were not good enough to lead the man united attack.
i think the question is did they look like they had the potential to be that good , now i didnt see any of them players play at that age but i have seen welbeck and imo I dont think he will make that level.
jred

Believable5 Unbelievable2

You didn't see them play because they were virtual nobodies in world football. Syd has a point here.

Nizza

Agree3 Disagree2

Danny Welbeck lacks the composure to be a top player, at the moment. He does a few things well but no one thing brilliantly. It is 50-50 to me as to whether he will develop further. I wouldn't sell him at this point but he is not a natural goalscorer or creator or dribbler. For me he is just short of being a man Utd first choice player.

Red Man

Agree4 Disagree3

21 Oct 2012 22:17:19
Syd can add Van Persie to that list, a 21 year old VP wasn't much good either, now look at him. A 21 year old Welbeck is much better than a 21 year old VP.

Agree7 Disagree2

Red man
i think danny will be a good a player and will do well at united but i dont think he will reach the level of villa etc so i think the whole argument of how good was villa etc at 21 a bit daft especially when i doubt many on this site even saw them play at that age.

nizza
just because they were virtual nobodies at the time doesnt mean they were bad players or didnt have huge potential.
i was lucky enough to watch a 21 year old gazza at newcastle when he was a virtual nobody and he put in some of the best performances ive ever seen .
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

No name
i would disagree with that arsenal bought RVP when he was 21 and i thought he had bags of potential imo, but not a great attitude
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Nizza Falcao and Cavani were very good even as 21 year old. I remember watching Falcao play for Porto 4 or 5 years ago and he was very good even back then. I don't believe welback has the same technical ability as some of the guys mentioned and a completely different player.

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 23:24:54
Soz jred but I think you are being a little daft here. Welbeck may not reach the heights of a Drogba, but Welbeck now is a much better player than Drogba was at the same age. RVP was average and no one had heard of the others. If you cannot believe that it's possible for Welbeck to improve with years more experience then that is very daft imo. No one is saying he will be a world beater, they are saying he could be a world beater and to be fair he has every chance. None of RVP, Falcao, Cavani, Villa, Drogba, Yorke, Lewandowski, Gomez, Ibrahimovic or Llorente were on par with Welbeck at his age. Certainly none were setting the world alight. Pedro

Agree0 Disagree2

Jred,
It simply comes down to how much potential we think the lad has got. Me, Syd and Pedro clearly think he has enough, based on how good of a player he is now at his age. You clearly disagree. I think we all agree he's roughly on a par with some of the fantastic strikers, when they were 21.
Apart from Shahram - Cavani rose to prominence at Napoli 2 years ago. And Falcao was still a River Plate player 4 or 5 years ago. Not quite being very good at Porto.

Nizza

Agree0 Disagree0

Shahram:
U remember watching Falcao play for Porto 4-5 years ago even though he joined Porto only in 2009 thats 3 years ago before which he was playing for River Plate. Please dont slate the kids who are getting their chances because there are very few who are actually getting it. IMO Welbeck will be getting 20 goals a season in another 2 years regularly.

Devil for Life

Agree1 Disagree0

Pedro
lol pal your way of the mark,
lets take drogba , at 21 how many times did you see him play.
what are you basing your "welbeck now is a much better player than drogba at the same age" comment on,
or what about falcao
At 19, Falcao debuted for riverplate scoring two goals in his first start. He quickly built a reputation, scoring seven goals in his first seven starts. He would score seven goals in his 11 appearances before badly injuring his knee,
he returned from injury at the age of 21 and that year Falcao was voted a member of the prestigious "XI of America" in the annual survey of South American sports journalists Falcao came in fifth in overall voting for South American player of the year in the same survey.
but your prob right welbeck is miles better than he was
sorry for the cut and paste
jred

Agree1 Disagree0

So what if welbeck is or is not as good as other strikers at 21, every player develops at a different pace, some strikers wont get good until their 30's others play there best stuff at 20. nobody knows how good he will be not even fergie but whilst he is at utd i will cheer him on and even more so the fact hes a manchester lad

Agree1 Disagree0

Nizza
thats very true , if you syd and pedro think he will reach the heights of falcao villa etc ,ok i hope you are right,
i think he will be a good player maybe very good but i dont think he will be one of the best in europe i dont think his got the ability to be as good as that.
to be honest i dont think his that much better than sturridge and i also dont think sturridge will turn out to be one of the best in europe
but i hope im wrong and your right
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Nizza
just one other thing i think its wrong that some people are saying his better than such and such at the same age when they clearly never saw them play, just sounds a bit man united tinted glasses to me
jred

Agree1 Disagree0

Devil for life

My bad but I remember watching him because when porto bought him there was a number of clubs in Europe that were looking at him and that is why it got my attention and also saw him play at River Plate but do not get Argentinian league games here any longer.

Finally, Who said I am slating Welback and just responding to the question of did you know Falcao is going to this good. I am never going to say yes I knew he was going to be worth 50 million 5 years on but he was different.

There are certain players that when you see them they leave an impression immediately no matter how old they are and you know there is something special about them and he was one of them. The same can be said about Rooney and Ronaldo, even raw they had that special thing.

I remember seeing Messi at around 17 play and thought holly s..t is this guy good.

Whilst I think Welback will be a very good striker, I do not believe he is in the same league as some of the strikers mentioned.

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

Cannot believe this discussion is still going. I am merely stating that Welbeck will improve with games and experience and that at 20/21 the players I listed were not as advanced as Danny currently is. Danny is playing for Manchester United and England at 20/21. He is not even close to being the finished article, but has time on his side. After all the penny didn't drop for Drogba until he was 25/26. Llorente was around 25 when he became top notch. Falcao has always been decent, but he became world-class at 26, RvP became the prolific goalscorer at around 26/27. David Villa didn't get a Spain debut til he was 23 and the penny didn't finally drop for him until he was around 25, that was when he was recognised as world-class. Lewandowski is just coming into his stride at 23/24. No one heard of him at 20/21. Cavani at 22 was discarded by Palermo and fobbed off to Napoli. He started being hot property at 23. All I am saying is Danny at 21 is still very young and the penny hasn't dropped for him yet, that will come in a few year's time like the manager said. He may turn out to be a decent player or a prolific striker we do not know. But what we do know is he will improve, it's a case of how much he will improve.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

Shahram, we were linked to Falcao a couple summer's ago when he was at Porto. He was around 24/25 at the time and I remember watching him thinking he was a good player, but was he good enough for us. 18-24 months later he has transformed into a different player and would love to see him at the club. My point is the penny has dropped for him and that hasn't happened until he was 26. The same could happen with Welbeck so he must remain at the club for a couple more years to see how he turns out.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Shahram
thats the exact point ive been trying to make about danny myself, i'm not having a go i thnk he will be a good player but i dont think he will reach the level of some off them.
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd he was world class at 24 thats why Athletico paid 40 million euros for him which is unheard of for a club like Athletico.

Even when he was at River Plate, Inter, AC Milan and if i remember correctly Valencia and few other clubs were looking at him and he ended up going to Porto.

I agree with you that Welback still has a few years to go before he is fully developed. In my opinion his biggest flaw today opinion is that for his size he does not shield the ball well and a poor first touch in scoring positions and to be world class he need to be much more clinical in scoring positions.

Now can we all get back to talking Chelsea and how we will handle their midfield.

Shahram

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 19:21:55
We've started a trend of buying young English talent.
Smalling & Jones last year & Goss & Powell this year for the near future. The Keane brothers were also scouted from Huddesfield I believe at 16.

Thomas Ince just might be the next promising English youngster to come in.

With Amos, Johnstone, Thorpe, Blackett, Barmby, Lingard, Cole, Tunnicliffe, Harrop, Pearson & Wilson doing well in the U21's & U18's we seem to be in a good position with home grown talent.

