10 Jul 2025 19:32:27
Rumours that garnacho is allowed back to team training. if this is even remotely true then what are we playing at?

1.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 20:29:43
Surely that can’t be true! Maybe he’s at Carrington training away from the 1st team like Rashford!

2.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 20:44:39
One wonders whether the club is struggling to get rid of Garnacho and Rashford, and perhaps Amorim is subsequently the subject of a good ol' fashioned commercial noogie.

3.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 21:05:24
Not team training, he and the others are allowed to use the facilities at Carrington if they wish.

4.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 21:09:16
Two days into pre season and Amorims authority is already undermined.

Might as well bring back Sancho and Rashford.

The club should already be planning for a mid season managerial change around october/ november time.

5.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 21:09:17
I guess we’re playing at all kids are going to make mistakes, perhaps the club are finding no value in the market to replace him, maybe nobody wants to buy him, and he’s a contracted player for Man Utd, an exciting youth product and human who’s not to be discarded to the waste?

6.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 21:25:51
Maybe nobody a-calling is the dose of reality Garnacho's big ego needs. There are aspects of his game which are excellent for a younger player.

7.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 21:50:24
Out of the 5 i'd have garnacho back. He does actually work for the team. He just needs to stop leaking stuff to his brother and knuckle down. He's going to be a very good player when it all clicks.

8.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 21:51:23
When were garnacho rashford and sancho banned from 1st team training?
5 players were granted extended leave 1 week to work on finding a new club.
At no time did amorim or the club as far as I'm aware say they were not welcome to train after that extra weeks leave.
2 others were granted extended leave in bruno and dalot due to the death of their close friends and intl team mate.
When was it said by anyone that they were not welcome back after their extended week?

9.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 21:54:17
Not sure that he can be just told not to turn up. Not sure how that plays with employment law. He hasn't been sacked so?

I don't see the problem with it.

10.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 22:17:16
Looking at some of the OAP free transfers we are being linked with like Ndidi, Vardy, Wilson etc. I’d probably stick with Garnacho too.

11.) 10 Jul 2025
10 Jul 2025 22:51:24
Who from the club has linked us with any of those fallguy.

12.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 04:47:06
He is a United player currently so every right to be at the club until he is no longer a club employee, not really anything to get so excited about, makes zero difference, in fact might be a benefit, he will be gone soon enough.

13.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 06:29:48
Nobody directly from the club has linked us. But when does the club directly say anything about any non United player.

Reports could all be BS, but that’s no different to most rumours out there around United.

14.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 07:58:25
Ken

Well reported that Rashford turned up at Carrington but was not permitted to train with main group, trained on his own with a coach. Widely reported the five are not going to train with Amorims main group.

{Ed077's Note - His "dream" is to play with Yamal at Barca, so why would we make him have a "nightmare at Carrington" ?

15.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 08:21:46
Redman rashford was given a weeks grace. He was not part of the team training as a result.
Nowhere has the club said all this 5 players could not come back training next week.
I doubt they really want them in the team group. This way those 5 can come back next week and as they are a week behind not join the 1st team training and tour.
At no time has there been any word from the club that they cannot come back training next week.
Reported by whom redman?
Why is it that people believe some ridiculous press reports and then call clickbait when it suits them?
Nothing from the club on this so why believe the daily star?

16.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 12:40:56
Ken

I don’t read the Daily Star but I do read Manchesters main evening newspaper. Maybe try it.

As an example they reported today Rashford drove into Carrington on Thursday to train on his own again.
He arrived at 4.47pm, eight minutes after Ruben Amorim had departed.

17.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 12:46:48
I don’t consider it unreasonable to allow him access to the club training/ gym facilities so long as he, and others aren’t connecting with team training. He’s still an employee and an athlete needs to train.

18.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 13:42:14
Fizz

No problem they can train separately at Carrington, they are not banned just separated from the main group.

19.) 11 Jul 2025
11 Jul 2025 15:27:33
I appreciate we want Rashford to move on, but it’s in the clubs interest that he stays fit and healthy…. plus I don’t get all this hatred for Rashford, some fools even saying he not worth 40m when you have likes of Kudos MGW even Erlanga going for more!
Weird the way some minds work and the biased views instead of logic
Yes Rashford gone backwards last couple of seasons, but he got the ability to be much better than the above 3 named that’s for sure.
I get people think he downed tools, maybe he did maybe he got other problems, we have no idea….

20.) 12 Jul 2025
12 Jul 2025 05:36:20
Totally agree German.

I for one would love to see a motivated and fit Rashford play for us. he's our best finisher still. I’d say the same for Garnacho - much
more raw, but has a higher ceiling.

I’d say the same about any of our exiles - tube demand for shiny new signings is always there. Perhaps we look closer to home a little - all these players improved when they left us temporarily (Sancho, Rash, Antony) . Is it all on them, or the culture and toxic environment of our club on the whole right now?

{Ed077's Note - Sancho improved so much that Chelsea paid a compensation fee to not buy him. And Rashford did so well at Villa that they've been banging on the door for him ? ???

21.) 12 Jul 2025
12 Jul 2025 09:05:46
Eric

If we want to go backwards then re integrate Rashford Sancho and co. They are one of the main reasons we have become a laughing stock. I suspect in the Woodward days they would have been pushed back in the squad and the manager would have to get on with it until the sack inevitably arrived.

Garnacho saddens me but his attitude is all wrong so I support the managers call on him too. Whilst it wasn’t confirmed where leaks came from the rumours certainly focussed on him.

No more lily livered hand wringing molly coddling of these self interested supposed top players. Open heart surgery, get them out.

22.) 12 Jul 2025
12 Jul 2025 09:37:41
None of them were banned from training, they were given extra time off to sort out moves away. Unfortunately due to various factors including their own greed that hasn't happened.

Now the club can't actually ban a player from training, they are legally obligated to provide training for players as part of the players contract. At best they can come to a mutual agreement that the player trains elsewhere.

Also they need to be able to stay in shape to help facilitate their moves away. Clubs will be less inclined to sign a player who hasn't trained in months and will likely require a month or two of special-ist training to get them into shape to be able to play at the highest level.

We just need to be able to move these players on ASAP, for the best of everyone involved.

23.) 12 Jul 2025
12 Jul 2025 16:38:04
Ed007 Rashford doesn't want to go to villa.

{Ed077's Note - Villa haven't "wanted" him back either ?

24.) 13 Jul 2025
13 Jul 2025 09:04:45
We keep talking about the open heart surgery. It’s behind the scenes and those in charge that need it the most. We have no money, we’re stuck with these players unless we sell them cheaply, which the club won’t do as it’s a business fist not a football club.

I’m telling you now - stick £5 on Rashford staying put.