Manchester United Banter Archive July 06 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


06 Jul 2014 22:43:33
The best thing that could happen for us right now would be for Holland to win the World Cup. what's more attractive than a World Cup winning manager and Manchester United combined, regardless of no UCL.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I don't think he can win it. As someone rightfully pointed out before, he didn't qualify for the World Cup in 2002, 12 years ago. We must sack him immediately and appoint Giggs, ins't that right Ed7

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Giggs? Put the glue-bag down pal. You seem a tad upset.}

Quite the opposite Number7, I thrive of this $hit TBH, its my nightly entertainment. LvG out!

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 09:28:18
MFCU,

Some very strange posts from you on this site, have a few to drink last night mate?

Agree0 Disagree0

Strange? It was called sarcasm my friend.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 23:35:26
Oh, think it was lost on me and ed004!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 22:40:33
Wayne Rooney will be the new captain of Manchester United. I just know it. Thoughts?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Think you may be very disappointed my friend.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd be delighted with that. He is a senior player, reliable, a leader, always gives 100% and he's a fanastic player who will start games when fit and playing well.

Rooney is the most suitable candidate.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why not, it could keep him motivated and on top of his game. If him and RvP can click next season we will destroy defences.

Agree0 Disagree0

Reliable?

Agree0 Disagree0

Syd - You want to give Rooney the captaincy to keep HIM motivated?! Surely the role of the captain is to keep the TEAM motivated amongst other things like transmitting the coaches requirements onto the field, (I know Rooney speaks double-Dutch but being an orator is not something I would associate with Wazzer), why wouldn't Rooney simply be motivated by doing the job he is paid to do, (well over paid)? He is hardly a leader of men, he doesn't even have a 100% starting place, nor does he lead by example with his on field antics - Mr Give Away.

If we are building new foundations then the leader needs to be somebody the squad can trust and rely on to pull them through the tricky games, Rooney vanishes when the going gets tough and only perks up when it's contract renewal time. RVP leads by example with his class and will start, but isn't going to be around long term, I would go for DDG - he will be a fixture of our team for the next 10+ years barring any surprises and he will be the foundation our new team is built on.

Even the most hardcore of Rooney lovers must see that giving him the captaincy is lunacy at this time, it is sending out the completely wrong message. I hope he pulls his finger out and warrants it, but he will most likely be bench warming if not sold and he is hardly an example for the youth, more often than not he is out of shape.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have no issue with either RvP or Rooney being captain.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah because 300k a week wouldn't be enough to motivate him! Poor Rooney!

Agree0 Disagree0

So Rooney vanishes when the going gets tough, yet Van Persie leads by class. If it wasn't for Wayne Rooney standing tall amongst the runis when Ronaldo got his dream move, the downward spiral would have been further accelerated. You keep talking Bobbins I am afraid Beast.

Deeps.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 22:36:55
There are some people on here who in spite of the evidence seems to feel the club would be making a disaster if they don't sign Hummels. Now I have to admit Hummels is a very gifted footballer, but having watched him on many occasions(one of my childhood friends is a Dortmund fan, so I have always had a soft spot for them) I can assure you he isn't perfect. He has and is still prone to the odd defensive lapse, and I'm not talking about misjudging a ball or being overzelous with a tackle. I'm talking about a "what the duck was that" moment. He also has a serious lack of pace and this only exasperates the problem when he makes a mistake as he has no recovery pace to correct it unlike a young Rio Ferdinand. I'm sure anyone who watches Dortmund on a fairly regular basis will back me up with this(Mick?)

Like I said he isn't a bad player, in fact he's boardering on world class and if he can iron out those mistakes then he will undoubtedly be world class.

Also I find it funny when people say don't sign Vermaelen for 10m on 100k a week wages because he picks up injuries, sign Hummels instead for 25-30m on 140-160k a week wages instead. Yet in the last 5 years at Dortmund Hummels has missed 64 games due to injury making an average of nearly 13 games a season out injured. He has also had perssistent ligament injuries including tearing an ankle ligament and rupturing his ankle ligaments on two separate occasions as well as having back injuries on a couple of occasions. He missed 27 games last season through injury. Now I'm not saying the guys a sick note but pointing out that his injury record is far from clear and that there is always a risk no matter what player you sign.

But that isn't even the main issue with trying to sign Hummels, the main problem is that he clearly doesn't want to come to us or anyone for that matter, Barca are looking at other targets because he doesn't want to leave Dortmund. Don't believe me then how about listening to Mats himself.

"When I end my career, I don't need to win eight championships, I'd rather have done something special. And that has certainly been the case here. That's why I don't waste any thoughts on this [leaving Dortmund] at the moment."

Or a quote from his own father and agent who might know a thing or two about his own son's thoughts

"I know Louis van Gaal from his time at Bayern Munich, "

"He's not contacted me about Mats moving to Manchester (United) though.

"I have heard some rumours but Mats is happy at Dortmund at the moment, and only thinking about the World Cup."

Add to that the fact that the reason Hummels is at Dortmund in the first place is because van Gaal rated Holger Badstuber as a better prospect than Hummels so allowed him to leave.

So the facts are in the past our new manager didn't rate him, his father and agent saying we haven't contacted them, him and his father saying he is happy at Dortmund, Barcelona moving on to other targets after being told so, and Dortmund will not want to sell after losing Lewandowski already this summer. All things point towards it being nearly impossible to sign him and us wasting our time trying. We wasted most of last summer chasing Fabregas when he didn't want to move, this year we dropped our interest in Kroos when it became apparent that he didn't want to move(or at least to us anyway).

There are other guys out there, its not like Hummels is the only one, just that Hummels is flavour of the month atm which distracts people from other just as good or maybe better players. Benatia for example.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Why would Hummels be on £160k a week if he joined?

Agree0 Disagree0

Vermaelen to me seems the most logical signing for sure.

Your judgement is likely to be better than mine as I only watched a handful of Dortmund games last season. I also agree that Hummels is definitely not World Class, but money aside would be a marked improvement on the current squad.

I think you are highlighting the unlikeliness of Hummels leaving here. From what I know that is most certainly the case. Talk of Indi and Vertongen in a positive context in comparison of Vermaelen in a negative context is unbelievable. i'm sure the new gaffer is aware of who the better player is anyway, or Sydney, if he's about?