What would be our best English Man United XI. 4-3-3

GK Amos, Jones, Smalling, Ferdinand, LB Thorpe, Cleverley Carrick, Scholes, Young, Welbeck, Rooney

Subs: Johnstone, M.Keane, Blackett, Tunnicliffe, Powell, Lingard, W.Keane

How do you think that squad would get on at Old Trafford against Westham, Wigan, Norwich?

Believable2 Unbelievable3

Swap Blackett for Thorpe who isn't a LB and it wouldn't be a bad team at all.

Sydney!

Agree3 Disagree2

I rate Johnstone higher than Amos and believe in the next 2 years he will be ahead of Lindegaard.

Caolán.

Agree2 Disagree2

21 Oct 2012 19:16:09
I think all the players not wearing the 'kick it out' t-shirts would have been better wearing them with the added phrase 'don't just talk about it', 'time for action' 'I wish they would' or something similar.

Makes the point better and more intelligently don't you think?

Andrew B

Believable2 Unbelievable2

No, people should be free to make their own decisions.

AJH

Agree4 Disagree0

Rio is wrong! Don't come up with excuses for him, If were other team player you would not say that.

Nick86

Agree1 Disagree19

Nick, why is Rio wrong? His brother was abused with reference to the colour of his skin. He clearly feels strongly about it and it his choice to make. What colour is your skin Nick, have you ever been abused because of the colour of your skin? No? Then shut up.

AJH

Agree14 Disagree4

AJH, Nick is entitled to his opinion. Is he not allowed because he is white? Surely that kind of stance is exactly what everyone is fighting against? I'm not saying that is what you've said but you see my point.

TK-Red

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 18:51:18
Let's face it, why would any young player sign with us now? We can't even keep our good young players. Fergie has stopped integrating them into the squad. When we bought Ronaldo he was raw but got playing time. I felt sorry for Pogba, not being on the bench while the likes of Gibson, Park and Giggs were getting games in midfield. Now he is playing for Juve and their midfield is miles ahead of ours. So, he's good enough for Juve and not good enough for us. What horrible man management by Fergie. We hear this crap that we have a youth policy but none of them get to play. I read that some of you say we have great players in the reserves but none get to play. Why is there a growing discontent among players on the reserve team? Maybe they know that they are better then the players ahead of them.

Believable10 Unbelievable1

I'm sure he would have played more often had he signed a new deal and didn't try his best to pimp himself out to other clubs in Europe. Pogba was my fave player and anyone can vouch for that, but he was never going to sign a new deal whether he played or not. It just would have improved his profile somewhat and it would have been harder for the fans to accept when he did leave in the summer. He was always leaving.

Sydney!

Agree4 Disagree6

This is an embarrassingly short-sighted way of seeing things. there are so many other factors to consider when integrating players to the senior squad besides raw talent. the most important thing is how the team functions as a unit and there's a massive step from being a talented 18 yr old to being a professional footballer for Manchester united. ask rafael, fabio, clevs, jones, smalling, welbeck, macheda if there's a problem with our youth policy.
As for judging the manager's "man management" based on the club being unable to retain pogba is simply inaccurate. I get your frustration as pogba will probably be a great player but this really has nothing to do with the manager's ability to select the right squad, the dynamics involved can be complex and many factors we are not aware of would be considered so we might aswell trust the best manager in the game instead typing posts that make utd fans look ignorant.

Brendan

Agree3 Disagree2

Syd, stop defending the club. The simple fact is SAF refuses to play the youngsters. He persists with Scholes and Giggs and doesn't give anyone a real chance, despite some huge potential. He is not the manager he was.

AJH

Agree12 Disagree1

Maybe if he played more he would have signed a new deal, who knows? You cant deny that he has massive potential at the one position we need the most. Just a major f*** up when you look at the situation.

Agree6 Disagree0

AJH, I am not defending anyone. The editor has told us why Pogba chose to leave and that has nothing to do with the manager or the club.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree3

No name, Pogba will be a great player and I was devastated to lose him, but he was angling for a move before last season even kicked off. The club were fighting a losing battle.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree3

Syd
fergy said we offered him the best ever deal for a young player so he must of wanted him to stay and at least thought there was a chance.
if he was prepared to offer him such a good deal why not give him some playing time as well.
jred

Agree8 Disagree0

If pogba's mind wasnt 100% made up about going or stopping I would think watching us get beat by blackburn with raf playing CM may of made it up for him
jred

Agree6 Disagree0

Interesting discussion guys. I look at this another way and assume these guys in the reserves are not good enough and that is why SAF does not play them.

If that is the case, who wants to defend the manager and his decision making on where we have spent our money over the last 3 years given the state of our midfield. we have spent over 100 million.

Everyone around here makes fun of LFC and I believe they have wasted so much money on the wrong players over a number of years and are paying for it now.

Our own transfer activity and where and who we have spent money on over the last few years has been utter rubbish and today we are left with a team that has a woeful midfield, average wingers, aging back four.

What is more upsetting is when I read that we are about to blow a big chunk of our transfer kitty on a winger or forward again and think this can't be right.

I can understand if we are not going to buy for the middle of the pitch, then we should have people coming through the youth ranks but that is not happening. This has been going on for 3 years now and its complete bs.

Personally I don't care where they come from Academy or going out and buying but this state of no man land is very frustrating.

Shahram

Agree4 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 17:43:54
The win against Stoke was a good one, nice to get a few goals and 3 points on the board. But there was nothing inspiring about the match, and to be honest there's only been one performance for me so far that actually stands out and that was the game where we had a midfield of Fletcher, Anderson and Cleverley. Fletcher was excellent in the DM role and Clevs and Anderson linked really well...this is something we need to see again, and especially against Chelsea. Their front four is very strong this year and will need to be contained. I think we need to see this for at least one of the Chelsea games...

-----------De Gea-----------
Rafael-Evans-Ferdinand-Buttner
-----------Fletcher----------
-----Anderson---Cleverley----
-----------Kagawa---------
-----Van Persie--Rooney----

I just think a team like that gives us the best chance of gaining some kind of control around the pitch. Because if Scholes is in the line up, the likes of Oscar and Mata will p**s through him all day!

Andy!

Believable6 Unbelievable2

21 Oct 2012 18:31:40
gotta say i think that luks our strongest team with what weve got, no doubt we will neva see it tho and he will probably play giggs and carrick tgeva or sumthing against chelsea.

Agree3 Disagree1

Put Rooney further back next to Kagawa to make it a more 4-1-2-2-1, Then I think that would be our best way of beating them. But Fergie will most probably go with a 4-4-2 with Carrick and Scholes in the middle.

-JakeW

Agree1 Disagree3

21 Oct 2012 15:35:41
Does anyone know the situation with Petrucci? Rumours seem to be creeping in that he may be on his way out. Why are talented youngsters not being given a chance at this club?

Believable7 Unbelievable1

Because they aren't patient enough. They want the big money and lifestyle before earning it. United stood by Petrucci for two years through injury, if he left on a free he would be a disgrace in my eyes.

Sydney!

Agree8 Disagree14

Aren't patient enough? I disagree, our midfield is crap and these youngsters should get games. Pogba played and scored yesterday vs Napoli, would he have ever got in a game of that importance with us? On top of that Juve midfield is miles ahead of ours. I watch other teams and see youngsters get a chance, why not with us? What good is it to have supposedly great young players and they never get a chance now with us? The players ahead of them aren't world class other than Rooney and RVP. Give youth a chance.

Agree9 Disagree1

Personally i think its rubbish he only signed a new deal a few months ago.

Agree1 Disagree0

To be honest Sydney, how patient would you be in this situation? He is captain of the reserves, head and shoulders above the players he is playing against. And yet despite this he still doesn't make the bench for League Cup games...This does not show any faith in him from the boss.

You're talking c**p.

Fresh!

Agree11 Disagree0

Serie A: No Country for Young Men.
Is one of the weakest leagues in Europe.

