Manchester United Banter Archive December 29 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


29 Dec 2017 19:23:14
A fine player bale, carrying a lot of injuries, if we buy him, in today's madness what is a reasonable price, if Liverpool paid 75mil. For an average defender from a side that leaked more goals than themselves this season.
I wouldn't be going above the 75 mil.

Believable3 Unbelievable4

29 Dec 2017 20:26:56
Think of it this way, would bale win us more points in 20 league games than any of our current players would
Playing 38? Obviously bare in mind Cup games and Europe?

Agree2 Disagree1

29 Dec 2017 21:41:53
Yes mdl he would.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Dec 2017 23:22:54
So when he's out injured for your champs league semi final and you lose horribly that's okay because you thrashed West ham 7-2 three weeks earlier? Good logic.

The point is you can't pick and choose when he is available. He is unreliably out injured. How is that doing for us with Jones, Baily, Smalling?

Agree6 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 00:03:00
DB I agree he is a risk I feel the same about rose. Both are really excellent players at their best. But their injury record has got to be of huge concern.

I know the squad needs strengthening but jose and the club cannot afford any more big money buys that don't deliver. We have young players with great ootential. In particular Rashford Martial bailly plus lindelof shaw mctominay and tuanzabe even pogba lukaku and jessie are all 24. It's not a time to panic buy.
My opinion is that we need 5 senior proven high quality players in the 26 to 29 year old category to join ddg and matic and the likes of young valencia and mata to compliment and help bring out the potential of that core group of young players.
I don't think that the likes of blind rojo smalling darmian miki and fellaini possibly herrera have got it in them to compliment that young core group and move to the level that is being set for us by our competition.
Jose may even look to sell one or 2 of that core young group who knows.
Players that fit into the category that have been linked with us are the likes of rose bale ozil perisic dybala i like the thoughts of those sort of signings. But all most unlikely in jan.

I'm really hoping that the club can pull a couple of good signings that will help us and give us some much needed impoudous going into the 2nd half of the season.

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Dec 2017 00:18:39
IF Bale could come in and be fit for 40 games in the season, and protected for the rest (not out injured) he woukd be fantastic for us either on the right wing or behind Lukaku. But for the money we would no doubt pay he would be a huge risk.

Perfect situation to loan till the summer with option to buy. But why would Real or Bale do that?

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 02:23:05
There is a risk with Bale, but we take risks all the time and can we afford not to take risks? Players of his caliber will hardly be beating down the door to sign for us, so if there is any sniff of a chance we need to take it.

Besides I'd rather have a player not contributing from the physio table than taking up a shirt on the pitch and being anonymous - something that our mega money players seem to do far too often.

I say go for it Woody, get him if you can please.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Dec 2017 09:54:38
Bale is a class act on his day 1 of the best in the world .
His injury record is a concern but I'm sure that will be reflected in his price.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Dec 2017 11:15:06
I can still see RM asking for over 80 mil even with his gammy leg.

I wouldn't want him now but if he get him il be over the moon if he proves me wrong.

Agree2 Disagree1

30 Dec 2017 12:44:15
RvP was always considered the same and he won us the title more or less by himself. Sometimes the problems are down to management and training methods.

Agree2 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 13:21:39
Bale would be fantastic for us players do recover from long injurys time and time again medical improvements over the last few decades has progressed and I have no doubt he would be the best player in the league but why would real sell he could fix them? and I doubt he would come to us he has rejected us twice but never say never.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 05:08:56
How happy are city right now with Vincent Kompany? On his day a fantastic centreback, but you can bet Pep will have him shifted out quickly after latest set back.

Owen Hargreves same story for us.

If you can't rely on fitness what can you rely on?

He is undoubtedly a very gifted player, if you thought you could manage him to a certain number of games (1 per week) then a good risk. But if you are not expecting to make a change to injury record and we will get more of thee same then not worth it.