Agree0 Disagree0

What's your take on Vermaelen Shappy? I'd be pleased and Syd would be gutted.

Agree0 Disagree0

'Hummels is definitely not World Class'

Have you ever seen him play?

He's one of the five best central defenders in the world along with Silva (29), Kompany (28), Pique (27) and Ramos (28) - and he's only 25.

Unfortunately I do not see him signing for us when clubs like Bayern, Barcelona and Real Madrid hold an interest.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hummels is world class, no essay from some lad on this site will change that, he is rated as so by his peers which is good enough for me, obviously his age and class represent better value than vermaelan.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 00:38:12
Syd mate don't be so naive. He is a player that Bayern and Barcelona would be prepared to bid for if he was available, both can offer not just UCL football but a real chance of winning it, they would both be prepared to pay him over 100k per week, in Barca's case probably close to 150k per week as they desperately need to replace Puyol. So if we are to get him to join we will have to offer more in wages than anyone else will offer.

Fresh, Vermaelen is a very good player when fit. Unfortunately his skill set doesn't blend well with either Koscielny or Mertesacker so he has been left out due to a more effective partnership rather than individual merits. Then because of this stop start process of games and being played out of position it is very hard for him to gain any momentum to build consisstancy and form.
His injury history is a worry due to our own injury record at CB. But if he can come in, stay fit and rebuild his form then he could be an excellent signing especially for the quoted 8m.

Agree0 Disagree0

No, I don't believe he is World Class! Otherwise I wouldn't write that, would I?

I can only base that on what I've seen! I've seen him play around 10 times in the last 12 months, and I would not say he is World Class! Maybe in the current climate he would start for nearly ever team in the World. And I s'pose that does define someone as World class.

But Word Class to me means, would the Hummels now start ahead of Rio and Vida when they were in their prime together! And I'd say definitely not! Nor would he of started ahead of Terry and Carvalho in Jose's first reign at Chelski, so again, not World Class!

World Class gets brandished far too much. It should signify a player that had the ability to walk into any team in any era IMO. So once again pal, No IMO he is definitely not World Class!

Agree0 Disagree0

Easy as that then Midfield General. Why haven't we signed him already? All we need to do is find the most suitable/best players in each position and buy them. Just like picking your 11 favourite chocolate bars off the shelf at Tesco. Any additives Syd?

Agree0 Disagree0

If you were to pick a World Team of 22 players, 2 in each position, would Hummels be included!

Anyway, besides that, as I have stated and even put on the 'teams' page, Hummels would be my preferred choice, but he is not available! So this whole debate is pointless! let's talk about CB's who are potentially available or who are available! This is not FIFA!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed004's Note - Best CBS in world are silva, Kompany, benatia and hummels IMO}

For me, Sergio Ramos is without a doubt in the 4! His all round game (bar his cheating and slyness) is superb. Same goes for Thiago Silva and Kompany. For pure defensive qualities I'd say Chielini or even Hummels Dortmund partner Subotic are better defenders than Hummels, but Hummels is better on the ball. So I concede that in this day and age of CB's Hummels may be closer to World Class than my post suggested. Everyone happy now? LOL

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I can't believe I'm going to say this but I agree with you about Subotic, he's a fantastic player and would be an ideal replacement for Vidic. I'll need to lie down after that, I feel dizzy.}

I think people are missing the point .
Hummels is a better player than vermaelen and there are plenty of more players that would be a better option .
We have kean, smalling, jones, evans so we prob have room for one more cb imo it needs to be a top cb

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 06:05:15
@ Shappy. Van Gaal did not push Hummels out. It was Klinsmann. 2008-2009 season he was loaned out to Dortmund and in 2009 when Van Gaal was appointed, Dortmund had already bid for him and the player wanted the move. Nothing Van Gaal could do.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 08:28:38
Rudi, that's true to a point. It was Klinsmann who originally loaned him out to gain experiance. But then he left and van Gaal came in, he kept key members of staff on and used their advice as well as his own judgement to decide if it was worth keeping Hummels. His decision was that he and everyone else at the club rated Badstuber higher, so it made no sense to try and keep a player who would only have been 5/6th choice CB at that time. You could argue that if van Gaal had kept Hummels at that time that his growth could have been stunted and he would not be the the player he is now.

Either way from what appears to be coming out now in the press is we are looking to move to a 343 type formation, that certainly explains are interest in Vermaelen if true.

Agree0 Disagree0

Shappy, Naive? Is this the same Bayern Munich who are refusing to pay Kroos that amount of money to keep him? It isn't me who's naive. Hummels if he signed would be on the same amount being offered to TV. Even if for some bizarre reason he did command a salary of £160k a week, then I would still pay it. You pay to dollar for the best players. He is probably only behind Thiago Silva. There's no doubt LvG wants him, no matter how much you are trying to suggest he doesn't.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'll say it again, a redundant argument! Hummels has again and again signified that he wished to remain at Dortmund. At this moment in time, Hummels isn't an option! So we are all discussing a no go! Obviously if the choice was between Hummels or Vermaelen with no boundaries, then MH would be the first choice. But football isn't that simple, apart from on FIFA!

Agree0 Disagree0

Didn't Herrera say he was happy at Bilbao just a few months ago? What would you expect him to say? I don't like it here, get me out of here?

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 17:54:06
Could any of the eds if you have a few minutes spare shed any light on the Fabio Coentrao situation please? There's every chance Evra could leave for Juventus and we could be left on low supply on players who can fill the Left-Back role, we nearly signed him last summer and he can play all the roles that Blind can and is only 26, thanks a lot in advance

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jul 2014 22:01:15
Albert Stuivenberg and Ryan Giggs will be immediately implementing what LvG wants to do on the preseason tour. It's a good addition in more than one way. He knows LvG's system inside out and he knows about every top notch young Dutch player in the Dutch set-up. If there's a bargain or two to be had, then he's the one to find them. He's a decent addition, but he's no Thomas Vermaelen :)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jul 2014 21:38:21
Liverpool fans keep playing down the sale of Suarez by saying they will be able to strengthen four other positions. Well they would have been able to do that and keep Suarez. So a pointless thing to say really. Whether Suarez was sold or not they would be buying the likes of Bertrand, Origi, Lovren, Can, Lallana, Lambert etc and improving their weak areas. Suarez leaving is a massive blow to their side. No matter who they sign this summer. I'm not sure any of their signings or likely signings have improved their first XI. Lallana on the left instead of Coutinho? Lovren instead of Skrtel? Bertrand instead of Flanagan? Can will be on the bench. Lambert will be on the bench. Origi will be out on loan. Man for man there's no big improvement or any improvement at all. I think after losing Suarez they needed to go out and buy some proper top notch signings. I think so far the signings have been squad improvements, whereas the first XI will be substantially weaker.

