Manchester United Rumours Archive January 11 2011

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


11 Jan 2011 23:42:16
Manchester United Rumours
Man Utd will be making a surprise January move for Southampton's Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain.

REDSTER

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 20:29:02
Manchester United Rumours
I heard that sir alex will make a £22m bid for barcelona's Sergio Busquets either in January or in the summer! ED?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 20:21:51
Manchester United Rumours
Wow some real transfer muppet alarm on here. .

Get a grip guys and realize which club you actually support. . no it's not h* *ing sheikh City.


Indeed, am struggling with h* *ing as a swear word. Was it on the muppets?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 19:15:42
Manchester United Rumours
Chris Cohan will join Manchester United for a fee of Around 4.2 Million.

11 Jan 2011 19:02:30
Manchester United Rumours
{Editor's Note: Unexpected. As I have said before, Rene Adler still remains the most likely in my view still.}

@Although I would love United to go out and spend 15m on De Gea, I have always thought a more experienced keeper will come in. I believe it can only be one of two Stekelenburg or Adler for me. After Adler's outburst on how he loves United etc, you have to say he's is one of the favourites. Ed him or his agent must have been contacted for him to publicly say he wants the United move.

Both Stekelenburg and Adler will cost under 10m in the summer, they will both have just 12 months left on their contracts and they have both declared they want to join United. We could get them for around 7-8m. Lets not forget if we wanted him now he (Adler) would only cost 15m.

Sydney!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 18:29:49
Manchester United Rumours
Manchester United are in a race with Everton to sign the highly rated Nottingham Forest player Chris Cohan. The price of Cohan is believed to be around 5 Million pounds. It is not known yet if Nottigham Forest will except a Player swap with Manchester United, where as Everton are prepared to offer Louis Saha?

11 Jan 2011 18:27:37
Manchester United Rumours
What is ur view on the Craig Gordon rumour reported on sky sports today Ed?

{Editor's Note: Unexpected. As I have said before, Rene Adler still remains the most likely in my view still.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 15:21:40
Manchester United Rumours
"{ed's note - they are looking for more than £40m for him, but the biggest problem would be persuading him.}"

The biggest problem is that we do not use the attacking midfielder position and need much more than a midfielder who can create but not dominate. We need a player who can win the midfield battle and create in BIG games not some injury prone flat track bully.

REDFAITH {ed's note - I am sure he was just talking hypothetically, I know I was.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 14:23:06
Manchester United Rumours
Firstly, great site by the way!

Secondly, people keep saying Michael Owen has been a bad buy and will go, in my honest opinion he has played well for the vast majority of games he has been picked for and scored valuable goals when urgently required of him. I hope he stays and that Hernandez can learn addition skills from him and that Utd give him some more chances. It is a psycological thing that because you have paid a great deal for one player ( Berbatov etc ) you are bound to play them, more than a free purchase. Any UTD fan will tell you the one position where the cupboard is bare at the moment is a creative midfielder.

The only real candidate in the market is Cesc Fabregas, in years past I believe UTD would have gone for him, we really do need him, the other options people discuss are a ''gamble'', if UTD really want to be regarded as the biggest and the best he is the player they should buy. It is no good keep saying you are the biggest if you do not back that up.

I love this club, but we have made some bad decisions in both purchases and sales over the last 12 years. Beckham was sold way too cheaply and was ALWAYS good for us.

Editor, what is the chance of Fabregas coming to UTD, what price do you believe would tempt Aresenal to sell to us? As you know we bought Frank Stapleton from them before and he was one of their big stars back then. Have times changed so much? {ed's note - they are looking for more than £40m for him, but the biggest problem would be persuading him.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 14:13:52
Manchester United Rumours
As much as I’d love to think United will sign someone in January, I think a lot of people have ignored a critical part of Fergie’s remarks the other day: “I’d like to get one player in during the transfer window if I could, but I don’t see it happening really.”

So he said himself that he does not see it happening, so let’s not get carried away.

