Manchester United Banter Archive January 08 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


08 Jan 2013 23:38:59
5-1 to lpool this weekend, its about time you lot got a good thrashing, and we are the side to do it..............ps, i see saf is keen on signing old man lumphard, you will be changing your name to manchester old boys next lol.............lfc

Believable5 Unbelievable18

Well our old boys are doing better than your wonder kids! Btw lfc I'm predicting a comfortable home win with a robin can Persie hat trick and he will show that little cheat of yours how to properly play football.

Caolán

Agree7 Disagree1

It's 'about time' you finished above us in the league too, or even within 20 points of us. But that ain't happening either. Just like your prediction

Gav

Agree4 Disagree1

Scouse humor ? I knew it was bad, but seriously ?

Mick

Agree3 Disagree1

Wow now I see why funny men like bishop are from Liverpool. Have a clap on the back man go on. Just two questions: where are you in the league?
Have you ever won the premie league?

Jay-c

Agree3 Disagree1

If that is your attempt of humuor, stick to the liverpool pages

nikz

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 23:31:47
"Well, it looks like Fergie is going for youth again.
Frank Lampard at the ripe old age of 35.
Giggs, Scholes and Lampard a combined age of 112 years old.
If this goes ahead i really don't know what Fergie is thinking when there are so many midfielders available Strootman being perfect for us.
Do we really wanna pay this guy 150 grand a week for two years rather than spend 20-25 million on a young midfielder on a five year deal that will get paid half of that per week.
This is getting crazy, im just waiting for the news that Ryan Giggs is gonna get another two year deal.
Come on Fergie pull your finger out!"

Simmo

Simmo, how on earth has Fergie managed to get us into our current position, without your advice and input?

You're taking lazy rumours out of the papers and presenting them as fact, just to stir up the other eejits on here who think they could do a better job then Fergie.

StevieK

Believable11 Unbelievable4

Signing Lampard on a free makes a lot of sense if Scholes and/or Giggs are retiring in the summer, he would fill the off the pitch void left as well as do a decent job on it. We would still need another midfield player possibly but I wouldn't moan if it happened. Doubt it will though.
Ben

Agree8 Disagree3

Ben, I have no issue with Lampard.

If Giggs and certainly it seems, Scholes, are to be finishing, I'm a firm believer that you still need some experience in the middle of the park to get you through a season - Carrick can't play every game - and help the younger ones come through.

I just don't think he will come, and Fergie has never said he is, but that doesn't stop guys like Simmo and others using the very thought of it, as an excuse to have a go at Fergie.

These guys believe players in their 30s have nothing to offer anymore, despite the likes of Xavi, Pirlo, Seedorf, Totti and Del Piero, proving that if you look after yourself, there's no reason why you can't still offer something at that age

Nobody, including me, is suggesting that they can play the majority of games (which they haven't anyway, despite some of the hysterical rantings on here), but players like Giggs and Scholes, and indeed Lampard, IMO, can still offer cameos here and there, that will help us through a long season - Gigg's pass to RVP in the last match being a prime example.

StevieK

Agree5 Disagree2

To get a player of lampards quality and experience on a free would be great business, I understand some on here would see it as a sign we are not signing big money young mids but you need a blend of youth and experience and steady heads like Giggs/Scholes/lamps with winning mentality are more important than you realise.

Snakey

Agree4 Disagree1

I could list 20 midfielders I'd sign before Lampard.....but those would probably cost money, unlike free transfer Frank (if he is on a free, that is, I might be wrong in which case, apologies!)

I don't want another team's castoff that they no longer want. It's embarassing. And I'll tell you something for nothing - if Ashley Cole comes in the summer, I will never, ever, support that man. Ever. I don't care if he scores the winning goal in the champs league for us. Some things are bigger than supporting the team and my loathing for that odious, disgraceful bloke is one.

RED_SKY

Agree1 Disagree3

What has Ashley Cole got to do with it? There's a world of difference between him and Lampard as human beings.

StevieK

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 22:47:46
Lots of junior players leaving, older players retiring and some just not performing.
My list of players to replace are
Giggs
Scholes
Fletcher
Evra
Ferdinand
+Any of the wingers
Do we have the budget to buy new or do we have players in the u18 / u21's to replace them?
Not sure....
Would like 3 signings of Strootman, Isco, Baines.
And I won't them all now!! Ha...
Pedroknight

Believable1 Unbelievable0

I think I said a very similar 3 signings down the page somewhere...

IMO those 3 could be got for around £45m and would improve all the key areas that need a bit of work. When you factor in player sales we wouldn't even need much of a net spend at all. Which would perhaps leave a little extra for a luxury signing?

Gav

Agree0 Disagree1

I think those 3 are achievable... Baines for around £12-15 million, Strootman for £12-15 million and Isco for £16 million.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 22:28:40
Just a quick question for you United fans. I'm an Everton fan and I venture over to this site from time to time just because you've been heavily linked with Baines as of late and I wan't to see other fans verdict of him. Plus the banter between United and Liverpool is funny as they have no argument to compete with Man United it's always the same "This is our year" "We're going through a transition", blah blah blah. Anyway, the question I wanted to ask was: Would you swap Rooney for Baines and Fellaini? I value Baines at £18m and Fellaini at £25-30m whereas I value Rooney at £45m.

It's a tough question for me to answer but just wondered what your answers would be.

Cheers

BitterBlue {Ed004's Note - I am sorry but I wouldn't agree to that. Baines is a top player and I think 18 million is a fair if not cheap price for him. I consider him one of the best if not the best in the premiership if not the world as a left back. However, people know what I think of Fellaini}

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Hello mate, nah I wouldn't have that to be fair I think baines is the best LB in the world atm but fellani I think is more of well wot shall we say a 'chelsea player' over ego and bad temperament id give you 15m for Baines tomorrow if I was in charge thou. Gd luck for the season bud, hope you beat the spuds to 4th!
Chris the REDman

Agree1 Disagree0

Baines, Barkley & Pienaar & you have a deal. United would have the best left side in the Prem then. Plus with Cleverley, Powell & Barkley a very promising young English midfield.

Then just buy Lewandowski with the Nani sale.

TJ {Ed004's Note - I'm sorry but I can't see how peinaar and Barkley would add more to our attack than Rooney?}

Agree0 Disagree3

To be honest Ed, I would have said that Baines was worth around £22-25m but I thought that I was being a bit bias to say that he was that much, but ironing from a fan who supports a top club, who thinks he is worth more that £18m is really appreciated. Anyway here's hoping that you destroy the Red half of Merseyside over the weekend (no doubt you will).

BitterBlue {Ed004's Note - In your opinion could you see Baines ever going to united. I have been told he is a massive Liverpool fan and he seems a humble fella but I've read him say he needs to play in Europe to become England's number 1 left back I think?}

Agree0 Disagree0

I think your valuations are out, Baines is worth 12m at most, Fellaini between 18-22m, i'd say 45-50m for Rooney is about right.

The only real problem i see other than the fees is i wouldn't want Fellaini as i don't think he is what we need atm. And i don't think Rooney would want to move back to Everton at this stage of his career, he is at his peak years and with the greatest respect to Everton i think he'd want to spend them with a team that is likely to win trophies. I can see Rooney going back to Everton at some point as he does truely love the club but i see it when he's 32+ for a final season or two swan song.

Shappy {Ed004's Note - Why do you rate Baines so low?}

Agree10 Disagree4

Cheers Chris, here's hoping ey. Hope United can pull even further away from Liverpool by winning the title this year again. Good luck lads.

BitterBlye

Agree1 Disagree1

Fellaini and Baines would not fill the void left by Rooney. To replace a worldclass player, you need another world class player. It keeps the team's morale high and adds a fear factor. If a world class player is out of reach, you need a proven talented young player who could go on to reach worldclass heights, while also contributing straight away. So for example if we sell Rooney, we would need one of Goetze, Isco, Muniain or Neymar to fill the void.

Also Shappy Baines is the best left back in the world atm. If he was 23 he'd be worth 30 million pounds. but since hes not as young and his rsale vaue dropped he would fetch between 15-20 million depending on wages.