Arsenal seem to be doing some nice business. Debuchy, Sanchez, Schneiderlin if they can get these players they will have improved their first XI significantly. Chelsea have improved their first XI. Costa & Cesc already in, possibly Pogba, Khedira or Vidal could be added. Courtois to come in from his loan. Varane and Luis to strengthen the defence if they can get them in. City really didn't need to do much. They have given their mercenaries a bigger contract each to keep them happy for another year (Yaya and Aguero). Ourselves are not yet done in the transfer market. Already two instant improvements. Wilson knocking on the door of the first team. I think he will be a breath of fresh air next season. A decent manager and a couple more signings and I think we will be in very good shape for next season. A top notch CB, another top midfielder and a pacey attacker and I think we will be set. After the season we have just had anything to be fair will be an improvement.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Well you know syd, we need squad players because we're competing on all fronts ;)

Unlike you lot our only European trip won't be to play Swansea away.

Please inform your 'tactical genius' Van Gaal that there are no penalty shoot outs in the premier league. 0-0 against Costa Rica after 120 minutes, impressive

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 22:34:56
Great post syd! I agree with what you have said.
However, if yaya was to leave city do you feel Fernando is the right replacement? Or will they opt for someone like pogba?
I feel that arsenal and Chelsea could do the best business.
We need to do business; the additions of hummels, de vrij, Vidal and a winger will be great.

Agree0 Disagree0

I couldn't agree more Sydney the moment Suarez leaves liverpool fear factor won't be the same and it be intresting see how sturridge does this season he have all the pressure on him and the opposition will focus a lot more on him unlike last season it was all about stopping Suarez and any liverpool fan who thinks they will be stronger than last season without Suarez are crazy any team losing the quality of Suarez will be weaker

And Mohawk talking about tactical genius van gaal might not be perfect but he sure won't be like your tactical genius Brendan and lose a 3 nill lead in last 10 mins

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Fernando will replace Garcia in the squad. I think just Hummels and Vidal would do. Di Maria would be a great bonus.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 23:26:40
Spot on syd and an obvious nice little bite from aggers with the boring old 'we are in Europe' jokes.

I've seen a few scousers talk about the 0-0 against Costa Rica and that proves lvg isn't very good. He is having to play with dirk kuyt because the Dutch squad is so poor and has got them to the semi finals. The Costa Rica keeper had the game of his life and if you watched the match you will have seen plenty of chances for holland players and only one team ever going to win the match.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney, we've already signed Lallana, Can and Lambert for £40M, do you honestly see Liverpool being able to afford Lovren (you're seriously questioning replacing Skrtel for Lovren? are you being serious?) for £20-25M, Moreno for £15-20M and Shaqiri/Markovic for £20M, taking our transfer spend to £90-100M, can we do this without the sale of Suarez? I certainly don't think so.

A starting eleven of Mignolet, Flannagan, Lovren, Sakho, Moreno, Gerrard, Henderson, Coutinho/Can, Shaqiri/Markovic, Sturridge, Sterling/Lallana

is a much stronger elevel than, Mignolet, Johnson, Skrtel, Sakho, Flannagan, Gerrard, Henderson, Coutinho, Sterling, Suarez, Sturridge.

Our defence and midfield will have been improved drastically, whereas our attacking depth would be improved, there's also talk we're looking at a new keeper, I'd expect someone like Begovic, who'd be an improvement on Mignolet, £70-80M, for a player turning 28 in 6 months, 3 biting offences in 3 years, isn't too bad, you predicted we'd get £35M tops for him after all Syd ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

Aggers, who's next on the list when Chelsea sign Markovic?

Agree0 Disagree0

Chelsea are a stronger team than City as it stands and they are not finished yet.

Liverpool will be weaker next season but give it a few seasons and players like Markovic and Origi will have them competing for top 4 again.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 00:36:38
McDonald

You have posted pretty much the exact post on here before and were torn apart for it then as well. Do you want the same again?

Agree0 Disagree0

Writing Liverpool off from Top 4 because they have lost 1 player from when they almost won the league. FML! Where do we find them from!

Agree0 Disagree0

Gds2, you can't argue against my points, if we add Lovren, Moreno, Begovic, Sanchez/Shaqiri, we'll have a stronger 11. nice to see manfromchester has a brain and the ability to take off his red tinted glasses.

Agree0 Disagree0

McRonald, if Suarez had stayed you would still have signed Can, Lambert, Lallana, Bertrand & Lovren. The only one's you wouldn't sign are the likes Origi & Markovic/Sanchez.

So the question is who is better Markovic or Suarez? There's your answer. Suarez leaving is a major blow no matter how much you pretend it isn't.

Agree0 Disagree0

MANfromCHESTER, who has written Liverpool off from a top four place? Where is that written?

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 09:30:04
But you will not have any world class players. Them players are good players and will add to your squad and give you a chance at top 4 obviously, but without Suarez in the big games, you do not have that x factor that will keep you up there with the big boys.

Agree0 Disagree0

Aggers, McRonald, question, which is the stronger attack:

Sturridge, Suarez, Sterling & Coutinho.

Or

Sturridge, Markovic, Sterling & Lallana?

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney with the latter attack, Coutinho will still be playing from midfield, with the sale of Suarez our starting 11 and squad will be much stronger as a whole.

Agree0 Disagree0

GDS2, your fixation with the term "world-class" need's to stop, last season according to you we had 1 world clss player in Suarez, whereas most United fans deemed you to have 4, Rooney, Mata, RVP and Vidic, we finished 2nd and you finished 7th, enough said really.

