18 May 2026 15:07:36
Has everyone seen the latest Cas post on FB?
You don’t wear the shirt, you carry it.
Looks like it is an advert to attract his replacement.
Manchester United banter 10
Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.
18 May 2026 14:10:46
Priorites now must be 2 midfielders, lm still not sure about a CB, Heaven, Martinez, Yoro, DeLigt and Maguire. Maguire isn't good enough, DeLigt's injuries, but the recent Op might solve his issue. Martinez has been the same since his injury but might need a good preseason, and the 2 young lads have great potential. We have option up top with a few combinations but do we need a other CF, not sure.
I think our defence still give away too many chances, not sure if that is because of midfield or full backs. What I will say is we did good business last summer, hopefully this will be the same. There are a lot of players to leave and sell on, so very busy summer ahead.
18 May 2026 14:54:08
I'd love to see us get someone like Murillo. But raiding Forest for both him and Anderson might be too much!
I'd classify it as Musts, Shoulds and Coulds.
Absolute musts are a right back and a centre midfielder.
Shoulds are a left back, centre back, another CM.
Coulds are another forward player, a third CM.
Those move depending on sales. Selling Zirkzee, for instance, makes that forward player move up the priority list.
18 May 2026 15:02:29
Fwiw, we give up a lot of chances because we play counter attack. It can be exciting when done right, like PSG and Bayern do, but we do so in an uncontrolled way, where we just play a low block and surrender possession.
It works great when we get the first goal, but it comes a cropper when we have to chase a game. It's the argument several of us have made about Carrick's style, but hopefully good recruitment will allow a style he hasn't shown this far.
17 May 2026 23:31:52
I made one prediction at the beginning of the year and that was that we would score 65+ goals.
We actually let in fewer goals than last season despite shipping 50 this time around. Still too many, but all in all it's a 26 goal difference swing. It's clear where we need to improve if we want to be title contenders.
Obviously plaudits go to Cas and Bruno, but outside those two my player of the season is Luke Shaw. He's taken a lot of stick for being injured, which you can hardly blame him for - I doubt that was his preference - but this year he's come back.
He's started every EPL game. What he's been lacking is a good left wing in front of him. In the last few games he's shown what he can brings to the attack. Two of his crosses led to goals v Liverpool, and he scored today. He needs back up next year, but I'm pleased he seems to have put his injury woes behind him.
18 May 2026 00:22:01
I think Shaw has been poor this year, and he needed to get forward more to overlap Cunha.
I am not a fan of his, and so I accept that maybe I am being a little harsh. But I think he is very overrated by some fans.
I started the season frustrated by both Shaw and Dalot.
Dalot has won me over a little more than Shaw. We will need a lot of money spent in cm this summer, and we need a backup striker. I don't see much money left for fbs, although they are 2 areas we need to improve to challenge.
18 May 2026 08:12:36
Shaw, imo, is average at best.
Just not mobile or quick enough. Ok defensively, but awful in final third.
His contribution offensively is negligible. If he is one of our neatest crossers of a ball, we are in real trouble.
Dalot is the dame. 2 average Joe's.
18 May 2026 10:59:22
They need to be backup, at best.
18 May 2026 11:10:30
I am not mad on Luke Shaw, but I would take him over Dalot any day of the week.
18 May 2026 11:13:34
Can't disagree, but... they're not the priority.
Centre midfield needs a team and squad upgrade, and at least one centre back has to come first if the club are working on a set budget.
Ederson and Anderson (or Tonali or Bruno G) would be incredible, plus drafting in a younger player either from within or elsewhere to make up the squad.
Rogers as a mobile forward would be outstanding business - can we leverage Rashford if Barca are not coughing up the dough?
Centre back I'm less clear on options!
18 May 2026 12:55:12
If we want to close the gap on the top teams, we need to be ruthless. The full back positions don't just need depth, they need players who can start.
Shaw has had little to no competition since he arrived. He's had Telles, Williams, Malacia and Dorgu, none of whom pushed the envelope.
Same with Dalot. We've had a year with Valencia, Darmain, Wan Bissaka and Mouzroui.
Dalot even went to Milan for a year.
These lads are 6 out of 10, and not bad in a pinch, but they are definitely upgradable, and, if we're being honest, full backs need to be more than solid at the back. An assist from either is rare, and top teams have full backs that can do damage further up the pitch.