BornInToIt

Agree4 Disagree3

Fresh, there is other reasons why he isn't making the bench for the League Cup games. Probably the same reasons why he hasn't been playing in the reserves lately. Injury/illness? disciplinary reasons? He has had two seasons out with injury and has played around the same amount of football as Januzaj and Daehli who are three years younger than him. He will get his chance when he is deemed ready.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree8

I agree with Fresh! Excuse me Sydney but you are not making any sense. For the past year and a half Petrucci has been our best reserve player by a mile. He worked very hard to get himself back on track and became captain. In the summer he could have left for free and he was offered contracts by the likes of inter where he would be making twice as much as he is beeing paid.

But no, he didnt leave, he decided to stay and fight for his place, repay the faith f the club in him.

And yet we go out and but ourselves another overrated english talent, who is not even half the player petrucci is atm. And despite having shown no loyalty whatsoever to the club and not having done anything of note, he makes his debut before Petrucci who isnt even in the cl squad while players who do not possess half of his class and ability are making their debuts and making the bench and traveling with the first team for the cl games.

And during all of this, Petrucci is probably sitting in his house wondering what he did wrng, and then he finally realises that staying with manchester united might be the worst decision he might make.

When he sees Paul Pogba, who he outshone last year, go to a club and play regular football in a worldclass team with worldclass players, and he is benching them. He is benching the likes of Pirlo, Vidal and Marchisio, while petrucci has no chance whatsoever to bench a 39 yo giggs.

if i was him, i wouldnt even consider not leaving.

Mick

Agree12 Disagree1

Serie A maybe weak but I saw Juve draw at Chelski in the Champions League. Do you think we are better than Juve? I think it would be a good match and if we played Scholes and Carrick we would get torn apart.

Agree5 Disagree0

Mick, Powell is much further along in progression than Petrucci is. There is also no proof that Petrucci has turned Inter down to sign a new deal. He could be stalling in the exact same way as Pogba did for all we know and he could well have agreed to join Inter in the summer unofficially of course? Or the manager may want him to play a bit more football before chucking him in at the deep end. Powell, Cleverley, Anderson, Scholes, Carrick, Fletcher are all ahead of Petrucci whether we like it or not.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree7

Petrucci has played enough football and has sufficiently impressed to become the reserve team captain. If the reserve team captain can't get into the first team what chance do the others have? He is still further down the line than Daehli etc. He has to get his chance soon or he should leave for the good of his career - I very much that he stays though.

Fresh!

Agree0 Disagree0

I wouldn't say that Powell is that much further ahead. He has gone from League 2 football to Premier League. Petrucci has been training and playing with and against Premier League players in training and a fairly high standard reserve league.

Fresh!

Agree1 Disagree0

Fresh, he is reserve team captain due to his age. The same reason Henderson is the U21 skipper. Petrucci is the oldest player in the reserves who has been at this club the longest.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree4

David De Gea, Phil Jones, Chris Smalling, Evans, Cleverley, Welbeck, Kagawa, Buttner & Rafael.

All players who will play a lot of games this season, what else do they have in common? they're all young lads.

Show me another club which has an 18 year old in their first XI, against a huge club?

IF certain clubs do have that sort of player then it just shows how much talent the individual possesses.

Petrucci is currently 2 years behind on his development, if he stays patient he will be introduced in the same way as Cleverley and we'll probably see him when he's 22/23.

Is it the right way to do it? I don't know I'm not a manager.

The only club with a younger squad than us is Norwich, take out Scholes & Giggs and we'd probably have the youngest squad in the EPL.

So stop all this nonsense about us never playing kids!

We play kids, just not our own. But I believe we don't start our youngsters because we think that they should possess the hunger and desire to keep playing at the level they're at until WE say they're ready to step up.

The Moon.

Agree2 Disagree2

21 Oct 2012 20:02:54
Sydney

You missed a 39 yr old winger from that list too.
Also Pogba left and rightly so after watching Gibson Park and Fabio all starting in CM ahead of him.
Petrucci will not get a chance so long as Fergie is there and I find it laughable you trying to somehow vindicate the manager for not sticking to his word and give these players a chance esp Pogba (if we dont play the kid then we will lose him) thats what he said at the start of last season and guess what he didnt play him and we lost him.

It p1sses me off then Fergie trying to pin the blame on the kid when he does decide to go somewhere else to get games.

Devil Dust.

Agree5 Disagree2

DD, we know Pogba was trying to leave before last season kicked off. The editor has made it very clear that Pogba was always going to leave and playing time had naff all to do with it. Choose not to believe that if you want, but I do believe that. Pogba was on the verge of breaking into the Manchester United first team and he left, what does that tell you? The kid was 18/19.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd

Pogba himself says different so yeah I choose to believe the kid as early in the season he was saying he wanted games and wanted to become a great at the club..what does that tell you ?

He was on the verge of the first team ??

He has already played more league games for Juve than he did for United ??

Devil Dust.

Agree4 Disagree1

For me Pogba's breakthrough moment should have been Blackburn at home. However SAF went with Rafael and Park in the middle. To me that would have been the moment to say I trust you , go out there and show me but SAF went with experience.

It was that moment that likely made up Pogba's mind , the managers decision not to trust his best youth player. You just cannot defend that position.

Add to that we lost that game. Scholes is then brought out of retirement again pushing Pogba further back. There are then pronouncements that Scholes has years left in him. How must Pogba have felt?

I wonder if the likes of Sydney have been good at sport at a young age, bursting to get in the team, believing you are better than what is there , feeling the injustice , perceived or otherwise that you should be in that team instead of those old experienced players on the downward slope.

Since then we have heard about Pogba and his greed , it was all about money not the managers poor decision and I just don't buy it anymore because we are seeing it again, experience before youth. Yet there are still some who would believe the party line, believe that it was all about money, after all the other reason would be an indecisive declining manager who went with experienced players out of position before giving youth a chance.

Red Man

Agree7 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 22:30:59
People are missing the point. He was trying to get a transfer before last season began, so maybe Ed2 is right when he says Pogba was always leaving. Devils Dust don't you think lack of playing time sounds better than him saying he left United for future fortunes?

Agree1 Disagree0

Could it be that if fergy had of played him more he may of decided to stay
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Oct 2012 00:22:18
Could it be that Ed2 who has many sources, Ed2 who has associates and friends close to people who know about Pogba's reps is actually telling the truth? He doesn't spread gossip so who are we to question what he says?

Agree0 Disagree0

No name
ed2 seems to know his/her stuff and pogba may well of been after a move , but thats not to say a good run in the first team would not of changed is mind or getting over looked in the blackburn game wouldnt of made his mind up
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Oct 2012 08:25:02
Because if you listen to Ed2 he said that he was always going to leave and playing time was irrelevant. You are talking about what ifs. Ed2 talks facts.

Agree0 Disagree0

Personally I think Ed002 knows more about the Pogba situation than he will ever divulge to us. I cannot blame him for keeping quiet as some on here never take in what he says anyway. What he has told us is plain and clear for most that he was never intending to sign a new deal with United. The editor said this over a year ago and it's exactly what happened. People would love to believe that if SAF had played him more often then he would have stayed, but the truth is it wasn't about playing time, it was about promises for future riches like image rights etc. If anyone watches the Paddy Crerand show you will know that Pogba told him he had to leave for better money as he had to put his family first. It was always about the promises of future cash. If people do not believe this then that is their choice, but I know what I believe. One thing for sure is that Pogba is certainly not going to come out and say he left for money reasons. Playing time was always going to be his excuse as it makes him look a better person.

Sydney! {Ed002's Note - What I know that I did not detail is the name of the person who was giving the advice to the kid, and what was being told to Pogba about "his future" away from Old Trafford. It was clear from when I first heard - a year or so ago - that he was going to leave regardless of what Manchester United would do and, regardless of a subsequent £3M offer that was made in January. I am a little surprised that this matter has come up again.}

Agree0 Disagree0

No Name

So Ed2 said Pogba was always leaving and playing time would make no change to that yet SAF was putting him in the team and squads to try and convince him to stay. So you would believe that SAF knows less about whether or not one of his players was leaving than Ed2 on a rumours page?

Get a grip!