Rodgers is building a team not a team of galacticos that'll fail year in year out, a team of Mignolet, Flannagan, Lovren, Sakho, Moreno, Gerrard, Henderson, Coutinho/Can, Lallana/Sterling/Markovic, Sturridge, Shaqiri/Sanchez

Playing the Rodger's philosophy of cohesive unity, effortless pressing of the ball, relentless direct counter attacking football, will make us a formidable side, their may not be an established world class player, however Sturridge, Coutinho, Sterling, Lovren, Sakho and Moreno, all have great potential and current ability and barring any hiccups will go on to be great footballers. I think the problem is, you hope with the sale of Suarez we will go back into mediocrity, just like we hope you will, I however believe both sets of fans need to accept that starting from next season Liverpool and Manchester United will once again both be competing at the top of English football, which afterall is great for the English game.

Agree0 Disagree0

Also another point, GDS2, Suarez rarely turned up if at all against the big clubs.

Agree0 Disagree0

McRonald, NO IT WON'T!

Like I have said above in plain English. Even if Suarez had stayed you would have signed the likes of Can, Lambert, Lallana, Lovren, Bertrand etc. The only ones who wouldn't have signed are Origi and Markovic. Would you rather have Suarez or Markovic and Origi? It's a simple question.

Agree0 Disagree0

Let me put it in a simpler way for you. Would you prefer:

Lovren, Bertrand, Can, Lallana, Lambert & Suarez?

OR

Lovren, Bertrand, Can, Lallana, Lambert, Origi & Markovic?

Agree0 Disagree0

McRonald, don't you think Liverpool may have got the news back last night that Sanchez has no interest in signing for Liverpool and then Liverpool immediately activate Markovic's clause? I do not think Liverpool had any intention of signing both Markovic and Sanchez. I think it was always one or the other. I could be wrong, but it seems odd that Liverpool would sign both Markovic and Sanchez and not have the room to fit them into the same team. How would you fit Sanchez, Sterling, Markovic, Lallana & Sturridge into a four man attack? I could be wrong, but I think Markovic is an alternative to Sanchez/Shaqiri and a direct replacement for Suarez. Suarez spent most of last season interchanging with Sturridge, but Sturridge was the number 9 predominantly and Suarez played on the right of him. Which is where Sanchez, Markovic & Shaqiri would have played. Where Markovic will play next season if Chelsea decide they don't want him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney, at the end of the day come the 1st of September our first 11 and squad will be stronger than it currently is.

Agree0 Disagree0

Also we'll get Moreno or Rodriguez not Bertrand, don't believe everything you read.

Agree0 Disagree0

Okay then, you keep avoiding the truth. Keep burying that head of yours deep deep deep in the sand. Come September 1st, you will have a slightly stronger squad, but a weaker first XI. The evidence is pretty clear.

Lets wait and see if you bring anyone else in other than I mentioned above, but if Bertrand, Lovren, Can, Lallana, Lambert & Markovic are your signings. And Agger or Skrtel leave, along with Suarez, then your first XI will NOT be stronger.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney, is Flannagan, Lovren, Sakho, Moreno a better defence than Johnson, Skrtel, Agger, Flannagan, the answer is a definite yes.

Lovren will be a huge upgrade on Skrtel, as for Agger he hardly got a game last year and he's extremely injury prone.

Agree0 Disagree0

IN REPLY TO SYDNEY!

'Chelsea are a stronger team than City as it stands and they are not finished yet.

Liverpool will be weaker next season but give it a few seasons and players like Markovic and Origi will have them competing for top 4 again.'

RedSeven

That's where Liverpool were written off from top 4! Next?

Agree0 Disagree0

McRonald, Sakho was available last season, but not picked. Moreno is not looking like happening, it's looking like Bertrand. Is Lovren a "huge upgrade" on Skrtel, no quite frankly. Is he a better player? Yes, is he a much better player, er not a chance. There will be no significant improvement. Skrtel to be fair saved many goals last season with his constant fouling which went unpunished. Is Markovic and improvement on Suarez? Not a chance. Is Lallana an improvement on Coutinho? Maybe. No doubt you will have a slightly better squad, but your first XI will not be as strong as it was last season and Suarez leaving is a HUGE blow. Liverpool will no longer have that fear factor that you once had with Torres and Suarez. As it stands, Liverpool have very little to be upbeat about at the moment.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney, Lovren is a huge upgrade on Skrtel, Lovren is quality, he's in the top 3 cb's in the league with Kompany and Koscielny, Sakho had an injury which kept him out for 2 months, he was also climatising to a different environment, there's a reason he was PSG's captain at 19 and France captain at 22, him and Lovren will form a formidable partnership.

Skrtel has no positional sense and no pace, which forced us to play a deep line, which is something Rodgers clearly doesn't want, he'd like us to play with a higher line, which he'll be able to do with Lovren.

What makes you think we'll sign Bertrand? because the Daily Fail says so? seriously, you bash people like Fresh! for reading to much into what the papers say, yet you use it to back yourself up in arguements, once Sauarez is sold and we have the cash, Moreno will be signed.

You're asking whether Lallana is an improvement on Coutinho, yet you bashed us all last season for having no quality in depth, now we're getting depth, you're trying to compare player A and player B, you're seriously dense.

Agree0 Disagree0

MANfromCHESTER.

Top four next season will be Chelski, City, us and Arsenal.

Agree0 Disagree0

Just like you said last season red seven, ey ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jul 2014 21:12:50
McRonald, we are talking about first XI's. What has that got to do with depth? Clearly it's not me who's dense.

Liverpool have enquired about Bertrand very recently and Moreno is unlikely to happen. You need to listen to Ed002.

Agree0 Disagree0

McRonald -

Not at all. I said we'd finish fifth and Liverpool would finish in the top 4 last season.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 17:30:11
I think most people need to take a step out of LVG's backside. This time last year he was not even mentioned for the job by most and now he is the man with the Midas touch - despite doing sweet FA so far!

Don't get me wrong I am more optimistic than I was Moyes, but had LVG taken over directly from SAF we wouldn't be creaming our pants about him just yet and there would be a lot of concern. The media are obviously building it all up as well so it's hard not to get too carried away by this impending revolution.

