Manchester United Rumours Archive September 02 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.


02 Sep 2012 23:15:21
A front six of RvP, Rooney, Chicarito, Nani, Scholes/Kagawa, Valencia (all having a decent game by their standards atleast) is a mouth-watering prospect if you ask me... I'm really hoping to see this atleast once in the coming season (if not more)
And compared to last season, what has changed? Nothing much, except the fact that we now have 2 world-class players in the attacking positions and that has forced us into a 4-3-3 or a 4-3-2-1 formation... To be honest, even though United won the league in 2011, eversince the departure of a certain Mr. Ronaldo, we hadn't seen the attacking play that we as United fans have become so accustomed to... I know its still early days to say that we'll reach such levels, but this is the sort of influx that we probably needed the most... new players to change the rhythm, tempo and most importantly the mindset of our play...
But theres miles to go before the aforementioned 6 (and the rest of the squad - with the likes of Welbeck, Young, Jones, Powell etc.) gel together to form a fearsome force...

-NPrak

Believable16 Unbelievable6

As regards todays game it is pretty obvious evra welbeck hernandez carrick and even ferdinand and even raf are not prem standard whether it be age ore abillity leauge one standard at best as mutch as i admire fergie the number two in the past years has been the brains we need a major overhall ore risk division one teams pushing us all the way personally i am dreading europe lucky we got the easy group but after today i dont know he either tries the youngsters ore in the summer makes mayjor investments ore another potless season a red united fan

Agree0 Disagree3

That would be a very poor lineup actually. You can't just stick a bunch of talanted players on the pitcvh and expect them to do well. There would be no midfield strength at all there and even the weakest midfields in the league would have a field day.

Thorne

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 23:14:25
According to Punto Pelota, Cristiano Ronaldo has told Real Madrid president Florentino Perez that he wants to leave the club.

chances of a return?

Believable27 Unbelievable25

Nani out, CR7 back in! Before all on here and god, I swear to run down my local high street in nought but my boxers, eating an apple, screaming eureka if this happens....

Dan

Agree0 Disagree0

I read the same thing but we couldn't afford him and I would hate for him to play for City or Chelsea. Those 2 and PSG would be the only ones to be able to afford him

Agree0 Disagree0

FFP starts next season and if City buy him then they will show a massive loss and possibly be banned from the CL. Believe it or not we will be the ones making the big money signings from next season onwards if FFP is enforced.

Agree1 Disagree0

LBH if CR7 where to leave RM for the EPL, I am pretty sure that he would return to OT. We all know and so does he that MU made him the superstar he is today and he has himself publicly thanked SAF and the MUFC FANS for everything he became. I'm sure he would not have forgot that and if he did return i will post a video of my self doing a run down my street in my boxers and my girlfriends bra lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree with prev post, would love him back but lets be realistic here, can you honestly see us being able to compete with Sh..ty and Chelski when it comes to cost?!even with Nani thrown in we would still be looking at a min of 40-50 mill, be great to see him back but think we've got as much chance of that as Pele signing up.

Charla

Agree1 Disagree0

Pretty poor timing on his behalf seeing as the transfer window has just closed!

Agree0 Disagree0

I smell the words "I want an improved contract"
Invisible STuey

Agree0 Disagree0

Could we afford NOT to put a Bid In. Nike would "Creatively" balance his salary against whatever rules may prevail

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Invisible STuey has the right idea - perhaps he is looking for an improved salary now that the income tax implications have changed in Spain (I think)

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 22:58:24
Anyone seen Ronaldo's comments?
He is sad with people inside real Madrid?
Any chance of resigning him in January?
It is a rumour site after all....
Q

Believable15 Unbelievable16

02 Sep 2012 20:01:57
24M is a lot for a 29 year old. But besides the penalty, that's the kind of money you have to pay for WORLD class quality. Now that's value for money.
Redchad

Believable26 Unbelievable2

Makes me laugh when they talk about players ages. So what if they are near the 30's so long as they can still do the job. Then people say there's no sell on value, sorry did we become a feeder club or something?
Money well spent, let's just hope it continues.

melwing28

Agree1 Disagree0

Those 3 points belong to Scholes and Van Persie. We are going to have a massive problem replacing Scholes. IMO only Xavi, Iniesta or Modric could even try to fill the ginger princes boots. Modric not as good as Scholes either IMO.

Dan

Agree1 Disagree0

24 million may be a lot for a 29 year old but 36 million is jot a lot for van Persia and kagawa now is it

Agree0 Disagree0

Alot of people on here questioned the purchase of RVP - being 29 and injury prone but yesterday he proved everyone wrong albeit after a trully awful pen which had me ripping my hair out.