Ed2 may well be connected to the t*ts in football or he could be passing on info that in itself is not correct.

He also said Becks was likely off to PSG last Jan yet did that happen?

Apologies Ed as it may seem like im personally attacking you but I am just highlighting how blind faith in believing what has been said to someone without questioning things should never be taken as gospel.

I feel too many on here are more sheep than thinking adults.

Jono {Ed002's Note - You are right, I know nothing. That is obvious from my saying that Beckham was off to PSG when clearly it was never going to happen. Sorry about misleading you all with the likes of Hazard, Moura, Pogba etc.. From now on you can figure it out yourselves - or try asking some of the other Eds to help out.}

Agree1 Disagree0

Ed002, like I said they never listen. They are always looking for someone to blame and in this instance it's SAF.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 15:23:29
If we want to be title contenders I think we will need to take a page out of Chelsea's book. It's time to change, 4-4-2 isn't working now and hasn't been for a while, even England are failing with it.

We need to steer the team towards and 4-2-3-1 formation. Scrap wingers against big teams and bring in technical midfielders, we should also let Petrucci and Powell have some time.

My ideal team would be:

____________De Gea

__Rafael__Smalling_Evans__Buttner

________Cleverley_Jones

____Powell__Kagawa__Rooney

____________RVP

I would love to see something similar to that, Petrucci and Powell can rotate and same with everyone else in the side.

We need to introduce the youth to the side, I am fed up with these older players waste valuable spots in the side.

-JakeW

Believable8 Unbelievable4

Jones is not technically good enough to play as a midfield 2 alonside Cleverly - it just won't work. He'd be fine in a proper midfield 3 though. Rooney should play where Kagawa is, I'd put Kagawa right and Powell left.

Fresh!

Agree3 Disagree1

Jake we haven't played 442 for some time now. Infact, more often than not, we have played 4231 and it hasn't worked.

TK-Red

Agree2 Disagree0

Its not worked as we have a lot of wrong personnel in there like Rio, Evra, Carrick, Scholes, Giggs etc etc

Agree4 Disagree0

I feel it hasn't worked because of a combination of poor tactics and using the wrong players. If we are to make 4231 work then we NEED a DM. No team plays 4231 without a DM except us. We also try and play wingers in the 4231 formation which will only lead to us losing possession.

To play 4231 you need a DM to ancor the midfield and cover the full backs who provide width. Along side him you can either play a deep lying playmaker or a all action box to box player depending on the opposition. Then the front three should be hard working players who are very comfortable in possession and very good technically, they need great vision and passing in order to unlock defences. The three should press high up the pitch in order to win back possession as soon as possible.

The way we play it with no DM means our midfield is weak and doesn't shield our defence. We play one or even two wingers who don't work hard enough and give away possession cheaply, they also aren't clever enough with their passing. Then to compound thing further we sit back rather than press high thus inviting teams onto our exposed weak centre allowing them to waltz though our team and score numurous goals against us.

In short we are tactically awful. For god's sake i could do a better job of organising our team atm.

Shappy

Agree14 Disagree0

Shappy for Fergie's replacement! ;)

-JakeW

Agree1 Disagree0

I don't think i'm ready for the top job just yet. lol. Maybe Micky Phelan should be worried though;) lol.

Shappy

Agree4 Disagree0

Shappy I think you're spot on in your analysis. We dont have enough talent in depth now in our midfield and herecy though it is, Scholes and Giggs can only hack it now against weaker opposition.

Europe has plenty of talented 24 to 28yo midfielders in their prime who will relish the chance to run at players 10 years older.

Age is not the only worry for us in midfield. Our defence is looking woefully slow now when Rio and Evra are in the side. Compound that with Vidic being in and out of the side now and our principle 'holding' midfielder Carrick being the wrong side of 30 now, we are quite simply, too old a side now in key positions.

This has been and will continue to be exposed against top opposition.

The stand-out 'must buy' player of the season was surely Javi Martinez. But instead we spend £20m on a 29yo rather than that going towards an area we had to strengthen in order to contend at the top level.

RVP is a great player and I have no issue with us buying him. I love the fact that he is a red TBH. However, if we are on a limited budget, which we all know we are, a player who can play defensive midfield or centre back at international level was a must. RVP cash should have been prioritised elsewhere. Simples.

Halesini

Agree1 Disagree1

I didn't think RVP was vital when we signed him but once Rooney got injured his real value showed. We would not be where we are now in the table if it wasn't for RVP regardless of whether we signed a DM or not. We may have conceeded less goals but we'd have scored half as many as we have. In hindsight RVP was a key signing. I think the question should be why did we spend 32m on Young and Jones the previous summer when neither have proven to be key players for us yet(Jones no doubt imo will be a key player in the future but in the here and now isn't). That 32m would have bought Javi Martinez before anyone else was seriously interested. Ah well its easy to look back and say what we should have done.

Shappy

Agree6 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 14:45:02
I think Sir Alex has hugely misread the support players like Rio and Justin Roberts are receiving from the general public. They see the way the FA fluffed everything over john Terry so he would be free to play in the Euros then a ridiculously small fine and minimum ban. What does Kick it out do or say about it ? Absolutely nothing. I ask you all to ask yourself this question if you had been in Rio's position and it had been your brother what would you have done? worn a tee shirt to save an old mans pride or stood by your brother? I have no time for Rio and his wanna be gangster lifestyle off the field but I believe that he is completely right in his actions and Sir Alex is making himself look foolish and out of touch. I AM KLOOT {Ed001's Note - I am with you on this one. I think you have to accept that it is Rio and Roberts that have suffered racist abuse and follow their lead, not try and tell them what to do. I am not a fan of Rio's persona either, but he has every right to stand up for what he believes in, especially in such a case, a case where he is the one who has suffered, not Ferguson. I found it more embarrassing that all those managers, who have clearly never been on the end of racist abuse, had the cheek to tell players who had, what to do about it!}

Believable8 Unbelievable1

Completely agree and had posted earlier on this issue but did not pass the moderators i guess. SAF can not act like a third world dictator and get himself in the middle of a subject that he has no business getting involved in. The days that you run a team like a prison ward are long gone and players today with the money going around will not put up with managers like this.

If this means rio is leaving well good for him because there are plenty of teams who will jump at getting him.

It is becoming a constant thing now where he publicly bashes the players and it is completely wrong.

Shahram

Agree3 Disagree0

I believe SAF cornered himself with the Jason Roberts comments and to try to hold a three line whip over a very emotive subject is the wrong argument at the wrong time as I alluded to in my previous post. Rio will support his brother and if that is the action that supports his principles then SAF should leave well alone. SAF comments on rio were all about SAF taking a stance and his pride being hurt because in SAFS mind rio showed him up. Poor management of a situation that didn't need hard line leadership and has now become a major issue. This is all about SAF and his ultimate control of everything and is I fear a sign of him losing it

Red Man

Agree3 Disagree0

As I said on an earlier post, I don't think SAF will actually reprimand Rio but publicly he has to be seen to be supporting the Kick It Out Campaign.

TK-Red

Agree0 Disagree0

Saf is acting like a spoilt child and has come across as being arrogant.
Saf this is not about u, its aboutrracism in football, so I will suggest you keep quiet on this one and give the relevant players the respect they deserve.
Extremely disappointed with this stupid attitude from a bully of a manger.
We are man united, we should be leading the in trying to stop these things and not acting as some kind of headmaster disciplining his students.
NoMidfield

Agree0 Disagree1

I agree, the FA and even Hodgson basically stood by Terry (the guilty) over the abused (the innocent) just for footballing reasons. Hodgson and the FA should be ashamed of themselves. So should everyone who stood by Terry and Suarez.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree1

No matter what Fergie thinks, Rio has a right under law to voice his opinion. We all can see that with what went on Serbia this week, The Terry case etc, many black players feel that the Kick out campaign has not worked. Look at the game, how many black managers; board members, tv presenters etc are there in the premier league or on TV. Look at Terry he is still Chelsea captain, he is still being paid an exhorbitant sum of money and yet if i had said what he had said, i would have been sacked. Until we sort our own house out how can we lecture UEFA or FIFA.