18 May 2026 13:56:12
Midfield and full back should def be our priorities. Get upgrades in those areas, and this team will be a lot better imo.
18 May 2026 14:50:01
Playing LCB in Amorim's system, Shaw had no remit to go forward, and was playing a new position. Even in a 4 at the back system, he's had no regular LW to work with. Cunha can play on the left, but he's not an out and out winger, more of an adapted second striker or #10. Nor do we know what his instructions were.
To sum up, both managers thought so little of him that they started him every game. I'm not saying there aren't better LBs out there, but we don't have one in our squad. For the year as a whole, he's shown himself to be a consistent and absolute professional.
18 May 2026 18:02:54
He has been consistent, no doubt about it. A consistent aberration. In the last 11 years, we have not mounted 1 league challenge.
Not blaming Shaw alone for that, but he has been a constant in the squad. Like Maguire, they will take you so far, but not to the top level.
17 May 2026 20:54:39
I'm too old to be a fan boy, and I don't get overly attached to players.
But genuinely feel quite sentimental about Casemiro leaving.
The guy's just pure class, on and off the field.
17 May 2026 22:08:16
Yep, what a guy. Been incredible since he announced he was going too, not one ounce of relaxing to end of season. 100% effort for the fans.
17 May 2026 23:06:26
He seems to be an all round good guy. Great pro, and he has been true to his word.
18 May 2026 00:09:30
We will miss him hugely next year. He scored many important goals, was a calming influence on the team, and you can see how well he and Mainoo dovetailed in midfield. His experience has a value beyond price. A true legend, and, above all, loved Utd, the fans and the city.
17 May 2026 17:13:20.
Well, both teams should have scored more, Bryan certainly should have a hat trick to his name.
It became a bit like a basketball match towards the end and certainly should of satisfied those who want to be entertained above all else.
Lammens pulled of a couple of good stops and certainly has had a first season of high promise, seems to be an excellent signing. Both full backs had decent games, Shaw took his goal really well. Licha moved the ball well but I would like to see a top quality CB come in this summer.
What to say about Bruno, equalling the assist record and it should of been at least 3 today. Kobbie, I thought was good, particularly first half. Casemiro had a steady final OT game, would love to see his replacement be Anderson who looks top quality, he had a very good game and his crossing was excellent.
It's said he is nailed on for City and if so hope we go for Mateus Fernandes, he looks a top prospect, cheaper if West Ham go down, but have to say would love to see Spurs make the drop.
Obvious delight at Bryan scoring, as said, he should have had 3. Cunha also looked good running at them, he does have that air of unpredictability about him. Whilst Amad was better today, a return of 2 goals and 2 assists all season is not good enough. He will have to significantly improve next season or he could be on his way.
A reasonable overall performance today, but we must improve defensively next season, 66 goals scored so far this season is excellent, 3rd highest in league but 50 conceded, far to many. Forwards win you matches but your defenders win you leagues.
17 May 2026 18:02:35
Agree with most of what you say, but defensively, our full backs, like most of the season, have not stopped crosses enough. Our bench is weak, and we need backup for Sesko.
17 May 2026 18:10:28
Anderson looked very special. If there is a chance, United shouldn't bulk at the fee and go all in on him.
17 May 2026 18:25:01
Anderson came and found Carrick for a post game hug. Didn't look like a nailed on City player to me. He would be a very good replacement for Cas.
17 May 2026 18:45:47
I think Anderson looked very good today.
We've got to at least go for him.
If not, I'd go all in for Tonali or Guimares at Newcastle. (Plus 1-2 others). I like the idea of two top additions, and Hackney, who has been mentioned before.
Ugarte and Zirkzee both undoubtedly off too, so we do need another forward. Maybe Carrick and Rashy can make up, and help him build bridges here, if Barca don't buy him.
17 May 2026 19:13:16
Anderson was very good. Would love him at United, but if City come calling, I'd imagine he's off there.
I wouldn't be sad to see Amad move on this summer. Seems a good lad, but if the aim is to challenge for top honours, he is way below the standard needed.
But, as there are many other spots needed more urgently, he will have another year to show the drastic improvement needed.
17 May 2026 20:58:00
DodgyBanter, really hope you turn out to be right re Anderson, would love to see him at O.T. next season. If we did buy him at the rumoured £120m, I can't see another 2 midfielders coming in.