Mick
Mick

Agree2 Disagree1

Baines is quality but I wouldn't swap Rooney for any left back in the world past or present..

Agree0 Disagree0

I rate Baines very highly but he is 28yo has very little european experiance and generally speaking defenders don't cost as much as attacking players. I think 12m is about right for him, 15m tops. You also need to consider who else would be in for him, possibly Chelsea but no foriegn teams will bid for him so there will be very little competition for him. And i'm not sure if i'm right here but doesn't he only have a year or two left on his contract?

Shappy

Agree4 Disagree0

Baines is worth £12m-£15m.

Fellaini perhaps £18m-£20m.

Rooney at 27 perhaps £45m-£50m.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

I think we differ greatly in valuations Sydney, I think big clubs such as United think they can offer as little money as possible to smaller clubs than them such as Everton because of the financial situation we're are in. In my opinion that is unfair! If Baines was playing for Barca or Real Madrid etc the value being quoted would probably be £25-30m. It's very hard to find a good left back these days and most posters seem to think he is the best in the world which I can't disagree with.

BitterBlue

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 22:26:25
There are many people on here who are asking why Man you haven't bought anyone.
When you have to rebuild because of age, (Giggs, Scholes, Ferdinand etc), it costs a lot of money.
If you add in the replacement of De Gea and a couple of others, you're looking at a lot of money.
They will probably not buy anyone until the Summer, when the Champions League money is paid out.

Believable0 Unbelievable3

We'll buy if our hand is forced. Arsenal bid for Smalling so we bought him. We were happy to leave Rooney & Jones at their respective clubs another season until Newcastle & Liverpool bid. We bought them cause our hand was forced. If someone has bid for Strootman 22m & he is an actual target I'd say he'll be a United player before February 1st.

TJ

Agree1 Disagree0

Fee's tend to be spread out over several years not paid in lump sums so waiting for money to be paid out isn't an issue. DDG is unlikely to be sold but if he is it will be for more than we paid for him, his replacement is likely to cost between 8-15m at most so we would likley make money on replacing him. We also have alot of good youngsters coming through who will replace some of the older players, Micheal Keane can replace Rio, Tunnicliffe can replace Fletcher, Blackett can replace Evra, Powell can replace Scholes and Lingard and replace Giggs.

But the main reason we are unlikely to sign anyone in this window is simply we don't often sign players in january and when we do they rarely make an impact until after the summer anyway as they need time to settle in. Vidic and Evra weren't first choice until around March, Smalling and Hernandez deals were agreed in january but not completed until the summer.

besides its only the start of the second week of january, lets wait until 28/29th to say stuff like it doesn't look like any business is getting done.

Shappy

Agree6 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 21:50:57
Not really utd rumour but chelski swap deal plus cash for ronaldo and torres going other way, roman offer ronaldo big sign on fee.

Believable1 Unbelievable6

08 Jan 2013 22:08:01
the same torres who as an atleti fan and ex academy player vowed never to play for real?

Agree4 Disagree0

Think he means the scouse Torres ;)

DodgyBanter

Agree0 Disagree0

Why would Real buy Torres? It's as logical as us buying Chamakh or Barcelona buying Carrol.

On another note how funny would it be to see Andy Carrol in a Barcelona shirt, trying to fit in into the pass and move system.

Mick

Agree1 Disagree0

Mick, thats a brilliant image. Not one I had ever considered, but now i know what to think of to make me smile when the misses is having a go at me

Jaxer

Agree0 Disagree0

Mick it could work. just get carroll to stand in the six yard box, the barca players are awesome at passing, so they should just smash the ball at his face, deflection and goal.

rddu

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jan 2013 09:24:22
Ha ha ha, Mick. Funny image indeed. Made myday
PeeBoaiy

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 21:38:52
Lets sign Lampard, it'd be funny just to watch Chelsea fans cry and he could chip in with a few goals. I've personally never rated him but if he gets goals and upsets Chelsea fans, i can't see where the problem would be

Believable3 Unbelievable8

I think you may be onto something, I've heard that "if he gets goals and upsets Chelsea fans" is our new transfer policy......

Gav

Agree4 Disagree0

Yes, let's base our transfer policy on annoying sets of opposition fans...

Fresh!

Agree1 Disagree0

Much like. Citys and Chelsea's transfer policy
Chris the REDman

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 21:22:59
Having been a Liverpool fan for many years now I know how the mighty can fall. This is the first ( and prob the last tbh) time on this page, just to see what you lot were predicting for Sunday. Yes you are far and away the better team, yes you are the bigger club and yes you have won more titles. I doff my hat to you I truly do. Here cmes the "but". Football has always been a game of swings and roundabouts and once saf goes you will fall like a stone (with huge debts incidently). I'm not saying we will fill the void, but you might find yourslf where we are now. Anyhoos. Just a note of caution. P.s we will beat you 2-1 on Sunday.

Hubris Fred

Believable8 Unbelievable8

You've all been saying for the last 15 years. You talk about huge debts and yet I'm guessing you know sod all about our financial situation so tell you what, let us worry about that and in the meantime we'll enjoy the success.

TK-Red

Agree4 Disagree2

Our debts will not affect our future, it only looks brighter. We have halved our debt since we got it and every year it goes down even more...... Sorry to let you down but we are going nowhere mate....

Agree3 Disagree2

Our debts are large but under control, so although they are a concern they won't be too restricting.

Yes the retirement of Sir Alex will be a huge loss, there is no denying that. He is the most successful manager ever and there is unlikely to ever be someone to be his equal. But the club is very well run, from the board room through the first team right down the the youth development. So although we are bound to see some drop off of success, it is unlikely to fade completely. We will probably go from winning an average of two titles every three years to one title every three. But we'll still be there or there abouts.

Anyway thank you for your concern and i'm looking forward to the game on sunday.

Shappy

Agree12 Disagree1

So long as SAF's replacement does not go by the name of Dalglish or Benitez I won't be too worried about Liverpool 'filling our void'.

If I were a Liverpool fan I'd be more worried about not making CL for another couple years, losing your best players and becoming one of those teams who sees getting into the Europa League as a nice bonus every once in a while.

I think it will be a tight game on Sunday, they usually are. I'd be happy with 3 points in any shape or form TBH.

I think we will finish the season well over 30 points ahead of you. Again.

Gav

Agree3 Disagree2

3-0 to us RVP hat trick.

Caolán.

Agree2 Disagree3

08 Jan 2013 21:51:50
Football = Swings and Roundabouts?
I beg to differ. Ed's, could you set up a swings and roundabouts page?

Whistler. {Ed007's Note - Ed003 deals with all the swinging side of things.}

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 22:04:03
yes the debt is bad but is that the same debt thats falling year on year. Also you scousers love to come out with that old chestnut about how when fergie goes we're finished. After all there are no world class managers out there to offer the job to. Who knows we might have to do what you did and employ a succession of persons.

Agree3 Disagree0

Touche to the replys. I'll go back under my stone. I'm a realistic Livepool fan .I know we are a long way off. 38 years a fan i've seen good and bad. Still fancy us to nick it though. Normally at this juncture would wish the opponents good luck, but... juusstt... can't seeeem ....to ..speeeaaaakkk!

Agree1 Disagree0

Dnt you worry about us mate cuz im a realistic united fan and as one I xan honestly say I dnt give a monkeys wot you lot think about us! We will always be at the top because we are a well run club albeit with debt but in a few years when that and the boss is gone and we still win wot will you cling to then? your club is the way it is because we run it right yours is a sham because you still cling to false hope of titles and beating us. Thus you waste many millions you dnt have on donkeys and all your hangers on!
Chris the REDMAN

Agree1 Disagree0

Well mannered Liverpool fans are always welcome to venture out from under their stones to have decent banter on this page, its the idoits who just let your side down by spouting daft nonsence that get met with the hostility they crave. I can't wish you good luck for the weekend but i wish you good luck with your relegation battle. I might not like Liverpool but it just wouldn't be the same without you.

Shappy

Agree11 Disagree1

Shappy, should Liverpool get relegated, I'm sure I speak for a few people when I say we'd get over it ;)

TK-Red

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 21:19:00
Robbie Savage on the radio...why? He's dreadful and rather full of himself. Had to switch off.