As fergie said the game changed when Scholes came on, not just that but when we changed to 442, Welbeck is not a wide man! i think we should continue to play 442, i understand Kagawa plays in the hole but are system doesnt seem to suit us for whatever reason maybe i need to give it more time?

RVP won that game on his own yesterday - besides scholes' composure to take control of the game no other player really stepped up

Defence was all over the shop although first game they have all played together in a while but what concerns me that any team that has a tall front man pumping balls into the box causes us alot of problems in which we were usually very reliable.

Midfield - Carrick had a reasonable game but didnt really produce going forward.
Cleverly again was tidy without any flash going forward.

Forward - RVP showed that 24m was a bargain imo - his three goals were completely different, shows that it can score anything (besides a pen ;) )

IMO we should revert back to 442 - play Kagawa centre mid with welbeck/Chic with RVP leading the line.

Giants14

Agree0 Disagree0

Carrick was sh1t! He was off the pace and got caught numerouse times. Played 2 decent long balls the whole game but they were asking a lot. Every team is getting closer to the way Barca play with the players they have signed for midfiled and we are still relying on Carrick who has actually now passed his peak. I think next season the bulk of our transfer kitty will and should be spent on phasing him out. Cleverley did have a good game again but with both him and Carrick in the middle we find our midfield going sideways or back at pretty much every opportunity

Agree0 Disagree0

Cleverley had a good game?!, what match were you watching then?, thought he was average at best!, he had that much influence he was dragged off for Scholes to show him how it's done, I may be in minority but I really don't rate Cleverley that highly, game seems to pass him by on too many occasions for me

Charla

Agree0 Disagree0

Zidane was around RVP age when he went Real Madrid for big money so I don't why people go on about price.

Mike

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 19:47:01
Here is a very interesting bit of info from a very reliable source. I would not post it if it wasn't 100%. He was at a wedding this week with Sir Alex. They have known each other for a long time and are quite close. Sir Alex let it slip that he was less than impressed with DDG. I don't know any more but he was adamant that Sir Alex was not happy. Any of you who saw the reserves game against Spurs this week and saw Lindeguard make that wonder save can not be surprised that he was given the opportunity to play today. I suggest that DDG just learns to catch the ball and not punch everything. As we have seen in the past Fergie has very little patience with goalkeepers and with time running out for him i expect him to be ruthless. I AM KLOOT

Believable5 Unbelievable34

DDG has played very well in the first 2 games.......just think fergie knew there would be more ariel stuff today........a mistake to drop him if u ask me.......lindegard is always solid

Agree0 Disagree0

But DDG has been awesome in the first two matches. granted we conceded 3 goals but it would have been alot more without him!

DanB

Agree0 Disagree0

Absolute lies considering de gea will be starting against Wigan.

Caolán.

Agree1 Disagree0

I can see that being kosher he f++ked up badly it was pretty pathetic, lets hope he learns because he will be best in the world

Pardoe

Agree0 Disagree0

I take it all back, fergie has just confirmed that he dropped him for his mistake against fulham! On a website website.

DanB

Agree0 Disagree0

"He made a mistake, he knows that. He'll be back in a few weeks time." That was the pre-match interview on sky with Fergie.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is absolute sh!t. He was dropped because he made a mistake, he also said these mistakes happen and its just a learning curve.

How many times has he praised him in the past followed by he's still only young and is going to improve?

Ozwald

Agree0 Disagree0

DDG has been brilliant but for that play last game. I wish the manager had the same standards for the rest of the squad. Evra would never play another minute.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wel my source who is 100% says your mate is talking absolute bobbins .......... If fergie thinks DDG is not performing then we need to cOnsider fergie cause we will have a lot of dodgy games this season due to our midfeild fergie knows this an was to stubborn to pay up for a world class one . We need a strong midfeilder end of . DDG will be here a long time end of ......... I'm my own source ...... End of ...

CAIN

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't make me laugh,Lindegard is a back-up goalkeeper not a starter.Yes De Gea will make mistakes he is young and learning but even the best mess up.De Gea has saved us many goals already at Utd and is clearly a keeper who is without doubt a starter.

Agree0 Disagree0

IMO DDG is the best shot stopper in the world, right now, barely out of his teens. Lindegard is a decent shot stopper and is much stronger, but he's some 6 years older, so its to be expected. DDG will still become the best keeper in the world, but its gonna take time to build up strength and experience. There's a reason, unlike with other players, why keepers usually don't debut until they're in their mid 20s and don't peak until their late 20s and early 30s. DDG will keep getting the majority of matches, and will over time become like Casillas or Buffon, absolute every match must have starting keepers. -KG

Agree0 Disagree0

I think he was dropped in an effort to show him he must improve the ariel part of his game. Just a temporary warning not a permanent measure. The manager knows Lindegaard is reliable enough to take the mantle when needed but I expect to see DDG back in the team soon, no doubt following a number of heavy training sessions. AF isn't the type to just right off a £19m transfer - he's far more stubborn than that!