Agree4 Disagree0

I also posted a view which didn't make it (any reasons Eds?). SAF has no business telling Rio he has to wear a t shirt - he needs to stay out of what is a very sensitive subject. After what happened to Anton, Rio should be free to make his own decisions.

AJH

Agree1 Disagree1

Can't understand how SAF dropped the ball with this one.
It's not like it was just any old black player - it was the brother of the victim!
How did he seriously think Rio would react?
Any manager has the right to impose rules on players regarding footballing issues that affect the club, but not even SAF has the right to try and dictate how a player should voice his opinion on a moral issue that affects him personally.

StevieK

Agree2 Disagree1

Chelsea say Terry has been fined a large sum, but I'm sure that they will pay it back to him at the end of the season in bonuses, that's even if they took it at all.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

Fergie or utd dont run the kio campaign so fergie is being a bully,i doubt legally they can fine rio for something that wouldnt be in his contract .fergie needs to let this quietly slip away before he makes himself look silly.
johndenton

Agree3 Disagree0

Now the PFA has come out in support of Rio and the media will spin this story. A complete distraction given our biggest game of the year so far coming up.

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

Rio just tweeted:

Just been to watch Disney On Ice with the family! Kids jigging + eating loads of candy floss! Good end to the day

The guy is so trying to be a gangster I just can't handle this lifestyle of his!

GDS

Agree4 Disagree0

LOL, good one GDS.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

I think this is a sad position we find ourselves in and it could have so easily been avoided if the lines of communication were working properly within Old Trafford.

Sir Alex hasn't covered himself in glory, but then neither has Rio. I fully respect his right to voice his feelings and i'm sure Sir Alex does. But i think Rio should have said to Sir Alex a week ago that he was intending not to wear the shirt, and Sir Alex knowing what had happened with Rio's brother should have spoken to Rio privately about it before speaking to the press.

As it stands i fully understand and appreciate Rio's stance on this subject but i feel the whole boycotting wearing the shirt of a private charity who have no power over the FA's running of the racial equality within football is alittle short sighted.

Personally i feel the best way to resolve this situation is for the club and Rio to make a donation to the charity to show no hard feelings with maybe a joint statement explaining the clubs stance and backing Rio in his.

Shappy

Agree11 Disagree1

21 Oct 2012 14:59:49
Sydney you said if we played the diamond you would have Valencia at right back, can I ask why? Rafael has been outstanding this season and probably our best defender!

Caolán.

Believable5 Unbelievable0

I meant to rotate with Rafael. Rafael cannot play in every game.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree1

21 Oct 2012 14:36:22
At what point do we give a starting debut to Petrucci or Powell instead of relying on Scholes? A home game against Stoke is not deemed appropriate but it is alright by SAF to keep on with a tired style with players who have declined beyond the point where they should be starting. Why is Wootton sat on the bench when Rio has struggled, you may say he isn't good enough but how will we know? Maybe when he starts playing for a team elsewhere. Why is Giggs hanging round when it was clear he really has gone beyond the level where he can compete?

It must be totally frustrating for our under21 players when it seems like even a home game against Stoke is beyond their capability even to be on the bench. I would rather have seen Powell or Petrucci having a start yesterday than another Scholes performance, one that is so sad after watching him play with distinction in prior years. We bemoan Pogba leaving but can anyone really, hand on heart, say he did the wrong thing because given his own outstanding captain of the under21's Petrucci can't get a game , Pogba would have expected another season in the reserves. We are systematically letting our youth down. I read recently about City's attempts to get a youth from Birmingham , but if we say come to us instead, he then looks at us and does he see where he can get a chance before he is over 21?

SAF ditched the diamond but likely expects to play it next week, that is poor because we need every chance to master it to have any chance this season. To turn up next week against a team that are more astute tactically than us in midfield is poor planning. Surely playing it yesterday should also have given him the chance to play a youngster. He played the experience card and as the season goes on it will be harder to introduce young players as the pressure grows. Maybe when he realises third is our likely finishing spot he will give one or two a chance. When Vidic is fit we could feasibly start with Vidic, Rio, Evra, Carrick, Scholes and Giggs, all over or well over 31 and wonder why there is no energy in the team.

I fear SAF has lost the edge that made him a great. He is picking a fight with Rio over the T shirt at a time when he should be concentrating on our tactics and personnel, Rio and the T shirt is a side issue. Basically as SAF made comments about Jason Roberts he set his position in concrete when he didn't need to, now he sees it as usurping his authority. It is typical intransigent Ferguson but the timing is all wrong. Sort the age and quality of the team out and get the tactics right, the other thing is a distraction that SAF has made and created a totally unnecessary rift. To me it shows his mindset and it is starting to form a worrying picture.

Red Man

Believable11 Unbelievable0

The problem I have with SAF's plans are he gives the youth chances in the cups and we are out in a couple of rounds and we never hear about them untill the pre season, and then in the cups. League games we hardly see them. With City/Chelsea buying a lot he wants to play safe and goes for the big names(old names).

DesiRED

Agree2 Disagree1

Red Man, Pogba would have been a regular in the starting line-up this season had he stayed. The manager always said that this season was Pogba's season. Petrucci needs a loan IMO, he is a good player, but not ready for a game like Stoke. Stoke is not an easy team to beat by any stretch of the imagination. I would also prefer to see Rio line-up against a tough team like Stoke than someone like Wootton who has struggled in Division one teams. I would like to see Powell and Petrucci play more, but unless Petrucci is injured it seems he is being difficult in the contract department and why would the manager play him then? I certainly wouldn't. Powell is only 18 so we have to be careful with him, we do not want to burn him out like Wilshere and Cesc were. Like Sterling will be. With Cleverley and Kagawa unavailable a diamond was not a likely outcome.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree6

There is always an excuse for not playing the young players isn't there, Sydney? It's Stoke it's Wigan it's Fulham
Not ready you say well we will not know until they have had two or three games.
Do you think Pogba believed SAF that he would get regular games or do actions speak louder than words? He was ready last season but SAF went with park and rafael in the middle. In training is SAF lauding everything the old players do and SAF kept saying Giggs and Scholes have years in front of them. Young players want to play not watch and Pogba was not convinced SAF would give him game time. It is a symptom of what we are, an ageing team where the youth either are not good enough or are not seen as good as a 38 year old well past his best.
You criticise Wootton without giving him a chance

You cannot tell me that one young player in the team filled with experience can't cut it.

SAF is preventing the hope of a first team start to our young players to keep the tried and trusted. Like our midfield SAF has lost his verve

Red Man

Agree2 Disagree0

Desi, to be fair we have had some very unkind cup draws in recent times. Newcastle, City, Liverpool, Chelsea to name a few.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree3

First off I have not criticised Wootton, just said if he couldn't cope with Div One players, then Stoke would murder him. To be fair Stoke murder most experienced EPL defenders. I am amazed that you have so little respect for Stoke who give all of the top teams problems year in year out. I would play Wootton in the League Cup games and I would get him a loan out to a Championship or EPL club after Christmas. Ferdinand is far better than Wootton is right now and if the manager was stupid enough to play Wootton against Stoke and he had a shocker you would be the first on here saying he should have played Rio. In regards to Pogba we know why he left the club and it had jack sh1t to do with playing time. The club would have been well aware of him trying to get a move away from the club 12 months before he left so why would we build up a profile for a player that will end up leaving for free?

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree4

I guess given how competitive the league is the young guys will never get a game. I also think the team is so stretched and squeezing out results that SAF will not take the risk of playing these guys.

I for one have not seen many of these guys play and intrigued to see if they are any good.

Only guy I have seen play was Wooton against NC and did not see anything that convinced me he is the future CB of the team and thought the other CB keane was better.

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney you really have no idea wht you are talking about. When Pogba looked at Petrucci last year: he was the under 21 captain, putting in motm performances every single game and not guetting a single sniff in the first team, what should he expect? last year Petrucci was better than Pogba, he is older and if Pogba was ready for first team why wouldnt Petrucci be? But none got a chance.