We need to wait and see what happens, because there is nothing guaranteed and he hasn't done a thing yet. These players were going to be signed irrespective.

Aside from the 2nd half against Spain it has hardly been convincing from the Dutch, if anything they have relied massively on one man who we don't have! Mexico & Costa Rica are hardly world beaters and the Dutch have looked very dull, which I hope is more down to their lack of overall talent than the tactics being deployed.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - Spot on, Beast. Some fans are looking at LVG as some kind of footballing Messiah, he's very far from that but is still a vast improvement on Moyes. Some people need to calm down and remember the size of task ahead. Utd have a serious lack of quality throughout the squad with players like Young and Cleverley still there, and surely a foreign manager won't get caught up in the 'he came through the ranks so we need to back him' nonsense with the average at best Welbeck.
Let's not forget the most important thing though, England flopped at the WC because of Rooney!
I have seen it all before at Rangers when Dick Advocaat was there, he filled the place with Dutch players and staff etc and the place was split with different cliques in the dressing room and behind the scenes.
It's happened at other clubs as well, it seems to be a Dutch trait, just look how many times Holland have imploded at major tournaments.}

06 Jul 2014 18:26:59
He's taken a Dutch squad which is far from vintage to ( at least ) the last four of the World Cup and shown that he's tactically versatile and not afraid to make tough calls
He's playing the football he has to at the moment to win with the squad he's got and it's working .
You're right he's not done anything with United yet so let's not get carried away but one things for sure .if he'd got the job last season with the same squad as Moyes had we would' nt have finished 7th and got humiliated by City and Liverpool along the way

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - And RVP wouldn't have turned his back on his team-mates, the club and the supporters when they needed him. The clique would have been in place.}

I think what also needs to be mentioned is what van Gaal has done with the squad he has. The defense and midfield are by no means household names, yet I haven't seen an over reliance on the big names of the team (RvP, Robben and Sneijder). Of course they do see a lot of the action, but Depay, Blind, Huntelaar, Kuyt and Lens also have their fair share of play. What I am trying to say is that van Gaal has created a real unit of players who very much so play as one, a unit which doesn't have to rely on one or two players and uses players who get the job done without lighting the world on fire. The spirit of the team is also pretty clear to see, and I think that's a big plus for us. Moyes never inspired the players as a group, I think van Gaal will.

Argentina will obviously be the big test, van Persie in particular will have to step up his game and I would like to see van Gaal change his tactics a little as I agree he hasn't been a maestro so far. We're a terrible set of supporters for setting ourselves up for a fall by jumping on any little thing, today it's the fact he subbed a goalkeeper for a shoot out. How that could have any implication for his managerial tenure at Manchester United is beyond me.

Agree0 Disagree0

There was a clique in place last season, it was the Everton contingent and Rooney.

Agree0 Disagree0

So true beast! Mexico just gave Brazil a run for there money playing exciting football.
Costa rica lol losers just beat Uruguay and Italy yeah no big deal. but hey the Dutch with the rubbishty team just needs to swat them aside. robben aside from, Spain hasn't been exceptional in any match other than the dive against Mexico
Dutch has played more as a team rather than individual brilliance yes not exciting football agreed. but the best use of what he had.

People kiss Mourinho's ass for effective football
but hey van gaal no biggie
fergie played boring football ever since Ronaldo left.
We have been workman like
our last trophy was won by individual brilliance of Rvp rather than amazing football
So we ain't any condition to judge van gaal.
And his tactics with Dutch

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 19:23:02
Andy,

Him subbing the goalkeeper at such a time in a quarter final shows that he has balls and that he will make big decisions when they are needed. It is not that he will bring lindegaard on in a shoot out, it's more what the decision signifies that people are getting excited about. Could you imagine moyes taking that gamble?

I agree people are getting a bit carried away but we are united fans and we want the best, we have to be realistic and say top 4 and a cup run this year would be a massive success after last year. But a plan and a playing style that the players can work with is what lvg brings, something we majorly lacked last season.

I agree he's not the messiah, but he's a very naughty boy.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 19:39:45
I can see why us fans think the way they do about van Gaal, he's replacing a much worse manager in David Moyes so hypothetically speaking things are only going to get better from here on improving on what we witnessed last season (less said the better)
It's just like fans creaming their pants at the prospect of signing Vidal to replace Tom Cleverley; you just know a huge chronic problem going to be sorted and things can only get better if it happens

Agree0 Disagree0

Why is suddenly fact that RVP faked injury?

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed007 I didn't know you were a QPR supporter but seeing as we both bide in Scotland. I'm, awfly pleased my granddad ( kris Boyd) is getting a wage.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I'm a Celtic supporter :)

GDS, I thought the "Messiah" jokes was not allowed on here? lol

I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! You mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!”

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 21:32:40
All the games where we lost and moyes couldn't change the game sitting clueless on the bench, not knowing what to do , how to motivate the team. All we can judge on is how van gaal has changed games and is willing to rock the boat to get the result. Holland are punching above their weight (imho) so let's see what happens.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 21:47:29
Would we have landed Shaw and Herrera if LVG wasn't with us?

Agree0 Disagree0

By all accounts David Moyes laid a lot of the groundwork for both those deals, so yes, we probably would have.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 22:23:00
007 very harsh, I think LVG has taken an average side - bar 3 - and done very well so far. Don't write the Dutch off just yet and that's that!

Agree0 Disagree0

This Dutch side are very much like SAFs last league winning side. Not great to watch but very able to get the needed result and LvG instills the same discipline and fear that SAF did. The difference now is the the Glazers are seeing a decline in their main asset and are now investing heavily, so things can only get better. At least we know now that whoever plays for United, they will be giving their all. It's a start!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 17:04:28
For anyone interested

Former Netherlands Under-21s coach Albert Stuivenberg has joined Louis van Gaal's staff at Manchester United.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Looks like a decent appointment from what I've read about the guy

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 15:58:38
Hi Guys

I was wondering with the possible exit of Evra whether we will go for Martins Indi.He can play both centre half and left back.I have been quite impressed with him during the world cup.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

He looks really clumsy IMO - a worse form of Sakho. I hope we don't go for him, the Verm would be better for cover as LB.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think this is partly why we are going for Vermaelen. We can't get Hummels who was the top target so Vermaelen will come in, versatile and experienced.