AJH

Believable5 Unbelievable1

Because he has the face for it

Gav

Agree5 Disagree0

I actually think he is decent! Now Alan 'I didn't see that Liverpool incident' green has to be the worse ever!! Paddys gunna get him one day!! Burley ia close too!
Chris the REDman

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 21:17:04
Keep reading a lot of rumours about De Gea being sold.
Why would we want to do that? He's 22 we've seen that he has the ability and some of the saves he makes are unbelievable Casillas was just as inconsistent at his age and he went on to be one of the best keepers in the world if we sell De Gea i will be thoroughly disappointed

Believable6 Unbelievable1

08 Jan 2013 20:45:03
How I was lambasted a couple of years ago when I said on this site that Fergie was under orders to drop the wages of young players which led to us losing most of our young talent. Please let some one come on here and defend the way Pogba was treated by the management. He would be a mainstay in our midfield now if he had been used properly instead he had to sit there and see a player come out of retirement and go straight into the team. He is exactly the kind of player we are screaming out for and will turn out to be a real star of European football. The thought that maybe next season we may have a line up that includes Ferdinand Giggs Scholes and Lampard would be hillarious if it wasn't so scary. I AM KLOOT

Believable10 Unbelievable12

I think it was made clear that the salary Pogba would have been paid had he stayed are more than fair, and he is not earning more at Juventus ( in terms of salary ). He wanted playing time assured, something ferguson didnt wish to offer, add to that an agent trying to milk every penny out of the boy, and you got yourself the reason he left.

Mick

Agree7 Disagree0

I don't mind ferdinand as a bit part player but scholes, giggs and lampard shouldn't be anywhere near the united team.
scholes and giggs are legends but i really hope they do a neville and realize it's time to leave.

JK92

Agree4 Disagree7

Offering the lad the biggest contract of someone his age after coming from youth football and having half season in the reserves to experience senior football for the first time. How dare SAF!!

Chose to go play in a league which is behind the English, Spanish, German, French and arguably the Dutch rather then be patient and experience the changing room, Old Trafford on match days, training weeks on the build up for big game weekends and then as you say, would of been a mainstay in our midfield this year!

Definitely not Pogab and his agents fault!

You joker.

Ports

Agree9 Disagree1

Scholes came out of retirement in January, Pogba's agent was touting him around in the summer of 2011. Unless he has a crystal ball and knew Scholes was going to come out of retirement so decided to look for a move away from the club?

Sure Scholes could have made up his mind, but according to the editor he was always going to leave due to his agent. Still we agreed a deal with his agent, and we offered Pogba £20k a week to sign which was the most a youth product has been offered in our history, but it could have been £40k and it wouldn't have mattered. The lad was getting bad advice.

The editor said there was a third party who used to be associated to the club who advised him to move. Of course he will not tell us who, but there is Blanc, Cantona, Barthez?

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree5

Wasnt it Vieira who spoke to him about leaving? Pogba was offered a silly amount for someone who had a handful of first team games.... A player doesnt deserve to get a ridiculous contract just because he plays for us he has to earn it... Look at Nani he is on less than £60k a week and he has played lots of games for us and internationally.... Players and especially youngsters seem to think that just because they are footballers they deserve millions when they dont.

Agree6 Disagree1

Why, how was Pogba treated by the management KLOOT? I'm intrigued

Also you seem to be contradicting yourself, did he leave because of Scholes coming out of retirement or because the Glazer's forced the manager to drop youth wages?

I had heard Pogba was offered the biggest contract ever offered to a youth player. If true, that doesn't fit in with your conspiracy. I would have liked to see Pogba play more for us but I think the manager had a good idea he wanted out. So why should we play him in front of others...

Gav

Agree7 Disagree1

Also, why bring Lampard into this? Just beacause he's been touted in the tabloids. You've just taken that as another opportunity to knock the club, even though we all know it's probably bullsh!t.

Gav

Agree7 Disagree1

Pogba is an undoubted talent and this was reflected in us offering him the biggest contract ever offered to a youth player. Unfortunately he was being badly advised by an agent looking to make millions by taking him to a new club. If we had offered his agent 2m to get him to sign for us i can assure you Pogba would be tied down to a 5 year contract now. But we are not gonna be held to ransom for players from our own academy.

Pogba also wanted assurances over playing time, may i just say i've never heard anything so galling in all my life. In football you are part of a squad, and as such you are expected to fight for your place. To expect to be given games without having to earn it is disrespectful to both the manager and your team mates. And when you consider who his manager and team mates were and what they had achieved in football just makes it even more unfathomable.

It's not like he was playing for a manager who doesn't give young players their chance.

He had a bad attitude, this may be born out of poor advice from a greedy agent. But if he can't see he has to earn his way at our club then honestly he is best off out of our club, and were probably best shot of him.

Shappy

Agree12 Disagree1

KLOOT, you can't (rightly) berate Rooney for thinking he was bigger than the club, then come out in support of the way Pogba and his agent behaved.

Making demands for guaranteed playing time, at the biggest club in the world, is something you can maybe do when you've actually achieved something in the game.

StevieK

Agree7 Disagree1

KLOOT are you RFT? Was it you and IRISH ROVER who used to always argue with each other before this site was split into team sections?
Just asking? Was about 2004?
Chris the REDman

Agree0 Disagree0

StevieK

Couldn't agree more with your point, I just posted something similar on a new thread but not sure it submitted correctly

Seems like hypocracy to me

Gav

Agree3 Disagree1

Guys your not in the know any more than the next guy. If SAF said we have offered the best contract ever to a player does that mean we take it as gospel he is telling the truth? I certainly wouldn't.

I think we matched juves offer that's why when he did move we never heard of the massive contract and pay so many jumped on his back about because in reality it was similar. His agent no doubt could see a step to Italy for 2 years then a move back to England will reap millions for him and a faster increase in pay for pogba do of course that's his advice. The fact pogba was wanting guarantees to play x amount of games (nobody knows how many or what specifics were spoken of so again jumping on the bandwagon) shows that he did have a desire to stay.

No doubt the rejection from SAF, the return of scholes, the playing of Rafa, jones, giggs in cm the freezing out of the training and public carrot dangling would have all served to arm his agent with more spin to get him to move.

I say we played hard ball when for a special player we should have catered for his needs!

We shot ourselves in the foot by letting Rooney away with it do of course all the renewals were going to be harder after that.

You have to remember pogba was singled out umpteen times by SAF as a future great so why when physically ready at 19 were we still relying on 37 year olds?

If I was offered for some playin time guaranteed, 5 years out of a young promising ready for the big time player on 20k a week ha you wouldn't get your hand back!

Pogbas agent had eyes so he could see how weak we were in CM and knew we needed him. He called our bluff and we failed to deliver hence he is now gone and we have seen a massive part of our future solution to our CM problem wander off to pastures new.

Jono

Agree2 Disagree3

Jono, it's just my opinion, but I think if he had stayed, there would have been something else come up down the line, that would have started something similar all over again.

Young guys like Pogba, with extremely influential agents, can sometimes be more trouble than they're worth, no matter how much potential they have. We all know Fergie does not like disruptive players, potentially or otherwise.

As you say, we'll never know, but I do know we'll survive without him somehow, just like we did after much better players than young Pogba were shown the door.

StevieK

Agree4 Disagree0

And mate, you're starting a dangerous precedent if you think the club should 'cater for his needs'. It risks upsetting the morale and team ethic of the club if you go down that road.

Maybe for a George Best or a Cantona, but certainly not for some kid who had barely played a game for the first team.

StevieK

Agree4 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 20:00:31
Syd,

I meant you were contradicting yourself earlier on the Fryers debate by saying United didnt rate him very highly thats why they only offered him pittance (£1, 500) a week but then they rated him at £6m.

That doesnt make sense but everyone knows Fryers either p1ssed United off or United just played hard ball cause it was Levy.
Fact of the matter is United should have accepted an offer of £3m if they only valued him at such a lowly weekly wage.

Devil Dust.