Pogba started guetting more games and exposure when the juventus links came up in order to convince him that he will have his share. before that he wasnt guetting a sniff. How is he supposed to know that once he signed a new contract he wont go back and keep playing fr the reserves.

It had nothing to do with money since his salary at juve is not bigger than the one we offered, but he is guetting games which is what he wanted in the first place.

And unless he goes out on loan Petrucci is gonna leave and yet again we will have lost a major talent about to break in the first team ( Pogba, Morrison, Fryers .. ).

Mick

Agree4 Disagree2

Mick, I do not think you know what you are talking about. Last season was Petrucci's comeback season from a two year injury. He was never going to get first team games and he would have known that. In-fact you would have to be pretty simple minded to think he would be risked in a senior match coming back from a serious almost career ending injury. He missed the League Cup game against Newcastle, but that could have been for a number of reasons. Something you need to remember is he may be 20, but he has had less football than an 18 year old. Age is completely irrelevant due to this very reason.

In regards to Pogba, the editor has already told us the reasons for Pogba's departure and it had nothing to do with playing time or a weekly salary. It was down to bad advice from his agent and a third party. If it was anything to do with playing time then why was his representatives hawking him around to other clubs in the summer of 2011? Did Pogba use his crystal ball to see if he was going to be snubbed for the first team last season? That's right mate Pogba was looking to leave before last season therefore him playing last season is irrelevant. His reps wanted him out of the clutches of Manchester United as they seen a cash cow and the promises of future money in the form of image rights was the main reason Pogba chose to leave. Something he would never have got at this club.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree2

Syd!

The truth is that SAF talk to much about Youth but when come to make the play he really preferes the 30's players.

Pogba is a clear example that if you give them a chance, they can really so something special.

Other players will leave United if Giggs, Scholes make the bench week in and week out!

Scholes and Giggs are legends but right now...!

Nick86

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 20:44:56
@Red Man

Although i agree with the sentiment of playing youngsters i don't think Stoke was the right game.

1. Stoke are good in the air, that is their main threat. Playing Wooton would have been a disaster.

2. I agree on Scholes. Powell or Petrucci should have started.

3. We didn't have the players available to play a diamond.

4. Mention Pogba all you like, he was always going to leave, regardless of gametime. He would have been a regular this season.

5. The issue with Rio should have been dealt with a lot better.

6. We are hearing strong rumours of Vidic leaving and Hummels being a possible replacement.

7. Giggs and Scholes will be gone in the summer, probably evra too.

REDFAITH

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah lasst season was his first full season, i agree. This makes the fact that he was our best player and captain even more impressive.

And this season he is still our best player, and during the tour he was very composed throught. So why did Powell, Lingard and tunicliffe get their chances ahead of him? Why didnt he make the cl squad?

Mick

Agree1 Disagree0

REDFAITH

I don't think playing Wootton would have been a disaster but my point was not aimed at him. It was aimed at Scholes and the lack of opportunities for any of our youth. The manager goes with the tried and trusted and we are not giving our youth any chance at all.

Red Man

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 22:37:35
Surely the reason Davide didn't get a spot was because his eye was in a bit of a mess?

Agree0 Disagree0

Petrucci did have a swollen eye on the day of the League Cup game. The manager definitely wouldn't have wanted the public to see that. Even if he could see out of the eye perfectly I doubt the manager would have played him.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 13:44:32
Mick

"Valencia seems to be hitting top form and he had the left back in his pocket and kept finding pace to send a cross"

Are you joking, he was awful yesterday. So quiet! He got an assist, but he looks so out of place at the moment.

Percy

Believable4 Unbelievable2

I would play a diamond formation without wingers and put Valencia at RB.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree11

He didnt create many chances but he had the beating of the left back didnt he ? And he sent a couple of dangerous crosses.
I agree he hasnt hit the heights of last season just yet though.

Mick

Agree4 Disagree2

Rubbish rafael showing the best form of his career

Agree8 Disagree1

So you would get rid of our most consistent defender so far? Valencia is always going to struggle when he isn't in top form because he is such a severely limited player. But he will never be a better wing-back than Rafael.

Danny Pughnited

Agree7 Disagree0

Danny, I would use both Rafael and Valencia as right wingbacks. Buttner and Young as left wingbacks. Obviously if the manager wants to revert back to using wingers during a game he can do. But in order to use wingbacks we would need a defensive midfielder. Jones could be an option there. As a b2b midfielder he isn't up to the task, but as a sitting defensive midfielder at the base of a diamond he would offer great protection to the CB's with the wingbacks able to push forward as width.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree2

Rafael has played so many games though, he deserves a game off now and then. He played the Olympics remember, and most games since then.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well Chelsea away is not the game you rest him as Hazzard will be playing down his side of the pitch and i would rather have him than Valencia at RB.
I guess we could have rested him against stoke or maybe against Braga. Howevr he is 21 and at his age your body can cope a lot better than when he is older.

Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 13:29:41
A few days ago I had posted about the likelihood of Ferdinand staying. I did say that I think he would, however I don't see SAF putting up with this at all. Other players, such as Stam, were 'dealt with' - they didn't last long. Given Ferdinand's form and age, his departure wouldn't be a bad thing. My pick to replace him is Benatia who is a very impressive defender. He'd be far cheaper than Hummels and would compliment the defenders that we have now.

Fresh!

Believable3 Unbelievable1

I would rather have papadopoulos. He is 4 years younger and already a better player, plus he'd make a great replacement for vidic since evans and smalling seem to be more than capable of succeeding ferdinand.

Mick

Agree2 Disagree0

Fresh I suggest you look at how much Lazio say they paid for Stam and how much we said we sold him for to know why he was sold. When Fergie was asked by the press where the missing two million had gone he said it was to agents not mentioning that his son was one of the agents involved. I AM KLOOT

Agree2 Disagree2

Mick do you want red onion and chutney with your papadopolus
johndenton

Agree0 Disagree1

Fergie admitted he made a big mistake selling stam
johndenton

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 13:28:13
Have to mention how lame Arsenal were yesterday. Not a single half chance to score against a very poor Norwich side who are certain to get relegated which cost me £118. It seems with Arsenal if Cazorla has a bad game Arsenal have a bad game. It will be a big struggle for them to finish in the top four this season unless they strengthen in January. We have a big couple of weeks coming up and so far we have seen off Newcastle and Stoke, two potential banana skins. We have been winning our UCL games and we are still in all the cups. Chelsea at the Bridge this weekend will be a big task, but without Atkinson refereeing we have a decent chance. I think we will beat them in the League Cup as our fringe players are better than theirs and I think we will beat Arsenal. That said we do need to pick the correct personnel and formations for these three games and I hope the manager gets it right.

Sydney!

Believable3 Unbelievable2

Think the diamond will work best against chelsea on the narrow pitch.

Agree2 Disagree0

Hmmm, think we'll be lucky to get a point...

AJH

Agree1 Disagree0

Aren't all pitches same size from this year? New EPL rules?

DodgyBanter

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 12:46:30
The front 3 of Welbeck, Rooney and RVP worked a treat yesterday, the movement and rotation is quality and it was a joy to watch at times.

I think Welbeck is really underrated, he gives 110% every game, chases every ball and tracks back when needed. He's a born and bred United fan, isn't that what we wanted? Somebody who plays for the badge and not the pay slip? I'd take Welbeck over players like Torres and Balotelli all day.

What he lacks in technical ability he easily makes up in his work rate.

Hoppy

Believable11 Unbelievable6

Just a couple of things Hoppy. One you can not play more than 100% but I accept it is a figure of speech and you are trying to make a point about the effort he puts in. Nobody has ever doubted his effort. What I have a problem with is his quality. If he has no time to think about it he is good but as soon as he has a little time or is in on goal he panics and scuffs the shot. He is certainly nowhere near the quality of the two players you wouldn't have instead of him. And wasn't he refusing to sign a new contract a few months ago. I don't think it had much to do with the badge. I AM KLOOT

Agree4 Disagree1

Thanks for the clarification on that one Kloot. I said that Welbeck is not the best technically, but he makes very intelligent runs and gives RVP and Rooney space. I heard that too, but you can never be sure with the media.