Agree0 Disagree0

He looked poor against Costa Rica. I think if we go for a CB who can also cover LB it'll be Vermaelen

Agree0 Disagree0

What, the big clumsy Dutch Chris Smalling? He is not good enough IMO, not even close enough! We have enough accident prone defenders as it is.

Agree0 Disagree0

Jan vertonghen is the man we need

Agree0 Disagree0

Wow people think we should sign Martins Indi? He's a disaster waiting to happen, and we already have a few of them at centre back don't we. 3 to be precise!

Agree0 Disagree0

Vertongen isn't a much better option either! he's another ticking time bomb, loves a mistake!

We have enough young potential in defence (to put it kindly in some cases). What we need is an experienced leader with sound knowledge of the CB role. Not some average player who is versatile. Jones, Smalling, Keane, Carrick. Indi and Vertongen are simply not an improvement. i'd rather show faith in Jonny Evans than either.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 14:38:14
Very exciting to think that within the next fortnight van Gaal will be in his office at Carrington. Now with Vermaelen out the World Cup do we expect to see the deal to go through this coming week? Quite a few journo's reckon its just a matter of a medical and a few last points of the deal to be completed. The deal makes total sense, especially if Evra is leaving. An experienced EPL center back that can cover left back.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

A very mediocre signing. Hardly anything to get excited about. We need a warrior like Hummels, not a sicknote.

Agree0 Disagree0

I would use kagawa in any deal for hummels

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 16:46:56
Hummels won't join without champions league football. We need an experienced stopgap. I think I'll trust king Louis judgement.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 16:47:45
Syd, your slating of the potential signing of Vermalen is ridiculous. Is hummels an attainable signing? Right now, no. TV will be cheap enough, and he covers left back. When fit he's a very good player, if LVG feels he can improve us, I will back his judgement.

Agree0 Disagree0

Jred, in an heartbeat.

Agree0 Disagree0

Coalan, I just cannot see how TV is getting people so wet. Hardly a great signing is he?

Agree0 Disagree0

Paying Arsenal's unwanted third choice cb £100,000 a week.

I think people will be surprised to find that van Gaal is capable of making mistakes, and signing Vermaelen would definitely be one.

Agree0 Disagree0

If a player won't join us because we have one year out of the CL then to hell with him is what I say. Konoplyanka and Hummels should go and swivel.

Both would improve our side massively but do we really want such fickle short term characters at our club?

The CL is over rated anyway in terms of importance for a career, group stages are normally a doddle against mickey mouse teams and then you have 4-6 high profile games dependent on how far you go and nobody remembers the quarter finalists anyway. It's the same as people saying you can't be the best footballer ever if you haven't won a world cup, stupid media rubbish - 99% luck if you are born in a country that can win the world cup for starters.

Agree0 Disagree0

"Hummels won't join without champions league football"

And you know this how? Herrera sacrificed UCL football to join us. Shaw could have opted for City or Chelsea, but chose MU. Vermaelen is willing to leave UCL football to join us if reports are to be believed. How can you possibly know Hummels won't join without UCL football?

I would peddle Kagawa to Dortmund on a Penny Farthing if we could have Hummels in return.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wow LvG has got to be really stupid. Really hasn't got a clue about signings and all the experts are here, ready to give him advice! Silly man! LvG will sign who he wants and it's my guess he has a little more experience? Not even behind his desk yet and people are saying he's going after the wrong players! Couldn't make it up!

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney, so you'd rather have no one instead of Vermaelen then? Was RVP not a sick note? Vermaelen is good on the ball, has bags of experience, is a former captain and can cover left back. For £10 million I see nothing to moan about and would be a good squad addition. He is far better than Koscielny anyway, he just doesn't gel with Mertesacker.

Agree0 Disagree0

Not every signing is going to be a world class one. Some should be solid players who will add some strength, although the quoted wages for TV are a bit steep. If we can nail 2 more top quality signings with 2 of a CM, CH, or winger, then this will have been a stunning window. I think £30M Euros plus Nani for Vidal proudly be good, off load Bebe, Zaha, Hernandez, and possibly Young and focus on a top class CH.

Agree0 Disagree0

Fresh, I believe Vermaelen is a back-up plan for Hummels, if all our efforts go south. Would I prefer TV or nothing? It's a close one, but he would be better than nothing agreed. Just VERY disappointing when we could have had a world class beast of a defender who doesn't spend 50 weeks of the year in the nurses office.

Agree0 Disagree0

Firstly nobody knows weather evra will be staying or going. So all the talk about covering lb may well be pointless.

Secondly i'm sure most of us would choose hummels as our first choice cb signing and nothing I've read suggests its a no go.

And we've already got people saying lvg isn't worth getting excited about etc.
After last season surely we have every right to be excited. LVG is a step up on most managers out there.

So why don't we just look forward to a great transfer window for us and a great season to follow :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Fresh
Do you think evans smalling jones and tc would be good enough options as our cb for the next 4/5 years .
We have kean also coming through so imo unless one of evans smalling or jones is sold we only have room for 1 more cb.
Imo its needs to be a top class player like hummels not TC.
Beast
I would think that a lot of players would look at the EPl and think maybe united won't make top 4 unlike teams like munich dourtmund real etc.
United in the CL no longer looks a sure thing

Agree0 Disagree0

I think it has been mentioned on here before that Van gaal and Woodward have an A B C list so we may have to accept some signings will not be A listed and as exciting, as others. Also we have to balance the books so with Hummels unlikely then maybe a combination of Vermarlen and de vries makes good sense.
Also could all be paper talk so let's, see what happens
S in coming week. hopefully we will see at least 1 more this week

Agree0 Disagree0

The main problem with our current defenders is that they're always one step away from the treatment table. Now we're looking to bring in a player that has been injured more than he has been fit during the last two seasons. Add that to the fact that he isn't good enough to start for his club, and was kept out of the national team by a man on the brink of retirement. Plus he wants big wages.

Hummels might be beyond us this summer, but we can definitely do better than an injury prone player whose best days are already behind him despite his relatively young age.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hummels should be the one of course. But we may have to wait a year and we need a stop gap that is versatile. Vermaelen ticks those boxes. If we got him I could easily see us go for Hummels next year, maybe Evans will go.