Believable6 Unbelievable8

It's different DD, to us because he was 4th choice he wasn't worth paying more than we offered him. But in terms of valuation, him having an English premium and the fact we would be selling to a rival he was valued higher.

Sydney!

Agree3 Disagree4

Why should we settle for 3m? Levy always charges us premium money for his players. And uses the excuse of not wanting to strengthen a rival when selling to us, then wen it comes to buying our players wants them for cheap! Mark my words we will have the last laugh!
Chris the REDman

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 19:26:42
According to my father who work at portugal told me that man utd are closing in on both benfica and porto wing wizard gaitan and rodriquez

Believable0 Unbelievable10

Not both mate.

Fresh!

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 19:22:17
Sneijder will never go to Turkey hes just using it as a ploy for teams like us or tottenham to give him a bigger wage! Everyone will be going on about him in the summer and we will see many different spellings of his name once again! FREDO

Believable1 Unbelievable3

Turkey for 18 months is not out of the question.

Sydney!

Agree0 Disagree6

Like Schniegjdarly? ;)

Rk16

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree with the above, he is desperate to get out of Inter, think he would go almost anywhere right now.

You have to remember he hasn't played for quite a while (that I'm aware?), he obviously has talent but a lot of clubs won't risk it because he's been out of action, potentially it's a useful stepping stone for him to prove himself.

Rolanski

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 18:39:20
If I was Strootman I'd leave this window. If PSV & United win the league he'd get two medals.

TJ

Believable5 Unbelievable4

I totally agree.If united could bring in, both Strootman and Wanyama..We would have the makings of a world class midfield.In regards to De Gea.I'm having doubts in the way he his adapting to the English game, and has shown far to many weaknesses.

Agree0 Disagree2

08 Jan 2013 18:35:14
How many games do you think Pogba, Morrison & Fryers would of played if they were still representing the best club in the world?

TJ

Believable0 Unbelievable3

08 Jan 2013 18:48:18
Pogba by now maybe as many as dozen, certainly between 6-12 counting sub appearances. Morrison & Fryers 0 but they'd have been on loan.

Agree2 Disagree2

Morrison and Fryers would have played few games, if any; but Pogba has played a fair bit for the old lady already, scoring a few goals as well (including one stunning volley from outside the area a few weeks ago).
I hate to go on about it, but he is exactly what our midfield is missing (in my opinion)

Jaxer

Agree7 Disagree1

Pogba would be a regular this season, but Morrison and Fryers would have played a couple UCL games and League Cup games.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree7

I'd say that Morrison and Fryers would have played up to 10 games, maybe 4-6 starts in LC, FA Cup & UCL dead rubbers. As for Pogba, he'd be on 20+ games a seasons including starts and sub appearences.

Fresh!

Agree0 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 18:26:26
Ronaldo has a £800mil Realease Claus on his contract so he won't be going anywhere until it expires

Believable0 Unbelievable8

But Real could very easily accept a bid for less than £800mil, the release clause just means that they HAVE to accept that offer

Agree4 Disagree0

You don't know how release clauses work then?

Gav

Agree3 Disagree1

Top quality post mate..... If this was a comedy site.

Agree3 Disagree0

Just like Messi's release clause was met recently, barca were obliged to tell Messi this and he promptly signed a new contract with barca.
to the original poster, do you think if Ronaldo had 6 months left on his contract and was looking to leave on a free, Madrid would not except a reasonable offer of say £30million from anyone? £30m is better than a free wouldn't you agree?
So these crazy release clauses are not written in stone.
Flyhalfmitch.

Agree0 Disagree0

In the Summer Ronaldo will either leave, or sign a new deal. If he rejects a new deal he will no longer be at the club come September 1st. With 2 years left on his deal Madrid can get a decent fee, with just one year they don't have much barganing room. I think that Ronaldo will be at a new club by September 1st, could be ours or PSG - They are think are the only two options he would consider.

Fresh!

Agree0 Disagree1

Ronaldo looked gutted last night at the sight of Messi winning the ballon d'or.I personnaly thing the only way he could win it again "becoming the worlds best footballer" is a move back home.He will receive lot's of support from SAF, player and staff to win the trophy back.I don't think PSG could take him to that level.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 18:25:34
Just humour me.
Say some team like Fulham, Newcastle or Everton wanted Welbeck for 13.5m no more no less. They weren't willing to negotiate any players in the deal before anyone say's throw Baines or Cabaye into the deal.

Just a simple Welbeck January sale 13.5m. Would you???

TJ {Ed004's Note - Yes if we could get Lewandowski for about that much}

Believable8 Unbelievable1

No because we couldn't replace him in January. Summer maybe, but i'd want 15, and a replacement in first.

Agree3 Disagree4

Welbeck could easily be sold for 20 million, he is much better than players like Bent, Carrol, Henderson, Sturridge.

-JakeW

Agree2 Disagree10

Id agree with that JakeW if he played for another team though and not us as teams seem to always get our players on the cheap with few exceptions.

Agree1 Disagree2

I'd bite their hand off. Jake £20M is a bit ambitious isn't it? Henderson was way over priced as was Carroll. The only thing that might bump up the price is his age but £20M?

AJH

Agree3 Disagree0

Don't think he is as good as sturridge to be honest.

Agree5 Disagree4

If I had to value Welbeck right now I'd say £13.5 mil was about tight TBH. Not sure I'd take it, we'd obviously have better options if we replaced him with Lewandowski but you need balance in the squad, players that are willing to sit on the bench as well as players who will want to start each game.

Gav

Agree1 Disagree0

Sturridge better than Welbeck? You must be joking

Agree3 Disagree2

This is a tough one, but i'd say no. I'd rather keep a talented young local boy who is only gonna improve and is happy being rotated and has love for the club.
If we sell him there is no garrentee that who we bring in will do a better job, and would they be happy to sit on the bench? Do they have the same love for the club?

Some times that cow in the next field looks better than your cow, but is it really.

Shappy

Agree6 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 18:25:20
No bigger club than Liverpool in the EPL according to Sturridge - just crying out for a drugs test

N.I. Devil

Believable13 Unbelievable7

I thought the move to anfield suggested that in the first place!
Chris the REDman

Agree7 Disagree2

Weren't Liverpool the only club interested in Sturridge? And didn't you have to pay him a massive £1.5m signing fee to convince him to join. I guess for £1.5m he would call his own nan an old goat.

Truth be told it's no more than the John Henry PR firms telling him what to say like the other puppet on JH's string Brendon Rodgers.

Sydney!

Agree5 Disagree8

08 Jan 2013 21:21:31
I didnt hear of any other club in for him.
Reason been he isnt a team player. if not played he will sulk.
2 years max and he be on his way for more money. and he won't get much above 10/12 a season before then

Agree2 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 18:24:27
I know neither are popular on here but if we were to sign a more experianced midfielder who would you prefer?

Lampard for free on a two year 150k a week deal

OR

Sneijder for 10m on a four year 150k a week deal

Shappy {Ed004's Note - Sneijder}

Believable5 Unbelievable5

Sneijder!! Lampard is so over rated he has no build up play what so ever, just a rich mans darron gibson
Chris the REDman

Agree7 Disagree5

Lampard for 2 years then readdress the situation. I'm not sure a 34 year old is the answer but IMO a 34 year old Lampard would do more for us than a 28 year old Sneijder. I don't think Sneijder would suit our style at all now.

TK-Red

Agree4 Disagree4

Sneijder. A few years younger and provides better techical ability and creativity than Lamps. I'd say the additional £10m transfer fee would be worth it (compared with Lamps for free)

Gav

Agree4 Disagree3

As much as Lampard has been sensational in the BPL.... Sneijder for me was the best in his position a few years back and is still only 28 and could be played as a deeper player too..

Agree3 Disagree3

Lampard isn't and never was in my opinion that great a player. Good, at times, yes, but not to the extent the hype around him would suggest he is.

Sneijder has that edge, I'd take him in the squad, out of the two.

Don't think we're crying out for either really though.

Rolanski

Agree2 Disagree1

Name another midfielder in the prem who has scored consistantly every season anywhere near as many goals as lampard ? not saying i would take him but for people to say he is crap is a bit over the top.
johndenton

Agree3 Disagree0

I don't think either of them are the answer but if Scholes and Giggs retire this summer, then one of Lampard or Sneijder would be good to add some experiance as long as we signed someone else younger to also play in midfield.