Another midfielder I like is Ederson of Atalanta. I think he is an excellent defensive No 6. It's rumoured we are in discussions with his agent. Given his contract situation, he is supposedly available for £40m. That would be perfect for us, as it's said we have allocated £150m for the purchase of midfielders. I would bite your hand off for those two and not worry about a third.
If we could get Nico Schlotterbeck for centre back at about £60m (I know he has just signed a new contract, but give it a try), and another player we are supposedly keen on, Morgan Rogers for £80m, that would be a total of £300m. A total I think we will spend.
If any monies from sales could be spent also, then I would go for full backs. If only one could be bought, then a right sided one.
Think that would give us a very good base to move on with.
Reckon this buying of players is quite easy really. Don't know what all the fuss is about!
17 May 2026 21:11:01
Anderson hugging Carrick is not nec significant.
Can't see us signing him and Ederson.
If I were Anderson, and had the chance to be schooled by Pep, I would go to City, knowing I would come out a better player.
With Villa in the Champions League again, I think Rogers will stay there for one more season. He is in a settled team who play him to his strengths with an excellent manager.
17 May 2026 22:00:24
Do you think Pep will be there much longer? One more year at most, one more week possibly.
17 May 2026 22:49:13
Rather Anderson than Baleba + Rogers.
Spend your money wisely on the right player that we need.
17 May 2026 22:50:37
Salford, is Pep going to be there, though? Even if so, it will only be for 1 more season.
Why would we not sign Anderson and Ederson? It's pretty clear we are certainly going for 2 midfielders, and they would complement each other with differing styles.
As for Rogers, he may well stay, but, seemingly, to comply with Financial Regulations, Villa will have to sell a big-ticket player to enable them to refresh their squad.
M.C. is looking for a left-sided player, and knows him from his Middlesbrough days, and Wilcox played a role in his development at City, so he is known by them, and, equally, Rogers knows them. Also, Rogers has the flexibility to play in different positions and could cover Bruno Fernandes, if needed. You can see why there is interest in him from the club.
Time will tell.
17 May 2026 23:09:50
Rodgers is multifunctional, and would be a great addition, imo. Anderson is fantastic.
I think Pep will jump ship, and if he does, things could get tricky there. I'm not sure he will head to City, I think we will get him. But if his mind is made up on City, we need to move on quickly.
17 May 2026 23:31:42
The game was entertaining, but it was because they could play with freedom.
Maguire is dipping, and Licha was far superior to him yesterday. We will need to continually assess his form over the coming season. He cannot be first choice.
Amad, I have said before, is not up to it. Maybe he needs a goal to break the dip, let's see. If he is happy with squad status, which I think he will be, then keep him for another season.
Yes, the FBs were good yesterday. Keep them as back ups for another season, unless we have takers for them.
It was good to see Mount come on and do a job, and not get injured. More of the same against BHA, and hopefully someone comes in for him too.
Glad Mbeumo got a goal, he needed that.
18 May 2026 09:01:37
Amad feels half a yard off the pace right now.
There's a good player in there still - so let's not abandon him just yet.
18 May 2026 11:21:08
There are at least 5-10 players that need to go before Amad.
He's not had a great season, but let's not forget what he did the season before. He was, by far, our best attacking option with 11 goals and 6 assists.
I would definitely keep him as a back up for Mbeumo, and it will also keep Mbeumo on his toes, knowing that Amad is pushing him for a start in the first 11.
18 May 2026 16:42:14
Totally agree, Simo, keep Amad for another season, but he will have to realise he is a squad player. Mbeumo should be left to play his proper position on the right hand side. As soon as we started messing about with him as a striker, his output and form fell right off.
Not sure how Amad will react, I suspect not well, but if so it cannot be helped. His reaction will say much as to his real character.

17 May 2026 07:39:01
{Ed's Note - YoungBlue2001 has posted a new article entitled, A Supporter’s Case Against the SFA’s Standards
16 May 2026 17:54:21
Does anyone think we should have a look at Goretkza? He's a free agent, and he could add some valuable experience to this squad. Not saying he would be a started, but as 1 of the supposed 3 CMS we are looking to add, would be a good bit of business.
16 May 2026 19:06:35
Probably 4 years too late, but if he can bolster the squad I'm not hating it.