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

If DDG wasn't in goal against Everton we'd have conceded 3-4-5 goals. Maybe ferguson should divert his attention to the midfield rather than the goalkeeper.

Agree0 Disagree0

DDG is very young and obviously needs to improve his commanding of the area but shot stopping wise has been fantastic.
As for Lindegaard, the poorness of his kicking of the ball yesterday I would expect DDG will be back far quicker than the original poster seems to think
Invisible STuey

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 19:37:53
'His too old', 'His too injury prone', 'His only had one good season', 'Thats too much money for a player with 1 year left on his contract', 'we shouldnt pay a penny over £15m' 'lewandoski is a better player', 'His going to block welbeck and chicha's progress.'

How many times were those statements uttered about RVP by posters on this site? Ever heard the expression ' keep your words nice and soft coz you may have to eat them'? I can think of a number of posters who should be served with tonnes of humble pie, but i feel sorry for you so i wont throw your names around for today :)
On a similar but unrelated note, how are all the Nani haterz doing? I see the transfer window's closed and his stil here, plus, he got a match winning assist....:)

Millz

Believable20 Unbelievable6

Nani did indeed get his one corner of the season over the first defender!

Agree2 Disagree0

Well all I can say is this guy is a class act.Yes he had a poor Euros for Holland but as a forward you rely on service, he got little to feed off.He may have a dodgy injury record but so did Giggs many years ago it didn't stop him from being an all time Utd great.Fact is injuries happen and it is not always the player that can control it,often it's just bad luck.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm a Nani hater, I'm still here. He had a shocking game when he came on, gave the ball away a lot for someone who only played 20mins or so, delivered 3 poor corners, then 1 mediocre one which van Persie got a brilliant head to.

Jaxer

Agree0 Disagree0

Well done too nani for not messing up a corner for once 1 assist dosent make him all of a sudden amazing plus the corner was really that good as RVP to do all for the work for the header

FLASH

Agree0 Disagree0

Nani haters are still here and justified you lunatic. how can you defend him cause he got one thing right and messed up with passes, corners, moving inside when he was brought on to play wide and just generally annoying to watch. Hate the thought of him with us for another season. Thats 2 summers now we couldn't get rid of him.

Longshanksneary

Agree0 Disagree0

First corner nani put in right and im pretty sure he slipped a bit as he kicked it ha still he got past the first man a few times just a pitythey evaded the whole 18yd box too

Agree0 Disagree0

To sum up Nani did ok he helped us win that is no more than should be expected of him... Today it was good to be Nani end of

Pardoe

Agree1 Disagree0

I know he can be inconsistent and frustrating at times but 17 goals & 28 assists in the last 2 seasons in the league is as good as anyone.

I think you should maybe appreciate what we have incomparison to what's available in the market. Any winger who could be considered better than him would cost a fortune and come with a big risk.

Frustrating YES
Genuine Match winner YES

Agree1 Disagree0

Thank got we did get RVP in to 'block' Wellbeck and Chicha's progres! All three played a part tonight and only one showed why he is true class. And at £15-24m that's good value in my boo.

Don't get me wrong I like Wellbeck and Hernandez but neither is close to being good enough to make us better than City at this moment in time. Thank god when Rooney got injured...we had RVP to rely on!

Well played Scholes tonight - he really made the difference when he came on. Worrying that our CM pairing was not good enough to dominate Southampton until he came on

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

Jason Puncheon looked better than Nani.

Did everyone notice how when Nani passed the ball to a Soton player when he wasn't on the wave length of Evra, how Fergie turned around in disgust to our guys on the bench. It was like he needed to play him as we lacked other options, but he hated the fact he had to. That's why we have been pushing so hard for a Moura. Young is injury prone and not that good and Welbeck is no winger, looked poor today, very much like Borini does for Liverpool stuck on the right.

I hope we get to Jan in touching distance, ship out Nani (unless the Russian window is till open and I would take the hit now and try out some young guns), then get some quality on the left in the next window - I'd even rather Bebe out there than rat face.

Sween

Agree0 Disagree1

Congratulations Millz, you're the first person to leave your name on a post!, or are you actually Nani's mother?, come to think of it, if you are, do you fancy a game?, prob be more consistent than your son!lol

Charla

Agree0 Disagree0

I think my fellow Nani-haters have already answered your question.