For me i'd go with Lampard, he know's the prem, and isn't motivated by money. Also there are rumours RVP and Sneijder don't see eye to eye, so maybe it best avioded.

Shappy

Agree5 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 18:20:14
website showing this !

Galatasaray president Unal Aysal has confirmed the club are in negotiations with Wesley Sneijder regarding a move to Turkey.

Might this be the end of the Man Utd link ?

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Let's hope so! And they spelt it wrong, it's Schneider ;)

GDS

Agree2 Disagree2

Hope so.

JK92

Agree2 Disagree0

GDS

Duh, it's Sneidgjler

AJH

Agree0 Disagree0

No its spelt schnider...get it right mate :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Its Waslay Schneigjderly actually

Agree0 Disagree0

Look, we need to stop this, it's getting very silly. For the final time, it's Wasserley Sneijjgderling

AJH

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 17:57:52
Evening, and Happy New Year to you all.

To start off, and without being too disrespective to Liverpool, I seriously believe we might give them a serious thumping this weekend. There's a whiff of un-confidence from Liverpool about the weekends fixture, and I think SAF will smell blood!

In respect to all this 'Howard Webb, blah, blah.' I'm sorry, but 99% of the time I've seen Howard Webb send a player off, it's been a good decision, and the fault lies with the petulant and un-controlled behaviour of the players involved.

Again, I'm not being disrespectful as I actually believe 'Rodger the Dodger, who plays with Gerrards todger' (sorry, couldn't resist) is actually doing a half decent job at Anfield, cleaning up and trying to make good of all of Kenny Dalglish's errors - unfortunately there was a lot of them, and is going to take some time to fix. Bring on the weekend!

WF Red Devil

Believable11 Unbelievable4

Disrespecive? un-confidence?

English please and then it might be worth a response

Puzzled

Agree10 Disagree6

You might consider reading your own posts, Puzzled, and then perhaps take your own advice.

TK-Red

Agree6 Disagree2

Puzzled - Perhaps he is not English or was in a rush or was using a phone which spits out all sorts of nonsense with predictive text or is not a spelling master...... You know It is pretty obvious what he was saying disrespectful and low confidence... I would understand your point if he put a load of unreadable drivel like the Liverpool fans.

Agree6 Disagree5

08 Jan 2013 17:52:56
Who does everyone think we will sign in the summer? I don't think that we have the money to pay for Ronaldo so that probably won't happen! FREDO

Believable1 Unbelievable0

I'd be happy with one midfielder.

Khedira, Strootman or one of them massive Benders from Germany.

TJ

Agree4 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 18:38:50
Strootman, Zaha, Baines and 1 other likely a surprise.

Agree1 Disagree1

LB Baines, CM Strootman/L Bender and AM/LW Isco/Munian/Rodriguez

Gav

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 17:51:44
Thank god Wesley Sneijder is going Galatasary !! Don't want to here his name on this site again.

On a brighter note we have RVP :)



TEDDY BEAR

Believable6 Unbelievable1

08 Jan 2013 18:09:27
he'll be back on the menu in the summer, he won't like turkey and will be after a move by july.

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 16:51:20
How kind of Sturridge to give our players extra motivation for Saturday....not, of course that we needed any at all...what a clown
Stuey

Believable4 Unbelievable2

08 Jan 2013 16:37:59
"Excuses"? What "excuses"?
Is it not fact that:

*this Liverpool side is the youngest and most inexperienced in years.
*this is presently your most accomplished side in years?
*you are playing at home?

These are all valid points which are likely to see you placed favourites for this tie.

It's interesting that you should mention Howard Webb. Certainly he's been a deciding factor in many of these fixtures. So fair to say all the odds favour his again being the difference between the two sides Sunday.

Like it or not, the pressure's on you to perform and produce a result, a convincing one at that. Anything remotely resembling the corresponding rendezvous last year would be poor, very, very poor on your part.

Us we are a team in transition, rebuilding. New manager, new players, new playing style etc. So that considered, a neat, mature and dedicated showing from our lads will be enough.

Dillie {Ed004's Note - Everytime we play you, you are a 'side in transition' also the Webb point was brought up by multiple pool fans yesterday}

Believable3 Unbelievable7

Id take a scruffy 1-0 we dnt need to smash you to prove anything, so I take it if we do put 4-5. Past u, you won't be complaining about tatics players eyc because we are expected to beat the SMALL teams!
Chris the REDman

Agree7 Disagree5

Respect to Sydney, he knew it was coming. I thought they were going to wait till after the match to start excuses, how wrong was I.

But we have to take into consideration that Liverpool are in a transitional period, one that started 23 years ago, and surely next year will be theirs?

Mick

Agree7 Disagree3

08 Jan 2013 17:58:16
its a poor attempt at reverse psychology. Sillie must have found a lost sixth form book somewhere. Of course being at home automatically makes us favourites. Same with us being top and you being mid table. You talk of your young team but surely that should be an advantage compared to our past it old guys as some of your fellow supporters like to say. Also as this is your cup final you should be well up for it. Lastly its nice of you to say its our best team for years when most people on here kick lumps out of it after every game. Hopefully we do put eight past you and this place will be scouse free for the rest of the season. But as its all about points and wins at this stage i'll happily take one nil. Even if its a 93rd minute penalty ;)

Agree3 Disagree2

Rafa you should take your facts and plan for the game against Stoke instead of posting under a pseudonym on a Manchester United site.


And Rafa, the pressure is always on top teams to perform. It's only mid table teams with nothing to play for that get to relax.

Danny Pughnited

Agree3 Disagree2

I do find it funny how Liverpool fans spend 51 weeks of the year saying:

"Liverpool are on the way back, this is United's worst team for years, Liverpool will be back on top"

and then the week before the OT fixture its:

"Liverpool are a young side, this is your most accomplished team for years, you are at home so should beat us by 3 and you're crap if you don't".

Every year they never fail to embarrass themselves.

TK-Red

Agree6 Disagree3

Good replies guys! 23 year 'transition' lol

TK-Red, you make a very valid point. Somehow we're 'finished' as a force and 'in decline' right up until the Liverpool fixture, when we become 'massive favourites' again...

Says a lot about Liverpool and their fans TBH

Dillie - if we lose and City win we will still be 4 points clear on top of the league. I can handle that pressure thanks!

Gav

Agree2 Disagree2

Norwich got an unlikely win against us, little teams always seem to raise their game against the bigger clubs. So I expect a decent Liverpool performance, but I am sure we will score 3 or 4.

Sydney!

Agree3 Disagree4

Gav, I think the 21 point gap says it all mate.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree2

A little team who have won 5 european cups sunshine. Dennis 89 {Ed004's Note - read this earlier. Pool fans claim they are one of the biggest teams in the world and in their defence mention 5 European cups. liverpool, the biggest club
In terms of stadium capacity: 6th
In terms of league position: 8th
Premiership titles: 0
In terms of turnover: 4th
2011 league position 8th
2010 league position 6th
2009 league position 7th
Last time even in champions league 2009-10 season

Yep the biggest by a mile. This is only for the premier league...}

Agree3 Disagree2

Since when was young and inexperienced a valid excuse? Im pretty sure we won the double with a young and inexperienced side in 1996?

You have little quality, not invested wisely and now your financial situation is clearly poor. It saddens me that Liverpool fans have to come on here and make excuses for a game which hasnt even been played.