Agree0 Disagree0

Fresh
So u think we should sell evans?

Agree0 Disagree0

Or we could just keep Evans and not buy Vermaelen. One top notch CB is all we need.

Hummels in the centre with Jones and Evans either side in a 343. Vidal and Herrera in midfield. Valencia and Shaw as width.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 12:25:30
I think we are in for some surprises under van gaal!

Maybe we will see a player promoted to the first team and played quite often, I truly believe he does not care what anyone else thinks.

Would not be surprised either if he got rid of a few players that we would not expect and turn a few stuttering careers around and make them class players again.

Its the van gaaal way or the highway . oooosh

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jul 2014 13:40:03
One of the biggest differences I've noticed between him and Moyes is that LVG does what wants, says what he believes and cares not for anyone's opinion but his own unlike David! Really oozes confidence and self belief, refreshing to say the least.

Agree0 Disagree0

He makes the big decisions, and makes the right ones. Moyes never did this.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hopefully as fans we will accept that not all his decisions especially big ones with high risk/rewards will come off. However the fact Hebies willing to makevthem means we stand a chance. next season will be up and down. varied in tactics and I hope the players buy into it the way this Holland team appear to have.
Passion. commitment and desire will be what we see next year from all 25 I hope.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 12:01:44
Would people be happy with 40m + Nani for Vidal? Quite a lot but personally I'd jump at that for a player of his quality. If it wasn't for yaya toure I wouldn't even have to think about labelling him the best centre midfielder in the world currently. If we do sign him though we must remember his birthday.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Its not cheap but clearly we need him and Nani is shocking to say the least. I would be more than happy with that deal.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah, he likes flowers and a card on his birthday. Just like Yaya.

They're a sensitive bunch these world class midfielders ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

£40m + Nani is a great deal. Gets rid of £100k + per week off the payroll for a player who's proved over and over again he's not United class.

Some reports saying Juve want Fellaini too. Yes please lol. 2 duffers for genuine world class midfielder? The stuff that dreams are made of :)

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 10:00:45
i know its only paper talk but I would swim from australia to manchester, piggyback nani and a briefcase with 50 million pounds in it to italy just to see vidal playing for us.
a midfield 3 of vidal, hererra and mata would be quality and something I would love to see.

we have made a great start to this transfer window and I hope it continues. I think LVG knows exactly who he wants to buy and who he wants to sell, apparently he knew about the managers job being possibly available from february I think, so i'm sure he has seen enough of our games to know most of the squad.

the deeper that holland goes in the tournament then I feel is better for us as playing under LVG may appeal to them more, just like playing for fergie or mourihno

all in all, i'm very confident that we will have a great year this year and may surprise a lot of people that have been saying that we are witnessing the downfall of the great Manchester United!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jul 2014 09:51:04
Had a banter with my everton buddies, they said shaw is over rated and won't get to baines level.thoughts guys?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

He's already at Baines' level at 18 years old. At Euro 2016 Shaw will be first choice LB.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 10:35:43
Spat out my weetabix

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 10:37:53
Their just bitter they didn't get to rip us off for him when they were asking for fees not far off what we paid for Shaw.

Don't get me wrong Baines is a good player and i'd have been happy to sign him for a reasonable price. he's an essential signing for any fantasy team for the number of points he gets from goals and assists. And that's an area Shaw will have to work on.

But remember Shaw is ten years younger and no disrespect to Southampton playing at a higher level with better players can only improve him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Already better Baines is a better crosser but that's it Shaw is faster and better defensivly just look at Baines performance at the world cup

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 11:09:00
Typical delusional mickeys.Already ahead of Baines who isn't that great which was proved at world cup

Agree0 Disagree0

And what level has baines reached?He's a very decent player both defensively and going forward but he's hardly been tested properly. Never played against any european giant. He, for the most part of his career has played in teams which just defend, which makes his job easier.He's never done anything good for england.
Shaw is going to be england's left back for a long time. He most probably will have to face much better wingers in the UCL sooner or later.There is no comparision of levels here.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 09:42:04
vidal is too expensive at £62 ,this is crazy money for a 27year old def mid ,no I realise he is great but this is what happens when you want a player from a club that doesn't want to sell , think we could be looking att another veron with this one ,how many of you thought he would flop? I would guess none ,for me carvalho for 30 m is the way to go and he will be just as good if not better in few years ,on a separate note I think van gal having the job ,but not actually being there is a huge blessing in disguise ,it means he can be rootless in his decisions as he hasn't meet or bonded or had to face anybody ,so to him it is just a name to get rid of

Believable0 Unbelievable0

First off at £62 he is the bargain of the century.
Second he is box to box.

Do you realise that he is about to hit his playing peak and is also regarded as the best in the world in that position but he is maybe not the right player for us.
Carvalho would also be my choice.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 10:38:12
£62 would be an absolute bargain for Vidal!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 10:41:19
I actually agree. I think its all mischief to get us involved in an auction whether we have interest or not.

I think if we were confident in getting vidal we wouldn't have spent 30 million on Herrera as I don't see us playing with two box to box types. Especially if we do go in for strootman some time in the future.

I think Carvalho being younger makes more sense as van gaal likes young players he can mould.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 11:22:31
Vidal is a physical player which fits right into the Premier League. He is IMO the best all around player in the world. Even for the made up figures being quoted we should try our very best to get him.

Veron flopped because he was not able to deal with how physical the Premier League is not because he was a poor player. His best performances for United were in the CL where the style of play is different. Vidal wouldn't have the same problem.

Agree0 Disagree0

Just think trying to deal with a club of a similar size to ours about there best player is going to lead to ridiculous money being spent ,and as some have said he will be wasted as a 6 and herrera is obviously our 8 so this added to the fact he is younger,cheaper and what we actually need makes me believe carvalho is the man for us

Agree0 Disagree0

Who knows, maybe we are going for both(I wish).
So "IF" we did get both who would we sell.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 13:34:01
£62m is not a bargain, maybe if you compare it to side show bobs transfer to PSG. He's an incredible player but £50m is more than enough for a 27 year old midfielder playing in Italy.