If you gave ME 5 years worth of trying even I could put in a decent corner at some point!

Nani is crap. Always has been. Always will be but with the odd glimpse of flair that folks seem to latch onto as him being the next best thing.

As for the transfer window the pecularities of the Russian league mean he can still be sold there and Zenit St Petersburg are interested if posts here are accurate.

Lets hope his 'match winning assist' as you call it puts a few £s on his valuation.

I find it rather bizarre that you think a winger that can take a corner is so awe-inspiring. What next ? A striker who can score ? A goalie who can make a save ?

Halesini

Agree0 Disagree0

You don't need to throw my name around, I'll do it for you. And you can keep that humble pie, I'm allergic.

I still think that the 24m could have been better spent. Yes we wouldn't have had rvp to save us yesterday, but if we'd strengthened midfield properly, we may not have needed saving to begin with.

Having said that, he's here now so I'll have to content myself with having one of the best goalscorers around, rather than the cm I wanted us to get. Guess I can live with that ;-)

Thorne

Agree0 Disagree0

Millz

No doubt he is world class Van Persie but if he hadn't scored the two goals after his missed penalty would you have posted that?
Fikkle!

Simmo

Agree0 Disagree0

Personally my only worry of signing RVP was whether he could stay injury free as he is obviously a world class player.
As for Nani, frustrating as hell he really needs to bring consistency to his game, but I never in a million years thought he was goign in the transfer window, jsut like Anderson wasnt either. Dependant on how they do this season I think it may be an entirely different case come the next summer. And by the way was Anderson injured or something?
Invisible STuey

Agree0 Disagree0

Few if anyone doubted RVP's ability, we're only three games into the season though, is it a bit too soon to be crowing like this - much as I'm delighted with the start, I'd be cautious about tempting fate

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 19:31:09
Just watched the post match interviews with Ferguson and Van Persie. Both of them singled out, that the substitution of Scholes and he's contribution won the game.

Now last season when we were struggling, the same happened then. Scholes came back and chances on goal increased instantly. When Scholes didn't play, the effect was reversed again.

Now I'm not saying we don't need a central midfielder....we do. However unlike most posts, I believe we need another Scholes and not a defensive midfielder. We need that link between midfield and attack. I don't think either Anderson or especially Cleverley are the answer....short term or long term. Scholes had he's abilities from the days of reserve football till now.
The past few months we've listed countless midfielders in our wishlists....but none of them are a Scholes type of player. Witsel, Dembele are more defensive. As much as I hate to say this....we need a Sneidjer or a younger version. Someone who can deliver a ball from 50 to 60 yards to an attackers foot from any angle.....maybe that's why we never got that midfielder this summer. Fergie may have a list of these type of midfielders, yet none were available. Personally believe we will have to buy one, as we don't have a natural replacement for Scholes at the club, not even to the standard of that young Scholes from the Fledgling days.

Highland Pedro.

Believable19 Unbelievable3

Dembele is not a defensive midfielder

Agree0 Disagree0

I believe that kagawa is that player. We still need the defensive MF to support him

Dan

Agree0 Disagree0

Deffoo agree with you.

Best form of defence (Aspecially for United) is Attack !!

CalamityManc!

Agree0 Disagree0

Is it just me or can others see it as well.We need a ball winner,not just a long term Scholes replacement.We lose possession and it takes far to long to get it back against weak opposition.When the level of opponents get tougher the midfield will struggle more than they have in the games already played.

Agree1 Disagree0

Such players are rare and expensive. You're right about Cleverley though. He's a nothing player. No physical presence and no penetration. Everything goes sideways

Agree2 Disagree0

Being a life long Red it hurts me to say this. I saw a Paul Scholes type player this very day. His name is Joe Allen. Very good player. And the Scousers have got him

Red Snapper

Agree1 Disagree1

KAGAWA

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Rooney can fill scholes shoes and now that we have RVP i think we could afford to try it out. he defends, is full of energy and can go box to box, he can pass the ball and shoot from distance. i know its not his first choice but i think he is as close to a paul scholes as you will find

Longshanksneary

Agree1 Disagree2

Your right longshank roo cant tackle either but to be fair he played the role well when filling in there last season but for me he needs to be up top with rvp blackburn had the s.a.s but we have fatman and robin

Agree0 Disagree1

I agree with most of the posts. However Scholes is different. He's world class and can change a game with a single pass. He was nicknamed Satnav by fellow players because of he's ability to find a players foot from anywhere on the pitch. Sneidjer is of similar style and game. He was nicknamed Sniper because he had the same qualities as Scholes.
I belive a box to box midfielder is more important than a defensive one. We need another Scholes type player. We get another Scholes, we get the ball to him....he will find your killer pass to the forwards. The only player outside of the top 4, I see with a similar type od player is Newcastle United with Yohan Cabaye. Scores but has a good assist record.