16 May 2026 19:44:22
Yeah, true Jim, but he's only 31, so could still deliver for a couple of seasons. Plus, he can pass on his knowledge to some of the younger players. He's won the lot. You always need a few older heads to keep the young ones in check. As a free, I think it could be a good bit of business.
16 May 2026 20:45:26
We need to churn 14+ players, and will need some free transfers this and next summer to accelerate the churn. But we also need to bolster the squad.
I like to look at the players who are expiring next summer, as there is a potential opportunity to obtain a player at a relatively low price.
Laimer, as an example, is expiring next summer and is currently in a contract dispute, so maybe he is worth a go at improving our right back position.
16 May 2026 21:19:17
Wasn't he looking for crazy wages?
16 May 2026 21:59:43
I think so, Eric, if you are referring to Laimer. Although crazy wages at Bayern might be okay at Utd. Especially if we can maybe gift them Mount. ?
17 May 2026 07:37:51
We've made some silly signings of older players in recent years, most of whom were mistakes, and I don't see that happening again. We need a top player, maybe 2, to replace Cas, and we need squad depth, but I hope that isn't ageing free transfers. I'll say again, Hackney would be a shrewd signing.
17 May 2026 11:27:58
Agree Ajh,
Younger players, not old ones at the tail end of their careers, are needed. Cas has been a special player, and Laimer is nowhere near as good. Ideally, we get players in the age range 23 to 26 who will be coming into their peak years, and then supplement with youth team players and bed them in for the future.
17 May 2026 11:44:12
It depends on his wages.
17 May 2026 11:45:35
Ajh,
I agree with you about Hackney. Sadly. I don't see it materialising.
17 May 2026 12:23:40
Depending on wages and length of contract, as the third midfield signing to add some experience, he wouldn't be a bad signing.
Something like a two year deal with a third year option, on reasonable wages, and on the understanding that he won't necessarily be first choice (and he's happy with that).
But at his age, I'd expect he will be looking for either a massive wage or guaranteed being first choice. He's leaving Bayern, so maybe he wants both a high wage and guarantees that he'd be first choice. It's not like he'll be on low wages already.
I'd imagine if he's happy to be paid well as a back up, then he'd probably opt to stay at Bayern. The fact he's leaving suggests otherwise.
I agree that Hackney could be a really smart signing. Low fee, homegrown, and he has been the best player in the Championship this season (a league that is a good testing ground for potential EPL signings). He's also worked under Carrick before, and he has the ability to be that ball dominant, controlling midfield profile that we are missing.
17 May 2026 12:27:45
Laimer would be for right back, and he is a significant upgrade on Dalot.
17 May 2026 18:04:32
If Carrick really thought Hayden was good enough, you would have thought that, having been his manager before, he would have had an edge in signing him.
16 May 2026 17:12:38
Possibly United related: I'd like to know how Chelsea can cope financially with no European or World football. Last year they posted record revenues of £490m which will presumably drop by >£100m in the coming season.
Their payroll and amortization squad cost will pretty much consume all of that. The FA cap is 85%. Are they going to have to sell players? If so, other than Garnacho, who would you want to buy?
16 May 2026 19:04:10.
Would consider.
Colwill - Martinez replacement.
Enzo - one of 3 CMs we need.
Palmer - Bruno understudy.
Joao Pedro - back up/rotation for Sesko.
Estevao - consider letting Amad go to make space.
16 May 2026 19:09:26
Enzo and Caicedo would be nice.
Reece James would also be good, although injured a bit recently.
They actually have some decent players in that group, but the group is massive. It is difficult to really see a player in the spotlight regularly, as they are switched out the following game.
16 May 2026 21:20:11
Enzo, Caicedo, Cucurella and James. Yes please.
17 May 2026 05:27:52
'Other than Garnacho' sounds like you'd want him back.
17 May 2026 10:21:19
Caicedo and James, absolutely. I steer miles away from Enzo. Too many issues surround him. Gusto, I like too. Hato and Andrey Santos. Basically, Chelsea's midfield is excellent, the rest is very hit and miss.
16 May 2026 06:41:55
With growing rumours the Glazer loving Ineos numpties are to appoint Carrick, some points.
If the club had conducted a thorough review, the answer would not be Carrick.
I think it is a huge mistake, there are far better out there but the club seems unable to free itself from comfortable emotional thinking despite saying they want best in class.
Will it be head coach or manager, will he have significant influence in player purchase? Suspect coach and some to little influence.