Covey

Agree0 Disagree0

Nice1 Ed004! Hmmm, so tempting to cut and paste that onto the L'pool site ;) I'll refrain for now I think

Gav

Agree1 Disagree0

But we're not 300m in debt {Ed004's Note - And your point is?}

Agree0 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 23:11:07
ed your ONLY excuse is the prem. its not like manchester united have got 10 CL's, 25 carling and FA cups :/

typical manc {Ed004's Note - Yeah nothing to do with the fact we are the most known and supported club in the world currently and receiving the largest commercial deals and turning over the largest revenue. How could I be so slow and not think of how the carling cup affects our brand image around the world..}

Agree0 Disagree1

No you just have 300m worth of dead wood hanging around and a manager who continues to buy flops!!
Chris the REDman

Agree2 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 16:18:40
This Fryers thing is beyond a joke. People on here are blaming the management for letting him go. At the end of the day, I imagine that we offered him a fair wage given that there were 3 players ahead of him in the pecking order, maybe even 4 as I'm sure SAF would play Evans at left back as third choice. Ultimatly, Fryers really wasn't that brilliant, he was decent. This is pretty obvious as Villas Boas has put him into the Tottenham development squad - not the first team.

Sometimes you have to let people leave, its just a fact of life. I will concede though that we should of taken the £3 million from Spurs.

Fresh!

Believable11 Unbelievable1

08 Jan 2013 16:01:22
Love the rumours about Strootman, but really don't believe they're true. Surely Fergie won't admit he's wrong after years of not buying midfielders. Would love to see us sign someone in this window. I feel the fresh blood would really help us kick on, and hopefully, put it up to Real Madrid in the Champions League!

El Diablo

Believable3 Unbelievable2

Why do people think that signing Strootman is so implausible? SAF has said that there will be no signings, so there will be one. He is not cuptied and ideal for the team so he can slot straight into the side.

Fresh!

Agree1 Disagree1

I don't think we will sign Strootman, we wouldnt want him to block the devellopment of Giggs now would we ?

Mick

Agree8 Disagree4

08 Jan 2013 15:13:09
utd targets over next 6 months jesus navas, ronaldo, haageland, lewandowski baines, plus one mystery target my guess lampard or sneijder which could be short term deal

Believable5 Unbelievable6

Nice of SAF to leave some of the squad then. lol daleman55

Agree0 Disagree0

We couldn't afford that lot {Ed004's Note - 2 seconds ago you posted as a pool fan? Make up your mind mate...}

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 00:00:51
hi there all,
i just want to ask the edds, if there is any truth in selling DDG, sorry if this has been asked and answered before.
I also want to ask whether we have been trying to sign anyone during this winter market, even though SAF has said we will not.
If we have been, which possible player is the most likely to be signed?
Thanks in advance
HV {Ed004's Note - I doubt we are going to sell De Gea and I don't think we will sign anyone unfortunately}

Believable2 Unbelievable0

08 Jan 2013 14:48:31
I have never talked about sneijder and i kinda feel a bit left out. So here is my opinion on the man, I think we where only lead to believe the deal broke down due to wages, but the really reason is that no one at the club could spell his name! Right, what do think, pretty plausible.
Its such a shame, i would have loved to get sneydejer on the back of my shirt!
However on a serious note, i think the missing links in the team are strootman and baines. I really think with time this team could be great.
Apart from evra, the defence is set up! all we need is stability and consistency between, rapha, smalling, vida/evans and baines. Ferdinand, will slowly become squad rotation.
The only problem with this area, personally in my opinion is that we need to get rid of the legends, and have faith in the youth, with the addition of strootman.
Powell will be very good and replace scholes and carrick, while tunners, cleverley and lingard (If he bulks up) will be great squad players.
Finally i don't need to say anything about the forward line, even welbeck, who i am not the biggest fan of, is showing that he offers another dimension and style of play to RVP, Rooney, Hernandez and Keane.

aaallj5

Believable1 Unbelievable1

If we didnt sign players because people can't spell their name then 'Rapha' wouldn't be playing right back for us ;)

GDS

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 14:37:44
Sydney - only just spotted your reply to my post yesterday. Sorry for trying to introduce a little bit of culture to this desert - pearls before swine comes to mind

Puzzled

Believable2 Unbelievable2

08 Jan 2013 11:34:12
Ed, what are the chances of signing Sneijder? Apparantly in the rules he can terminate his contract if he has played in less than 10% of Inters games this season? So really the only sticking point would be his wages and surely he'd drop them in order to move now.

A.R {Ed007's Note - I don't think there is any chance of Sneijder signing for Utd.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Love how everybody is spelling his name right now. Still hate the obsession with him, lets hope he goes to turkey and we never hear from him again.

GDS

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 14:22:10
So interesting times ahead for us. Liverpool on Sunday, we are all hoping Anderson and Rooney are fit. Would be nice to have Jones and Nani on the bench too. I think there is a chance Rooney will play. If not Anderson, Kagawa, Vidic, Jones, Nani & Rooney all need games so WHU could be up against it midweek.

City have Arsenal away and although Arsenal are pretty lame they are having a decent run of games. With Yaya, Nasri & Aguero all missing they will not get a better chance to take points off of City. I will be an Arsenal supporter this weekend but I will not hold my breath that they will win. We demolished them so City should have a similar effect one would think.

Sydney!

Believable7 Unbelievable2

The next few weeks will be very important because many derbies are going to be played.If we manage to still be 7 or more points ahead of 2nd after these matches i think we will be favs by far to win the league.

Agree1 Disagree1

A while back I said that this would be a big weekend. I think at the end of it we will have a 9 point lead. I can only see a win for us against Pool, and also think that Arsenal are capable of snatching something. City aren't in the best of form, and as you say they are without Aguero, Nasri and Yaya, as well as Kolo and I doubt Balotelli will be involved.

City won't be full strength, but we will be nearing full strength. Happy days!

Fresh!

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 14:13:28
if we get lampard in the summer and not a good young midfielder then it will be a disgrace.

JK92

Believable9 Unbelievable7

You are correct. Really can't see it happening though so I'm not too worried...

Gav

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 12:59:46
Fair to say all the pressure's on you this weekend to perform and get a result. Arguably your most accomplished side in years (at home) against the younges, most inexperienced Liverpool team in years, anything less than a fine performance and convincing result (3 - 0, 4 - 0) will be a disgrace on your part.

We know where we are at and have to do nothing other than put in a decent effort, which I have no doubt we will.
El Pistolero and the Studge should have fun.

Dillie {Ed004's Note - Games not even played and you're making excuses. Between this being a young Liverpool side and Webb being ref I think I've heard them all so far}

Believable1 Unbelievable10

I said this would happen yesterday.

Liverpool fans are so predictable.

Sydney!

Agree10 Disagree3

Don't worry Dillie, we will beat you, keep the excuses coming.

-JakeW

Agree4 Disagree1

Here we go again....

Agree4 Disagree1

Sydney was 100% right, he said this would happen lol excuses excuses

Big Mac

Agree5 Disagree1

Haha, I love how scared Liverpool are of us these days

Luke

Agree4 Disagree1

Syd did say expect the excuses to come early.. he was spot on.

JK92

Agree5 Disagree0

SYD called this yesterday! Its as if we have heared it all b4.
Chris the REDMAN

Agree4 Disagree0

Shows how far Liverpool have come that it is a disgrace if utd don't beat by at least 3 goals.

Jordan

Agree4 Disagree1

It's so they can class a draw or a narrow loss as a victory.

Sydney!

Agree5 Disagree1

Haha! Sydney! was 100% right! Liverpool fans are really pathetic!

kdevil10

Agree5 Disagree0

Syd had rightly predicted this yesterday.. even my friends who are pool supporters are embarrassed by this post.. Benoit

Agree3 Disagree0

It won't be a disgrace, I agree with this post. It should be 3 or 4 nil...lol

Patzi

Agree0 Disagree0

Dillie

What a lame post.

Where has the passion and belief gone from Liverpool fans? Perhaps it went with all the success in the 1980s...

You've spent £150m+ on new players in recent years yet you're still that poor? Great 'investment' by Dalgish, Comolli et al.

We've scraped many games by 1 goal this season. To say we'll have underperformed to win by anything less than 3 goals goes to show how far you've dropped!

Gav

Agree0 Disagree1

Liverpool have spent well over £200m in two years.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 12:24:13
Reference post further down regarding reports in Italy of Strootman close to signing for a premier league club, apparently PSV are looking for 18million which may be nearer to 22 million euros.
I reckon it will be less.