He has also passed up on us a couple of times and I'm not sure we are his favourite club. I would rather have someone who is all in and wants to play for us.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 14:02:11
I don't care how much any player costs to be honest 1 million or 200 million if he comes here plays well and works hard and adheres to the managers plans then he is welcome.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Dec 2017 14:12:58
agree DB on his day he is a fantastic player - so powerful and explosive that can turn a game on its head in a second. but his injury record is appalling and as we all know once you start getting muscle injuries then you very rarely get over them. Perhaps a change of training methods will do him the world of good. However, the prem is much more physical so for me its a gamble not worth taking. Griezmann would be my first choice but if the rumours of our interest in Dybala are true then I would be over the moon as he is a fantastic player.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 15:24:47
I do care how much a player costs and I think buying Bale will be an absolute disaster. Has injured most of the time. So it'll make no sense to buy him.
Leahy, vvd is not an average defender and I wish we had him in our ranks.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 15:39:08
Attack, No 1 in transfer money, not even in top ten best defenders.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 16:43:42
But if he fill he weakness for Liverpool and they win trophies then he will be good value. That's why i think prove is totally irrelevant. If he costs 1 million and is a success great if he costs 75 and brings success than great too.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2017 17:15:31
I think VVD on his own cannot fix liverpool’s Leaky defence but I think he is one of the best cbs in the league on form. They’ve signed a very good player for a very over inflated price but like ken said if they win trophies then it will be money well spent.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Dec 2017 14:49:40
Across various news outlets it has been reported that both Man Utd and Man City are to look at Samuel Umtiti from Barcelona given he has a release clause of 60m Euro.

I just wondered if any of the Eds know whether he is someone being looked at? Sure I've seen on here in the past to ignore release clauses as they don't apply or are misunderstood.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Try the Sharkopod.}

29 Dec 2017 12:05:52
Any truth in the rumours regarding Andre Gomes coming in from Barça in Jan?

Thanks!

Believable0 Unbelievable3

29 Dec 2017 12:19:45
Hopefully not.

Agree6 Disagree1

29 Dec 2017 12:00:58
Just wondering if there is a realistic chance of us signing anyone in January?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - Yes.}

29 Dec 2017 12:20:57
Thanks for the quick response.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Dec 2017 10:12:36
Dont know how credible the talk is but the mention of Dybala and NOT so much Greizman is like a belated xmas present.

Believable3 Unbelievable1

29 Dec 2017 09:48:02
Just like to say a (late) Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all the posters and Eds.

Just thought I share my two cent on the club and Mourinho situation.

So 1 and a bit years ago when we hired Mourinho. We all knew what type of Manager we were getting. A winner at all costs type. He isn't going to play pretty football.

What happening now has happened at Real Madrid and Chelsea (twice) . That part where the club is at a cross roads and can either go in one direction (Mourinho) or the other (club philosophy) .

Lets be honest Mourinho isn't known for promoting youth through and playing attacking football (club philosophy) . The flirting with PSG and demanding for more transfer money is a hidden message to the board. You back me, give me control of signings or I'm going.

This transfer window and the months leading up to the summer will determine if he stays or goes.

Personally I want him to stay. I have had no issues with him apart from the way he set the team out against City in the 2nd half. We should of took the game to them. All this stuff he does with media is expected. Again he has been like this for the past few years. However I think he going to have to show some level of more commitment to the club and club is going to have to do same if they want to keep this relationship going onwards and forward. It either going to be a new contract for him or the classic self destruction of Mourinho.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

29 Dec 2017 12:00:57
I think jm should be judged at the end of the season on progress made not now . We were 23 points off the pace last season let's see come the end where we finish and how far away we are . I get the city have spent a bit more argument so maybe hard to keep pace but if that's the rule of thumb then we should therefore be ahead of all the others which we currently are, people may fear some teams below may pass us but they haven't yet and we shouldn't judge him on what if but what is and at the seasons end .

Agree1 Disagree0

29 Dec 2017 12:07:10
Shane

Just saying-
Previous to this Mourinho has given debuts to United academy graduates Joel Pereira, Axel Tuanzebe, Scott McTominay, Demitri Mitchell, Josh Harrop and Angel Gomes. Whilst Joe Riley, Matty Willock, Dean Henderson and Kieran O'Hara have also trained with the seniors or made matchday squads.

In terms of the transfer fee message, I said a couple of days ago that it’s about time someone challenged the Glazers to show real ambition. Well done to Jose for that. SAF fudged it with no value garbage and our built up advantage over years has been gifted away in the glory of chasing asset value improvements. Jose stays to build the power base and then develop from there, either with or without him.

Agree8 Disagree7

29 Dec 2017 12:41:16
Fair assement that Red Man.

Mourinho (like or not) has not been backed properly in the market. He wanted a wide right player who could deliver straight away and instead we have to rely on yonger players coming through who may or may not make it at United.
We all hope Marshall and Rashford do make it but there is no guarantee they will. He also clearly wanted a left back.