Agree0 Disagree0

Completely agree with you about the need to replace scholes.

Watching the game today, i, like many of us were probably doing, was keenly observing the midfield, in which we were unfortunately outrun again today. posession was poor.

Since the start of the season iv been closely looking at exactly what the midfield roles are. So far it seems to me that we have one player that sits deep and plays a passing game in front of the back four. i think this is generally reffered to as playing "in the hole". Carrick was doing that today. Then the other midfielder (cleverly) is responsible for pressing high up the pitch, closing down and always being available for the short pass. Then there is an attacking midfielder (kagawa today) who recieves the ball with back to goal, spins off and sets off the attack, playing passes around the box. This system changed late in the game though when scholes came on. Him and carrick then played side by side. So there may be a few different combinations used for the central midfielders.

In todays game, i thought cleverly had another good game, bearing in mind his role isnt meant to be that expressive. High energy in opponents half, and effective short passes around the place. I thought kagawa was alright when it came to passing and shooting, but his first touch and control isnt a shadow of rooneys and i thought that was missed. late in the game van persie dropped back there instead and i thought we improved. For me the big problem thoughout the game however, was the player in front of the back four. Carrick does have the distribution skills, but his ability to close down just isnt there. The same is true too for scholes/giggs and anderson, who usually play here too. They are either too old (giggs/scholes) or naturally immobile (carrick) or overwieght (anderson.) Consequently given that cleverly is closing down high up the pitch, it means the area in front of our back 4 is only ever protected by a slow player that cant close down quickly. From what iv seen, that is the exact place opposition are dominating possession in at the moment, and its happening in every game irrespective of opposition quality. I really wish we would do something about it.
The exact type of midfielder i would guess we are looking for, is a very mobile type to guard the back four, but at the same time, the player also needs to be a playmaker in terms of distribution ability, like scholes carrick or anderson. Problem is, where do you find a player like that on the cheap? Dembele may be a good defensive midfielder but is his 15-30 yard passing all that good? I saw a few loose ones from him in tottenhams game yesterday. This may in fact be the problem that we had over the transfer window. There arent too many targets of this type. It seems witsel and modric were the only players we were solidly interested in. At the same time, until we do something about this, i think we will continue to labour through games in this present fashion.

Agree0 Disagree0

*Modric* would have been THE answer, just a shame he only had eyes for Real

Moutinho would make a decent 2nd choice but perhaps he is destined for Spurs in January

The 'top' players who play this role i.e. Xavi, Schweinsteiger, Pirlo are all unatainable for one reason or another...I repeat Modric would have been the perfect solution for us and I wanted us to sign him for the last 2 years

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

There are two players who could get close to Scholes level but there are massive question marks.

1 - Wilshere - before he got injured he looked incredible, reminded me of a young scholes but even more mobile, lacks the long ball, but if he comes back well then he would be ideal - doubt he would leave Arsenal.

2 - Joe Allen (as Red Snapper said), maybe lacks that attacking class, but his availability, vision and ability to find the right pass is almost unmatched in the premier league. He has looked class for the past 12 months, never heard of him before Swansea got promoted though.

I think Fergie saw this problem several years ago and wanted to mould Ramsey into the Scholes role, but he chose Arsenal and got injured, now he isn't half the player he was.

Also watching Arsenal today it was interesting to see Diaby, reminded me of YaYa, just a matter of his fitness staying there. Dembele is an attacking midfielder and his distribution is poor, but his dribbling, strength and power is quality, would have been great behind Kagawa with a good DM mopping up.

Sween

Agree0 Disagree0

There are only two players in the world can replace Paul Scholes and being both at Barca I see little chance of Xavi or Iniesta coming any time soon. I would agree with an extent to the naming of Kagawa. Think he can develop into the old Scholes role of an attacking play maker making great bursts into the box.
What we are obviously missing is a Keane/Robson type player. But Anderson/Cleverly/Jones certainly deserve the chance to fulffill this role. DOnt think Cleverly has started the season too well but he is technically very good, think he would be more effective if we played at a higher tempo as he moves the ball on very well. However back to the Keane/Robson type, more significantly we miss a leader of this type. There really isnt a captain/leader in our whole side like that. My only concern there is that the great Arsenal side of years back lost there leaders and although they have had many good players since, look what has happened
Invisible STuey

Agree0 Disagree0

Dembles a striker

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 19:18:44
Phew! Wow, that game was a rollercoaster!