Also, with regard to Sanchez, Inter president Massimo Moratti when questioned about the possibility of buying Sanchez said: “I don't think so.”

And Udinese coach Francesco Guidolin said: “If it was up to me then I would keep Sanchez until June and I think the club agree with me on that. However, it does depend on a number of factors and we’ll just have to wait and see what happens."

So, again no obvious suggestions of a Sanchez transfer in January at this stage.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 11:50:22
Manchester United Rumours
Manchester United Rumours
What would you say to the idea of signing either Jarvis or Albrighton and sticking them on left wing? They'd be a damn sight cheaper than Bale and to be honest i think Albrighton is the better player in the sense that Bale went missing against us yet albrighton & Jarvis both stood out. If Bale is as good as everyone makes out then how can he be silenced so easy yet considered lesser players stand out?

I know this is just one game but it is a big game and i would rather not waste money on bale if he's just going to go missing (great against inter but other than that he fails to shine in the bigger games)

Ed & EVERYONE ELSE - what do you think? and what price tags would you stick on Jarvis and Albrighton?


P.s I'm just not convinced of Bales potential/ability vs price tag.

MONK

{editor: Both are really good players. I am not sure about price tags.}
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ MONK

I think the problem with Bale is that when he comes up against a proper defender (One that does not attack better than he defends) example being Phil Neville he looks poor. He looked poor against us too.

He looked good against Inter because Maicon wouldn't (Couldn't / can't) defend.

I personally like him and think that he is a top player (or has the ability to be a top player) but Historically Spurs will rip United and everybody else off when it comes to selling players.

Albrighton was class against us, he looked like he will be excellent.

Jarvis again looked good against us but I am unsure if he has the ability to be a World class player.

I would say Bale's realistic value would be 17-20 Million, spurs will not let him go for less than 35 Million though.

Realistically Jarvis would be worth around 7-10 million and Albrighton around the same 7-10 million.

Just my take on the subject.

Gaz

11 Jan 2011 11:50:05
Manchester United Rumours
@MONK

Dont you think that if Bale were a target now would be the time to get him while he does go missing in some games and has some still doubting his ability?

If he were the finished article and was consistantly performing brilliant then surely the price tag would increase further and also the interested clubs would increase.

We did it with hernandez when Fergie had an incling that other interested parties were gonna take a look at him in the WC. Its the way Utd work, get rough round the edges players for cheap and mould them.

Obviously Bale now being at a prem club (and even more so at Spurs) the fee would be big so the cheapness has gone but we could still mould him into a better and more influencial player.

Jono!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 11:43:28
Manchester United Rumours
"So why didn't they find the problem at the medical then? It would have saved us 2 years of anguish. He had a worsening knee problem and it wasnt found. Certainly the ongoing medics seem good but are the docs who did the medicals 3 years ago (Hargreaves) still the same ones doing it now?

No problem in taking a player with an injury that will clear up as long as it is correctly assessed. It worked for Van Nistelrooy and we picked that up."

Tendonitis is very hard to find. You do not know about how worse your tendons are getting until they finally go one day and you have to get a full in depth scan to know that which is not done in medicals. Small injuries here and there are always there and pain in the knees is common with players. He had fully recovered from the injury he had at bayern so there was no reason to not take him. His knee problem was tendonitis was made known after far deeper research which is not done during medicals.

As for the 2 years of anguish you mention i rather look at the 1 year of dream midfield control. I honestly do not believe that we would have won the CL or the PL that year without him. So it was worth it imo. His injury resurfaced later which was unfortunate, you cannot do anything about that. We had chased him for quite a long time as well. I still have a slight hope of him coming back, but again i am being too optimistic.

For every injury horror we have seen there are still people on here and among united fans worldwide who want proven injury prone players like torres and fabregas, what can we do about it? Did we know about Rio's back problem when we bought him? No, it came up and we sorted it out now gradually, hopefully we can do the same with hargreaves.

REDFAITH

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 11:31:29
Manchester United Rumours
That is why we have an insurance on players For hargreaves it covers half his transfer fee and the wages while he has been out. Not bad is it? And in terms of playing, you cannot predict anything with injuries. People have small niggles here and there, and its very difficult to determine a problem until it surfaces.