The Glaziers flatter to decieve when it comes to spending money and spent nothing towards the end of Fergies reign and under Moyes. They make plenty of money out of our club each year so MOurinho is right to challenge them.

Agree7 Disagree5

29 Dec 2017 15:51:02
So spending 300 million is not getting enough backing. Fact is mourinho did not pick his targets correctly, griezmann would have been signed but for the ban and no one in their right mind would agree to paying 50mn for perisic, if mourinho can't pick his targets adequately why blame the owners for that.

Frankly his signings while still being better than either lvg's or moyes's have been random and without regard to style of play he normally expects. Mkhitarayan isn't a mourinho player, he is a flair player who plays well in patches and as his experience with klopp showed he is not really a hard worker so why was he bought rather than someone who would have closer to mourinho's philosophy.

Same goes Lukaku, unlike any of drogba, Costa, milito or benzema, lukaku has little in way of actual technique, his hold up skills are worse than any 5 year old's, he is the complete opposite of what your normal mourinho striker is yet we spent 75mn on him rather than 60mn on morata who actually fits the mould. Lindelof is also turning out to be a poor signing.

Ibra last season scored goals but also missed enough chances to cancel out any advantage his goals provided, he is another player that looked out of place in the team as we have seen the improvement our attack has gone through due to basic fact that our striker isn't the slowest player on the pitch when playing counter attacking football.

Not all signings work out, they didn't for SAF or for any other manager including the bald guy next door but they at least need to be consistent with the style you want to achieve, mourinho's haven't been that for me. Can't blame the owners for that.

Also redman how many of those debutant players has he used this seadon, he has had opportunities to play tuanzebe and Mitchell both yet we haven't seen them anywhere near the team, he is never going to be a good manager for you if you are a young player trying to break into the team and a few random games when you have given up on a competition doesn't make him a great youth coach.

Agree6 Disagree8

29 Dec 2017 16:39:34
Fact is we needed to spend more to get to City's level to begin with as City's first 11 was better.
We have spent a big amount but not enough to go the extra mile just yet.
Giggs has quite rightly come out and said there are problems in missing out on quality talent so it's not just in supporters heads about the Glaziers.

As for Mourinho not playing youth i don't see other managers doing much different there either.

Agree3 Disagree2

29 Dec 2017 19:30:56
CSM

If you look at Pep and Jose’s starting position in terms of the quality of the team, City were much better. You can throw numbers around all you like but we had been left behind by years of underfunding by the Glazers and it needed urgent address. What we spent has us now challenging in the top four but unless you see quality in the team that I can’t, more spending is needed. Jose hasn’t come to do a Wenger, he wants to make his team No1 and in a world where a Southampton defender costs £75M, you and others need to get real on how much is needed to be spent.

Great point from Chorltonred about even Giggs pointing out recruitment but this also requires drive from the very top. Are the Glazers committed to making us No1 in the football world or the financial world? It needs to be both.

Agree7 Disagree7

29 Dec 2017 20:19:39
When Jose and pep got there jobs city and utd had just finished 4 th and 5 th the previous season each with 66 points, they then both spent heavy under pep and Jose and the following season city were 9 ahead of utd, again they both spent heavy before the start of this season, granted city a bit heavier but now the gap is a chasm . The table suggests city and utd finished level points the season before the current managers not city starting a mile ahead or the phrase the table duznt lie is not true.

Agree7 Disagree3

29 Dec 2017 20:29:30
We may well have finshed on the same points but City were a better team. Most people would agree with that. City under preformed whilst we preformed pretty much as you would expect from a side finishing 5th.

Agree4 Disagree4

29 Dec 2017 20:46:05
Chorlton i don't expect man utd to win 19 of the 20 epl games played but it is 1 thing to expect that and another to expect a manager to win against burnley, leicester and bristol after spending 300mn, what mourinho expects is for fans to sympathise with him for being unable to beat 3 teams whose total player purchases from inception to today won't come to 300mn because city have spent more money than utd. I call that BS excuse from a manager who blames everyone for his failures and credits himself for all the achievements.

And about giggs's comments they are a pile of garbage, giggs told utd sign mbappe and jesus 3 years ago, he was the first team assistant then, are we really suppose to beleive that he was somehow also involved in scouting for the youth team, also city bid 40mn or so for mbappe at start of the last season it was rejected, don't see why utd's 5mn would have been accepted.

