01 Aug 2016 00:15:46
really fed up with the pogba (non deal/ deal) didn't know that adidas were our owners, not our sponsers (believe its them and their ads that are holding up the announcement of deal) also didn't know we had to sign an agent as well to get him.

1.) 01 Aug 2016
01 Aug 2016 01:02:14
As much as Raiola is an annoyance, you have to be fair in this case. If I was an agent and upon a team signing my client there was an agreement that if he were to be sold on that I was to receive 20% of said fee, then I would 100% be holding my ground until I received my cut.

2.) 01 Aug 2016
01 Aug 2016 06:44:05
I agree MPez, if it was stipulated in Pogbas contract that any club buying him had to do the signing in the back of a ford mondeo with everyone dressed as Santa then that's the deal . as it stands he wants the money every one involved knew he was asking for from the first day they enquired about Pogba if not before . why should he back down? sickening as it is . but how many agents/ managers are making money from artists in the music biz / acting biz etc etc? same thing.

3.) 01 Aug 2016
01 Aug 2016 07:52:18
yes but it seems united are paying the 20% on top of the agreed price.

4.) 01 Aug 2016
01 Aug 2016 08:56:34
leeder,

The stories coming out are that Juve are paying that fee, so you don't actually know that, just another chance to make the deal seem more expensive.

5.) 01 Aug 2016
01 Aug 2016 12:26:45
The buying club pays the agents fees.

6.) 01 Aug 2016
01 Aug 2016 12:39:00
Fused, that is correct, but technically this is not an agents fee it is a pre agreed profit share agreed with Juve. As such I would expect juve to pay it and Utd to pay raiola a seperate fee for negotiating the deal.

7.) 01 Aug 2016
01 Aug 2016 13:11:28
if juve want x amount after what raiola gets then that's pogbas price, that's the amount they want to sell the player.