If it is a 2 year deal I hope they agree a low compensation figure for when they have to sack him, likely mid season, I suspect second year.
I will support the team as I have always done but believe the ownership must change.
Glazers and Ineos out asap.
Carrick would have to show more than he has ever done in his very brief career to make me believe in him.
Opposition fans are happy if we appoint Carrick.
I once said LvG should only have been appointed to prepare for Pep. Given Carrick and Holland influence is it prep for Southgate?
The club have an avowed intention to win the league in 2028, appointing Carrick means they think he can. I hope I am wrong, I hope he is running around OT with the trophy but I just can’t see it.
If this goes wrong, as I fear it will, Wilcox at least and if he also agreed with it, Berrada must also be sacked.
16 May 2026 09:08:16
Red Man, you are a long standing, well respected poster, and I really enjoy engaging with you, but posting pretty much the same thing again and again. Come on, we get it.
The poll suggests a 50 50 split, and many of those who are accepting of Carrick are not massively enthusiastic about it, but don't see any exciting alternatives.
You say there are far better out there, and I don't doubt Iraola is currently a better coach, but how would he cope in the goldfish bowl of United? Everyone is a risk, nobody excites me right now.
16 May 2026 09:15:10
Jeez!
The Carrick out bandwagon is already at full throttle.
I really hope he does well, otherwise the I told you so brigade will be unbearable!
16 May 2026 09:31:53
AJH
Thank you, and I understand. I am not Carrick out, can't be yet, he is a temp with temp contract ending soon. I am frustrated with the club, very frustrated. Once he is officially appointed, I just have to see what happens, like the rest of us, hence why I posted that for the last time now before appointment.
Once appointed, he gets the same judgement on performance as every other manager.
16 May 2026 09:54:54
You can't be Carrick out, Red Man, if you can't stand him even getting the job.
It's ridiculous at this stage.
You speak as someone who has all the answers.
If Berrada, Wilcox, Vivell et al collectively know less than a poster on this site, then the club is truly screwed.
But my guess is that they know plenty more, and we will be absolutely fine.
It is much more important that we get the recruitment right.
Carrick may only be a short-term placeholder until a better manager becomes available, or he may surprise us all and do well.
Either way, recruitment has to be on point because that is the key.
We have messed up recruitment for too long now, but in recent windows it looks as though we have turned a corner, and that's down to these so-called 'INEOS clowns'.
16 May 2026 10:09:08
I'm not particularly keen on Carrick getting the full-time role, but I agree there isn't a standout alternative. My biggest concern is that it feels expectations are dampened a bit with Carrick. The two-year contract and 'no one else better' mentality have almost written the excuses if things don't go well.
16 May 2026 10:32:19
Why would Carrick/Hopland be laying the groundwork for Southgate, lol. When they could just appoint Southgate now, seeing as he is available, lol.
16 May 2026 12:52:23
I don't think there is any way they could not offer Carrick the job. I think we were 7th, maybe 8th, when he took charge, and now we are sitting 3rd, with ECL guaranteed and probably 3rd place as well. Not bad for a temp!
He has used the current squad as well as anyone could expect, and in fact probably exceeded what we thought was possible from this group of players.
I get the "not so ecstatic" feeling of most, I am the same, but could anyone seriously come up with a viable alternative?
Iraola, I think, looking at what happened to Thomas Frank, big fish, small bowl to small fish, big bowl, will have swayed the chance away from Iraola.
I for one will be hoping that he continues on the upward trajectory of Utd, as he continues to learn what it takes to achieve as a Utd manager.
16 May 2026 13:49:26
I'm in total agreement, JR.
I'm not expectant, and I think the odds are against him. But I am very hopeful.
There are a lot of questions Carrick has to answer, and there are gaps in his CV.
But he has answered every question asked of him so far.
He can only answer the questions as they arise, and so far he has done that.
I have doubts, but he has already answered some of those doubts.
I don't see any other obvious stand out contenders.
If Carrick can consolidate 3rd next season, and get closer to the top 2, and do well in the cups, I would see that as good progression.
If he doesn't succeed, and we slip away, and the football is uninspiring, then they will sack him, simple as that.
I will remain hopeful until there is damning evidence to the contrary. At this point, I see no evidence to the contrary, and I see more green flags than red.
16 May 2026 15:45:31
Let's be honest, the odds are against any and every manager we could appoint.