Supasub

Believable5 Unbelievable0

08 Jan 2013 12:15:05
Rumors knocking about saying Scholes is going to call it a day at the end of the season. I can't see Fergie looking to bring in the likes of either Strootman or Wanyama till July, however Frank Lampard might not be a bad shout? would be a free at the end of the season and could get 2/3 years out of him, Fergie knows how to get the best out of players!

Believable3 Unbelievable8

Lampard and Mourinho perhaps,
KevDarko

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Jan 2013 10:38:43
What does everyone think of Zeki Fryers statement and how he felt disrespected.

He says he was offered 1500 pounds a week in a new contract. Why would SAF treat people this way and turn down a 3 million offer from spurs and ask for 6, knowing they would not pay that much for him.

It serves him right if true and odd behavior for a 71 year old man.

Shahram

Believable5 Unbelievable12

It was reported at the time he was only offered 1500, bit strange to me
jred

Agree2 Disagree6

Would you turn down £1500 a week Shahram? He would have been an U21's player, no more. If he loved the club as much as he said he does then he would have accepted the deal.

Sydney!

Agree13 Disagree6

Maybe Fergie didnt think he deserved any more than that?? I know in footballing terms that is pennies but for a bit part youngster that seems fair to me.

Agree9 Disagree3

Some reports saying, we turned down 5 mio offer in the summer. turning down 5 mio and then offering 1500 per week is a bit strange indeed. Benoit.

Agree1 Disagree5

Benoit, we wanted £6m and Spurs were only prepared to offer £3m. To avoid it going to a tribunal and knowing foreign club pay a minimal amount in compensation, Levy got Liege to buy him for a pittance then he bought him for £3m. It's a complete manipulation of the rules, but not illegal. I think we should have sold him for £3m, but with Levy constantly giving us ridiculous quotes for Spurs players and purposely blocking a Modric move to United, the manager thought he would do the same.

Sydney!

Agree9 Disagree1

Sydney
Whilsat you are quite knowledgable and a regular poster, some of the your views completely off the wall. So if you love the club, you bend over and take rubbish or is that your general philosophy in life, for love take any rubbish someone gives you.

We Paid 3.5 million for buttner and he is on 20,000 a week so how does a player worth 5 to 6 million only worth 1500 a week in today's footballing world and

The whole thing is strange, if SAF thought the kid is worth 75K Pounds a year in wages then sell him and accept 3or 5 mill that was offered.

Sounds like Fergie like many employers wanted to bully him and squeeze the guy and got what he deserved. As they say do your talking with your feet and walk.

Shahram

Agree6 Disagree5

"Maybe Fergie didnt think he deserved any more than that"

I would never say that has been one of Fergie's strengths over the years, we have missed on a multitude of players and opportunities.

Shahram

Agree1 Disagree7

Sydney

Modric wanted to go to Chelsea the year before and it was blocked. He came out and said his dream is to go to Madrid and it was always his first choice so I don't get how levy blocked his move to us in the summer, when the player was always going to choose madrid over us.

Shahram

Agree2 Disagree1

Its penny pinching as it always has been.

There have been umpteen reports of the same happening to players that come through the ranks Brown, O'Shea, more lately Pogba and Welbeck. These players were playing (or could have) just as important a part as others in the squad on nowhere near the same pay.

Ideal example currently. Nani and Young.

Now I don't know exacts but it seems around 45k is what Nani is on where as Young is on 60? When they are both of similar use to the club.


Now we have seen Welbeck's reputation brought into question as he wouldn't sign the deal he was offered straight away and add that to previous stories of Wes Brown and its a clear picture that anyone brought through at Utd is just expected to accept what we offer and that should be that. SAF has previously waded in with the likes of Pogba and Brown and publically said what he thinks on it, always with a bit of spin allowing the masses to round on the 'greedy' footballer tag and pressurise the player into signing. Sometimes it works and others stick to their guns a bit longer but irrelivent of whether you are offered 1500 a week or not if the offer you recieve is something you see to be a bit disrespectful or whatever then its that persons right to feel that way.

1 thing is for sure is that SAF wanted him to stay otherwise we wouldnt have offered the contract and he wouldn't give a monkies where he had ended up. So if thats the case what difference does it make giving an up and coming fringe player an extra couple of grand a week? Its not the way anymore Fergie! the players have too much power.

The biggest thing SAF can't deal with is the loss of power in his role, this is why he is so involved in the transfer deals and wages where as I don't think it should be case. If a player is in one hand being described as the future of Man Utd then on the other getting offered a deal thats not as great as its getting made out to be then of course you would feel unappreciated as a player as the praise is not reflected in the contract offer.

Also that 1500 a week wouldn't have been negotiated for likely 2-3 years so why should he just accept it?

Jono

Agree2 Disagree4

Shahram,

And we have won countless trophies whilst remaining profitable. Maybe leave the business side to the people that know what they are doing eh?

You would have us with double the wage bill we have now with loads of prima donnas asking for more and more money every week. If fergie thought fryers was good enough he would have got more money, do you really think fergie is that bothered? Like Sydney said, he wanted to get one up on levy who has done us over quite a few times over the years.

GDS

Agree8 Disagree0

Shahram, we paid £7.5m for Bebe and he was on a year's salary of £90k. Fryers was behind Evra & Fabio and he was behind Blackett in the reserves. You tell me why he is worth more than £1500 a week. What divine right does he have to demand more?

In the summer United were very interested in Modric and at one point looked favourites to sign him until RM entered the race. Levy wanted more money from an English club than what he wanted from a foreign club and purposely priced United out of a move leaving RM as Modric's only option.

Sydney!

Agree6 Disagree3

Kinda contradicting yourself there Syd !

Devil Dust.

Agree4 Disagree6

"Sounds like Fergie like many employers wanted to bully him and squeeze the guy and got what he deserved. As they say do your talking with your feet and walk."

It's pretty simple really, the club had Evra & Fabio ahead of him, they were going to buy another LB in the summer and Blackett was ahead of him in the reserves. So why would the club offer him silly money to sign? If he cared about the club like he said he did he would have signed the deal and earned himself a better contract in the near future. Instead his greed made him look elsewhere.

Sydney!

Agree5 Disagree3

Actually Modric wanted to go to united aswell but was told by his agent if he did want to move he'd have to rock the boat as Tottenham were playing hard ball.
He very nearly ended up at PSG who I imagine would still be interested if he were available, as they were willing to pay what was asked and they were a foreign club.

Supasub

Agree1 Disagree0

Jono, we allowed Fryers to go on tour with Spurs in the summer. The manager had no issues in selling him at all. He just wanted a bigger amount than Spurs were offering, it's as simple as that. Levy has always drove a hard bargain with us so the manager wanted to return the favour so to speak.

Dust, feel free to elaborate?

Sydney!

Agree3 Disagree1

Done a fine job of playing hardball there then didn't he Sydney? Spurs got there man and United 5%

Agree0 Disagree0

No name, exactly, that is why he is so angry.

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree0

"And we have won countless trophies whilst remaining profitable. Maybe leave the business side to the people that know what they are doing eh?

You would have us with double the wage bill we have now with loads of prima donnas asking for more and more money every week. If fergie thought fryers was good enough he would have got more money, do you really think fergie is that bothered? Like Sydney said, he wanted to get one up on levy who has done us over quite a few times over the years. "


GDS

What does winning countless trophies have to do with a discussion about a player who seems to have been mismanaged and commercially even a bigger mismanagement.

This is a public site but I can assure you my business background is quite relevant and based on the clubs valuations today have dealt with a much more bigger fish and more complicated entities in the past.

As matter of fact I would say let the manager run the team and leave the business side to people who know what they are doing.


Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney

"Shahram, we paid £7.5m for Bebe and he was on a year's salary of £90k. Fryers was behind Evra & Fabio and he was behind Blackett in the reserves. You tell me why he is worth more than £1500 a week. What divine right does he have to demand more?"

You just contradicted your self and answered my question as the above case has turned out to be a great business decision right?

No divine right but why act like a petulant child at the cubs expense and not allow the player to leave and receive a transfer fee that is reasonable. Still will with my view and believe stick strange behavior by the man.