Hoppy

Agree1 Disagree0

Kloot I agree with what you have said but just feel that it is his lack of experience that is the problem. Welbeck has all the qualities to become an excellent forward. There are a few forwards that have gone on to be great players(even legends at their respective clubs) that were not as good as Welbeck is at this age. A few people are complaining that the youth are not used enough, but now we are givig a player a chance and bkasting him because he is not setting the world alight. I'm not saying ye will turn into Ronaldo but just give the boy a chance. CDS

Agree3 Disagree0

Kloot, was a 20/21 year old David Villa, Falcao, Cavani, Llorente or Didier Drogba good enough to play for United? Nuff said.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

CDS, it's called hypocrisy. One minute someone is saying the club are not paying the youth enough, next minute he is saying DW is holding out for more cash in a new deal so didn't care about the badge then. Then there are people on here saying we should be playing the younger players and then they are criticising them when they can, DDG, Rafael, Jones, Cleverley & Welbeck spring to mind. Some people need to make their minds up.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

Syd
how many times did you watch villa, falcao cavani drogba play when they were 21.
maybe they were good enough

its not about age its about quality, imo players should be picked on there ability.

any player who plays for united is open to getting criticised it goes with the job, everybody wants us to give youth a chance but only if they are good enough.

is it really hypocritical to want to give youth a chance while at the same time giving an opinion on how they play or how good they could be in the future.

im not sure about welbeck to be honest i dont think he will turn out to be a good enough player to be the main man at a club like united.
i think cleverly will be a good player and have a career at united but i dont think he will be good enough to be our main man in the middle.
jones could be very good and I think DDG and RAF will be top top players.
so yes give youth a chance but they need to be good enough, who was the last real top player to come through the academy and break in to the first team
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred, so how do you suggest DW to become good enough without playing games? Answers on the back of stamp please mate.

And to answer the question Villa, Falcao, Llorente, Drogba & Cavani at 20/21 were NOT good enough to lead the United attack. That of course comes with experience and plenty of game time. A 20/21 year old DW couldn't replace RvP now, but a 24/25 year old DW just might.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree4

21 Oct 2012 12:33:11
Well Well Well

Haven't I said it all along and now Pogba inadvertently lets it slip. Read the article in the Daily Mail. Vieira convinced me to join Juve. Said it all along. a City Development official advising United youngsters, more underhandedness from our neightbours

Never mess with the Moston Red

Mike the Moston Red

Believable3 Unbelievable3

I have posted a view immidiatly after his transfer to juve that veira is playing a part there. So being a united played he cant go to city straight away. So juve is just a stepping stone. They dont need him either. Viera just used his all contacts at juve to convience them to buy him nd sell to city in 2 years time so no hard feeling runs on player at manchester. Every1 undstands that players move for big money to city so will assume that pogba also have.
I count it as looooonnnnggg politics.
Rodio17

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 11:17:04
Feel really upset with SAF comments regarding Rio yesterday ive lost a lot off respect for him but not surprised really most of his interviews these days r embarrassing
CardiffRED

Believable10 Unbelievable4

Support Cardiff the dude

Agree0 Disagree2

I think we can safely say this will be Rio's final season at the club.

Sydney!

Agree6 Disagree1

Sydney, I think it should be Fergusons last season at Utd. It's Rios choice not to wear the shirt ! For Saf to declare himself embarrassed at Rios lack of doing what he to told to do shows he is convinced he is bigger than the club itself... Shocking behavior from the manager.... No doubt about it !!


Red Ted

Agree9 Disagree1

Agreed Syd this was the final nail in the coffin imo

Pardoe

Agree1 Disagree0

I for one will be glad to see the back of Rio hes a liability

ms85

Agree0 Disagree3

21 Oct 2012 09:38:45
Sigh! Steve Mcmahon the irritating person has to be the most biased football "pundit" for a neutral broadcaster. Bloody hell, bitter scouse. May be Gary Neville should take a tutorial of sorts for such persons! Espn Asia have got to kick his bald ass out.

Well atleast Paddy Crerand is employed by United. He makes up for a lot of it :)

Deeps...

Believable7 Unbelievable2

21 Oct 2012 09:22:21
We won and scored four goals and at times played some good football after half an hour of dour slow play to begin with.

I maintain that playing yesterday's style with a central midfield two of Carrick and Scholes will win us nothing. Yesterday we were incredibly slow and sluggish at the start very like the Spurs game but with the central midfield like that there is no energy or verve. The manager has not learned from previous games and I am concerned with his thought process at the moment.

The first goal for them was caused by an old slow player who has never been able to tackle yet surely Scholes experience should have told him not to dive in and concede such a free kick to a tall powerful team. Scholes went in on his wrong foot as well, he is a sending off waiting to happen and if it is a big game it will cost us. As soon as Scholes did that I felt we had a problem. Stoke played like Wimbledon yet have a little more than them in the middle so can retain possession a little more. Still for some reason they dropped deep after a decent start and we took advantage. RVPs cross was beautiful right in front of where I sit so had the perfect view. I thought both RVP and Rooney had good games and that is our strength at the moment the ability to score.

People blame the defence but it is right in front of the defence where the problem is. Their second goal saw Kightly run straight through our midfield , I sat back and thought there is no way at all that would have happened if Keane or Robson had been playing. Then you look and see Scholes struggling to cover and Carrick not strong enough or quick enough. Anderson gave the midfield legs and covered better than the others yet he is not the answer. We lacked command in the middle of the park. Then I ask why was Powell not given time, why was Giggs on the bench , why do our young players not get a chance? Why has Petrucci not had any time out there? Why are we persisting with so many old players and ones that are not good enough?

It comes back to SAF. He is persisting with the older players and i believe it is almost out of fear of failure. Perhaps the pressure of City and Chelsea has got to him because the old slow style will see us fail when it matters.

I see SAF thinks we will win the Champions league, I wonder if he sees Scholes and Carrick in their prime rather than where they are now. Yes we are second but looking at our team yesterday that central midfield will not beat top teams when it matters. Third is where we are heading and out of Europe against the first top team we face. Old legs with an old slow style will cost us and it has to change.

Red Man

Believable10 Unbelievable2

Best post I've seen on here for a long time. I've also been saying that Scholesy and carrick should not okay tigethet .
Our tactics are wrong and Ferguson has not learned and is too old for change. I'm not being disrespectful, as I'm old myself. It is just his attitude.
Why are the youngsters not been given a chance?
Powell buttner did very well when given the chance. Petrucci is our reserve captain and is stand out talent, yet no first team chance. Instead, we have Giggs Scholes Rio evra and the same old tactics.
Play like this on Sunday and wewill be wwiped out.
NoMidfield

Agree5 Disagree3

Complete BS, we have no chance in CL and if he does not know that, then time for a new manager.

Teams like Barca, Bayern, RM, Porto and few more will eat us for lunch with our midfield. He is just trying to motivate the team for the Braga game.

RVP, Rooney,Welback are not better than Ronaldo, Tevez, Rooney and we never got a sniff against Barca because we were rubbish in the middle of the pitch and we are worse today.

Shahram

Agree7 Disagree2

I have to disagree . Yes scholes legs are probably gone and yes that was a bad tackle but even in his prime his tackles were Probably worse.
We conceded so many because
We are far too concentrated on attack. This was shown when evra gave it away to knightly on halfway line.
I think Anderson could be AN answer to midfield .he can certainly ping a pass and is Quite good at defense.
Maybe this lineup v Chelsea

De gea
Evra rio Evans rafael
anderson
Clevs. Kagawa
Rooney
Van Persie welbeck

Jay-c

Agree0 Disagree4

Totally agree Red Man. A lot of us on here are singing from the same song sheet, but I'm afraid nothing is going to change SAF's preferences.