Agree0 Disagree0

£62 mill is way overpriced your right, but £62 IS still a bargain.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree, £62 is too much, £62 + nani is a much fairer deal for us.

Agree0 Disagree0

Vidal will be the difference between us winning the league and fighting with the goons for 3rd place pay whatever it takes the new robbo

Agree0 Disagree0

Vidal is a player that can take any team up a notch. He is generally considerd as the best midfielder in the world by his peers and most footballing critics. If he were to come in and perform to the same level he has for Juve then we will have a bargain on our hands.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 08:27:30
Enough of transfer Madness. on a separate note!
Last year as we toiled along I waited for David moyes to become suddenly a better tactician as I pulled my hair out screaming at him to make a change or seeing no game plan whatsoever I still supported him. may be may be he would learn
He never did. from the gambler that fergie was to dithering Dave.
Louis Van Gaal may or may not have a golden Willie
But what he does have is an Amazing tactical brain. irrespective of what you folks say there is no fixed system
What there is/should be is the spirit to win, the passion the desire which makes him the perfect man to manage us.
I have never liked mourinho.
but there is one quality that absolutely no one can deny.
he gets his team to play for him every person gives his all on the pitch
Considering he learnt his trade from Van gaal.
Its going to be brilliant tactical battles us vs Chelsea.!
Yes we want to be champions
None of us know if we will or we won't
But one thing we know for sure. We will be feared we will be respected we are Manchester United! GGMU!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

One random decision does not change the fact that since the Spain game Holland have limped past 4 teams that they should have beaten comfortably.

I thing LVG is a good manager but he has done nothing at this world cup to improve that opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 12:04:57
Costa Rica parked the bus and Navas and Gonzalez had the games of their careers. It should have been 6-0. Mexico weren't a shabby team and the Dutch struggled in the heat. Chile were a very good team and most people on here are desperate to sign their two best players. So I think your not giving enough credit to other teams. Fact remains their still in the semis. You can only beat what's in front of you and so far they have. he's created a united team all willing to run through walls. How often in the past have Dutch teams collapsed because of ego.

Agree0 Disagree0

Should have beaten comfortably? R7 Chile Mexico and Costa rica? Chile are one of the best teams in south America gave Brazil a run for there money Mexico played brilliant football
With the team Dutch have I am surprised they are in Semi finals
Costa rica kicked out Italy Uruguay and England
yet the average Dutch team should have beaten them confortbly.
The truth is other than RVP and robben and to an extent sneijder they don't have proven stars the rest are youngsters has beens and average players like vlaar
Lvg has made the best possible use of the squad in front of him with good tactical brilliance
I for one can't wait to see him manage us!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 12:26:01
Redseven,

Give over mate, no games are easy at the World Cup, they beat a tough Mexico side who almost beat Brazil and last night were by far the better team against Costa Rica who earlier in the tournament beat Uruguay and Italy.

The decision last night was a brilliant one, not random but planned, otherwise he would have used his 3 subs. Last season we had a manager scared to make a tough decision in any game any who appeared to have no plan. In each game lvgs plan is clear to see, even if it doesn't necessarily work for the full 120 minutes it can be adapted.

If you can't see that this is going to be a lot better than last season then you are never going to get it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Have you seen the Holland squad red seven. couple of top quality players and the rest good but not great. So that is the semi finals with an average team simply because he has made them work, adapted tactics and made winning the priority. I would take that next year.however he is getting the players he wants in so it will be win as a priority nut he will do it withflair.
I for one am massively excited

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 13:29:31
You cannot say Costa Rica were a team that Holland should have beaten comfortably after they beat both Italy and Uruguay and drew with England. It doesn't matter about on-paper stats, they had built some great form and have a decent manager who knew what he was doing.

The signs of a winning team is to win even when you're not playing your best, holland could definitely win this world cup no doubt.

Agree0 Disagree0

Exactly GDS there is the plan that's there. there is a counter plan if one doesn't work. And its about the team with a few flair players. average players we have aplenty fergie's best attribute was getting the best out of them. lvg cut from the same cloth? We will see. one thing for sure we will be focused with a plan unlike last year. or fergie's last couple of years. where Sir Alex won us the games with his sheer strength of will!

Agree0 Disagree0

This is pretty much the same Dutch team that made it to the Final of the last World Cup; only with a group of young players who everybody on here seems to think are worthy of playing for Manchester United (I've seen people saying that they'd like to see us sign at least 10 of their players over the past month). Sneijder's probably not playing as well as he was four years ago but RVP and Robben are playing considerably better.

Holland have played some of the ugliest football I've ever seen from a Dutch team at this World Cup and were it not for Arjen Robben (and to an extent his diving) they would have been out already. To be honest I'd be much more optimistic about next season watching Holland lose playing good football rather than win playing long diagonals and relying heavily on luck and Arjen Robben's diving!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jul 2014 19:17:30
I bet Sunday lunch is a hoot around your house red seven. You would prefer him to have got knocked out so you could be more confident, absolutely crazy.

We need a manager with a winning mentality with teams that can win even if not playing at their best. Seems like you aren't going to change your mind, but maybe watch last nights game again and the chances that holland created in all different ways and coming from different positions.

Good point about it being the same team as last time so it is really easy, don't Spain have the same team as last time? They didn't do too badly did they?

Agree0 Disagree0

Holland don't have the same team as last world cup at all! Their entire defense is different; the only players who remain are Robben, RVP, Sneijder, De Jong, and Kuyt.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ruud -

Starting line-up for the 2010 final and their ages now and then;

Maarten Stekelenburg (27/31)
Gregory van der Wiel (22/26)
John Heitinga (26/30)
Joris Mathijsen (30/34)
Giovanni van Bronckhorst (35/39)
Mark van Bommel (33/37)
Nigel de Jong (25/29)
Arjen Robben (26/30)
Wesley Sneijder (26/30)
Dirk Kuyt (29/33)
Robin van Persie (26/30)

The only players they've really lost to age are Mathijsen, Van Bronkhorst and Van Bommel. The rest are arguably around the age they should be in their prime and the fact that they are not playing for their country would suggest that the players that are are better, no? Or are you suggesting that LVG opted not to take his best players with him?

Agree0 Disagree0