Not to bring everyone down but I still feel as if there are some deep rooted problems in the squad.

1. Rafael and Evra are too small. Whenever we have a cross into our box I feel they are gonna score.

2. Carrick slows it down too much. Its fine to slow it down at times, but not when you need goals. It also contradicts Kagawa who tries to speed things up.

3. Welbeck needs to have a bigger impact on games.

4. Perhaps the most worrying, is that I don't seem to enjoy watching us play anymore. It's all well and good when we have an amazing comeback like today. But recently it seems as if every game is a frustrating struggle, I find myself constantly shouting at the TV. I don't know if this is just me, but we never dominate teams like we used to, or create as many chances.

But anyway, very happy in the end that we got the result and RvP was class (apart from the pen)

SB

Believable39 Unbelievable6

I agree with the 4th point, its a bit like watching England play atm

1993

Agree0 Disagree0

Couldnt agree more...I dont enjoy watching us anymore and Carrick slows us down when historically, we always played at a high tempo.

Dan

Agree0 Disagree0

SB, it's not just you, I haven't enjoyed watching us for a couple of years. Good in spurts but generally lacking pace and creativity.

AJH

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree with you on #4. It is painful at times, but we're a small step away from clicking, i think anyway. We're playing a new system, givem 'em time.

Totally disagree with you on #1 though. Don't think size is an issue. Evra is the same height he's always been and he was the best LB in the world at one point. Some of the best fullbacks are small..Carlos..not big. Rafael had a good game today. Fergie said they'd worked on back post corners in training, i bet that training didn't involve Rafael marking one of the biggest players out there.
Well, i thought he did ok anyway.

Great result anyway though.

RedMist

Agree0 Disagree0

Point 4 no it is not just you,many feel just as frustrated as you do. We can see the glaringly obvious problems and are unable to do anything about it.The defensive midfielder is there to protect the back four not seeing much protection going on at the moment.Might be nice to see a few ball winning tackles but that seems to be as rare as a clean sheet at the moment.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree, we seem to be very boring to watch alot of the time. We really needed to get a creative spark in CM that could pick a pass from nowhere... Fingers crossed for January :L

JK

Agree0 Disagree0

Re the shouting at the t.v dude i was the same i mean I was screaming "keep the king ball", "we are the ones in white". "will someone please take control of the midfield" and "why cant we defend the high balls?"

Agree1 Disagree0

Boring to watch? Did you see the game?

Caolán.

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree with #2 but the rest is rubbish carrick is not good enough should be ando and clevs all the way people who say they dont enjoy the games are being a little fickle would you rather exciting football every match or honours all we need is a little drive in the middle of the park if ando can stay fit i think he can be this guy would have liked dembele but we shown again today utd do not die and its this that has brought us 20 years of glory

Agree0 Disagree0

We play exactly like England, I have been saying it for ages. The problem is 4-5-1, with no quality on the left. This means that teams sit deeper and there is less space for Kagawa and RVP to operate. If Valencia does get to the by-line there is normally one or two options max in the box, with several defenders picking up. It is the same with Rooney or anybody else.

We attack through our full backs to open the space - which then means we are isolated and leads to teams being able to stroll past Carrick, etc, who are not mobile enough.

Another major problem is that Cleverley and Carrick are stepping on each other's toes we need just one player like that in there and unfortunately Cleverly doesnt have the stature and Carrick lacks mobility, (and a rocket up his back side when he has the ball). They both have slightly different roles, but it isnt penetrating enough. Look how the game changed when we went 4-4-2.

For CaolAin - everyone who watched this game would have been entertained, but it wasn't enjoyable, it was horrinbe how a team with only a couple of players most people have heard of were able to almost beat us and we didn't create too many chances yet again. I have said it before, but the fear has gone from teams playing against Utd and that fear has gone into the players that do play for Utd, it's all safety first. We need to release the shackles, go 4-4-2 and start attacking again, teams will soon have to change the way they play, once we start smashing the goals in again and terrifying defences.

Sween

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont understand all you Cleverley worshipers. He doesn't have the technical passing ability or footballing brain. He was schooled by a 17 year old in the Southampton midfield until he came off and then Scholes ran the show. I dont know why SAF doesnt play Ando instead of Clevs with Carrick. In the end we need to replace our centre mids entirely next summer when Scholes retires again.

Dan

Agree0 Disagree0

Never in a million years would of thought i would say this but i realy think its time for fergie to say good by and let some one younger take over. Im bored of the the same old problems not being addressed and to much loyalty being shown in average players (carrick, welbeck, evra, nani, anderson) to name a few! These players are simply average players who should not be in our first team. Why is it that we can see that but fergie seems blinded by that fact! To stubbern to admit he has bought rubbish and has been trying to polish turds for the last few years instead of being firm and getting rid of the players we are carrying and replacing them with quality. Sick of seeing us play the same old same old and nothing i have seen so far this season fills me with any hope of our style of football changing! We used to be the best team in this league playing the best football, who out there now reckons we play the best football??? Not many i reckon.