United has the best medical staff in england i think, the work they have managed to do with ferdinand, giggs and scholes is amazing.

REDFAITH

So why didn't they find the problem at the medical then? It would have saved us 2 years of anguish. He had a worsening knee problem and it wasnt found. Certainly the ongoing medics seem good but are the docs who did the medicals 3 years ago (Hargreaves) still the same ones doing it now?

No problem in taking a player with an injury that will clear up as long as it is correctly assessed. It worked for Van Nistelrooy and we picked that up.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 11:30:32
Manchester United Rumours
P.s I'm just not convinced of Bales potential/ability vs price tag.

MONK @MONK personally on bale im not convinced he looks brilliant in some games n anonymous in others. .would need to be doin it over a few seasons not just 1 before i would be shouting for us to sign him. . . . Red Knight

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 11:21:17
Manchester United Rumours
What would you say to the idea of signing either Jarvis or Albrighton and sticking them on left wing? They'd be a damn sight cheaper than Bale and to be honest i think Albrighton is the better player in the sense that Bale went missing against us yet albrighton & Jarvis both stood out. If Bale is as good as everyone makes out then how can he be silenced so easy yet considered lesser players stand out?

I know this is just one game but it is a big game and i would rather not waste money on bale if he's just going to go missing (great against inter but other than that he fails to shine in the bigger games)

Ed & EVERYONE ELSE - what do you think? and what price tags would you stick on Jarvis and Albrighton?


P.s I'm just not convinced of Bales potential/ability vs price tag.

MONK

{editor: Both are really good players. I am not sure about price tags.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 10:29:49
Manchester United Rumours
Ed - what are your views on Jarvis of Wolves?

I personally think he has great potential.

{editor: Looks like a class player.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 09:09:17
Manchester United Rumours
Man utd linked with £15m bid for safcs Craig Gordon (source sky sports news). Sunderland fan

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 06:20:00
Manchester United Rumours
What are you views on the busquets thing ed?

{Editor's Note: It would be a massive coup if it happens. However, there is a chance that this has been built up by his agent to get leverage in the contract dispute.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 04:01:20
ED n sydney. .
I think Hazard clarified it in a interview dat he likes Arsenal n Real Madrid but that dsnt mean he is going there. . he can also play at big clubs like Manchester n Barca. . .
so why is everyone sayin Hazard to Arsenal is a done deal. .

Do u knw anything about this interview ED n Sydney. .?

Shaun

{Editor Note: Arsenal would be his club of choice, he feels he would get first-team football there under Wenger.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 02:53:34
Manchester United Rumours
Just read on a website that United are pondering a 25 million pound move for sergio busquets since his contract talks with barcelona are stalled over his wages.he wants the same as mascherano but is not getting it.
or its probably just his agent saying that Manchester United are interested so as to increase his value.

anyway, i don't think united need him. he's a good player but we don't need anymore defensive midfielders.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Jan 2011 01:19:22
Manchester United Rumours
P.s to people saying he'd fail the Medical you obviously don't know what the Medical is for, it is quite simply to find out the players fitness levels and to find any covered up injuries as long as the Med staff know about the injury in advance then the signing would not be a problem.

*You're wrong. It's for insurance purposes*

Believable0 Unbelievable0

10 Jan 2011 23:54:35
Manchester United Rumours
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Answer- I understood if a player had played in the UEFA cup to December and they transferred in January they could play in the Champions League during the later rounds. However if they played in the Champions League to December they are not eligible for later rounds.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Reply:
Incorrect.

Basic up shot is a club can register 1 player who has already played in Europe, as long as that players club are not in the competition his new team will be competing in.

So, even though Ninis played for Pana in the CL, as they are no longer in the CL he could be registered - same as we could register any player whose european season started in the Europa League.

To clarify though, this can only be done for one player (there can be 3 replacements named within the CL squad)

Believable0 Unbelievable0