Agree5 Disagree5

29 Dec 2017 21:19:02
Going on that basis then how did City manage to drop points against Everton? It's football and other teams are allowed to up their game and take points off us.
Yes we should be beating these teams but sometimes it doesn't work out like that. We lost 5 a season under Fergie and still won the league. Times change and teams adapt and get better.
We need to back him properly in the market and see where we are this time next season. If things are no better and the football is still poor to watch, then I will like you want a change.
As for Giggs talking rubbish I honestly don't know what to believe. What I do know is the Glaziers are not here because they love United like we all do.

Agree4 Disagree0

29 Dec 2017 21:19:56
CSM

You “expect a manager to win against burnley, leicester and bristol after spending 300mn”. I presume you remember SAF had a major spending spree after he arrived and lost games after doing so?

Later in his time with us SAF lost to was it York in the League cup 3.0, at OT if I remember correctly. It happens and often we struggled under SAF in mid season but I doubt many used it against SAF.

The focus should be on the boardroom ambition, because the amount should be irrelevant, the board, the Glazers should want on field success as much as us, spend what it takes but do they? Why do you not want us to spend what it takes?

Agree5 Disagree3

29 Dec 2017 22:41:04
We have had the 3rd biggest spend in Europe over the last 3 year .
We have the biggest wage bill in the epl.
Can't always blame the owners for the team not playing well .

Great people are mentioning fergy because he never needed to spend more than every club in Europe to be successful.

Agree7 Disagree2

29 Dec 2017 22:55:52
It sounds pathetic United supports moaning about cash when we have the highest wage bill in the league and spend the amount we have .

Can you imagine how it sounds to other fans, of the teams that pogba cost more than .

We are second in the league with a strong squad that isn't really playing at the top of its game.

City have up the the bar to a level United have never achieved before a level Jose has never achieved .
Most points in any of the top leagues, most points in the history of English football.

The last time Jose won a title was with Chelsea, after the same amount of games as we have played now his title winning Chelsea team had 3 more points than we have now .
Mind you Chelsea never had to compete with a city team that where the best team English football has seen after 20 games .
I
So maybe this isn't quite as bad a squad as people want to make out or maybe Jose isn't doing quite as bad and maybe even the club who have spent a fourtune on wages and transfers aren't doing to bad.

Maybe city and pep are just a bit special, a bit like peps Munich and barce team .

Agree6 Disagree3

29 Dec 2017 22:56:08
Good stat that jred and what was our spend in the previous years of "no value" in the market?
Fergie is gone and we need to move on as there might not be another like him.

Agree4 Disagree0

29 Dec 2017 22:57:24
Jred

How successful was SAF in Europe?

Over 20 years with great teams and only 2 European Cups, maybe if there had been value in the market or the owners invested fully when needed we wouldn’t be lagging behind the Scouse after the greatest period of success at our club.

For your information. CIES Football Observatory numbers say Manchester City have committed €513m to transfer fees since Pep Guardiola's appointment.
Manchester United have committed €382m to fees since Jose Mourinho's appointment.
A difference of 34%.

Agree4 Disagree5

29 Dec 2017 23:04:34
In 2006 Chelsea won the title with 95 points the record amount of points .
At this stage of the season they had a grand total of 6 points more than we have now .
And they didn't have to play a team like city .

Agree2 Disagree2

29 Dec 2017 23:28:25
Mendy 57 mil not kicked a ball
Silva 50 mil hardly kicked a ball
Danilo 30 mil hardly kicked a ball
Luis 12 mil not played
Gundagon 27 mil Injured more than he has played
Nolito 18 mil pretty poor
Bravo 18 mill awful
Danilo 30 mil, really not that good .
215 mil euro there
Do we judge a player on how much he cost tho?


Stones a player who I really like was bought for 55 mill and everyone laughed and said he was a waste of money
Sane has come on loads bought at 20 years old and has adapted to the league etc really well
Jesus only 19 again playing well .
Shame we can't say that about more of our players .

Agree4 Disagree4

29 Dec 2017 09:44:52
One of the papers today say the youngster Gribbins was the one player who completed all sessions with the first team earlier this week-the other lads didnt.

I wonder if that means the left footed kid has a chance of being on the bench this weekend . as a winger. OR (and I do hate being cynical) could it be that if the lad were to get a chance it could be JM saying "look what i'm reduced to, playing a kid as we didn't recruit an experienced winger "

I know the fans would love to see a skilful youngster getting a chance on merit, could be just the game for a kid to come on all being well.

Believable0 Unbelievable0