Agree0 Disagree0

Apart from the first point I would agree. Last couple of years we have tried to change the style of our play and it is too pedestrian.
Yesterday was a prime example, we played a possesion game but we were very slow moving the ball forward allowing the opposition to get back and make two walls of four to shut us out, and further on we were even being out pressed.
One of the best periods for me as a fan was watching us learn from the great Juventus team with our youngsters. We really learnt a hell of a lot about pressing the opposition and playing at a high tempo.
I dont see it as coincidence that it is when we go behind a end up chasing the game we generally start playing much better football, and interesting that yesterday as soon as we switched to more of a 4-4-2 and moved the ball forward quicker we scored goals.
I see little wrong with the squad that we have or our still never say die attitute, I would like to see us go back to being a bit more gung ho and playing and pressing at a much higher tempo.
Invisible STuey

Agree0 Disagree0

I totally agree SB, last season if we had played say wolves 3rd game of the season i would be 00% confident of a convicing win, yesterday i found myself at kick off wondering wether we could win after the start we had, yes we relied on RVP finishing and scolesys playmaking, iwe dont look like creating gscoring opportunities.
Our 3 goals were a pen, a corner and a good cross, what was worrying is no one- one ones against any of our opponents in the first 3 games. We are having to graft for goals instead of them coming naturally, hopefully we will see this improve after the international break.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree as the short passing was very off, as if it was still pre-season football. The style of play to much too slow with players stopping to look before passing (until no.22 arrived), Valencia didn't attack players and come inside he just went up wing to cross. Anderson and Cleverly are not the answer, as they have had time and not proved thier worth. I still think the twins should have both been sent out on loan, not just one, as I expect to see them get injured in every match ( its always the same) and I expect Buttner to get a chance to play both sides a lot during the season. We have not had a decent scoring midfielder since scholes and Dempsey might have been an option - 6million!.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree to an extent, we don't counter attack like we used to but then today's tactics teams just throw ten men behind the ball when they play us. What frustrates me is how we concede goals so easily. We ave most the ball then a team will have one chance and take it. Dont diss the boss tho he put us on the pedestal we sit today! Pity some of u don't remember the dark old days when we went 26years without the title

Agree0 Disagree0

Totally agree with point 4. we used to do it the "hard way" in style. now we just do it the hard , unattractive, jammy way. The midfield is a joke. Keane never replaced. Scholes, giggs, Ferdinand done. Last yr at aldersghot vidic was outpaced and booked 5 mins in, he has lost it for a while (hummels plz). We are totally inept of ideas , creativity. We are a stagnant team while the other prem teams are moving with the times. Southampton dominated us in midfield! I fuse all remember we never needed a 30 goal striker cos all our goals came from midfield. not any more. GOOD BUYS BUT we should have signed tiote,(a little terrier) and hummels and probably took a chance on a kaka loan. How many player of ours in midfield would our rivals want? anderson..no, carrick..no, nani..no

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 19:15:25
First of all an apology for the Eds who are now trawling through several 'we need a new midfielder' posts.

If it were not for RVPs touches of class though we would be staring down the barrel of 3 points from 3 games though having played thus far, lets face it, average competition.

I appreciate we have new players to bed in which will take time however a 38yo Scholes will not be there to bail out our midfield in every game of a 60 game season if we are going to contest on all 4 fronts.

Clearly Fergie believes our 'central' midfield has enough werewithall in Scholes, Giggs, Carrick, Cleverley, Fletcher, Anderson and Jones.

Thats hardly a midfield that would put the fear of God into Barca or Real though is it regardless of what combination you pick.

Long way to go yet and clearly we will improve. However we should be looking at Cabaye or Moutinho to have a midfield name that opposition players would genuinely be wary of.

I hope we are in for either in the January window by which time hopefully Nani has packed his bags to help finance any moves given I think we've already spent our allotted transfer monies for the year.

Halesini

Believable10 Unbelievable1

02 Sep 2012 15:29:48
Abit of a shock seeing Rio back in the line up. I'd have thought Evans would have been closer to full fitness. Well defensively on paper we look much stronger. It'll be interesting to see how Kagawa RVP and Welbeck link up. Looking forward to the kick off.

Shappy

Believable7 Unbelievable3

I know Lindergard needs games but dropping De Gea is a mistake for 2 reasons...