We are a massive club that has fallen well off the pace, and we have a fan base with expectations far beyond what any manager can realistically achieve, especially with our current squad.
For any manager to be a success at our club will take the stars aligning.
We will need to buy and sell the right players at the right time for the right amount of money. That probably means another 10 players leaving at least, and another 10 coming in to replace them just to have a squad capable of challenging for the biggest honours on all fronts. While, at the same time, we will need 80% of our current young squad to step up and actually reach their full potential.
While, if we are honest, any new manager will have a limited say on transfers, and young players reaching their potential is far more down to what they do than to the manager.
On top of all that, you need the opposition to present you with the chances needed, and a big old slice of luck in terms of cup draws, fixture lists and injuries.
The main reason we have failed over the past decade is because we have been expecting too much from the manager; we expect another Sir Alex.
Someone who can do everything and solve everything by themselves. Yet we forget that Sir Alex wasn't always that man; he grew into the greatest manager with us. But we are expecting someone to come and immediately be what it took Sir Alex 15 years to become.
Every single managerial candidate has issues that, we can argue, make them a poor (or lacking) choice.
Every single candidate would need to grow into the role, and to be successful they will need the right team and structure around them.
Carrick isn't the sexy choice, but that doesn't mean he is the wrong one. People aren't excited by him, but maybe that's a good thing. A new manager that excites also raises expectations, probably beyond what is achievable, which is ultimately setting us up for failure.
If we are completely honest, a good season next year probably means finishing in the top 5, playing better, more consistent football, and a couple of good cup runs (particularly in Europe). Literally, if we finish 4th, make the FA Cup semis and the UCL quarter-finals, while playing better football, then that is progress.
16 May 2026 16:02:41
I think Carrick is the shrewd choice. And he, frankly, made it impossible not to give him the job. He’s conducted himself perfectly, and got incredible results out of a squad we have all said is not good enough for years.
A squad many blamed for Amorim’s awful stint in charge. Imagine what he can do with better players!
He’s not flashy, he’s not loud, but he’s effective and gets on with it. And wins. Much like his playing career.
16 May 2026 18:56:09
Carrick on a 2-year deal is actually a sensible choice by the club. He's come in, and results-wise we have done well, we have more points on the board than any other team since he came in, and we've beaten 7 of the top 10 teams in that time.
It gives us time to evaluate him properly and see what he's made of. In 2 years' time, there might be other managers, such as Enrique, that become available.
If it doesn't work out, we've not got to pay a long contract out.
16 May 2026 20:35:37
It doesn't look like they even interviewed anyone else. They should have done that, so it at least looks like they chose Carrick over some people.
They should have given him a 3 year deal, but with a cheap clause to terminate after 1 year (end of season) or 2 years (end of season) that they keep quiet.
This way he'd be publicly backed, but with offramps for the club. If he continues to do well, they can renegotiate that out.
16 May 2026 23:24:12
Happy far far far too too realistic. Please don't post unless it's over the top reactionary stuff. ?
17 May 2026 03:01:36
Don't think it took Alex 15 years to be fair!
17 May 2026 12:32:59
Keefy, Sir Alex took over in November 1986, and won his first league title with us in 1993.
That's 7 years just to get us to win our first title.
He wasn't the all-conquering Godfather of football who could run the club top to bottom in 1993.
Really, it was the treble-winning side of 1999 that acted as a springboard that led to him having the kind of power and free rein to run the club from top to bottom.
Early 2000s was when he established that position, where he could change or control pretty much most aspects of the club.
Which, if you do the maths, is around 15 years from when he first took over.
Recency bias means we tend to remember how Sir Alex was able to control and run the club with an iron fist, but that was in the early to mid-2000s. He didn't have that kind of power or sway in the 90's.
17 May 2026 15:55:44
Primacy bias helps us remember the beginning - which you did, Shappy. So?
18 May 2026 12:23:01
Utter blox.
16 May 2026 04:58:34
Still a possibility that Spurs get relegated and Pool don't qualify for CL. Fingers. ?
{Ed077's Note - Well, math does math there ?
16 May 2026 11:28:00
Liverpool could technically finish 7th Ed, but its highy unlikely given who Brighton and Bournemouth have to play.
It's easy to forget how much everyone thought Liverpol would dominate this year. They won the league and seemed to have bought well, how wrong we were. Long may it continue
Manchester United Banter Archives