Shahram

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 09:56:52
So Wilshere wants to win trophies...
I give 2 or 3 years and the yellow bar on a web site will read 'Jack Wilshere hands in transfer request'. I think he should save himself a year as everyone knows arsenal are near enough finished. It will just take them finishing outside the top 4 for the cracks to really start to open!

Ste-Utd

Believable10 Unbelievable5

I did post on the Arsenal site yesterday pointing out he would inevitably ask to leave at some point.

AJH

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 09:10:48
Well, it looks like Fergie is going for youth again.
Frank Lampard at the ripe old age of 35.
Giggs, Scholes and Lampard a combined age of 112 years old.
If this goes ahead i really don't know what Fergie is thinking when there are so many midfielders available Strootman being perfect for us.
Do we really wanna pay this guy 150 grand a week for two years rather than spend 20-25 million on a young midfielder on a five year deal that will get paid half of that per week.
This is getting crazy, im just waiting for the news that Ryan Giggs is gonna get another two year deal.
Come on Fergie pull your finger out!

Simmo

Believable8 Unbelievable5

I believe if we could get Lampard for 2-3 million in this window, I would do it. He could without a doubt play a part in helping secure the PL.

ussoldier77

Agree5 Disagree8

Whats happens after that?
Is he worth paying 150 grand a week for two years when there are better and younger players available for half that wage and will play for us for 5-10 years.
It's a silly signing, if we give him a two year deal he will be 37, Carrick will be 34, Fletcher will be 30 (if he ever gets back to full strength which i doubt very much), Scholes will have retired, Giggs will be 40, Anderson will still be on the treatment table with a chapped a*se. Doesn't leave us with much does it.
The only player not drawing his pension will be Cleverley and he hasn't exactly set the world alight.
We need to buy young now, Lampard isn't the answer its a quick fix and for the amount of money he gets it's silly.
We all know that we need midfielders when is he gonna realise this?

Simmo

Agree5 Disagree2

I am not convinced we want him.

Sydney!

Agree10 Disagree0

For 150,000 I will take Sneijder any day of the week. Yeah I know he missed his chance and on that basis we should never want Hazard, Moura, Benzene, Modric etc etc at the club in the future :)

Shahram

Agree5 Disagree2

Simmo,

Mate I agree with you we certainly need to invest in a younger midfielder. I am simply saying I would pay 2-3 million for Frank to ensure it helps us lock up the title this year.

Basically I would say to him, right if you want another trophy, we will sign you to a 1 year deal but you have to come down on wages.

I just believe 2-3 million is worth spending for the sheer fact we don't have to see citeh lift the trophy again

ussoldier77

Agree3 Disagree2

Just yet another case of lazy ass journalism! Fergie has in the past shown interest, United always in market for a CM, sooo low and behold the journo's put 2 and 2 together again.

I personally wouldnt buy into it, like Syd said not convinced!

Cban

Agree3 Disagree0

I said in the summer i didnt think we would sign a big name cm as fergy would look to give clevs a chance, i think he sees a midfield 2 of clevs and carrick with variations around that.
i think we will sign a squad player to take over from fletcher (after fergy did the right thing and gave him a chance to regain fitness).
and i think we will sign an experienced player to replace scholes who i think may retire, i wouldnt be that surprised if it was lampard

would much prefer we sign a real top cm but ive been wanting for that a few years now and it doesnt seem on the cards to me
jred

Agree1 Disagree0

What is a "top midfielder" to you Jred?

Is Witsel a top player to you? Dembele? Sneijder? Nasri? Strootman?

Sydney!

Agree2 Disagree0

Syd
a midfielder that would come in and expect to play week in week out, play a similar amount of games as Carrick.
for example am a big fan of Martinez I think if we had of bought him for 35 mill him and Carrick would of played 90% of our games severely limiting the amount of games clevs would play.
strootman for me is still a developing player at a similar stage of his career as clevs
jred

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree jred, but this is a squad game and we are short of midfielders so I think the manager will add to the squad by September. We will most certainly buy a midfielder, perhaps two. Fletcher clearly is struggling again and Scholes will highly likely retire in the summer. Powell and Tunnicliffe will need loans so we will be short. More so than we are now.

Sydney!

Agree1 Disagree0

I agreed Syd
There can't be no more excuses from Fergie. He needs reinforcements now. Scholes needs to call time on his career now, Giggs should only be appearing as a substitue now. Fletcher will never get back to the level he was at.
This transfer window or the summer transfer window is gonna be really important and we need to make sure we bring in at least two midfielders.
Im sure rubbishty City, Chelski are going to buy and bulk up there squad, we need to do the same.

Simmo

Agree1 Disagree1

Simmo

Chelsea and City will always spend money and look to improve. We've been worried about that for years but we're still competitive. We do need a CM (just 1 IMO) and probably a winger. I'd like a LB too but not sure that will happen. I don't think we need to panic though, I see our transfers happening in the summer rather than Jan.

Gav

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 08:31:04
May not be relevant but for all the animosity between sneijder and RVP, sneijder voted for RVP as no. 1 for Ballon d'or. Van Gaal, however, didn't have RVP in his top 3.. Benoit

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Well that goes to show how misinformed and judgmental people can be on this site. They are suppose to hate each other remember.

Shahram

Agree1 Disagree2

08 Jan 2013 08:23:44
ED i just read a rumour about Buttner being allowed to go on loan, did you hear anything about this ?

MUMBAI_BOY {Ed004's Note - I can't see it being true and I can't see us allowing it in January}

Believable1 Unbelievable0

If you read it on tribalfootball, it says 'in summer'.. Benoit

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 07:04:35
A lot of people already jumping on Buttner after only playing a handful of games. He's taken a big leap from a lesser league to probably the bestleague, which is a HUGE jump.

He still needs time to adjust, yes he is raw but tell me Evra wasn't when he played his first few games. Not saying Buttner will be our new left back but surely he deserves the chance to be at least given a run in the team and then judged. I think with work on his defensive game and a little on his crossing he could be a gem of a player.

Not ruling out Fabio coming back and taking the LB spot either. He has talent, is continuously progressing (had a great game against chelski) and working towards this. If he can stay fit i think he could be just as good as Rafael.

See i don't think LB is as big a problem as others make out, for me a CM or two is a must. The CB issue i feel will depend upon Rio and/or Vidic. Personally i would keep Vidic and bring in Hummels and let Rio go. Can see both him and Lampard going to WHU.

420United

Believable8 Unbelievable1

08 Jan 2013 01:27:12
4-3-2-1
DDG
Rafael Evans Vidic Evra

Carrick Kagawa Cleverly

Rooney Ronaldo
RVP

BOBSAE 1993

Believable4 Unbelievable3

That is the team that I would play, however swap Evans for Smalling - although Evans is excellent now. Kagawa would have plenty of movement ahead of him with those three so would get many assists and playing alongside two others would mean that we would be defensively quite solid.

Fresh!

Agree1 Disagree1

You couldn't swap Evans for a Mars bar

Puzzled

Agree0 Disagree2

Dreams....

Patzi

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jan 2013 00:46:41
I nearly had a heart attack when I heard the rumours about DDG today, but thankfully it's just more bullsh!t from the Mirror. Yeah makes sense, sell a goalkeeper who is improving all the time after just 18 months at the club and sign an average Pepe Reina who punches the ball too. Seriously, it's yet again a case of 'cows in the field'.

There seems to be an obsession with changing everything after a few shaky moments. You say he should be sold, then you suggest another 20 year old in Marc Andre ter Stegen! You suggest Courtois! You suggest Butland! All the same age and quite frankly, not as good as De Gea. How many points has De Gea cost us this season? How many points has he earned us this season?

Get a grip! Some things in this team are perfectly fine would you believe. I'd hate to see what would happen to the team if some of the posters on here were manager.

G.A.G.U.S

Believable26 Unbelievable2

I agree with everything apart from you saying Courtois is not as good as DDG......

Agree2 Disagree1

Well said mate

Agree3 Disagree0

If you are not happy with a player, why would you play him in consecutive matches, de gea has played in all games after reading away

nikz

Agree4 Disagree0

Proper order my friend.

StevieK

Agree2 Disagree0

Good post mate well said.

Mike

Agree2 Disagree0

Well said

AJH

Agree2 Disagree0