1. he is better than lind
2. it may have an adverse effect on his confidence.

Agree1 Disagree0

Totally agree think its a bit rough on him he made one mistake otherwise some of his saves where top notch, vidic didnt get dropped but then thats why fergies the boss
cantona's legal team

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with dropping De Gea for this game. Fergie was definitely taking Southampton's style of play into consideration. Lindergard is the better keeper against teams with a dangerous areal target man.

A proper talk with De Gea should settle his confidence. He has to know where his weaknesses are and until that is sorted he may not play all games.

KB

Agree0 Disagree0

I wonder if we will lose this game cause of our midfield and defence ?

Agree0 Disagree0

If it was not for RVP we would of lost the game. we can see from this game our midfield is not up to standard of Manchester Utd.

Agree1 Disagree0

Well you got youre answer - shocking - we will win nothing this year

Agree0 Disagree0

Quite right. There was the argument again for top class midfielders.

Agree1 Disagree0

Disappointing today think rvp might get a clip round the ear for the penalty but win is a win in the end. couple more games we will be up to speed

Agree0 Disagree0

Dropping De Gea on account of southamptons use of the diagonal ball worked well for their first goal didn't it?
De Gea has been one of the better players so far this season IMO. How many would we have conceded against Everton if not for him?

Van Persie is exactly what we needed, someone to score goals when it counts. He made up for the penalty miss.

We still need a strong midfielder, I like cleverley but he was absent for me today.

Agree1 Disagree0

Too many 7/10 of players at Utd, we lack genuine World Class, only really RVP fits into that mould, Kagawa has looked good but was poor today. What was with the dwelling on the ball by Carrick all about, playing at the back has made him even slower with the ball, if that were possible?!

It's going to be a long hard season, just hope Chelski suffer now after their loss on Friday, shame the Intl break has come along though. Come on UTD, we need more assertiveness.

Sween

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes it is 3 points but still worrying that the game is transformed by the substitution of a 38 year old (albeit a genius). Then there is time, vision and telling passes. I thought up to then Carrick was in dreamland, Cleverley lacking in creativity and Valencia obsessed with staying on the touchline and banging in long balls (though one did come off). Why does there seem to be no pace in attack? Why are so many passes sideways or backwards? Why can't we counter teams that think they will overrun us in midfield and bully a goal or two? Answers on a postcard to SAF.

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't think RvP will get a clip round the ear at all, yes he missed the penalty but you can only praise him after that game for he won it for us. Clinical finishing i think even Rooney would not have been capable of.

Ozwald

Agree0 Disagree0

Am I the only united fan in the world that thinks welbeck is utter toilet?
I know Nani's inconsistent and possibly still going but he should have started today. Welbeck is worse on the left than he is up front.

Agree1 Disagree1

I agree with this anonymous post above ^. I honestly believe that welbeck is an over rated player, Hernandez is 10 times better IMO.

But other than that yes I agree we need a new midfielder, but there's no point moaning about it now, we ain't going to get one now until at least the January transfer window (probably next summer).

And fergusons done it time and time again we will win the title this year!

Agree0 Disagree0

Oswald he will get a clip round the ear you dont take penalties like that when 2-1 down yes he pulled us out the proverbial but had he not he would have got a boot kicked at him

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Welbeck has been improving his all round game, as part of that process he is going to look a bit ropey from time to time. Also doesn't help being stuck on the left where his languid movement isn't suited. Hernandez will be a very useful Robbins/Solskjaer player, but nothing more his game is just pace, but I didnt like how that Soton centre half, Hoogvield or something caught him so easily. I think his injuries have cost him his major asset, maybe?

Sween

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 15:14:39
Team

Lindergard
Rafael, Vidic, Ferdy, Evra
Carrick, Cleverly
Valencia, Kagawa, Welbeck
RVP

Ste-Utd

Believable6 Unbelievable2

I really don't like when Welbeck is played out on the wing. When we are playing with only one striker and Welbeck isn't breaking into that spot I think we have better options than him out on the wing.

Agree2 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 15:02:58
Any good links for todays game guys?

Macca!

Believable0 Unbelievable2

Go to vipbox and click on the football link usually get a decent stream
johndenton

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Sep 2012 14:58:09
hey guys I am over here in Thailand, can u give me a reliable live streaming link for the game pls

Believable0 Unbelievable3

01 Sep 2012 20:00:49
Eds do you know of any present interest to sign Nani before the close of the Russian transfer window?

Dan {Ed002's Note - Zenit remain interested.}

Believable0 Unbelievable1

After his performance today i hope its true,other than the cross for the winner he did absolutely nothing
johndenton

Agree0 Disagree0