J Bones.

Agree1 Disagree0

With Kagawa returning late and Cleverley playing a full game a day after scheduled, the diamond was out of the question yesterday. I have no doubt in my mind that we will play a diamond against Chelsea next week. Scholes and Carrick wouldn't have been enough in midfield in their hay day as the game has moved on since then, teams pack midfields now and that is what will win you games. It certainly would have prevented Kightly's goal.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

I think the Chelsea game bar injury picks itself.

__________DDG
Rafa__Ferdy___Evans__Evra
_________Carrick
__Kagawa_______Clevers
_________Rooney
__Welbeck_______V.Persie

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

I am certain that either Scholes, Giggs or even both will start against Chelsea. Fergie will play Cleverly and Kagawa on Tuesday and drop at least one of them for the big game.

Danny Pughnited

Agree3 Disagree0

Danny, you maybe be correct, but is the line-up above the line-up you would choose? Well perhaps swap Evra & Rio for Buttner & Smalling?

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 09:19:58
Well guys glad we got the Stoke game out of the way and 3 more points. It was quite an odd game to watch and the site has been very subdued post game, which was a reflection of the match.

At times we seemed very pedestrian and slow and the crowd was very subdued, which I believe is the result of Carrick and Scholes playing in the middle. I thought RVP was our best player on the pitch and although rooney got 2 goals, RVP was the major influence in the game.

On the goals conceded, I don't blame Rooney and believe DDG has to come for that ball as it is within 4 yards of the goal line, besides that I actually thought our defenders did quite well and the second goal was more a reflection of a midfield that does not have pace to track back a counter and a lucky bounce for the guy who scored, kind of like the Buttner goal earlier in the season.

Looking ahead to the Chelsea game, I pray SAF puts some meat and pace in the middle of the pitch, i.e. Anderson and Cleverly and even maybe Carrick as a DM and maybe we play Rooney on the right and Valencia on the left, which will need to track back and do a lot of defending and RVP upfront in a 4141 formation.

Or we could play a 4411 formation with Cleverly,Carick, Welback, Valencia, Rooney in the hole and RVP upfront.

The Chelsea midfield is very good if you give them space and room to run at you and we need to get stuck in and win the midfield battle.

Reminds me of a few years ago when we went to Arsenal fearing the worst and Fletcher did one hell of job on Viera.

I fear they will love to see Scholes in the starting lineup as their midfield will run past him and the whole shape of the team goes to sh..t and players will get pulled out of position to cover for him and we will end up blaming our defenders to no fault of their own.

Evra on the left is always a major concern and I believe they will target him but can't see Buttner even being considered as SAF always goes with Evra in big games.

All in All a win against Braga and a draw at Chelsea would be great week of football for us.

Finally, I believe we need to make a statement at Chelsea from a psychological point of view as at the moment they are building up a lot of momentum and we need to put the brakes on them.

City's result yesterday was quite impressive and a clear signal that they are going to be there all the way and it's time for us to put up or shut up.

Shahram

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Play like we did yesterday and we will lose against Braga and wiped out at Chelsea.
Chelsea have got a manager and players to play modern attacking football based on a very strong and creative midfield. They are also backed by two excellent central defenders.
All of whom we do NOT have atunited.
NNoMidfield

Agree1 Disagree2

Chelski's midfield is good going forward, but is soft defensively, we need to grow a pair and go and attack them with one of these formations...

_________DDG
Raf__Evans__Ferdy__Evra
____Carrick___Ando
Kags____Rooney____Welbz
_________RVP

_________DDG
Raf__Evans__Ferdy__Evra
___Clevs__Carrick__Ando
__Rooney__RVP___Kags

I can't see Fergy leaving Giggs and Scoles out though, just hope he doesn't play both.

One things for certain, we go there to win, to make a statement and put down a marker... Not to draw.

DodgyBanter

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 08:22:28
We should definitely get Sneijder. Class is permanent. He still has 2-3 years with him and with Nani or Petrucci (SAF just doesnt want to play him )going the opposite way it will suit both parties.

Ddg
rafael smalling evans evra
carrick sneijder
Cleverley rooney kagawa
van persie

With anderson valencia & young can come as substitues if we wanna change tactics etc.

wesley can pick a pass. His workrate is fine.
Remember when RM sold him to Inter he wasnt in the best of form but after signing for them he was brilliant. they won champs league. I feel sneijder needs a change. He could be our own 'Mata' with earlier understanding with Vanpersie.

Sign Sneijder.
Also buttnet can easily fill in at LW.

Believable0 Unbelievable5

That ship has sailed, SAF won't go back there now... and I'm happy with that. Would rather have Cabaye and a whole lot of saved money.

DodgyBanter

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 08:03:58
Man United vs Stroke

Match 8 of the season, good to be still in second place on the points table and only 4 points adrift leaders Chelsea whom we meet next and we better tighten our defensive girdle or else Mata and Co could have a field day at our cost.

I wouldn't call it the best match of this season but have surely had far worse ones so far, what was great to watch was the constant movement of the front three of Wazza, RVP and Welbeck although the latter's finishing and speed with the ball at his feet is much to be desired and will have to really work hard to get rid of those deficiencies and looking at Welbeck since the last season it's going to be an uphill task. The through ball from RVP should have been scored off, so too the cross from Rooney, missing such chances could hit our team in a tight match.

RVP has had his best match so far since his transfer and was everywhere, from deep midfield to the opposition goal line and his finish to the Tony cross was in fact an exquisite touch, made it look so very easy and effortless. Our team has certainly benefited from his corners and the cross for our equalizer was just perfect and tailor made for Rooney to nod in. I am sure this partnership will flourish with time and games. I really enjoyed our attacking play from our forwards but our defense has been porous and leaked again. If Bale made Rio look like a snail, Kinsley made our entire defense look like a spineless deck of cards just falling aside even though DDG made a valiant attempt to stop it, surprisingly even got a hand on it but couldn't keep it out. Our defensive girdle has to be tightened or else the efforts of our fine forwards will be in vain.

DDG was a lot better in goal today and good on the crosses as well but could have done better at Rooney's own goal, he could have sure got to it with ease. There is no denying that he made two fantastic saves and kept us in the game like so very often last season. I have a feeling that given the chance he will improve as an all round keeper.

Rooney has surely brought the much needed energy upfield, though with Him, RVP and a better finisher than Welbeck along we could be the most feared attacking force in world football. Yes I know, the forward line cannot function without a good midfield, and ours is terrible. Scholes was a total waste in this game and was actually shocked to see him back after the break as he had just missed a second booking at the end of the first half, Carrick and Scholes is a bad combo to start a game with. With Ando in the last 20 minutes things got slightly better but still not a healthy midfield.

The defense was the worst today even though we managed to keep the "jolly green giants" off the ball in the air we were beaten all over. Except for Rafa our defense was just ordinary and was getting Goosebumps every time the ball was played deep in our half especially on our left flank. Evra had a very bad day at the office while defending and his first touch and passing certainly lacked confidence and conviction. If we defend the same way in the next game Chelsea will make us pay dearly. By the way Hazard's through ball for Mata to score was a peach.

Overall, happy with the win and the three points in our kitty. Hope to see a better performance from our defense on Tuesday and next Sunday. All the best to the Red Devils - Fred

Believable0 Unbelievable1

21 Oct 2012 06:44:52
Man united has not lost any game when rvp scores

Believable0 Unbelievable3

Not lost one when I've scored either mate!

GDS

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2012 04:15:05
to those talking about ravel morrison yes he got man of the match today but i was at that game and it was a poor match. Ravel ducked out of every challenge and tackle like he was scared to get touched. His vision was miles better than anyone around him and his passing was mostly good, if his teammates were on the same wavelength then it would have been very good. But he definitely lacked bottle and as i said avoided almost every tackle and a few times tried to play the ref looking for the foul. Not sure we missed out. Now compared to pogba... Mort

Believable2 Unbelievable1